<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recovery 2.0: Reimagining New Orleans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ExposureBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The future of your home town</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-43395</link>
		<dc:creator>ExposureBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The future of your home town</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 05:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-43395</guid>
		<description>[...] Right now, New Orleans residents are struggling to get their homes back where they wereÂ even though they aren&#8217;t reallyÂ sure if their lovely city will everÂ recover from the Katrina hit.Â  They hear influential congressmen say that New Orleans should be bulldozed, and that any money given to rebuild N.O. would be going down a rathole. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Right now, New Orleans residents are struggling to get their homes back where they wereÂ even though they aren&#8217;t reallyÂ sure if their lovely city will everÂ recover from the Katrina hit.Â  They hear influential congressmen say that New Orleans should be bulldozed, and that any money given to rebuild N.O. would be going down a rathole. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clif Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-20661</link>
		<dc:creator>Clif Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 03:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-20661</guid>
		<description>Why not just reroute the Mississippi River to the Atchafalaya and set up a NEW New Orleans (call it something different) on higher ground several several miles to the west.  The Army Corp of Engineers has been fighting this inevitibility for years now, every time spring floods threaten to divert the main flow of the river.  Let a new river course and a new planned city happen naturally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not just reroute the Mississippi River to the Atchafalaya and set up a NEW New Orleans (call it something different) on higher ground several several miles to the west.  The Army Corp of Engineers has been fighting this inevitibility for years now, every time spring floods threaten to divert the main flow of the river.  Let a new river course and a new planned city happen naturally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gee</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-9624</link>
		<dc:creator>gee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 02:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-9624</guid>
		<description>To Ruth(Sept. 27th), Underground tunnels? HUH? Parts of New Orleans are below sea level! That's the problem! The few basements that the city had  usually had water in them under normal circumstances. I really don"t think that underground is where we need to look for solutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Ruth(Sept. 27th), Underground tunnels? HUH? Parts of New Orleans are below sea level! That&#8217;s the problem! The few basements that the city had  usually had water in them under normal circumstances. I really don&#8221;t think that underground is where we need to look for solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wild Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-9500</link>
		<dc:creator>Wild Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 17:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-9500</guid>
		<description>After reading all of the above "suggestions" I have come to this conclusion. Those of you who know nothing about the city and have never even visited New Orleans are talking out of your rectums (as usual). New Orleans is one of the greatest historical sites in the history of the United States. The port has been actively operating and supplying goods both to and from a very large portion of the country for a very long time. Much longer than most other large cities in the US have been in existence. The cultural and music history of the area is irreplaceable. We have been an International city since the original explorers arrived. To say that New Orleans should not be rebuilt is absolutely ludicrous. Yes, there should be some planning done prior to reconstruction. Yes, the levees that protect the city will have to be rebuilt to withstand larger storms. Yes, the dynamic of the city will be changed forever. BUT...the politicians should be minimally involved in the planning and the distribution of funding (from whatever sources). The politicians (Congress, the Army Corps of Engineers, etc., etc.) are exactly the ones who have screwed things up in that area for longer than we ALL have been alive. The entire area, including the floodplains that were ruined by the Army Corps of Engineers with all of the overflow diversions, will have to be rethought prior to ANY new construction. The Louisiana coastline has been receding and being ruined by saltwater intrusion ever since the river flood plain was diverted by the Corps (through political boondoggle) to allow the land owners of all the previously almost worthless marshes and swamps to fill in and develop into towns and subdivisions (Strictly for $$$). They ruined the dynamic of the floodplain which rejuventated itself every spring when the Mississippi River would provide the entire area with new topsoil carried downriver and deposited in the swamps and marshes. This also acted a a giant filter for the water. The result being annual "flush" of the ecosystem and an attraction of food and nesting areas and spawning areas for all of those Gulf delicacies like Redfish, Speckled Trout (spotted Weakfish to you Yanks), shrimp, crabs, and oysters.
