<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seeing the forest for the flood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Goldstein&#8217;s CJR, episode 2</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-167563</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Goldstein&#8217;s CJR, episode 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 06:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-167563</guid>
		<description>[...] Rocky Mtn Blogger Bash attendees The Jarvis post *Jarvis responds World Wide Rant Resurrection Song The Blog of the Century of the Week Rocky Mountain News Linda Seebach [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rocky Mtn Blogger Bash attendees The Jarvis post *Jarvis responds World Wide Rant Resurrection Song The Blog of the Century of the Week Rocky Mountain News Linda Seebach [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mockmook</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-120548</link>
		<dc:creator>mockmook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 19:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-120548</guid>
		<description>JJ whined: "The story in New Orleans is much larger: all about what governmentâ€™s responsibilities are and whether government met those responsibilties and whether we can learn from the mistakes that government and others made and whether we will all be safer the next timeâ€¦"

Sorry to come in so late on this once lively debate ;-)

But, I have to ask, since no one else did:

WHAT ABOUT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF INDIVIDUALS????

* Responsibility to evacuate before Nagin gave "permission."

* Responsibility to prepare for a disaster (food, water, etc.)

* Responsibility to not live in "bowl" in NO

* Responsibility to elect competent leaders

* Responsibility to educate oneself (to be able to do the above)

Etc, etc, etc, ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JJ whined: &#8220;The story in New Orleans is much larger: all about what governmentâ€™s responsibilities are and whether government met those responsibilties and whether we can learn from the mistakes that government and others made and whether we will all be safer the next timeâ€¦&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry to come in so late on this once lively debate <img src='http://www.buzzmachine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But, I have to ask, since no one else did:</p>
<p>WHAT ABOUT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF INDIVIDUALS????</p>
<p>* Responsibility to evacuate before Nagin gave &#8220;permission.&#8221;</p>
<p>* Responsibility to prepare for a disaster (food, water, etc.)</p>
<p>* Responsibility to not live in &#8220;bowl&#8221; in NO</p>
<p>* Responsibility to elect competent leaders</p>
<p>* Responsibility to educate oneself (to be able to do the above)</p>
<p>Etc, etc, etc, &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-9144</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-9144</guid>
		<description>The Left's credo of its enemies: Guilty until proven innocent. Guilty if you disagree with the Left's credo. Guilty if you are not a member of its Tribe. GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Left&#8217;s credo of its enemies: Guilty until proven innocent. Guilty if you disagree with the Left&#8217;s credo. Guilty if you are not a member of its Tribe. GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thin skins</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-8295</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thin skins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2005 19:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-8295</guid>
		<description>[...] One canâ€™t help feeling that on some level - subconsciously, perhaps - PE feels like it is slumming it a bit, and is looking down its nose at the company it finds itself forced to keep. As much as I like Public Eye - and I do like it - their â€œjournalists stand here and bloggers stand thereâ€ vibe is detectable, and nothing demonstrates that better than these two battles the blog has now engaged in, with Jarvis and Hewitt&#8230; The Jarvis kerfluffle was minor. It was just odd that CBSNews.com&#8217;s Dick Meyer said I made his blood boil. I said he misunderstood or I misstated and in either case, he should cool his jets. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One canâ€™t help feeling that on some level - subconsciously, perhaps - PE feels like it is slumming it a bit, and is looking down its nose at the company it finds itself forced to keep. As much as I like Public Eye - and I do like it - their â€œjournalists stand here and bloggers stand thereâ€ vibe is detectable, and nothing demonstrates that better than these two battles the blog has now engaged in, with Jarvis and Hewitt&#8230; The Jarvis kerfluffle was minor. It was just odd that CBSNews.com&#8217;s Dick Meyer said I made his blood boil. I said he misunderstood or I misstated and in either case, he should cool his jets. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ironbear</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-8164</link>
		<dc:creator>Ironbear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 01:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-8164</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;"In the end, what is the real value of journalism?" - JJ&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Lately? Not much, it'd seem.

&lt;blockquote&gt;"Iâ€™ll hold all their damned feet to the fire." - JJ&lt;/blockquote&gt;

With what? Facts and data, or "a Higher Truth" than mere information? ;)

And are you going to light the fire with what's left of your credibility after this is all done?

