<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who wants to own content?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: JeffMolander.com - Consumer Empowerment, Successful Social Marketing Web Best Practice - Social Media Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-376795</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffMolander.com - Consumer Empowerment, Successful Social Marketing Web Best Practice - Social Media Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-376795</guid>
		<description>[...] Jarvis of Buzzmachine.com agrees. The sense of empowerment that consumers receive when participating in a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jarvis of Buzzmachine.com agrees. The sense of empowerment that consumers receive when participating in a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IDG Knowledge Hub : Blogs : The rise of ad networks&#8230;Jeff Jarvis commentary</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-375264</link>
		<dc:creator>IDG Knowledge Hub : Blogs : The rise of ad networks&#8230;Jeff Jarvis commentary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-375264</guid>
		<description>[...] or not only time will tell - is a key business model for the future of media. Welcome to the post-scarcity post-media economy.   Trackback URL &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or not only time will tell - is a key business model for the future of media. Welcome to the post-scarcity post-media economy.   Trackback URL &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crowdsourcing - outsourcing to the crowd &#171; Herr Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-374995</link>
		<dc:creator>Crowdsourcing - outsourcing to the crowd &#171; Herr Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-374995</guid>
		<description>[...] hÃ¶re ich wieder Jeff Jarvis: &#8220;Who wants to own content?&#8221; Er ist bestimmt kein knappes Gut mehr.     No Comments   Leave a Commenttrackback [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hÃ¶re ich wieder Jeff Jarvis: &#8220;Who wants to own content?&#8221; Er ist bestimmt kein knappes Gut mehr.     No Comments   Leave a Commenttrackback [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who wants to create content? &#171; Herr Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-374854</link>
		<dc:creator>Who wants to create content? &#171; Herr Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 15:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-374854</guid>
		<description>[...] 10, 2008 in Content, owningcontentTags: Content, owningcontent   &#8220;Who wants to own content?&#8221; fragt Jeff Jarvis in seinem wegweisenden [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 10, 2008 in Content, owningcontentTags: Content, owningcontent   &#8220;Who wants to own content?&#8221; fragt Jeff Jarvis in seinem wegweisenden [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wer zahlt fÃ¼r Content? &#171; Herr Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-374848</link>
		<dc:creator>Wer zahlt fÃ¼r Content? &#171; Herr Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 13:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-374848</guid>
		<description>[...] Jarvis behauptet in seinem grundlegenden, provozierend betitelten Post &#8220;Who wants to own content?&#8221; , dass Kommunikation das KÃ¶nigreich sein - Content is not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jarvis behauptet in seinem grundlegenden, provozierend betitelten Post &#8220;Who wants to own content?&#8221; , dass Kommunikation das KÃ¶nigreich sein - Content is not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Newspapers: a minus-sum game</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-374334</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Newspapers: a minus-sum game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 18:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-374334</guid>
		<description>[...] revenue is gone forever. I&#8217;m not whining about that. It&#8217;s the new reality of the post-scarcity economy. This will only [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] revenue is gone forever. I&#8217;m not whining about that. It&#8217;s the new reality of the post-scarcity economy. This will only [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zero apr credit card zero percent apr credit card</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-372937</link>
		<dc:creator>zero apr credit card zero percent apr credit card</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 02:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-372937</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;fake credit card numbers credit card phone numbers...&lt;/strong&gt;

