<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who wants to own content?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:19:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: doxy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mai cititi carti?</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-404641</link>
		<dc:creator>doxy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mai cititi carti?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-404641</guid>
		<description>[...] nu se dezvolta si pe site-urile&#160;bibliotecilor. E bine totusi ca se discuta undeva. Cum spunea Jeff Jarvis: &#8220;Distribution is not king. Content is not king. Conversation is the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nu se dezvolta si pe site-urile&nbsp;bibliotecilor. E bine totusi ca se discuta undeva. Cum spunea Jeff Jarvis: &#8220;Distribution is not king. Content is not king. Conversation is the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to make a newspaper part of an online community &#171; Tom Scotney</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-393875</link>
		<dc:creator>How to make a newspaper part of an online community &#171; Tom Scotney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 20:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-393875</guid>
		<description>[...] this is somewhere I want to be. In the last ten years we’ve gone from “content is king” to “conversation is the kingdom”, and so to be trying to develop a community for these conversations to take place would be a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this is somewhere I want to be. In the last ten years we’ve gone from “content is king” to “conversation is the kingdom”, and so to be trying to develop a community for these conversations to take place would be a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zitate über Onlinejournalismus : online simple</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-391514</link>
		<dc:creator>Zitate über Onlinejournalismus : online simple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 15:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-391514</guid>
		<description>[...] Distribution is not king. Content is not king. Conversation is the kingdom. But in this new age, you don’t want to own the content or the pipe that delivers it. You want to participate in what people want to do on their own. You don’t want to extract value. You want to add value. You don’t want to build walls or fences or gardens to keep people from doing what they want to do without you. You want to enable them to do it. You want to join in. Jeff Jarvis, &#8220;Who wants to own content?&#8221;, buzzmachine  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Distribution is not king. Content is not king. Conversation is the kingdom. But in this new age, you don’t want to own the content or the pipe that delivers it. You want to participate in what people want to do on their own. You don’t want to extract value. You want to add value. You don’t want to build walls or fences or gardens to keep people from doing what they want to do without you. You want to enable them to do it. You want to join in. Jeff Jarvis, &#8220;Who wants to own content?&#8221;, buzzmachine  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TV&#8217;s next &#171; BuzzMachine</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-390639</link>
		<dc:creator>TV&#8217;s next &#171; BuzzMachine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-390639</guid>
		<description>[...] Not long ago, they said that owning these channels was tantamount to owning a mint. No more.  The same was said of content. But it&#8217;s relationships (read: links) that create value [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Not long ago, they said that owning these channels was tantamount to owning a mint. No more.  The same was said of content. But it&#8217;s relationships (read: links) that create value [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffMolander.com - Consumer Empowerment, Successful Social Marketing Web Best Practice - Social Media Internet &#124; JeffMolander.com</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-386298</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffMolander.com - Consumer Empowerment, Successful Social Marketing Web Best Practice - Social Media Internet &#124; JeffMolander.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-386298</guid>
		<description>[...] Jarvis of Buzzmachine.com agrees. The sense of empowerment that consumers receive when participating in a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jarvis of Buzzmachine.com agrees. The sense of empowerment that consumers receive when participating in a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El nuevo escenario informativo (traducción del anterior) : Centro de Estudios de Medios</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-386208</link>
		<dc:creator>El nuevo escenario informativo (traducción del anterior) : Centro de Estudios de Medios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-386208</guid>
		<description>[...] será inevitablemente más pequeña, ya que dejará de ostentar el monopolio en una economía de escasez. Se me ha acusado de celebrar esa escasez durante la cumbre. Eso es una interpretación errónea, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] será inevitablemente más pequeña, ya que dejará de ostentar el monopolio en una economía de escasez. Se me ha acusado de celebrar esa escasez durante la cumbre. Eso es una interpretación errónea, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A scenario for news (Jeff Jarvis, Buzz Machine, 24/11/08) : Centro de Estudios de Medios</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-386067</link>
		<dc:creator>A scenario for news (Jeff Jarvis, Buzz Machine, 24/11/08) : Centro de Estudios de Medios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-386067</guid>
		<description>[...] The local news organization inevitably will be smaller because it no longer holds a monopoly in a scarcity economy. I’ve been accused of celebrating that shrinkage at the summit. That’s an artless and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The local news organization inevitably will be smaller because it no longer holds a monopoly in a scarcity economy. I’ve been accused of celebrating that shrinkage at the summit. That’s an artless and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A scenario for news</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-386026</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A scenario for news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-386026</guid>
		<description>[...] The local news organization inevitably will be smaller because it no longer holds a monopoly in a scarcity economy. I&#8217;ve been accused of celebrating that shrinkage at the summit. That&#8217;s an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The local news organization inevitably will be smaller because it no longer holds a monopoly in a scarcity economy. I&#8217;ve been accused of celebrating that shrinkage at the summit. That&#8217;s an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-384178</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-384178</guid>