You've been around long enough that I shouldn't have to remind you of the First Rule of Holes, but scanning through the comments here, looks like you need a refresher course: "when you're in one, stop digging."

As far as lessons go: You ain't a teacher, and I don't need any lessons you have to teach. Have a bigger shovel - it'll help you dig faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;In the end, what is the real value of journalism?&#8221; - JJ</p></blockquote>
<p>Lately? Not much, it&#8217;d seem.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Iâ€™ll hold all their damned feet to the fire.&#8221; - JJ</p></blockquote>
<p>With what? Facts and data, or &#8220;a Higher Truth&#8221; than mere information? <img src='http://www.buzzmachine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And are you going to light the fire with what&#8217;s left of your credibility after this is all done?</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve been around long enough that I shouldn&#8217;t have to remind you of the First Rule of Holes, but scanning through the comments here, looks like you need a refresher course: &#8220;when you&#8217;re in one, stop digging.&#8221;</p>
<p>As far as lessons go: You ain&#8217;t a teacher, and I don&#8217;t need any lessons you have to teach. Have a bigger shovel - it&#8217;ll help you dig faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corvan</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-8105</link>
		<dc:creator>corvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-8105</guid>
		<description>Owl 1, maybe you should look at Jeff's lates post on this.  According to Rosen, you're probably an "extreme Bush supporter."  I got to be a member of "the Bernie Goldberg hit squad."  If I were you I would be jealous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Owl 1, maybe you should look at Jeff&#8217;s lates post on this.  According to Rosen, you&#8217;re probably an &#8220;extreme Bush supporter.&#8221;  I got to be a member of &#8220;the Bernie Goldberg hit squad.&#8221;  If I were you I would be jealous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owl 1</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-8101</link>
		<dc:creator>owl 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-8101</guid>
		<description>Li said "Maybe the whole disaster response to Katrina was actually better"..

You will probably be strung up for even the suggestion but that is exactly what I was saying several days ago.   Everyone was giving those crying reporters pats on the back when I was on here rating them as F-.  Media touted Police Compass and Broussard.  I never believed a word of it because I saw a disaster that was hit with another diaster........the first responders in NO......and then the second responders in Baton Rouge.  Then the third responders looked to be dragging tail by 24 hours.  If you can get pass all that the media fed us, you can go looking for facts and what actually happened.  

I stand by my comments I made on this blog the week after Katrina.  I think FED gov was the shining star compared to the local government and the state government.  I think the people of the US are incredibly generous and TX state gov was inspirational with shelter and real help.  Mistakes...many...4 states, 90,000sq mile natural disaster.  We had laws, politicians and media that made this diaster worse than it needed to be.  