When card consolidation credit debt get casino om net...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>fake credit card numbers credit card phone numbers&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>When card consolidation credit debt get casino om net&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DiÃ¡logos de EL PAIS&#8217; &#8216;Periodismo digital: reinventar los medios</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-365700</link>
		<dc:creator>DiÃ¡logos de EL PAIS&#8217; &#8216;Periodismo digital: reinventar los medios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 09:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-365700</guid>
		<description>[...] poco a poco en el desarrollo de nuevas herramientas y aplicaciones. Citando a Cory Doctorow y a Jeff Jarvis, si antes se decÃ­a que &#8220;en la web, el contenido es el rey&#8221;, ahora su puesto lo ocupa [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] poco a poco en el desarrollo de nuevas herramientas y aplicaciones. Citando a Cory Doctorow y a Jeff Jarvis, si antes se decÃ­a que &#8220;en la web, el contenido es el rey&#8221;, ahora su puesto lo ocupa [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who wants to own content? &#171; Tom Altman&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-362117</link>
		<dc:creator>Who wants to own content? &#171; Tom Altman&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-362117</guid>
		<description>[...] 24, 2007 by tomaltman   I found an interesting blog post by Jeff Jarvis this morning called &#8220;Who wants to own content?&#8220;Â  (If you&#8217;re not familiar with Jeff, he writes a blog called Buzz Machine which [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 24, 2007 by tomaltman   I found an interesting blog post by Jeff Jarvis this morning called &#8220;Who wants to own content?&#8220;Â  (If you&#8217;re not familiar with Jeff, he writes a blog called Buzz Machine which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Marks</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-362075</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-362075</guid>
		<description>Gerd sent me to this blog - and I am glad I came. It fits research that I have been doing in West Africa, where community media are doing great deals with mobile companies, and where conversations have always been king in oral cultures. Radio, TV, phone have just extended the range of reach. The other great point is that content creation has become cheap, so that producers with a passion can now realise the story they want to tell. I don't believe so much in UGC, but in user generation publication - where those with a story can make money - probably on merchanise or performance rather than the rights of the book/video/radio show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gerd sent me to this blog - and I am glad I came. It fits research that I have been doing in West Africa, where community media are doing great deals with mobile companies, and where conversations have always been king in oral cultures. Radio, TV, phone have just extended the range of reach. The other great point is that content creation has become cheap, so that producers with a passion can now realise the story they want to tell. I don&#8217;t believe so much in UGC, but in user generation publication - where those with a story can make money - probably on merchanise or performance rather than the rights of the book/video/radio show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerd Leonhard</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-362066</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerd Leonhard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-362066</guid>
		<description>Jeff, it is amazing alike we think (and speak) - check out my latest, free online book on "The end of Control" www.endofcontrol.com :

"This book is about the most important issue the media business is facing as it tries to move forward: control. .... In my work as speaker and advisor, the tough issue of control emerges, again and again, as the key contention point within TV companies, publishers, record labels, and broadcasters: How can a commercial venture that is based on so-called â€œintellectual propertyâ€ thrive and prosper in an environment that seems to continuously and progressively remove control from the creators/owners/providers of content, and hands it over to the people formerly known as consumers (aka the users), effectively making them more powerful every single day?  But the reality is that every click inadvertently makes another case for the consumerâ€™s ever-increasing rise in importance. Within all the conversations I have had about things like commercial content versus shared content, about the read-only or the read-write web, and about copyright versus Fair Use, the crucial question always seems to boil down to WHERE IS THE CONTROL HERE, i.e., questions such as â€œWho will control this new media universeâ€ and â€œHow much control do I need to run a revenue-generating business?â€

...read on ;)    Look forward to seeing you at LeWeb3 in Paris!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, it is amazing alike we think (and speak) - check out my latest, free online book on &#8220;The end of Control&#8221; <a href="http://www.endofcontrol.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.endofcontrol.com</a> :</p>
<p>&#8220;This book is about the most important issue the media business is facing as it tries to move forward: control. &#8230;. In my work as speaker and advisor, the tough issue of control emerges, again and again, as the key contention point within TV companies, publishers, record labels, and broadcasters: How can a commercial venture that is based on so-called â€œintellectual propertyâ€ thrive and prosper in an environment that seems to continuously and progressively remove control from the creators/owners/providers of content, and hands it over to the people formerly known as consumers (aka the users), effectively making them more powerful every single day?  But the reality is that every click inadvertently makes another case for the consumerâ€™s ever-increasing rise in importance. Within all the conversations I have had about things like commercial content versus shared content, about the read-only or the read-write web, and about copyright versus Fair Use, the crucial question always seems to boil down to WHERE IS THE CONTROL HERE, i.e., questions such as â€œWho will control this new media universeâ€ and â€œHow much control do I need to run a revenue-generating business?â€</p>
<p>&#8230;read on <img src='http://www.buzzmachine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />    Look forward to seeing you at LeWeb3 in Paris!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-09-24 at The New Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-360599</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-09-24 at The New Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-360599</guid>
		<description>[...] BuzzMachine Â» Blog Archive Â» Who wants to own content? (tags: trust content publishing journalism newspaper) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BuzzMachine Â» Blog Archive Â» Who wants to own content? (tags: trust content publishing journalism newspaper) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAR</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-360165</link>
		<dc:creator>DAR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-360165</guid>
		<description>I agree with your points here.  But I think that you don't totally get the mindset of old media.  I don't believe that their fear is only just a knee-jerk "fear of change" reaction.  I think what's really going on is that they're thinking "How on earth are we going to make money now?!?!?"