		<description>I think that however the relationship is built, the trust issue is king.  I don&#039;t think there is anyway to own a conversation - except &lt;i&gt;temporarily&lt;/i&gt; rise to the top of search engines or social media quoted with a key-phrase.  I like your conviction about the issue, and the passion that the post has raised.  Good polarising tactic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that however the relationship is built, the trust issue is king.  I don&#8217;t think there is anyway to own a conversation &#8211; except <i>temporarily</i> rise to the top of search engines or social media quoted with a key-phrase.  I like your conviction about the issue, and the passion that the post has raised.  Good polarising tactic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1000 things I&#8217;ve learned about blogging &#124; Online Journalism Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-383148</link>
		<dc:creator>1000 things I&#8217;ve learned about blogging &#124; Online Journalism Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-383148</guid>
		<description>[...] Conversation is the kingdom. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Conversation is the kingdom. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BASIC Principles of Online Journalism: C is for Community &#38; Conversation (pt2: Conversation) &#124; Online Journalism Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-383019</link>
		<dc:creator>BASIC Principles of Online Journalism: C is for Community &#38; Conversation (pt2: Conversation) &#124; Online Journalism Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 08:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-383019</guid>
		<description>[...] a year later Jeff Jarvis argued &#8220;Conversation is the kingdom&#8220;: &#8220;In this new age, you don’t want to own the content or the pipe that delivers it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a year later Jeff Jarvis argued &#8220;Conversation is the kingdom&#8220;: &#8220;In this new age, you don’t want to own the content or the pipe that delivers it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 99 conclusiones acerca de los blogs y la blogosfera</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-382632</link>
		<dc:creator>99 conclusiones acerca de los blogs y la blogosfera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-382632</guid>
		<description>[...] (v&#233;ase el punto 34) 51. El contenido no es el Rey. 52. La conversaci&#243;n es el rey. 53. Conversaci&#243;n es el reino. 54. No debemos intentar ser medios de comunicaci&#243;n 55. Si alguien te env&#237;a un [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (v&eacute;ase el punto 34) 51. El contenido no es el Rey. 52. La conversaci&oacute;n es el rey. 53. Conversaci&oacute;n es el reino. 54. No debemos intentar ser medios de comunicaci&oacute;n 55. Si alguien te env&iacute;a un [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffMolander.com - Consumer Empowerment, Successful Social Marketing Web Best Practice - Social Media Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-376795</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffMolander.com - Consumer Empowerment, Successful Social Marketing Web Best Practice - Social Media Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-376795</guid>
		<description>[...] Jarvis of Buzzmachine.com agrees. The sense of empowerment that consumers receive when participating in a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jarvis of Buzzmachine.com agrees. The sense of empowerment that consumers receive when participating in a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IDG Knowledge Hub : Blogs : The rise of ad networks&#8230;Jeff Jarvis commentary</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-375264</link>
		<dc:creator>IDG Knowledge Hub : Blogs : The rise of ad networks&#8230;Jeff Jarvis commentary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-375264</guid>
		<description>[...] or not only time will tell - is a key business model for the future of media. Welcome to the post-scarcity post-media economy.   Trackback URL &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or not only time will tell &#8211; is a key business model for the future of media. Welcome to the post-scarcity post-media economy.   Trackback URL &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crowdsourcing - outsourcing to the crowd &#171; Herr Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-374995</link>
		<dc:creator>Crowdsourcing - outsourcing to the crowd &#171; Herr Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-374995</guid>
		<description>[...] hÃ¶re ich wieder Jeff Jarvis: &#8220;Who wants to own content?&#8221; Er ist bestimmt kein knappes Gut mehr.     No Comments   Leave a Commenttrackback [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hÃ¶re ich wieder Jeff Jarvis: &#8220;Who wants to own content?&#8221; Er ist bestimmt kein knappes Gut mehr.     No Comments   Leave a Commenttrackback [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who wants to create content? &#171; Herr Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-374854</link>
		<dc:creator>Who wants to create content? &#171; Herr Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 15:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-374854</guid>
		<description>[...] 10, 2008 in Content, owningcontentTags: Content, owningcontent   &#8220;Who wants to own content?&#8221; fragt Jeff Jarvis in seinem wegweisenden [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 10, 2008 in Content, owningcontentTags: Content, owningcontent   &#8220;Who wants to own content?&#8221; fragt Jeff Jarvis in seinem wegweisenden [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wer zahlt fÃ¼r Content? &#171; Herr Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-374848</link>
		<dc:creator>Wer zahlt fÃ¼r Content? &#171; Herr Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 13:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-374848</guid>
		<description>[...] Jarvis behauptet in seinem grundlegenden, provozierend betitelten Post &#8220;Who wants to own content?&#8221; , dass Kommunikation das KÃ¶nigreich sein - Content is not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jarvis behauptet in seinem grundlegenden, provozierend betitelten Post &#8220;Who wants to own content?&#8221; , dass Kommunikation das KÃ¶nigreich sein &#8211; Content is not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Newspapers: a minus-sum game</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-374334</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Newspapers: a minus-sum game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 18:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-374334</guid>
		<description>[...] revenue is gone forever. I&#8217;m not whining about that. It&#8217;s the new reality of the post-scarcity economy. This will only [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] revenue is gone forever. I&#8217;m not whining about that. It&#8217;s the new reality of the post-scarcity economy. This will only [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zero apr credit card zero percent apr credit card</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-372937</link>
		<dc:creator>zero apr credit card zero percent apr credit card</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 02:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-372937</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;fake credit card numbers credit card phone numbers...&lt;/strong&gt;