To this day, you still can NOT find a state governor that thinks the FEDS should have come in and took state control.  They all know what happened.  The question is........will the media continue to mis-stake the facts.  One of those facts is thousands of people were rescued.  I call that a pretty good response in the face of state incompetence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Li said &#8220;Maybe the whole disaster response to Katrina was actually better&#8221;..</p>
<p>You will probably be strung up for even the suggestion but that is exactly what I was saying several days ago.   Everyone was giving those crying reporters pats on the back when I was on here rating them as F-.  Media touted Police Compass and Broussard.  I never believed a word of it because I saw a disaster that was hit with another diaster&#8230;&#8230;..the first responders in NO&#8230;&#8230;and then the second responders in Baton Rouge.  Then the third responders looked to be dragging tail by 24 hours.  If you can get pass all that the media fed us, you can go looking for facts and what actually happened.  </p>
<p>I stand by my comments I made on this blog the week after Katrina.  I think FED gov was the shining star compared to the local government and the state government.  I think the people of the US are incredibly generous and TX state gov was inspirational with shelter and real help.  Mistakes&#8230;many&#8230;4 states, 90,000sq mile natural disaster.  We had laws, politicians and media that made this diaster worse than it needed to be.  </p>
<p>To this day, you still can NOT find a state governor that thinks the FEDS should have come in and took state control.  They all know what happened.  The question is&#8230;&#8230;..will the media continue to mis-stake the facts.  One of those facts is thousands of people were rescued.  I call that a pretty good response in the face of state incompetence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corvan</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-8094</link>
		<dc:creator>corvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-8094</guid>
		<description>Another interesting thing, now that the reporters have been proven wrong, they're trying desperately to change the subject.  I'm not just talking about one idealogical spectrum either, they're both doing it.  The same way politicians change the subject when they're wrong.  Maybe that's the problem.  Reporters like politicians, are smiply opinon shapers.  Facts just don't enter into the equation.  At least that certainly seems to be the gist of what Jeff has been saying.  But what do I know?  I'm a member of the Bernie Goldberg hit squad.  Still, if our host has another opinion on the matter I'd be happy to listen to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another interesting thing, now that the reporters have been proven wrong, they&#8217;re trying desperately to change the subject.  I&#8217;m not just talking about one idealogical spectrum either, they&#8217;re both doing it.  The same way politicians change the subject when they&#8217;re wrong.  Maybe that&#8217;s the problem.  Reporters like politicians, are smiply opinon shapers.  Facts just don&#8217;t enter into the equation.  At least that certainly seems to be the gist of what Jeff has been saying.  But what do I know?  I&#8217;m a member of the Bernie Goldberg hit squad.  Still, if our host has another opinion on the matter I&#8217;d be happy to listen to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JennyD</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-8037</link>
		<dc:creator>JennyD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-8037</guid>
		<description>Maybe it's not us, but the reporters who were racist. Maybe the reporters believed the rumors and reported them as fact because the people involved were black and poor. The news audience believed it because professional journalists told us it was true. (Also Nagin and his chief cop....who were happy to jump on the mayhem bandwagon.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s not us, but the reporters who were racist. Maybe the reporters believed the rumors and reported them as fact because the people involved were black and poor. The news audience believed it because professional journalists told us it was true. (Also Nagin and his chief cop&#8230;.who were happy to jump on the mayhem bandwagon.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-8036</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-8036</guid>
		<description>6 bodies found at Dome; 4 at Convention Center

In Houston, &lt;a href="http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/metropolitan/3372849" rel="nofollow"&gt;17&lt;/a&gt; out of 31 recorded deaths ... resulted from heat-related illnesses during the mass evacuation...none of the deaths occurred during the storm itself.

One could argue persuasively that there was planning failure in Houston, the contra flow didn't occur soon enough, gasoline tankers were not pre-position along the evacuation route, the overblown Katrina/Rita coverage compelled far greater number of voluntary evacuees to join in the exodus with the mandatory evacuees, rather than 1M on the road, they had 2.5M on the road.  (Notice with Rita there is less emphasis on whether it was FEMA or the federal government that failed in ensuring a safe evacuation of a heavily populated area.)

My concern about the Katrina coverage is that individuals in other urban areas may not seek shelter in public facilities in the event of a natural disaster.  If you were visiting Miami, Los Angeles, Detroit and were compelled to seek shelter in their respective convention centers, would you take your family there or would you try to ride it out in your hotel?

The image that stays with me from Katrina is the interview with the 12-year old girl screaming into the microphone, "we're going to die in here."  She should have been (metaphorically) slapped and told, "no, you're going to be absolutely miserable but you're going to live."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6 bodies found at Dome; 4 at Convention Center</p>
<p>In Houston, <a href="http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/metropolitan/3372849" rel="nofollow">17</a> out of 31 recorded deaths &#8230; resulted from heat-related illnesses during the mass evacuation&#8230;none of the deaths occurred during the storm itself.</p>
<p>One could argue persuasively that there was planning failure in Houston, the contra flow didn&#8217;t occur soon enough, gasoline tankers were not pre-position along the evacuation route, the overblown Katrina/Rita coverage compelled far greater number of voluntary evacuees to join in the exodus with the mandatory evacuees, rather than 1M on the road, they had 2.5M on the road.  (Notice with Rita there is less emphasis on whether it was FEMA or the federal government that failed in ensuring a safe evacuation of a heavily populated area.)</p>
<p>My concern about the Katrina coverage is that individuals in other urban areas may not seek shelter in public facilities in the event of a natural disaster.  If you were visiting Miami, Los Angeles, Detroit and were compelled to seek shelter in their respective convention centers, would you take your family there or would you try to ride it out in your hotel?</p>
<p>The image that stays with me from Katrina is the interview with the 12-year old girl screaming into the microphone, &#8220;we&#8217;re going to die in here.&#8221;  She should have been (metaphorically) slapped and told, &#8220;no, you&#8217;re going to be absolutely miserable but you&#8217;re going to live.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-8033</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-8033</guid>
		<description>Maybe these dudes are trying to say that getting the facts right isn't all that journos should be doing. It's possible to be perfectly accurate in the recitation of the facts and still be misleading, simply by being selective about which facts you mention and which ones you don't, after all.

