<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s not just newspapers&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/07/26/its-not-just-newspapers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/07/26/its-not-just-newspapers/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:43:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mp3</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/07/26/its-not-just-newspapers/#comment-12682</link>
		<dc:creator>mp3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/07/26/its-not-just-newspapers/#comment-12682</guid>
		<description>as</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Yan</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/07/26/its-not-just-newspapers/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Yan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/07/26/its-not-just-newspapers/#comment-313</guid>
		<description>It&#039;ll get to the point that if we want well researched, or eye-witness, accounts, we&#039;ll turn to bloggers. TV news gives me little evidence that their stuff is better researched. And how is Fox News doing among the most influential, 25-34 audiences? I&#039;d argue that it&#039;s not doing that well, as those folks go online for their news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll get to the point that if we want well researched, or eye-witness, accounts, we&#8217;ll turn to bloggers. TV news gives me little evidence that their stuff is better researched. And how is Fox News doing among the most influential, 25-34 audiences? I&#8217;d argue that it&#8217;s not doing that well, as those folks go online for their news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sammler</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/07/26/its-not-just-newspapers/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>sammler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/07/26/its-not-just-newspapers/#comment-228</guid>
		<description>Does this have anything to do with how execrable the news is, with meaningless pictures used to illustrate unimportant and ephemeral stories, read by ignorant bouffants?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this have anything to do with how execrable the news is, with meaningless pictures used to illustrate unimportant and ephemeral stories, read by ignorant bouffants?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David McMurray</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/07/26/its-not-just-newspapers/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>David McMurray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/07/26/its-not-just-newspapers/#comment-223</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t suppose they&#039;re also referring to...MSNBC? No, not THAT paragon of journalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t suppose they&#8217;re also referring to&#8230;MSNBC? No, not THAT paragon of journalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right of Center</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/07/26/its-not-just-newspapers/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Right of Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/07/26/its-not-just-newspapers/#comment-214</guid>
		<description>An interesting tidbit at the end (though to get there you&#039;d have to read the *whole* article):

&quot;And then there&#039;s Fox News. From the outside looking in, Fox appears to be an island of stability in a crazy-competitive market. But how much growth is there in a mature business, even if you&#039;re the cable news leader?&quot;

At least the author felt obligated to report that fact, although as &quot;conditioned&quot; as he could make it.

Hmmm?  I wonder why Fox News is doing better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting tidbit at the end (though to get there you&#8217;d have to read the *whole* article):</p>
<p>&#8220;And then there&#8217;s Fox News. From the outside looking in, Fox appears to be an island of stability in a crazy-competitive market. But how much growth is there in a mature business, even if you&#8217;re the cable news leader?&#8221;</p>
<p>At least the author felt obligated to report that fact, although as &#8220;conditioned&#8221; as he could make it.</p>
<p>Hmmm?  I wonder why Fox News is doing better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