When card consolidation credit debt get casino om net...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>fake credit card numbers credit card phone numbers&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>When card consolidation credit debt get casino om net&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DiÃ¡logos de EL PAIS&#8217; &#8216;Periodismo digital: reinventar los medios</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-365700</link>
		<dc:creator>DiÃ¡logos de EL PAIS&#8217; &#8216;Periodismo digital: reinventar los medios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 09:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-365700</guid>
		<description>[...] poco a poco en el desarrollo de nuevas herramientas y aplicaciones. Citando a Cory Doctorow y a Jeff Jarvis, si antes se decÃ­a que &#8220;en la web, el contenido es el rey&#8221;, ahora su puesto lo ocupa [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] poco a poco en el desarrollo de nuevas herramientas y aplicaciones. Citando a Cory Doctorow y a Jeff Jarvis, si antes se decÃ­a que &#8220;en la web, el contenido es el rey&#8221;, ahora su puesto lo ocupa [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who wants to own content? &#171; Tom Altman&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-362117</link>
		<dc:creator>Who wants to own content? &#171; Tom Altman&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-362117</guid>
		<description>[...] 24, 2007 by tomaltman   I found an interesting blog post by Jeff Jarvis this morning called &#8220;Who wants to own content?&#8220;Â  (If you&#8217;re not familiar with Jeff, he writes a blog called Buzz Machine which [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 24, 2007 by tomaltman   I found an interesting blog post by Jeff Jarvis this morning called &#8220;Who wants to own content?&#8220;Â  (If you&#8217;re not familiar with Jeff, he writes a blog called Buzz Machine which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Marks</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-362075</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-362075</guid>
		<description>Gerd sent me to this blog - and I am glad I came. It fits research that I have been doing in West Africa, where community media are doing great deals with mobile companies, and where conversations have always been king in oral cultures. Radio, TV, phone have just extended the range of reach. The other great point is that content creation has become cheap, so that producers with a passion can now realise the story they want to tell. I don&#039;t believe so much in UGC, but in user generation publication - where those with a story can make money - probably on merchanise or performance rather than the rights of the book/video/radio show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gerd sent me to this blog &#8211; and I am glad I came. It fits research that I have been doing in West Africa, where community media are doing great deals with mobile companies, and where conversations have always been king in oral cultures. Radio, TV, phone have just extended the range of reach. The other great point is that content creation has become cheap, so that producers with a passion can now realise the story they want to tell. I don&#8217;t believe so much in UGC, but in user generation publication &#8211; where those with a story can make money &#8211; probably on merchanise or performance rather than the rights of the book/video/radio show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerd Leonhard</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-362066</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerd Leonhard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-362066</guid>
		<description>Jeff, it is amazing alike we think (and speak) - check out my latest, free online book on &quot;The end of Control&quot; www.endofcontrol.com :