It is my opinion that the city and surrounding small towns that provide support to the Mississippi River traffic and the incredibly large seafood industry MUST be rebuilt, but with some forethought and planning. This planning should be committee based and the members of that committee should be drawn from a wide base of interests (shipping, seafood industry, oil, soil and water conservation, for example) all with equal say so, and should be studied extensively prior to any major expenditures and rebuilding efforts are started. PRIORITY ONE: This should be cleanup of the area. Nothing else will happen until that is accomplished. Let's spend the money RIGHT NOW that has been allocated by the government to get rid of the trash and clean up the damage. Then and only then can ANY reconstruction begin. Help those folks whose homes survived the storm clean up their neighborhoods. The process of rebuilding is going to have to come from the outskirts and work its way inward. The housing projects that  have been destroyed should NEVER be rebuilt. Those folks are currently scattered and distributed throughout the Uniited States and should stay where they are, not be attracted back to a "free" lifestyle supported by government at all levels. Government involvement or not....New Orleans WILL be rebuilt by those who love it, albeit a longer timeframe. I wonder how many of you anti rebuilders would be so quick to condemn your own hometowns into non-existence if a major natural disaster were to obliterate it. As the song says "Do you know what it means.....to miss New Orleans...to miss it each night and Day?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading all of the above &#8220;suggestions&#8221; I have come to this conclusion. Those of you who know nothing about the city and have never even visited New Orleans are talking out of your rectums (as usual). New Orleans is one of the greatest historical sites in the history of the United States. The port has been actively operating and supplying goods both to and from a very large portion of the country for a very long time. Much longer than most other large cities in the US have been in existence. The cultural and music history of the area is irreplaceable. We have been an International city since the original explorers arrived. To say that New Orleans should not be rebuilt is absolutely ludicrous. Yes, there should be some planning done prior to reconstruction. Yes, the levees that protect the city will have to be rebuilt to withstand larger storms. Yes, the dynamic of the city will be changed forever. BUT&#8230;the politicians should be minimally involved in the planning and the distribution of funding (from whatever sources). The politicians (Congress, the Army Corps of Engineers, etc., etc.) are exactly the ones who have screwed things up in that area for longer than we ALL have been alive. The entire area, including the floodplains that were ruined by the Army Corps of Engineers with all of the overflow diversions, will have to be rethought prior to ANY new construction. The Louisiana coastline has been receding and being ruined by saltwater intrusion ever since the river flood plain was diverted by the Corps (through political boondoggle) to allow the land owners of all the previously almost worthless marshes and swamps to fill in and develop into towns and subdivisions (Strictly for $$$). They ruined the dynamic of the floodplain which rejuventated itself every spring when the Mississippi River would provide the entire area with new topsoil carried downriver and deposited in the swamps and marshes. This also acted a a giant filter for the water. The result being annual &#8220;flush&#8221; of the ecosystem and an attraction of food and nesting areas and spawning areas for all of those Gulf delicacies like Redfish, Speckled Trout (spotted Weakfish to you Yanks), shrimp, crabs, and oysters.<br />
It is my opinion that the city and surrounding small towns that provide support to the Mississippi River traffic and the incredibly large seafood industry MUST be rebuilt, but with some forethought and planning. This planning should be committee based and the members of that committee should be drawn from a wide base of interests (shipping, seafood industry, oil, soil and water conservation, for example) all with equal say so, and should be studied extensively prior to any major expenditures and rebuilding efforts are started. PRIORITY ONE: This should be cleanup of the area. Nothing else will happen until that is accomplished. Let&#8217;s spend the money RIGHT NOW that has been allocated by the government to get rid of the trash and clean up the damage. Then and only then can ANY reconstruction begin. Help those folks whose homes survived the storm clean up their neighborhoods. The process of rebuilding is going to have to come from the outskirts and work its way inward. The housing projects that  have been destroyed should NEVER be rebuilt. Those folks are currently scattered and distributed throughout the Uniited States and should stay where they are, not be attracted back to a &#8220;free&#8221; lifestyle supported by government at all levels. Government involvement or not&#8230;.New Orleans WILL be rebuilt by those who love it, albeit a longer timeframe. I wonder how many of you anti rebuilders would be so quick to condemn your own hometowns into non-existence if a major natural disaster were to obliterate it. As the song says &#8220;Do you know what it means&#8230;..to miss New Orleans&#8230;to miss it each night and Day?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-9456</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 12:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-9456</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with the reply from Phil...I also am am from New Orleans and have been through many hurricanes over the years.  Government failed miserabley in terms of propholactic measures, but then again it did not make the hurricane.  The devistation by flood was made be nature... the looting (and yes there was more looting than the media likes to show) murder and rape was made by garbage that was already present in our "urban community".  I wonder if new mutli story housing projects will be constructed to achieve Jackson's and Sharpton's demographics... God knows that's a priority....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with the reply from Phil&#8230;I also am am from New Orleans and have been through many hurricanes over the years.  Government failed miserabley in terms of propholactic measures, but then again it did not make the hurricane.  The devistation by flood was made be nature&#8230; the looting (and yes there was more looting than the media likes to show) murder and rape was made by garbage that was already present in our &#8220;urban community&#8221;.  I wonder if new mutli story housing projects will be constructed to achieve Jackson&#8217;s and Sharpton&#8217;s demographics&#8230; God knows that&#8217;s a priority&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-9360</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 02:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-9360</guid>
		<description>As a native New Orleanian I find it very distressing to see so many commenters quoting a large variety of half-truths based on either assumptions or bad information sources.  Please don't criticize what you don't understand.

