<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Media Guardian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/12/in-media-guardian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/12/in-media-guardian/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:19:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MikeW</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/12/in-media-guardian/#comment-389465</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=461#comment-389465</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re confusing it with the Daily Worker ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re confusing it with the Daily Worker &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pulitzers discover the future</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/12/in-media-guardian/#comment-39302</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pulitzers discover the future</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=461#comment-39302</guid>
		<description>[...] : Here are Rex Hammock and I wishing for a Pulitzer for their online efforts. (Full disclosure: Nola.com was of the sites I helped start in my last job, so I&#8217;m prejudiced.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] : Here are Rex Hammock and I wishing for a Pulitzer for their online efforts. (Full disclosure: Nola.com was of the sites I helped start in my last job, so I&#8217;m prejudiced.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Next: A Pulitzer-prize-winning blog?</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/12/in-media-guardian/#comment-17279</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Next: A Pulitzer-prize-winning blog?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 15:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=461#comment-17279</guid>
		<description>[...] The Pulitzer committee finally will allow online submissions in breaking news and breaking-news photography; in other categories, online has be go hand-in-hand with print. It&#8217;s a wimpy step but at least it&#8217;s a step. And I wonder whether the Times-Picayune&#8217;s blogs could win the Pulitzer. Rex Hammock and I said they should. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Pulitzer committee finally will allow online submissions in breaking news and breaking-news photography; in other categories, online has be go hand-in-hand with print. It&#8217;s a wimpy step but at least it&#8217;s a step. And I wonder whether the Times-Picayune&#8217;s blogs could win the Pulitzer. Rex Hammock and I said they should. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/12/in-media-guardian/#comment-7296</link>
		<dc:creator>PR Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 19:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=461#comment-7296</guid>
		<description>[...] Whilst reading through the new Berliner-format Guardian, I noticed a column in the New Media section by Jeff Jarvis of Buzz Machine. This weekâ€™s article by Jeffâ€™s is about how blogs and other forms of new media have proved to be indispensable through the Hurricane Katrina devastation against other forms of media outlets. Did I miss something here? I missed this completely in the blogosphere and found out from my hard copy. Although I am a subscriber to Jeffâ€™s blog and he did mention it, I guess Iâ€™m not paying full attention! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Whilst reading through the new Berliner-format Guardian, I noticed a column in the New Media section by Jeff Jarvis of Buzz Machine. This weekâ€™s article by Jeffâ€™s is about how blogs and other forms of new media have proved to be indispensable through the Hurricane Katrina devastation against other forms of media outlets. Did I miss something here? I missed this completely in the blogosphere and found out from my hard copy. Although I am a subscriber to Jeffâ€™s blog and he did mention it, I guess Iâ€™m not paying full attention! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Death by a thousand baby steps</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/12/in-media-guardian/#comment-6740</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Death by a thousand baby steps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 18:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=461#comment-6740</guid>
		<description>[...] : After Rex Hammock and I said that the Times-Picayune and Nola.com should win a Pulitzer for their journalism, which happened to be distributed online and could not be distributed in print after Katrina, Mark Glaser did a good act of reporting and asked the Pulitzer committee about whether work online could win their prize. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] : After Rex Hammock and I said that the Times-Picayune and Nola.com should win a Pulitzer for their journalism, which happened to be distributed online and could not be distributed in print after Katrina, Mark Glaser did a good act of reporting and asked the Pulitzer committee about whether work online could win their prize. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tuberc</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/12/in-media-guardian/#comment-6721</link>
		<dc:creator>tuberc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 14:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=461#comment-6721</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;And note that Iâ€™m there not thanks to my resume but thanks to my blog.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

yeah right. and I suppose michael jordan got to play minor league baseball for the chicago white sox because of his stellar sub .250 batting average. give us a break. your blog would not be as well-known if it were not for your resume. there are plenty of other blogs just as well-written (if not more) with plenty of smart things to say. i&#039;m not saying you don&#039;t deserve a guardian column, of course you do, but don&#039;t try to push that &quot;one of the little people&quot; line of bull as if it&#039;s anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;And note that Iâ€™m there not thanks to my resume but thanks to my blog.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>yeah right. and I suppose michael jordan got to play minor league baseball for the chicago white sox because of his stellar sub .250 batting average. give us a break. your blog would not be as well-known if it were not for your resume. there are plenty of other blogs just as well-written (if not more) with plenty of smart things to say. i&#8217;m not saying you don&#8217;t deserve a guardian column, of course you do, but don&#8217;t try to push that &#8220;one of the little people&#8221; line of bull as if it&#8217;s anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJF</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/12/in-media-guardian/#comment-6696</link>
		<dc:creator>PJF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=461#comment-6696</guid>
		<description>Jeff, with regards to Guardian &quot;print&quot; and blog &quot;screen&quot; - are you aware of &quot;sassygate&quot;?

If you are, I find it hard to believe* that you would even consider writing for that newspaper. Your expressed opinion that the Guardian is the best-written paper in the English publishing world indicates a profound ignorance of the reality of that publication (or of English), so perhaps you are indeed unaware of &quot;sassygate&quot;.

*My belief is based on my earlier experience of your blog. I came back purely to see your reaction to the anniversary of September 11th. Sadly, I wasn&#039;t surprised by the muted, distant and almost matter-of-fact nature of your posts. You seem to be forgetting. 