&quot;This book is about the most important issue the media business is facing as it tries to move forward: control. .... In my work as speaker and advisor, the tough issue of control emerges, again and again, as the key contention point within TV companies, publishers, record labels, and broadcasters: How can a commercial venture that is based on so-called â€œintellectual propertyâ€ thrive and prosper in an environment that seems to continuously and progressively remove control from the creators/owners/providers of content, and hands it over to the people formerly known as consumers (aka the users), effectively making them more powerful every single day?  But the reality is that every click inadvertently makes another case for the consumerâ€™s ever-increasing rise in importance. Within all the conversations I have had about things like commercial content versus shared content, about the read-only or the read-write web, and about copyright versus Fair Use, the crucial question always seems to boil down to WHERE IS THE CONTROL HERE, i.e., questions such as â€œWho will control this new media universeâ€ and â€œHow much control do I need to run a revenue-generating business?â€

...read on ;)    Look forward to seeing you at LeWeb3 in Paris!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, it is amazing alike we think (and speak) &#8211; check out my latest, free online book on &#8220;The end of Control&#8221; <a href="http://www.endofcontrol.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.endofcontrol.com</a> :</p>
<p>&#8220;This book is about the most important issue the media business is facing as it tries to move forward: control. &#8230;. In my work as speaker and advisor, the tough issue of control emerges, again and again, as the key contention point within TV companies, publishers, record labels, and broadcasters: How can a commercial venture that is based on so-called â€œintellectual propertyâ€ thrive and prosper in an environment that seems to continuously and progressively remove control from the creators/owners/providers of content, and hands it over to the people formerly known as consumers (aka the users), effectively making them more powerful every single day?  But the reality is that every click inadvertently makes another case for the consumerâ€™s ever-increasing rise in importance. Within all the conversations I have had about things like commercial content versus shared content, about the read-only or the read-write web, and about copyright versus Fair Use, the crucial question always seems to boil down to WHERE IS THE CONTROL HERE, i.e., questions such as â€œWho will control this new media universeâ€ and â€œHow much control do I need to run a revenue-generating business?â€</p>
<p>&#8230;read on <img src='http://www.buzzmachine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />     Look forward to seeing you at LeWeb3 in Paris!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-09-24 at The New Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-360599</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-09-24 at The New Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-360599</guid>
		<description>[...] BuzzMachine Â» Blog Archive Â» Who wants to own content? (tags: trust content publishing journalism newspaper) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BuzzMachine Â» Blog Archive Â» Who wants to own content? (tags: trust content publishing journalism newspaper) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAR</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-360165</link>
		<dc:creator>DAR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-360165</guid>
		<description>I agree with your points here.  But I think that you don&#039;t totally get the mindset of old media.  I don&#039;t believe that their fear is only just a knee-jerk &quot;fear of change&quot; reaction.  I think what&#039;s really going on is that they&#039;re thinking &quot;How on earth are we going to make money now?!?!?&quot;

Just look at your own words:

&quot;But in this new age, you donâ€™t want to own the content or the pipe that delivers it. You want to participate in what people want to do on their own. You donâ€™t want to extract value. You want to add value. You donâ€™t want to build walls or fences or gardens to keep people from doing what they want to do without you. You want to enable them to do it. You want to join in.