Journos also don't want to be relegated to the role of being fact-collectors for the blogosphere, because the opining is way more fun. It could be that the driving force behind The Great New Orleans Media Riot of 2005 was the desire of the MSM not to be slave to the blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe these dudes are trying to say that getting the facts right isn&#8217;t all that journos should be doing. It&#8217;s possible to be perfectly accurate in the recitation of the facts and still be misleading, simply by being selective about which facts you mention and which ones you don&#8217;t, after all.</p>
<p>Journos also don&#8217;t want to be relegated to the role of being fact-collectors for the blogosphere, because the opining is way more fun. It could be that the driving force behind The Great New Orleans Media Riot of 2005 was the desire of the MSM not to be slave to the blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corvan</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-8009</link>
		<dc:creator>corvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 03:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-8009</guid>
		<description>Strange, over at NRO Jonah Goldberg has taken a stance on this issue that is sort of similar to Jeff's.  Apprently discounting accuracy is a journalism thing rather than a left-right thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange, over at NRO Jonah Goldberg has taken a stance on this issue that is sort of similar to Jeff&#8217;s.  Apprently discounting accuracy is a journalism thing rather than a left-right thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jody  Tresidder</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-8005</link>
		<dc:creator>Jody  Tresidder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 03:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-8005</guid>
		<description>Kat,
Which brings us round neatly to Jeff's peculiar thesis on the whole mess; that it is our responsibility to extract the right truth from the wrong facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kat,<br />
Which brings us round neatly to Jeff&#8217;s peculiar thesis on the whole mess; that it is our responsibility to extract the right truth from the wrong facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kat</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-7989</link>
		<dc:creator>kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 01:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-7989</guid>
		<description>Today, I heard some guy on CNN blame the lies on racism.  He said that had such lies been told in a white neighborhood, no one would believe them, but they were believed because the people were Blacks.  So it wasn't the media's fault for telling the whoppers--it was our fault for believing them.  We are racists for believing  what the media fed us 24-7 regarding rapes, murders, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, I heard some guy on CNN blame the lies on racism.  He said that had such lies been told in a white neighborhood, no one would believe them, but they were believed because the people were Blacks.  So it wasn&#8217;t the media&#8217;s fault for telling the whoppers&#8211;it was our fault for believing them.  We are racists for believing  what the media fed us 24-7 regarding rapes, murders, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Li</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-7976</link>
		<dc:creator>Li</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-7976</guid>
		<description>The thing that I believe is continually lost in this discussion and in so many others going around the internet, is that the death toll and mayhem from Katrina has ended up to be nowhere near what was originally predicted or feared (or rumored).  Katrina was absolutely beyond horrible and many families are suffering terribly.  I do not mean to diminish the deaths and destruction in ANY way.  However, by any realistic standard 1000 dead is just not the same level of catastrophe as 10,000 dead....especially in a wide-swath cat 4 hurricane that hit in  heavily populated areas.  It's just not. So, in my mind the whole story, the whole premise, is now rather different than it was presented early on with respect to blame or accountability-  whichever word you prefer.  Yet, it seems so many of us are still stuck at and reacting to the "original" premise and still (perhaps unconsciously) framing the story around that original (incorrect) premise of 10,000 deaths.