Just look at your own words:

"But in this new age, you donâ€™t want to own the content or the pipe that delivers it. You want to participate in what people want to do on their own. You donâ€™t want to extract value. You want to add value. You donâ€™t want to build walls or fences or gardens to keep people from doing what they want to do without you. You want to enable them to do it. You want to join in.

And once you get your head around that, you will see that you can grow so much bigger so much faster with so much less cost and risk.

So donâ€™t own the content. Help people make and find and remake and recommend and save the content they want. Donâ€™t own the distribution. Gain the trust of the people to help them use whatever distribution and medium they like to find what they want.

In these new economics, you want to stand back and interfere and restrict as little as possible. You want to reduce costs to the minimum. You want to join in wherever you are welcome. "


You've explained all the ways that they shouldn't try to make revenue, and all the ways they should avoid high costs.  But how are they supposed to *make* revenue off of new media?

As someone who follows the scene, I'm guessing the answer is "advertising", and surely there's some companies that are making a killing off of that (i.e., Google).  But can every company make strong revenue off of it?  I doubt it.  And even of those that do, I'm guessing the revenue will be lower than they've made off of print media.  (See Henry Blodget's recent analysis of the NYT's financials at http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/08/its-easy-to-say.html for an example.)

You make it sound as if all they need to do is adapt to change and they will survive, and that they're fools not to see that.  But I think that's not true at all - adapting won't solve their problem.  Their existing business model is ending and even the new business models won't replace it.  And THAT is what they're scared of.

Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your points here.  But I think that you don&#8217;t totally get the mindset of old media.  I don&#8217;t believe that their fear is only just a knee-jerk &#8220;fear of change&#8221; reaction.  I think what&#8217;s really going on is that they&#8217;re thinking &#8220;How on earth are we going to make money now?!?!?&#8221;</p>
<p>Just look at your own words:</p>
<p>&#8220;But in this new age, you donâ€™t want to own the content or the pipe that delivers it. You want to participate in what people want to do on their own. You donâ€™t want to extract value. You want to add value. You donâ€™t want to build walls or fences or gardens to keep people from doing what they want to do without you. You want to enable them to do it. You want to join in.</p>
<p>And once you get your head around that, you will see that you can grow so much bigger so much faster with so much less cost and risk.</p>
<p>So donâ€™t own the content. Help people make and find and remake and recommend and save the content they want. Donâ€™t own the distribution. Gain the trust of the people to help them use whatever distribution and medium they like to find what they want.</p>
<p>In these new economics, you want to stand back and interfere and restrict as little as possible. You want to reduce costs to the minimum. You want to join in wherever you are welcome. &#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve explained all the ways that they shouldn&#8217;t try to make revenue, and all the ways they should avoid high costs.  But how are they supposed to *make* revenue off of new media?</p>
<p>As someone who follows the scene, I&#8217;m guessing the answer is &#8220;advertising&#8221;, and surely there&#8217;s some companies that are making a killing off of that (i.e., Google).  But can every company make strong revenue off of it?  I doubt it.  And even of those that do, I&#8217;m guessing the revenue will be lower than they&#8217;ve made off of print media.  (See Henry Blodget&#8217;s recent analysis of the NYT&#8217;s financials at <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/08/its-easy-to-say.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/08/its-easy-to-say.html</a> for an example.)</p>
<p>You make it sound as if all they need to do is adapt to change and they will survive, and that they&#8217;re fools not to see that.  But I think that&#8217;s not true at all - adapting won&#8217;t solve their problem.  Their existing business model is ending and even the new business models won&#8217;t replace it.  And THAT is what they&#8217;re scared of.</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Times deselected</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-360117</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Times deselected</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 03:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-360117</guid>
		<description>[...] Bull. TimesSelect represented the last gasp of the circulation mentality of news media, the belief that surely consumers would continue to pay for content even as the internet commodified news and &#8212; more important &#8212; even as the internet revealed that the real value in media is not owning and controlling content or distribution but enabling conversation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bull. TimesSelect represented the last gasp of the circulation mentality of news media, the belief that surely consumers would continue to pay for content even as the internet commodified news and &#8212; more important &#8212; even as the internet revealed that the real value in media is not owning and controlling content or distribution but enabling conversation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelo Markus</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-357650</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelo Markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-357650</guid>
		<description>Amen, brother. I said sometime ago that media is not about owning content or distribution. It is about relationships. And Locke is quite right: relationships are also not something to be owned. Sweney continues: Here we go, he has four rules/lessons/options for large media companies, this ought to be interesting. Hmmm, I seem to have come out of it with 5 - perhaps one is an example. 
http://www.turkenter.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen, brother. I said sometime ago that media is not about owning content or distribution. It is about relationships. And Locke is quite right: relationships are also not something to be owned. Sweney continues: Here we go, he has four rules/lessons/options for large media companies, this ought to be interesting. Hmmm, I seem to have come out of it with 5 - perhaps one is an example.<br />
<a href="http://www.turkenter.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.turkenter.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AltaGid</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-356288</link>
		<dc:creator>AltaGid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-356288</guid>
		<description>Hello! Help solve the problem. 
Very often try to enter the forum, but says that the password is not correct. 
Regrettably use of remembering. Give like to be? 
Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! Help solve the problem.<br />
Very often try to enter the forum, but says that the password is not correct.<br />
Regrettably use of remembering. Give like to be?<br />
Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erinc Kuzu</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-355643</link>
		<dc:creator>Erinc Kuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 14:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-355643</guid>
		<description>Iâ€™m ambivalent and thatâ€™s hardly me. It is a profound point in this cult of the consumer era. I agree, yes I do. And with some of the other blogs I have read. â€œJack be nimble, Jack be quickâ€, and so the light footed will win the initiative. I was recently a panelist at a conference in San Antonio, â€œRestoring the Trustâ€ convened by the learned Leonard Witts and many others e.g. Dan Gilmore, Craig Newmark. That and this conversation is ripe, ready to be plucked for mass consumption. But perhaps it wonâ€™t because the elements raised threaten the a comfortable status quo form traditional sources e.g. let content go, open source, share, add donâ€™t subtract. What, they cry. Traditional media was built on principles that are at odds with the now, and wrapping their heads around this provokes a tired, but, eeeek, neccessary clarion callâ€, â€œSo whereâ€™s the business model?â€
Trust is implicitly required in return business, er trade. Some have it, some well known brands trade on it. But a discerning public c.f 44 circa percent of US folk have lost trust in the media, tells a different story. They will stay in a motel overnight if their brand doesnâ€™t show respect. Content may certainly not be king, but it does stay close to his Highness. It boils down to the quality. Not always, but enough. TV viewers will tolerate fuzzy pics from a phone cam, but theyâ€™ll want their host to make sense, to offer food for thought, to offer qualilty at some point between the news and the next real life (sic) show. Thatâ€™s why Iâ€™m responding to this blog - my third time only - iâ€™m feeling the fibre.
Imperceptibly or otherwise natural selection will demonstrate our penchant to share new spaces, which have deeper regions of value, trust, responsiveness. How long? And will the juggernauts be able to turn their vessels around fast enough before, and some might suggest rightly so, become irrelevant is a blog- in- the -waiting.