Here are some facts you can rely on:

The Sept 06 2005 CRS Report for Congress states and I quote that "the flooding in New Orleans was predicted but the extent of inundation was uncertain."

Why was it predicted?   Because Mega-storms (which began with Hurricane Andrew) were a new phenomenon which began in the 90's.   The vintage levees and floodgate systems were thought capable of withstanding a fast moving category 3 hurricane but a 4 or 5 were in question.   New Orleans was clearly not prepared.

All of this information was presented to Congress by the Corp of Engineers as early as 2002 and congress refused to act.

In conclusion I humbly submit that HAD our government reacted quckly with the "relatively" cheap preventative effort the largest part of this disaster would never have occurred.

In the words of Don Henley "We get the government we deserve."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a native New Orleanian I find it very distressing to see so many commenters quoting a large variety of half-truths based on either assumptions or bad information sources.  Please don&#8217;t criticize what you don&#8217;t understand.</p>
<p>Here are some facts you can rely on:</p>
<p>The Sept 06 2005 CRS Report for Congress states and I quote that &#8220;the flooding in New Orleans was predicted but the extent of inundation was uncertain.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why was it predicted?   Because Mega-storms (which began with Hurricane Andrew) were a new phenomenon which began in the 90&#8217;s.   The vintage levees and floodgate systems were thought capable of withstanding a fast moving category 3 hurricane but a 4 or 5 were in question.   New Orleans was clearly not prepared.</p>
<p>All of this information was presented to Congress by the Corp of Engineers as early as 2002 and congress refused to act.</p>
<p>In conclusion I humbly submit that HAD our government reacted quckly with the &#8220;relatively&#8221; cheap preventative effort the largest part of this disaster would never have occurred.</p>
<p>In the words of Don Henley &#8220;We get the government we deserve.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will lopez</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-8990</link>
		<dc:creator>will lopez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 02:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-8990</guid>
		<description>I do fill that New Orleans is esential and should be rebuilt just the way it was, but done right this time.  New Orleans was surrounded by a levee system designed to withstand a category 3 hurricaine which it has always done quite well.  The reason for this is because theese levee are over 40 years old.  However, I like to think that we have progressed as a nation and now have the ability to build a category 5 levee system.  New Orleans has the ability right now to pump up to an inch of water per hour out of the city, this is without uprading and adding pumps.  If the nation would want to we could completely rebuild New Orleans in such a way that if another Katrina were to occur it would be a several hour inconvience for its citizens.  Sadly though Louisiana is the poorest state in the country.  It is the United States version of a third world country.  I know because I have lived here my entire life.  What is even even worse is like New Orleans, it has probally the most natural recources of any state or (as New Orleans is concerned) city in the entire country.  At one time New Orleans was predicted to rival New York in both size and importance.  Obviosly the two cities have strayed far apart since then.  But i firmly believe that New Orleans if given the chance again can over time rise to that level.   So I ask another question.  How badly does the nation care about New Orleans??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do fill that New Orleans is esential and should be rebuilt just the way it was, but done right this time.  New Orleans was surrounded by a levee system designed to withstand a category 3 hurricaine which it has always done quite well.  The reason for this is because theese levee are over 40 years old.  However, I like to think that we have progressed as a nation and now have the ability to build a category 5 levee system.  New Orleans has the ability right now to pump up to an inch of water per hour out of the city, this is without uprading and adding pumps.  If the nation would want to we could completely rebuild New Orleans in such a way that if another Katrina were to occur it would be a several hour inconvience for its citizens.  Sadly though Louisiana is the poorest state in the country.  It is the United States version of a third world country.  I know because I have lived here my entire life.  What is even even worse is like New Orleans, it has probally the most natural recources of any state or (as New Orleans is concerned) city in the entire country.  At one time New Orleans was predicted to rival New York in both size and importance.  Obviosly the two cities have strayed far apart since then.  But i firmly believe that New Orleans if given the chance again can over time rise to that level.   So I ask another question.  How badly does the nation care about New Orleans??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dillinger</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-8247</link>
		<dc:creator>Dillinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 20:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-8247</guid>
		<description>Venice Orleans

I have long had this dream of building a re-creation of Bourbon Street a la Venice Italy. 
Not like I'm a big land developer or anything, just a dream I have. 

I had considered someday starting my amusement park down in Venice, La. or somewhere land was cheaper. It just wouldn't have been feasable to consider doing something like that in New Orleans. Until now. 
After seeing that entire areas of New Orleans may have to be bulldozed and rebuilt, I suddenly realized that this may be the opportunity of a lifetime. 

Imagine a Mardi Gras parade with floats that actually do! 

We could take some of the lower lying areas, perhaps around the 9th Ward and create a brand new small French Quarter with canals. Of course there would still be street access basically to what would be the backsides of the buildings. 

The main drag would be a network of canals with extra wide pedestrian walkways on either side, rows of storefronts with large connected balconies allowing people to walk along the main mall out of the sun or rain. The architecture should be absolutely stunning, like a Mardi Gras poster, beveled glass, brass gaslamps, arched pedestrian bridges, very detail oriented. We could have contests among architects to see who can come with the most flavorful New Orleans style architecture. Water would be kept sparkling clean using a Living Machine system designed by Ocean Arks International. http://www.oceanarks.org/

There would be lots of alcove style doorways, mini stage areas, and gazebos offering good accoustics and shelter where street performers can ply their trade. I also envision an area similar to the French Market which has rows of fancy umbrella carts. We can make it easy for returning residents to get small business loans to start a variety of small cart sized businesses. Imagine not just Lucky Dog carts, but also beignet carts, jambalaya carts, oyster carts, gator on a stick, masks, etc. Small business training and assistance will be provided. If you are succesful with your cart, you can save your money and work your way up to your own small storefront. We should have an area set aside for artists, away from the music and noise and encourage the art scene we used to have in Jackson Square 10 years ago before the brass bands took over and made it impossible for over 100 other performers to conduct business over the volume. No offense intended. Keeping that in mind, we should designate interspersed areas for louder acts like brass bands, drum or amplified acts. 

