<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poor woman&#8217;s West Wing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:43:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-10833</link>
		<dc:creator>blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 01:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-10833</guid>
		<description>I am not impressed with this show either.  It is lacking something. I am not sure Davis is convincing enough as a predisdent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not impressed with this show either.  It is lacking something. I am not sure Davis is convincing enough as a predisdent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Appelo</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-8257</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Appelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 22:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-8257</guid>
		<description>It should&#039;ve starred Susan Sarandon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should&#8217;ve starred Susan Sarandon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankbruno</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-8224</link>
		<dc:creator>frankbruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 16:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-8224</guid>
		<description>Catherine --

Dennis Hopper was actually pretty excited about it, if Entertainment Weekly is to be believed (and it almost always is!).  Apparently he&#039;s turned hard-core Republican.  Seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catherine &#8211;</p>
<p>Dennis Hopper was actually pretty excited about it, if Entertainment Weekly is to be believed (and it almost always is!).  Apparently he&#8217;s turned hard-core Republican.  Seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7982</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7982</guid>
		<description>I thought it was semi-interesting, I&#039;ll probably tune in a few more times to see how it develops. If I were &quot;Mr. First Lady&quot; though, I&#039;d have tossed out that chick that was showing me around in a matter of seconds and tossed the pink sofa out behind her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was semi-interesting, I&#8217;ll probably tune in a few more times to see how it develops. If I were &#8220;Mr. First Lady&#8221; though, I&#8217;d have tossed out that chick that was showing me around in a matter of seconds and tossed the pink sofa out behind her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Lester</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7958</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Lester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7958</guid>
		<description>Actually it just reminds me that I missed &quot;NCIS&quot; and &quot;My Name is Earl&quot; again last night. Maybe it&#039;s time to get a TiVO after all.

Having missed &quot;C in C&quot; but reading everybody&#039;s reviews, I wonder, could they be purposefully portraying a ditzy fictional president to make Hillary look strong and competent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually it just reminds me that I missed &#8220;NCIS&#8221; and &#8220;My Name is Earl&#8221; again last night. Maybe it&#8217;s time to get a TiVO after all.</p>
<p>Having missed &#8220;C in C&#8221; but reading everybody&#8217;s reviews, I wonder, could they be purposefully portraying a ditzy fictional president to make Hillary look strong and competent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brabc1</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7950</link>
		<dc:creator>brabc1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7950</guid>
		<description>You should have watched the second half of the Bob Dylan special (PBS).  I never realized his background and how deep he really is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should have watched the second half of the Bob Dylan special (PBS).  I never realized his background and how deep he really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whodat</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7931</link>
		<dc:creator>whodat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7931</guid>
		<description>#1 ratings do not mean anything for a premiere. It means it had good long-lead promotion, which it did. The true test is the next few weeks. 

#1 ratings do not also mean it is a good show, merely a highly watched show. 

And here&#039;s guessing Eric from moveleft will watch a few more times and if it is like Jed Bartlett&#039;s white house he will like it.

This has to be the dumbest post of the week: &quot;Why donâ€™t you kiddies go back to constantly bashing the NYT and Dan Rather and leave the media analysis to experts.&quot;  Who exactly are the &quot;experts&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1 ratings do not mean anything for a premiere. It means it had good long-lead promotion, which it did. The true test is the next few weeks. </p>
<p>#1 ratings do not also mean it is a good show, merely a highly watched show. </p>
<p>And here&#8217;s guessing Eric from moveleft will watch a few more times and if it is like Jed Bartlett&#8217;s white house he will like it.</p>
<p>This has to be the dumbest post of the week: &#8220;Why donâ€™t you kiddies go back to constantly bashing the NYT and Dan Rather and leave the media analysis to experts.&#8221;  Who exactly are the &#8220;experts&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Jaffa</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7930</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Jaffa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7930</guid>
		<description>JBK -