MS SQL 2005 , ASP.NET , PHP Hosting - http://www.speedlayer.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iâ€™m ambivalent and thatâ€™s hardly me. It is a profound point in this cult of the consumer era. I agree, yes I do. And with some of the other blogs I have read. â€œJack be nimble, Jack be quickâ€, and so the light footed will win the initiative. I was recently a panelist at a conference in San Antonio, â€œRestoring the Trustâ€ convened by the learned Leonard Witts and many others e.g. Dan Gilmore, Craig Newmark. That and this conversation is ripe, ready to be plucked for mass consumption. But perhaps it wonâ€™t because the elements raised threaten the a comfortable status quo form traditional sources e.g. let content go, open source, share, add donâ€™t subtract. What, they cry. Traditional media was built on principles that are at odds with the now, and wrapping their heads around this provokes a tired, but, eeeek, neccessary clarion callâ€, â€œSo whereâ€™s the business model?â€<br />
Trust is implicitly required in return business, er trade. Some have it, some well known brands trade on it. But a discerning public c.f 44 circa percent of US folk have lost trust in the media, tells a different story. They will stay in a motel overnight if their brand doesnâ€™t show respect. Content may certainly not be king, but it does stay close to his Highness. It boils down to the quality. Not always, but enough. TV viewers will tolerate fuzzy pics from a phone cam, but theyâ€™ll want their host to make sense, to offer food for thought, to offer qualilty at some point between the news and the next real life (sic) show. Thatâ€™s why Iâ€™m responding to this blog - my third time only - iâ€™m feeling the fibre.<br />
Imperceptibly or otherwise natural selection will demonstrate our penchant to share new spaces, which have deeper regions of value, trust, responsiveness. How long? And will the juggernauts be able to turn their vessels around fast enough before, and some might suggest rightly so, become irrelevant is a blog- in- the -waiting.</p>
<p>MS SQL 2005 , ASP.NET , PHP Hosting - <a href="http://www.speedlayer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.speedlayer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Yahoo&#8217;s big mistake</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-351842</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Yahoo&#8217;s big mistake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 05:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-351842</guid>
		<description>[...] said it often before and I&#8217;ll say in once more: Yahoo is the last old-media company. It controlled content &#8212; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] said it often before and I&#8217;ll say in once more: Yahoo is the last old-media company. It controlled content &#8212; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ND__</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-344247</link>
		<dc:creator>ND__</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-344247</guid>
		<description>In Zeiten von massenhaft Websitenm&#252;ll im Internet eine sehr gut aufgebaute Website, nicht &#252;berdimensioniertes Design und sehr gut recher-schierte Hintergrundinformationen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Zeiten von massenhaft Websitenm&#252;ll im Internet eine sehr gut aufgebaute Website, nicht &#252;berdimensioniertes Design und sehr gut recher-schierte Hintergrundinformationen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-277596</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 06:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-277596</guid>
		<description>Interesting web page is, i\'ll see you later one more timeB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting web page is, i\&#8217;ll see you later one more timeB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: íƒœìš°&#8217;s log - web 2.0 and beyond &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ë¯¸ë””ì–´ì˜ ë¯¸ëž˜, ì£¼ëª©ì˜ ìˆ˜ì§‘ì— ìžˆë‹¤.</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-160489</link>