This would certainly do wonders to not only bring scores of tourists back into New Orleans, but bring commerce into even more areas of the city. I would personally like to see an area such as this open 24 hours as well, like Las Vegas. 

I am very concerned. as I'm sure many of you are, that there will be a huge rush to build quickie, cube style housing using all generic Home Depot hardware and suddenly, Bang! everything looks justs like any other suburban housing, Anywheresville, U.S.A.. Starbucks, The Gap, Borders ,etc..
Not that I don't appreciate what they're doing up in Humanities Plaza, but for God's sake don't send any of those cubes to New Orleans. Send them to Baton Rouge or Mississippi, or Alabama but if you are going to be sending anything here, please have some consideration for the distinctive architectural heritage that is New Orleans. If you look at the reconstruction of San Francisco after the big fire, they did a good bit to preserve the look of the original architecture in a kind of cosmetic way: basically taking cubes and tacking on a Victorian face. I think if we are going to rebuild, we need to think beyond the Home Depot box and consider going the extra yard at the design stage. We need to basically recreate the hardware store of the past from which to draw our building materials, equipped with ornate railings, cast lamposts, fancy street sign holders, etc. and subsidise it somehow so it costs the same to the builders to make fancy buildings which compliment the building guidelines. 

I realize of course that the cost of rebuilding old style housing using lots of wood like it's an endless commodity has become very expensive as well as environmentally irresponsible. However none of us wants to end up with a city of plain brick cubes like the old housing projects either. Maybe we can't have cast iron French balcony railings. But perhaps fiberglass or other modern materials might be more feasable. We can't have lot's of extra wood brick-a-brack on all our buidings, but replica cornices can be cast from recycled materials, nailed on and painted over. We cant have big pillars made out of solid wood, but we can cast the same out of steel and cement and have a a new New Orleans which is not only built to look, but built to last. 

It is clear that we should lay an all new fiber optic and underground power grid. I advocate laying an interlocking system of underground tunnels like under Disneyworld which would allow quick security and emergency access to any part of the city, even during the busiest Mardi Gras. The new ground level of the 9th Ward and other low lying areas should be raised 20 feet, not just build higher levees. I am talking about probably the largest landfill project in the history of America. If Japan can build an airport in the ocean by moving a mountain, America can raise the 9th Ward. 

Considering summer temperatures of 110 and 120 percent humidity, let us also keep in mind that building generic, single family cube style houses like they're building up in New York will require a lot of air conditioning to keep them cool. That will waste more energy in our new city, which of course is exactly what George Bush and the power companies want. 
The true challenge in designing the future architecture of New Orleans is to introduce the concept of environmentally sound and sustainable housing while doing as much as possible to maintain the look and feel of the Big Easy. Backsides of houses facing the sun are fitted with solar, while the front, shady side maintains a distinctive Mardi Gras style look. 