There is not one single level of government from the Parish administrators to City and State officials to the Federal government (including Congresses past and present) that did not make mistakes, did not miscalculate, did not mis-communicate, and did not fail to do things that should have been done to protect the populace both before and during the hurricane.  That is a fact.  It is undeniable.   No one deserves a "pass". As a society we absolutely must evaluate all those points of response and responsibility in a clear -headed way, learn from the mistakes and failures, replace officials where warranted, redraw disaster plans, and try to do a much, much better job next time. (All the while knowing that circumstances will be different "next time" and things WILL still go wrong next time.)

But, in all fairness, every one of those governmental entities mentioned above also planned things, and did things, and ordered things, and appropriated things and arranged things that certainly saved lives and helped prevent an even worse catastrophe from materializing.  Add to that the work of the private disaster response organizations. Maybe what they all did in concert was a large part of the difference between 10,000 and 1000 deaths?  Can we accept or even entertain that possibility?  Maybe the whole disaster reponse to Katrina was actually better than we have been able to admit.  Can we try to at least test that out as a frame for the story?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing that I believe is continually lost in this discussion and in so many others going around the internet, is that the death toll and mayhem from Katrina has ended up to be nowhere near what was originally predicted or feared (or rumored).  Katrina was absolutely beyond horrible and many families are suffering terribly.  I do not mean to diminish the deaths and destruction in ANY way.  However, by any realistic standard 1000 dead is just not the same level of catastrophe as 10,000 dead&#8230;.especially in a wide-swath cat 4 hurricane that hit in  heavily populated areas.  It&#8217;s just not. So, in my mind the whole story, the whole premise, is now rather different than it was presented early on with respect to blame or accountability-  whichever word you prefer.  Yet, it seems so many of us are still stuck at and reacting to the &#8220;original&#8221; premise and still (perhaps unconsciously) framing the story around that original (incorrect) premise of 10,000 deaths.</p>
<p>There is not one single level of government from the Parish administrators to City and State officials to the Federal government (including Congresses past and present) that did not make mistakes, did not miscalculate, did not mis-communicate, and did not fail to do things that should have been done to protect the populace both before and during the hurricane.  That is a fact.  It is undeniable.   No one deserves a &#8220;pass&#8221;. As a society we absolutely must evaluate all those points of response and responsibility in a clear -headed way, learn from the mistakes and failures, replace officials where warranted, redraw disaster plans, and try to do a much, much better job next time. (All the while knowing that circumstances will be different &#8220;next time&#8221; and things WILL still go wrong next time.)</p>
<p>But, in all fairness, every one of those governmental entities mentioned above also planned things, and did things, and ordered things, and appropriated things and arranged things that certainly saved lives and helped prevent an even worse catastrophe from materializing.  Add to that the work of the private disaster response organizations. Maybe what they all did in concert was a large part of the difference between 10,000 and 1000 deaths?  Can we accept or even entertain that possibility?  Maybe the whole disaster reponse to Katrina was actually better than we have been able to admit.  Can we try to at least test that out as a frame for the story?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-7975</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-7975</guid>
		<description>OT News Flash:  No More IFC at Ground Zero!

I just received this:

We are very pleased to announce that Governor Pataki has announced the removal of the International Freedom Center (IFC) from Ground Zero. See http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/28/AR2005092801849.html for details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT News Flash:  No More IFC at Ground Zero!</p>
<p>I just received this:</p>
<p>We are very pleased to announce that Governor Pataki has announced the removal of the International Freedom Center (IFC) from Ground Zero. See <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/28/AR2005092801849.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/28/AR2005092801849.html</a> for details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whodat</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-7951</link>
		<dc:creator>whodat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 19:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-7951</guid>
		<description>well have to agree to disagree there. Too many interests are in the oval office I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well have to agree to disagree there. Too many interests are in the oval office I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravo</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-7946</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-7946</guid>
		<description>WHODAT,

No one manages to do everything right, but with Bush I do think the intent is there byond most politicians.  Hopefully, some of the money kept out of the La corruption machine will find it's way back to the more deserving Vets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHODAT,</p>
<p>No one manages to do everything right, but with Bush I do think the intent is there byond most politicians.  Hopefully, some of the money kept out of the La corruption machine will find it&#8217;s way back to the more deserving Vets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravo</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-7944</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-7944</guid>
		<description>OK, Eileen...thanks..I will do the same tonight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Eileen&#8230;thanks..I will do the same tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravo</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-7943</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-7943</guid>
		<description>Marym...I don't pretend to know these things.  Because I don't know, I look to find truthful answers.  It doesn't seem we can easily find them.  