		<dc:creator>íƒœìš°&#8217;s log - web 2.0 and beyond &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ë¯¸ë””ì–´ì˜ ë¯¸ëž˜, ì£¼ëª©ì˜ ìˆ˜ì§‘ì— ìžˆë‹¤.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-160489</guid>
		<description>[...] ì›¹ì€ ì´ê²ƒì„ 360ë„ ë’¤ì§‘ì–´ ë†“ì•˜ë‹¤. ì»¨í…ì¸ ë¥¼ í†µí•´ì„œ ì£¼ëª©ì„ ì–»ëŠ” ë°©ë²•ì€ ì´ì œ ì£¼ëª©ì„ ë°›ëŠ” ìˆ˜ë§Žì€ ë°©ë²• ì¤‘ ë‹¨ì§€ í•˜ë‚˜ì¼ ë¿ì´ë‹¤. ë¬¼ë¡  ì§ˆì´ ë†’ì€ ì»¨í…ì¸ ë¥¼ ì§€ì†ì ìœ¼ë¡œ ê³µê¸‰í•˜ëŠ” ê²ƒì€ ì£¼ëª©ì„ ë§Žì´ ë°›ì„ ìˆ˜ ìžˆëŠ” ê°€ëŠ¥ì„±ì„ í¬ê²Œ ë†’ì¸ë‹¤. ê·¸ëŸ¬ë‚˜, ë™ì˜ìƒ ì‚¬ì´íŠ¸ ì–´ëŠ ê³³ì„ ì°¾ì•„ë´ë„ &#8220;ì£¼ëª©ì˜ ì–‘ì€ ì»¨í…ì¸ ì˜ ì§ˆì— ë¹„ë¡€í•œë‹¤&#8221;ë¼ëŠ” ê³µì‹ì´ ë°˜ë“œì‹œ ì„±ë¦½í•˜ì§€ëŠ” ì•ŠëŠ”ë‹¤ëŠ” ê²ƒì„ ì•Œ ìˆ˜ ìžˆë‹¤. ë‹¤ë¥¸ ë°©ë²•ì´ ë„ˆë¬´ë‚˜ ë§Žì´ ì¡´ìž¬í•˜ê³  ìžˆë‹¤. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ì›¹ì€ ì´ê²ƒì„ 360ë„ ë’¤ì§‘ì–´ ë†“ì•˜ë‹¤. ì»¨í…ì¸ ë¥¼ í†µí•´ì„œ ì£¼ëª©ì„ ì–»ëŠ” ë°©ë²•ì€ ì´ì œ ì£¼ëª©ì„ ë°›ëŠ” ìˆ˜ë§Žì€ ë°©ë²• ì¤‘ ë‹¨ì§€ í•˜ë‚˜ì¼ ë¿ì´ë‹¤. ë¬¼ë¡  ì§ˆì´ ë†’ì€ ì»¨í…ì¸ ë¥¼ ì§€ì†ì ìœ¼ë¡œ ê³µê¸‰í•˜ëŠ” ê²ƒì€ ì£¼ëª©ì„ ë§Žì´ ë°›ì„ ìˆ˜ ìžˆëŠ” ê°€ëŠ¥ì„±ì„ í¬ê²Œ ë†’ì¸ë‹¤. ê·¸ëŸ¬ë‚˜, ë™ì˜ìƒ ì‚¬ì´íŠ¸ ì–´ëŠ ê³³ì„ ì°¾ì•„ë´ë„ &#8220;ì£¼ëª©ì˜ ì–‘ì€ ì»¨í…ì¸ ì˜ ì§ˆì— ë¹„ë¡€í•œë‹¤&#8221;ë¼ëŠ” ê³µì‹ì´ ë°˜ë“œì‹œ ì„±ë¦½í•˜ì§€ëŠ” ì•ŠëŠ”ë‹¤ëŠ” ê²ƒì„ ì•Œ ìˆ˜ ìžˆë‹¤. ë‹¤ë¥¸ ë°©ë²•ì´ ë„ˆë¬´ë‚˜ ë§Žì´ ì¡´ìž¬í•˜ê³  ìžˆë‹¤. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who wants to own content &#171; Dream On !</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-155240</link>
		<dc:creator>Who wants to own content &#171; Dream On !</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 08:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-155240</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff has an interesting post sometime back where he emphasized that content and distribution both cann&#8217;t differentiate a media house from other or even protect it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff has an interesting post sometime back where he emphasized that content and distribution both cann&#8217;t differentiate a media house from other or even protect it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M@Blog &#187; Conversation is the kingdom</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-151167</link>
		<dc:creator>M@Blog &#187; Conversation is the kingdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 13:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-151167</guid>
		<description>[...] Hear, hear! Jeff Jarvis has a great post for old-economy models. Two choice quotes: Equity no longer grows from exclusivity. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hear, hear! Jeff Jarvis has a great post for old-economy models. Two choice quotes: Equity no longer grows from exclusivity. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Exploding TV: The atomic bomb</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-150750</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Exploding TV: The atomic bomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 02:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-150750</guid>
		<description>[...] Amen, brother. I said sometime ago that media is not about owning content or distribution. It is about relationships. And Locke is quite right: relationships are also not something to be owned. Sweney continues: Here we go, he has four rules/lessons/options for large media companies, this ought to be interesting. Hmmm, I seem to have come out of it with 5 - perhaps one is an example. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Amen, brother. I said sometime ago that media is not about owning content or distribution. It is about relationships. And Locke is quite right: relationships are also not something to be owned. Sweney continues: Here we go, he has four rules/lessons/options for large media companies, this ought to be interesting. Hmmm, I seem to have come out of it with 5 - perhaps one is an example. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/08/23/who-wants-to-own-content/#comment-99931</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=313#comment-99931</guid>
		<description>i love this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