I believe we can turn New New Orleans into a model city which other cities will copy for generations to come. On the other hand, we can also let our government, and good old American greed screw it up royally. 
We need to have a plan. A Big Plan, not just a whole bunch of little ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Venice Orleans</p>
<p>I have long had this dream of building a re-creation of Bourbon Street a la Venice Italy.<br />
Not like I&#8217;m a big land developer or anything, just a dream I have. </p>
<p>I had considered someday starting my amusement park down in Venice, La. or somewhere land was cheaper. It just wouldn&#8217;t have been feasable to consider doing something like that in New Orleans. Until now.<br />
After seeing that entire areas of New Orleans may have to be bulldozed and rebuilt, I suddenly realized that this may be the opportunity of a lifetime. </p>
<p>Imagine a Mardi Gras parade with floats that actually do! </p>
<p>We could take some of the lower lying areas, perhaps around the 9th Ward and create a brand new small French Quarter with canals. Of course there would still be street access basically to what would be the backsides of the buildings. </p>
<p>The main drag would be a network of canals with extra wide pedestrian walkways on either side, rows of storefronts with large connected balconies allowing people to walk along the main mall out of the sun or rain. The architecture should be absolutely stunning, like a Mardi Gras poster, beveled glass, brass gaslamps, arched pedestrian bridges, very detail oriented. We could have contests among architects to see who can come with the most flavorful New Orleans style architecture. Water would be kept sparkling clean using a Living Machine system designed by Ocean Arks International. <a href="http://www.oceanarks.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.oceanarks.org/</a></p>
<p>There would be lots of alcove style doorways, mini stage areas, and gazebos offering good accoustics and shelter where street performers can ply their trade. I also envision an area similar to the French Market which has rows of fancy umbrella carts. We can make it easy for returning residents to get small business loans to start a variety of small cart sized businesses. Imagine not just Lucky Dog carts, but also beignet carts, jambalaya carts, oyster carts, gator on a stick, masks, etc. Small business training and assistance will be provided. If you are succesful with your cart, you can save your money and work your way up to your own small storefront. We should have an area set aside for artists, away from the music and noise and encourage the art scene we used to have in Jackson Square 10 years ago before the brass bands took over and made it impossible for over 100 other performers to conduct business over the volume. No offense intended. Keeping that in mind, we should designate interspersed areas for louder acts like brass bands, drum or amplified acts. </p>
<p>This would certainly do wonders to not only bring scores of tourists back into New Orleans, but bring commerce into even more areas of the city. I would personally like to see an area such as this open 24 hours as well, like Las Vegas. </p>
<p>I am very concerned. as I&#8217;m sure many of you are, that there will be a huge rush to build quickie, cube style housing using all generic Home Depot hardware and suddenly, Bang! everything looks justs like any other suburban housing, Anywheresville, U.S.A.. Starbucks, The Gap, Borders ,etc..<br />
Not that I don&#8217;t appreciate what they&#8217;re doing up in Humanities Plaza, but for God&#8217;s sake don&#8217;t send any of those cubes to New Orleans. Send them to Baton Rouge or Mississippi, or Alabama but if you are going to be sending anything here, please have some consideration for the distinctive architectural heritage that is New Orleans. If you look at the reconstruction of San Francisco after the big fire, they did a good bit to preserve the look of the original architecture in a kind of cosmetic way: basically taking cubes and tacking on a Victorian face. I think if we are going to rebuild, we need to think beyond the Home Depot box and consider going the extra yard at the design stage. We need to basically recreate the hardware store of the past from which to draw our building materials, equipped with ornate railings, cast lamposts, fancy street sign holders, etc. and subsidise it somehow so it costs the same to the builders to make fancy buildings which compliment the building guidelines. </p>
<p>I realize of course that the cost of rebuilding old style housing using lots of wood like it&#8217;s an endless commodity has become very expensive as well as environmentally irresponsible. However none of us wants to end up with a city of plain brick cubes like the old housing projects either. Maybe we can&#8217;t have cast iron French balcony railings. But perhaps fiberglass or other modern materials might be more feasable. We can&#8217;t have lot&#8217;s of extra wood brick-a-brack on all our buidings, but replica cornices can be cast from recycled materials, nailed on and painted over. We cant have big pillars made out of solid wood, but we can cast the same out of steel and cement and have a a new New Orleans which is not only built to look, but built to last. </p>
<p>It is clear that we should lay an all new fiber optic and underground power grid. I advocate laying an interlocking system of underground tunnels like under Disneyworld which would allow quick security and emergency access to any part of the city, even during the busiest Mardi Gras. The new ground level of the 9th Ward and other low lying areas should be raised 20 feet, not just build higher levees. I am talking about probably the largest landfill project in the history of America. If Japan can build an airport in the ocean by moving a mountain, America can raise the 9th Ward. </p>
<p>Considering summer temperatures of 110 and 120 percent humidity, let us also keep in mind that building generic, single family cube style houses like they&#8217;re building up in New York will require a lot of air conditioning to keep them cool. That will waste more energy in our new city, which of course is exactly what George Bush and the power companies want.<br />
The true challenge in designing the future architecture of New Orleans is to introduce the concept of environmentally sound and sustainable housing while doing as much as possible to maintain the look and feel of the Big Easy. Backsides of houses facing the sun are fitted with solar, while the front, shady side maintains a distinctive Mardi Gras style look. </p>
<p>I believe we can turn New New Orleans into a model city which other cities will copy for generations to come. On the other hand, we can also let our government, and good old American greed screw it up royally.<br />
We need to have a plan. A Big Plan, not just a whole bunch of little ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Kellogg</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-7972</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Kellogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-7972</guid>
		<description>Divide Louisiana between Texas and Mississippi, and sell New Orleans to Disney for a theme park. We could then add Guam as the 50th state to replace Louisiana (Puerto Rico won't make up it's mind about statehood for generations), and life would be better for everybody all around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Divide Louisiana between Texas and Mississippi, and sell New Orleans to Disney for a theme park. We could then add Guam as the 50th state to replace Louisiana (Puerto Rico won&#8217;t make up it&#8217;s mind about statehood for generations), and life would be better for everybody all around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-7962</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-7962</guid>
		<description>Just a suggestion, but if people are going to rebuild the city, how about moving it about 100 miles more inland? How stupid could you be to go right back to the same place and deal with all of the same problems. Let the delta regenerate while you sit back and create your beautiful city again. (shuttle service to the French Quarters is optional)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a suggestion, but if people are going to rebuild the city, how about moving it about 100 miles more inland? How stupid could you be to go right back to the same place and deal with all of the same problems. Let the delta regenerate while you sit back and create your beautiful city again. (shuttle service to the French Quarters is optional)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-7877</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 05:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-7877</guid>
		<description>re: Jim S

You confuse the shipping function of the area with the city of NO itself.  