And once you get your head around that, you will see that you can grow so much bigger so much faster with so much less cost and risk.

So donâ€™t own the content. Help people make and find and remake and recommend and save the content they want. Donâ€™t own the distribution. Gain the trust of the people to help them use whatever distribution and medium they like to find what they want.

In these new economics, you want to stand back and interfere and restrict as little as possible. You want to reduce costs to the minimum. You want to join in wherever you are welcome. &quot;


You&#039;ve explained all the ways that they shouldn&#039;t try to make revenue, and all the ways they should avoid high costs.  But how are they supposed to *make* revenue off of new media?

As someone who follows the scene, I&#039;m guessing the answer is &quot;advertising&quot;, and surely there&#039;s some companies that are making a killing off of that (i.e., Google).  But can every company make strong revenue off of it?  I doubt it.  And even of those that do, I&#039;m guessing the revenue will be lower than they&#039;ve made off of print media.  (See Henry Blodget&#039;s recent analysis of the NYT&#039;s financials at http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/08/its-easy-to-say.html for an example.)

You make it sound as if all they need to do is adapt to change and they will survive, and that they&#039;re fools not to see that.  But I think that&#039;s not true at all - adapting won&#039;t solve their problem.  Their existing business model is ending and even the new business models won&#039;t replace it.  And THAT is what they&#039;re scared of.

Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your points here.  But I think that you don&#8217;t totally get the mindset of old media.  I don&#8217;t believe that their fear is only just a knee-jerk &#8220;fear of change&#8221; reaction.  I think what&#8217;s really going on is that they&#8217;re thinking &#8220;How on earth are we going to make money now?!?!?&#8221;</p>
<p>Just look at your own words:</p>
<p>&#8220;But in this new age, you donâ€™t want to own the content or the pipe that delivers it. You want to participate in what people want to do on their own. You donâ€™t want to extract value. You want to add value. You donâ€™t want to build walls or fences or gardens to keep people from doing what they want to do without you. You want to enable them to do it. You want to join in.</p>
<p>And once you get your head around that, you will see that you can grow so much bigger so much faster with so much less cost and risk.</p>
<p>So donâ€™t own the content. Help people make and find and remake and recommend and save the content they want. Donâ€™t own the distribution. Gain the trust of the people to help them use whatever distribution and medium they like to find what they want.</p>
<p>In these new economics, you want to stand back and interfere and restrict as little as possible. You want to reduce costs to the minimum. You want to join in wherever you are welcome. &#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve explained all the ways that they shouldn&#8217;t try to make revenue, and all the ways they should avoid high costs.  But how are they supposed to *make* revenue off of new media?</p>
<p>As someone who follows the scene, I&#8217;m guessing the answer is &#8220;advertising&#8221;, and surely there&#8217;s some companies that are making a killing off of that (i.e., Google).  But can every company make strong revenue off of it?  I doubt it.  And even of those that do, I&#8217;m guessing the revenue will be lower than they&#8217;ve made off of print media.  (See Henry Blodget&#8217;s recent analysis of the NYT&#8217;s financials at <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/08/its-easy-to-say.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/08/its-easy-to-say.html</a> for an example.)</p>
<p>You make it sound as if all they need to do is adapt to change and they will survive, and that they&#8217;re fools not to see that.  But I think that&#8217;s not true at all &#8211; adapting won&#8217;t solve their problem.  Their existing business model is ending and even the new business models won&#8217;t replace it.  And THAT is what they&#8217;re scared of.</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