A day later and you announce this. You are either not sufficiently motivated to investigate the grim reality that is the frothing, anti-Western delusion of the Guardian mindset; or you have investigated and just aren&#039;t sufficiently concerned. 

It&#039;s still &lt;b&gt;WWIII&lt;/b&gt;, Jeff, and you&#039;re sleeping with those that knowingly and happily sleep with the enemy.

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, with regards to Guardian &#8220;print&#8221; and blog &#8220;screen&#8221; &#8211; are you aware of &#8220;sassygate&#8221;?</p>
<p>If you are, I find it hard to believe* that you would even consider writing for that newspaper. Your expressed opinion that the Guardian is the best-written paper in the English publishing world indicates a profound ignorance of the reality of that publication (or of English), so perhaps you are indeed unaware of &#8220;sassygate&#8221;.</p>
<p>*My belief is based on my earlier experience of your blog. I came back purely to see your reaction to the anniversary of September 11th. Sadly, I wasn&#8217;t surprised by the muted, distant and almost matter-of-fact nature of your posts. You seem to be forgetting. </p>
<p>A day later and you announce this. You are either not sufficiently motivated to investigate the grim reality that is the frothing, anti-Western delusion of the Guardian mindset; or you have investigated and just aren&#8217;t sufficiently concerned. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s still <b>WWIII</b>, Jeff, and you&#8217;re sleeping with those that knowingly and happily sleep with the enemy.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Darlington</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/12/in-media-guardian/#comment-6586</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Darlington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=461#comment-6586</guid>
		<description>Jeff, As a British &quot;Guardian&quot; reader of some 35 years and a massive enthusiast for the Net, I&#039;m delightedthat you&#039;ve become a writer for the newspaper. It&#039;s encouraged me to look at your blog on a regular basis and given me ideas for my own. The &quot;Guardian&quot; is a unique paper in its ownership structure - a trust rather than a megalomaniac or shareholders - and its web site is one of the best new sites in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, As a British &#8220;Guardian&#8221; reader of some 35 years and a massive enthusiast for the Net, I&#8217;m delightedthat you&#8217;ve become a writer for the newspaper. It&#8217;s encouraged me to look at your blog on a regular basis and given me ideas for my own. The &#8220;Guardian&#8221; is a unique paper in its ownership structure &#8211; a trust rather than a megalomaniac or shareholders &#8211; and its web site is one of the best new sites in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/12/in-media-guardian/#comment-6556</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 18:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=461#comment-6556</guid>
		<description>Jeez, Jeff, this is pretty nauseating.  I always had you figured for a moderate guy, but if you believe al-Grauniad is the best-written paper in the world, I can only say I misjudged you. Well, wear a Che shirt to the staff meeting and you should get along fine...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez, Jeff, this is pretty nauseating.  I always had you figured for a moderate guy, but if you believe al-Grauniad is the best-written paper in the world, I can only say I misjudged you. Well, wear a Che shirt to the staff meeting and you should get along fine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonT</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/12/in-media-guardian/#comment-6513</link>
		<dc:creator>JonT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=461#comment-6513</guid>
		<description>And the Guardian&#039;s anti-american stance doesn&#039;t bother you at all Jeff?

(and they are anti-american - not just anti-Bush).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the Guardian&#8217;s anti-american stance doesn&#8217;t bother you at all Jeff?</p>
<p>(and they are anti-american &#8211; not just anti-Bush).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/12/in-media-guardian/#comment-6437</link>
		<dc:creator>PR Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=461#comment-6437</guid>
		<description>[...] Whilst reading through the new Berliner-format Guardian, I noticed a column in the New Media section by Jeff Jarvis of Buzz Machine. This week&#8217;s article by Jeff is about how blogs and other forms of new media have proved to be indispensable through the Hurricane Katrina devastation against other forms of media outlets. Did I miss something here? I missed this completely in the blogosphere and found out from my hard copy. Although I am a subscriber to Jeff&#8217;s blog and he did mention it, I guess I&#8217;m not paying full attention! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Whilst reading through the new Berliner-format Guardian, I noticed a column in the New Media section by Jeff Jarvis of Buzz Machine. This week&#8217;s article by Jeff is about how blogs and other forms of new media have proved to be indispensable through the Hurricane Katrina devastation against other forms of media outlets. Did I miss something here? I missed this completely in the blogosphere and found out from my hard copy. Although I am a subscriber to Jeff&#8217;s blog and he did mention it, I guess I&#8217;m not paying full attention! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glyn</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/12/in-media-guardian/#comment-6413</link>
		<dc:creator>Glyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=461#comment-6413</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Jeff, and as a Brit I look forward to reading your thoughts on paper as well as on the net (handier when in the bath). 

I see that for the next two weeks, because of its launch, the online Guardian will be free to everyone instead of only on subscription; so people will be able to read your next two weeks articles for them: www.guardian.co.uk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Jeff, and as a Brit I look forward to reading your thoughts on paper as well as on the net (handier when in the bath). </p>
<p>I see that for the next two weeks, because of its launch, the online Guardian will be free to everyone instead of only on subscription; so people will be able to read your next two weeks articles for them: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