Historically NO was the BIG port. But now shipping facilities exist for tens of miles around NO.  I saw the figure that NO itself has about 3000 people working at its port facilities but there are over 100,000 elsewhere in the region who do so.  

The original topic was rebuilding the city proper into some sort of paradise. That will benefit many, so we can expect wonderful claims will be made about how America cannot exist without the great flow of Mississippi commerce and the cultural richness of jazz, Mardi Gras, and above-ground burials.  

The truth is that the Mississippi commerce will continue even if not one acre of NO is rebuilt.  Some shippers will have to adjust but that is what business does.

I favor helping the city rebuild. Either do that or utterly raze it.  But don't just  let it rot.  And don't rebuild it as a massive social experiment for urban planners?  And why fear that we couldn't live without this very old and very battered few square miles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: Jim S</p>
<p>You confuse the shipping function of the area with the city of NO itself.  </p>
<p>Historically NO was the BIG port. But now shipping facilities exist for tens of miles around NO.  I saw the figure that NO itself has about 3000 people working at its port facilities but there are over 100,000 elsewhere in the region who do so.  </p>
<p>The original topic was rebuilding the city proper into some sort of paradise. That will benefit many, so we can expect wonderful claims will be made about how America cannot exist without the great flow of Mississippi commerce and the cultural richness of jazz, Mardi Gras, and above-ground burials.  </p>
<p>The truth is that the Mississippi commerce will continue even if not one acre of NO is rebuilt.  Some shippers will have to adjust but that is what business does.</p>
<p>I favor helping the city rebuild. Either do that or utterly raze it.  But don&#8217;t just  let it rot.  And don&#8217;t rebuild it as a massive social experiment for urban planners?  And why fear that we couldn&#8217;t live without this very old and very battered few square miles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim S</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-7836</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-7836</guid>
		<description>"The city is not vital to the ports. And the ports and shipping facilities were not much damaged." Wow. I guess all of the employees who work there are going to live in tents and have their food and everything else they need airlifted in or something, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The city is not vital to the ports. And the ports and shipping facilities were not much damaged.&#8221; Wow. I guess all of the employees who work there are going to live in tents and have their food and everything else they need airlifted in or something, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dries</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-7833</link>
		<dc:creator>dries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-7833</guid>
		<description>Perhaps we should  build another International Freedom Center in NO? just to prove that bad weather patterns are americans' fault.

4 years later, we cannot build a single edifice at WTC. at his rate. new orleans will take a century before anything happens, while La. politicians keep on stealing &#38; being (occasionally) locked up for it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps we should  build another International Freedom Center in NO? just to prove that bad weather patterns are americans&#8217; fault.</p>
<p>4 years later, we cannot build a single edifice at WTC. at his rate. new orleans will take a century before anything happens, while La. politicians keep on stealing &amp; being (occasionally) locked up for it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franky</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-7827</link>
		<dc:creator>Franky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-7827</guid>
		<description>Yeah that's all very interesting - but today's my birhtday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah that&#8217;s all very interesting - but today&#8217;s my birhtday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-7823</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-7823</guid>
		<description>These discussions confuse NO city with the shipping function of the general area.

The ports at the mouth of the Mississippi are very important and among the busiest in the world.
 
The city is not vital to the ports. And the ports and shipping facilities were not much damaged.

It is natural that the people of NO want massive aid. But it really doesn't matter if the city is restored. It is/was living on nostalgia and welfare, much of it old slums, with some life support from tourism themed around jazz legends and pagentry.

In other words "I like it" but in the way that I like a good magic show.  I neither believe it or consider it important.

As for a rebuilding plan bringing in the best engineers, academics, and planners - "Lord deliver us from such madness."  I guess the academics, etc. want some of those big federal checks too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These discussions confuse NO city with the shipping function of the general area.</p>
<p>The ports at the mouth of the Mississippi are very important and among the busiest in the world.</p>
<p>The city is not vital to the ports. And the ports and shipping facilities were not much damaged.</p>
<p>It is natural that the people of NO want massive aid. But it really doesn&#8217;t matter if the city is restored. It is/was living on nostalgia and welfare, much of it old slums, with some life support from tourism themed around jazz legends and pagentry.</p>
<p>In other words &#8220;I like it&#8221; but in the way that I like a good magic show.  I neither believe it or consider it important.</p>
<p>As for a rebuilding plan bringing in the best engineers, academics, and planners - &#8220;Lord deliver us from such madness.&#8221;  I guess the academics, etc. want some of those big federal checks too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marina Architect</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-7813</link>
		<dc:creator>Marina Architect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-7813</guid>
		<description>Congress is holding the 100B plus of funds. I'd invite as many of them as possible. In fact, it's a good opportunity for politicians to step and show some class. 