Did FEMA fail?  - Brown has been fired 



Is this correct?  I don't know...but I'd like to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marym&#8230;I don&#8217;t pretend to know these things.  Because I don&#8217;t know, I look to find truthful answers.  It doesn&#8217;t seem we can easily find them.  </p>
<p>Did FEMA fail?  - Brown has been fired </p>
<p>Is this correct?  I don&#8217;t know&#8230;but I&#8217;d like to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-7940</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-7940</guid>
		<description>Ravo,

Please do (and thanks).  I sent mine off about 10 minutes ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ravo,</p>
<p>Please do (and thanks).  I sent mine off about 10 minutes ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravo</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-7939</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-7939</guid>
		<description>With your permission, may I use your words?  I'd find it impossible to improve upon them.

Better, perhaps those who think Blanco ought not to get away with this, could use those paragraphs as well and send in as many as we can.

It bodes well to find out if Blanco is simply dense as some say, or if her motives were to extort.  Either way, she should not remain Gov.

She had a similiar delay with Ivan.  It would have gone much worse, had Ivan behaved like Katrina.  Blanco should have been dealt with last year, and perhaps this year some lives and suffering would have been spared.

http://www.cornpone.net/2004/09/big_easy_escape.html
From 2004  &lt;i&gt;In the meantime, a one-finger salute to our government officials here in Louisiana for the horrible effort at evacuation. Had Ivan taken a western turn, this would have been not only a major blow to New Orleans but a major loss of life. &lt;/i&gt;

And Broussard, IMHO he definitely needs some sort of legal action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With your permission, may I use your words?  I&#8217;d find it impossible to improve upon them.</p>
<p>Better, perhaps those who think Blanco ought not to get away with this, could use those paragraphs as well and send in as many as we can.</p>
<p>It bodes well to find out if Blanco is simply dense as some say, or if her motives were to extort.  Either way, she should not remain Gov.</p>
<p>She had a similiar delay with Ivan.  It would have gone much worse, had Ivan behaved like Katrina.  Blanco should have been dealt with last year, and perhaps this year some lives and suffering would have been spared.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cornpone.net/2004/09/big_easy_escape.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cornpone.net/2004/09/big_easy_escape.html</a><br />
From 2004  <i>In the meantime, a one-finger salute to our government officials here in Louisiana for the horrible effort at evacuation. Had Ivan taken a western turn, this would have been not only a major blow to New Orleans but a major loss of life. </i></p>
<p>And Broussard, IMHO he definitely needs some sort of legal action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marym</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-7936</link>
		<dc:creator>marym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-7936</guid>
		<description>Ravo,  best wishes in your loss of your mother.  

I read the piece you sent a cite for: am curious:
"There were DMAT teams inside the Super Dome before the levee broke.  Never before had so many FEMA teams and personnel been sent into a disaster.  

One thing you must understand: the DMAT, VMAT, and DMORT teams that make up the National Disaster Medical System are NOT "first responders."  Our job is to supplement overwhelmed communities if needed.  The initial responsibility lies with the state.  If they become overwhelmed in the aftermath of a disaster where their local hospitals, medical, veterinary, and mortuary assets cannot handle the magnitude of the disaster, we come in and augment their resources.  It takes 24 to 48 hours to mobilize the federal assets in normal circumstances.  We come from every state in the United States, leaving our jobs and families behind at the drop of a hat to help where ever it is needed.  Our cache of equipment and medical supplies must either be moved from our home base or from the federal warehouses in Maryland by truck or plane.  This takes time.  But we were there before Katrina hit and many more arrived immediately after even before knowing the full scope of this disaster. "