The ratings next week will say more about what the public thought of the pilot episode than the ratings for the pilot itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JBK -</p>
<p>The ratings next week will say more about what the public thought of the pilot episode than the ratings for the pilot itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBK</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7924</link>
		<dc:creator>JBK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7924</guid>
		<description>Of course, it turns out CIC was the #1 rated show of the night. Guess Buzzflash and his acolytes are not quite as representative of America as they think. Why don&#039;t you kiddies go back to constantly bashing the NYT and Dan Rather and leave the media analysis to experts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, it turns out CIC was the #1 rated show of the night. Guess Buzzflash and his acolytes are not quite as representative of America as they think. Why don&#8217;t you kiddies go back to constantly bashing the NYT and Dan Rather and leave the media analysis to experts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7920</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7920</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t watch Commander in Chief, but I did watch E-Ring last week.  Now THAT was bad.  I think I rolled my eyes about 800 times.  So cliche, so unrealistic, such bad acting.  How did poor Dennis Hopper get roped into that one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t watch Commander in Chief, but I did watch E-Ring last week.  Now THAT was bad.  I think I rolled my eyes about 800 times.  So cliche, so unrealistic, such bad acting.  How did poor Dennis Hopper get roped into that one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Jaffa</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7911</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Jaffa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7911</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t like it or hate it.

I&#039;ll probably watch the next couple of epsisodes and then decide whether to watch more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t like it or hate it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll probably watch the next couple of epsisodes and then decide whether to watch more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whodat</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7907</link>
		<dc:creator>whodat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7907</guid>
		<description>Wait--you people actually watched that? And thought it might be good?
C&#039;mon now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait&#8211;you people actually watched that? And thought it might be good?<br />
C&#8217;mon now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Superwoody</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7902</link>
		<dc:creator>Superwoody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7902</guid>
		<description>I only liked the token jabs at Hillary being a bitch when she was in the WH.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only liked the token jabs at Hillary being a bitch when she was in the WH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monte Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7898</link>
		<dc:creator>Monte Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7898</guid>
		<description>One minor redeeming feature: Donald Sutherland beginning to snack on the scenery, and obviously preparing to chew the lights and mike boom next...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One minor redeeming feature: Donald Sutherland beginning to snack on the scenery, and obviously preparing to chew the lights and mike boom next&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarleneJaeckel.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;Commander in Chief&#8221; disappointment</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7895</link>
		<dc:creator>MarleneJaeckel.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;Commander in Chief&#8221; disappointment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7895</guid>
		<description>[...] Looks like I&#8217;m not the only person who did not think much of the new ABC drama &#8220;Commander in Chief&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Looks like I&#8217;m not the only person who did not think much of the new ABC drama &#8220;Commander in Chief&#8221;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ppr</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7891</link>
		<dc:creator>ppr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7891</guid>
		<description>You should have watched The Amazing Race Family.....much more exciting!! All the way to the last minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should have watched The Amazing Race Family&#8230;..much more exciting!! All the way to the last minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7890</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 12:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7890</guid>
		<description>Granted the pilot episode was nothing to be excited about.  I grew tired of both the Hillary Clinton shots and the cardboard Republicans.  I will, however, give the show a couple more episodes before throwing in the towel.  Hell, I hated the West Wing for several episodes, but continued to watch because nothing better was on. Tuesday night is not one of the strongest nights of television, but I can always find somethng else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granted the pilot episode was nothing to be excited about.  I grew tired of both the Hillary Clinton shots and the cardboard Republicans.  I will, however, give the show a couple more episodes before throwing in the towel.  Hell, I hated the West Wing for several episodes, but continued to watch because nothing better was on. Tuesday night is not one of the strongest nights of television, but I can always find somethng else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Fuchs</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7888</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Fuchs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 12:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7888</guid>
		<description>Scratching the seven year itch - unsatisfying.

The show&#039;s only redeeming quality seems to be in renewing a long-existing deep love affair for the West Wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scratching the seven year itch &#8211; unsatisfying.</p>
<p>The show&#8217;s only redeeming quality seems to be in renewing a long-existing deep love affair for the West Wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carson Fire</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7885</link>
		<dc:creator>Carson Fire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7885</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;â€œListen, missy, a girl canâ€™t be President!â€&lt;/i&gt;

You must have seen the promo!