Allbaugh's Contractors want to make money by building a trailer park ghetto. Stop them before you do anything. That's why we need Democracy 2.0 before we can do anything.

For this to succeed it has to be a confluence of engineering, new urbanism and architecure. Look into New Urbanism, with 100B on the table, a lot can be done. Don't let Congress piss it away. 

That bridge to nowhere is still being built with a cost of over 200M. All the noise we made and it's still being built. Without Congress on board, Recovery 2.0 is going to turn into a "Bridge to Nowhere 2.0".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress is holding the 100B plus of funds. I&#8217;d invite as many of them as possible. In fact, it&#8217;s a good opportunity for politicians to step and show some class. </p>
<p>Allbaugh&#8217;s Contractors want to make money by building a trailer park ghetto. Stop them before you do anything. That&#8217;s why we need Democracy 2.0 before we can do anything.</p>
<p>For this to succeed it has to be a confluence of engineering, new urbanism and architecure. Look into New Urbanism, with 100B on the table, a lot can be done. Don&#8217;t let Congress piss it away. </p>
<p>That bridge to nowhere is still being built with a cost of over 200M. All the noise we made and it&#8217;s still being built. Without Congress on board, Recovery 2.0 is going to turn into a &#8220;Bridge to Nowhere 2.0&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-7812</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-7812</guid>
		<description>FWIW - before getting all hot and bothered about the Gulf Opportunity zone.  Similar rules have been in place in western Mississippi for more than a decade and 20 years earlier the Tenn-Tom waterway was a similar government pork trough that did little for the northern MS/AL corridor.  None of which has done much for the endemic poverty in the state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW - before getting all hot and bothered about the Gulf Opportunity zone.  Similar rules have been in place in western Mississippi for more than a decade and 20 years earlier the Tenn-Tom waterway was a similar government pork trough that did little for the northern MS/AL corridor.  None of which has done much for the endemic poverty in the state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-7811</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-7811</guid>
		<description>"How many people can this place support when it had no industry aside from tourism before the storm".

Jeff, do your homework.  New Orleans is the biggest port in the United States and the 3rd largest in the world.  Over 50% of our exported grain goes out through New Orleans, and a significant portion of our natural gas and oil come  in through there.

That such a critical resource was so poorly protected is a political battle we can fight if you want, but not rebuilding isn't an option unless you are willing to raise gasoline prices by 30% and cut our food exports by half.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How many people can this place support when it had no industry aside from tourism before the storm&#8221;.</p>
<p>Jeff, do your homework.  New Orleans is the biggest port in the United States and the 3rd largest in the world.  Over 50% of our exported grain goes out through New Orleans, and a significant portion of our natural gas and oil come  in through there.</p>
<p>That such a critical resource was so poorly protected is a political battle we can fight if you want, but not rebuilding isn&#8217;t an option unless you are willing to raise gasoline prices by 30% and cut our food exports by half.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred lapides</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-7807</link>
		<dc:creator>fred lapides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-7807</guid>
		<description>It seems just plain silly to consider how to make things better for the impoversished, assuming that any will rwill return, while at the same time ignoring the same poverty problem  throughout the nation. How can you "fix" poverty in New Orleans and ignore it nation-wide? Additionally, the pockets of extreme poverty exist in a number of communities along the Gulf region, and in Texas too.  Or do we simply build a new city and keep the poor out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems just plain silly to consider how to make things better for the impoversished, assuming that any will rwill return, while at the same time ignoring the same poverty problem  throughout the nation. How can you &#8220;fix&#8221; poverty in New Orleans and ignore it nation-wide? Additionally, the pockets of extreme poverty exist in a number of communities along the Gulf region, and in Texas too.  Or do we simply build a new city and keep the poor out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-7804</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-7804</guid>
		<description>Rebuilding the physical infrastructure of New Orleans is a simple task compared to getting its residents to build the "intellectual/emotional infrastructure" necessary to stop tolerating corruption and demand that state and local officials take their responsibilities seriously. The passive "someone else will take care of it" attitude found in NO and Louisiana was the biggest factor in that debacle, and I have no clue how you get people to start taking responsibility for their lives after generations of "letting the good times roll." How do you get an entire state to understand that sometimes the good times roll over you??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rebuilding the physical infrastructure of New Orleans is a simple task compared to getting its residents to build the &#8220;intellectual/emotional infrastructure&#8221; necessary to stop tolerating corruption and demand that state and local officials take their responsibilities seriously. The passive &#8220;someone else will take care of it&#8221; attitude found in NO and Louisiana was the biggest factor in that debacle, and I have no clue how you get people to start taking responsibility for their lives after generations of &#8220;letting the good times roll.&#8221; How do you get an entire state to understand that sometimes the good times roll over you??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YetAnotherRick</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-7801</link>
		<dc:creator>YetAnotherRick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-7801</guid>
		<description>Do not [re]build it. Not [t]here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do not [re]build it. Not [t]here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katrina Coverage</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-7800</link>
		<dc:creator>Katrina Coverage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-7800</guid>
		<description>What a wonderful plan! Unfortunately, Our Leader and others have already started on their own plans, which will probably end up being something most Americans don't want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a wonderful plan! Unfortunately, Our Leader and others have already started on their own plans, which will probably end up being something most Americans don&#8217;t want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-7796</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 17:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-7796</guid>
		<description>if you build in a floodplain,expect to be flooded,if you build on an earthquake fault,expect earthquakes,if you build where hurricanes hit,expect hurricanes,however the tax payer should't have to pay for stupidity..cavate empter..let the buyer beware</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you build in a floodplain,expect to be flooded,if you build on an earthquake fault,expect earthquakes,if you build where hurricanes hit,expect hurricanes,however the tax payer should&#8217;t have to pay for stupidity..cavate empter..let the buyer beware</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff m</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-7794</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 17:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-7794</guid>
		<description>The only public involvement should be the Corps of engineers  building a levee at the normal high water mark (ie somewhere above sea level and normal high river level).  All land on the low side of the levee should be condemned permanently.   It can be covered with grass and made into a park or something.  Tough luck for the property owners on the low side.  They knew their land was below flood level.