Why, then, is Brown declaring that FEMA is small in force and has the job only of 'coordinating other relief agencies'?  Curiouser and curiouser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ravo,  best wishes in your loss of your mother.  </p>
<p>I read the piece you sent a cite for: am curious:<br />
&#8220;There were DMAT teams inside the Super Dome before the levee broke.  Never before had so many FEMA teams and personnel been sent into a disaster.  </p>
<p>One thing you must understand: the DMAT, VMAT, and DMORT teams that make up the National Disaster Medical System are NOT &#8220;first responders.&#8221;  Our job is to supplement overwhelmed communities if needed.  The initial responsibility lies with the state.  If they become overwhelmed in the aftermath of a disaster where their local hospitals, medical, veterinary, and mortuary assets cannot handle the magnitude of the disaster, we come in and augment their resources.  It takes 24 to 48 hours to mobilize the federal assets in normal circumstances.  We come from every state in the United States, leaving our jobs and families behind at the drop of a hat to help where ever it is needed.  Our cache of equipment and medical supplies must either be moved from our home base or from the federal warehouses in Maryland by truck or plane.  This takes time.  But we were there before Katrina hit and many more arrived immediately after even before knowing the full scope of this disaster. &#8221;</p>
<p>Why, then, is Brown declaring that FEMA is small in force and has the job only of &#8216;coordinating other relief agencies&#8217;?  Curiouser and curiouser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whodat</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-7934</link>
		<dc:creator>whodat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-7934</guid>
		<description>"We finally have an honest man leading us who has the courage to do the unpopular but necessary things, content that â€œhistory will judge himâ€ after he has gone.

God bless how goes about quietly ignoring the fools who so unspeakably attack him. I cannot believe the grace he has shown under all this."

Can I sue Ravo and/or Buzz Machine? I totally gagged on a wheat thin and almost choked when I was reading that.

He is not honest. He is a politician. Unpopular but necessary things? Like cutting the Vets budget?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We finally have an honest man leading us who has the courage to do the unpopular but necessary things, content that â€œhistory will judge himâ€ after he has gone.</p>
<p>God bless how goes about quietly ignoring the fools who so unspeakably attack him. I cannot believe the grace he has shown under all this.&#8221;</p>
<p>Can I sue Ravo and/or Buzz Machine? I totally gagged on a wheat thin and almost choked when I was reading that.</p>
<p>He is not honest. He is a politician. Unpopular but necessary things? Like cutting the Vets budget?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/09/27/seeing-the-forest-for-the-flood/#comment-7933</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=548#comment-7933</guid>
		<description>Ravo,

It might be interesting to pose a few queries to the U.S. Department of Justice:  http://www.usdoj.gov/

There are plenty of examples of Federal indictments against former governors.  As to sitting governors?  I don't know.

A few questions might include:

1.  It is my understanding that the state of LA prevented the Red Cross from entering New Orleans to provide emergency relief, including food and water, in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina.  That fact is clearly stated at the Red Cross web site.  Is there any consideration for indicting Kathleen Blanco for deaths which resulted from her decision to prevent aid from reaching folks at the Superdome and Convention Center?

2.  It is my understanding from a televised interview of Mayor Nagin that there were "turf wars" between Governor Blanco and President Bush related to "money" at a time when she was continuing to deny Federal offers of assistance to coordinate the evacuation of New Orleans.  Was Blanco attempting to extort money from the federal government in exchange for local cooperation?  Is this a matter of investigation at the DOJ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ravo,</p>
<p>It might be interesting to pose a few queries to the U.S. Department of Justice:  <a href="http://www.usdoj.gov/" rel="nofollow">http://www.usdoj.gov/</a></p>
<p>There are plenty of examples of Federal indictments against former governors.  As to sitting governors?  I don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>A few questions might include:</p>
<p>1.  It is my understanding that the state of LA prevented the Red Cross from entering New Orleans to provide emergency relief, including food and water, in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina.  That fact is clearly stated at the Red Cross web site.  Is there any consideration for indicting Kathleen Blanco for deaths which resulted from her decision to prevent aid from reaching folks at the Superdome and Convention Center?</p>
<p>2.  It is my understanding from a televised interview of Mayor Nagin that there were &#8220;turf wars&#8221; between Governor Blanco and President Bush related to &#8220;money&#8221; at a time when she was continuing to deny Federal offers of assistance to coordinate the evacuation of New Orleans.  Was Blanco attempting to extort money from the federal government in exchange for local cooperation?  Is this a matter of investigation at the DOJ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