The theme is at least 20 years too late. Both major political parties now have strong women that a majority of partisans would be overjoyed to see in the White House. One party has been an admirer of Brit PM Thatcher since the 80s, and the other party had a female VP candidate in the 80s. The current pres has women advising him at very high levels. It&#039;s just not the issue it once was.

Judging from another new &quot;show&quot; I&#039;ve seen this season, there seems to be a new push to use badly-scripted network dramas to promote hoary old liberal ideas like &quot;Americans are still too lunkheaded to accept a female president&quot;. This other one, a show I wanted to like because of the performers, was split between a lawyer in court giving long, uninterrupted speeches about the evils of intelligent design, and an amorphous tale about a short man who didn&#039;t think people were taking his murder seriously enough. I think the message was supposed to be &quot;human rights for diminutive murderers&quot;, but I&#039;m not really sure, and the writers certainly weren&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>â€œListen, missy, a girl canâ€™t be President!â€</i></p>
<p>You must have seen the promo!</p>
<p>The theme is at least 20 years too late. Both major political parties now have strong women that a majority of partisans would be overjoyed to see in the White House. One party has been an admirer of Brit PM Thatcher since the 80s, and the other party had a female VP candidate in the 80s. The current pres has women advising him at very high levels. It&#8217;s just not the issue it once was.</p>
<p>Judging from another new &#8220;show&#8221; I&#8217;ve seen this season, there seems to be a new push to use badly-scripted network dramas to promote hoary old liberal ideas like &#8220;Americans are still too lunkheaded to accept a female president&#8221;. This other one, a show I wanted to like because of the performers, was split between a lawyer in court giving long, uninterrupted speeches about the evils of intelligent design, and an amorphous tale about a short man who didn&#8217;t think people were taking his murder seriously enough. I think the message was supposed to be &#8220;human rights for diminutive murderers&#8221;, but I&#8217;m not really sure, and the writers certainly weren&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Treacher</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7883</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Treacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7883</guid>
		<description>Whenever she has to play anger at terrorists or mean people or whoever, I bet she just thinks about Renny Harlin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever she has to play anger at terrorists or mean people or whoever, I bet she just thinks about Renny Harlin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7881</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7881</guid>
		<description>whats your grade for the real thing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whats your grade for the real thing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick gregory</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7876</link>
		<dc:creator>rick gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 05:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7876</guid>
		<description>David, 

Don&#039;t demean a C-... This show wasn&#039;t even that good...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t demean a C-&#8230; This show wasn&#8217;t even that good&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mumblix Grumph</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7875</link>
		<dc:creator>Mumblix Grumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 04:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7875</guid>
		<description>I missed the show...were there a lot of &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bad White MenÂ®&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; saying things like &quot;Listen, missy, a girl can&#039;t be President!&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed the show&#8230;were there a lot of <i><b>Bad White MenÂ®</b></i> saying things like &#8220;Listen, missy, a girl can&#8217;t be President!&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shovelware</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7874</link>
		<dc:creator>Shovelware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 04:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7874</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Coming Attractions: Net Porn, Brown Power.&lt;/strong&gt;

This blogging thing is thirsty work. It makes cleaning the Augean stables look like 10 minutes&#039; work with some Lemon Pledge and plenty of Handi-Wipes. I&#039;ve been under the hammer of a dozen deadlines, hence my absence from the bully...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Coming Attractions: Net Porn, Brown Power.</strong></p>
<p>This blogging thing is thirsty work. It makes cleaning the Augean stables look like 10 minutes&#8217; work with some Lemon Pledge and plenty of Handi-Wipes. I&#8217;ve been under the hammer of a dozen deadlines, hence my absence from the bully&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tonynoboloney</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7869</link>
		<dc:creator>tonynoboloney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 03:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/09/27/poor-womans-west-wing/#comment-7869</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t very impressed with the speech either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t very impressed with the speech either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