Beyond that.  Map out new perimeter expressways.  Condemn the property necessary for this.  Build the expressways.

Compensate the property owners on the low side of the levee about $10 per acre and offer them a bargain purchase price on similar sized pieces of state or federal land in the vicinity.  Compensate the property owners displaced by the perimeter road fair market value.

Do nothing else besides expediate building permits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only public involvement should be the Corps of engineers  building a levee at the normal high water mark (ie somewhere above sea level and normal high river level).  All land on the low side of the levee should be condemned permanently.   It can be covered with grass and made into a park or something.  Tough luck for the property owners on the low side.  They knew their land was below flood level.</p>
<p>Beyond that.  Map out new perimeter expressways.  Condemn the property necessary for this.  Build the expressways.</p>
<p>Compensate the property owners on the low side of the levee about $10 per acre and offer them a bargain purchase price on similar sized pieces of state or federal land in the vicinity.  Compensate the property owners displaced by the perimeter road fair market value.</p>
<p>Do nothing else besides expediate building permits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Burton</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/recovery-20-reimagining-new-orleans/#comment-7793</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=541#comment-7793</guid>
		<description>Ravo - actually environmentalists and private enterprise SHOULD be natural allies. It's an artifact of our accounting system that they're not. I highly recommend Jared Diamond's book &lt;i&gt;Collapse&lt;/i&gt;, btw - he gets flack from both sides. I also follow a lot of environmental economics discussion.

People are under the impression that corporations have higher profits as their primary goal. In reality, that's a strategy towards getting higher valuation. If actual social costs were accounted for, a "green" strategy would yield greater stockholder value, and we'd see more corporations acting more "responsibly" because it would be in their self interest. Markets are good things - I believe that one of the major roles of government should be to insure that they operate fairly and efficiently.

Much of the impetus for stronger emissions regulation, for example, are coming from large corporations. They understand the need, but don't want to be put at a short-term competitive disadvantage. Completely understandable, even if it blows up the "us vs them" rhetoric that too many people on both sides love. If you're interested, I can get some more links for you on these topics. Or just read my blog - I write about some of these issues fairly often.

Currently, our system rewards reactive, after-the-fact approaches rather than proactive, risk-reduction approaches. It's a complex issue, but it does go to the argument that our budgeting and priority systems are broken. Changing that requires a great deal more than the stale reformulations that both the "left" and the "right" provide us with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ravo - actually environmentalists and private enterprise SHOULD be natural allies. It&#8217;s an artifact of our accounting system that they&#8217;re not. I highly recommend Jared Diamond&#8217;s book <i>Collapse</i>, btw - he gets flack from both sides. I also follow a lot of environmental economics discussion.</p>
<p>People are under the impression that corporations have higher profits as their primary goal. In reality, that&#8217;s a strategy towards getting higher valuation. If actual social costs were accounted for, a &#8220;green&#8221; strategy would yield greater stockholder value, and we&#8217;d see more corporations acting more &#8220;responsibly&#8221; because it would be in their self interest. Markets are good things - I believe that one of the major roles of government should be to insure that they operate fairly and efficiently.</p>
<p>Much of the impetus for stronger emissions regulation, for example, are coming from large corporations. They understand the need, but don&#8217;t want to be put at a short-term competitive disadvantage. Completely understandable, even if it blows up the &#8220;us vs them&#8221; rhetoric that too many people on both sides love. If you&#8217;re interested, I can get some more links for you on these topics. Or just read my blog - I write about some of these issues fairly often.</p>
<p>Currently, our system rewards reactive, after-the-fact approaches rather than proactive, risk-reduction approaches. It&#8217;s a complex issue, but it does go to the argument that our budgeting and priority systems are broken. Changing that requires a great deal more than the stale reformulations that both the &#8220;left&#8221; and the &#8220;right&#8221; provide us with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
