<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Take your chances</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:15:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: clevelander</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-9358</link>
		<dc:creator>clevelander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 02:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-9358</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m picturing &quot;The 60 Year Old Virgins&quot; or: &quot;When Harriet met Souter.&quot;
kissy-kissy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m picturing &#8220;The 60 Year Old Virgins&#8221; or: &#8220;When Harriet met Souter.&#8221;<br />
kissy-kissy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8816</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 13:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8816</guid>
		<description>Jeff, that gay crack is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wonkette.com/politics/harriet-miers/index.php#notsowild-about-harriet-128694&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;still up there...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, that gay crack is <a href="http://www.wonkette.com/politics/harriet-miers/index.php#notsowild-about-harriet-128694" rel="nofollow">still up there&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8798</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 13:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8798</guid>
		<description>The bible-thumpers wanted to, and felt they had earned the right to,  appoint a fellow thumper. They don&#039;t want anyone that would seem to be anywhere near the middle. &quot;Rule the nation as God intended&quot; and all that.

The really scary part of this nomination, however, is the true intent, and it ties into what I said above - she would be nothing more than a tool, a bought jurist, to advance Republican agendas.

They plan on dirty dealing in elections from years to come, on gutting environmental and social legislation, on destroying public schools, etc. They can&#039;t have any pesky judges who are actually familiar with constitutional law interfering with their plans. They&#039;re putting in their rubber stamp.

More &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slingshot.org/?p=134&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2005_10_02_digbysblog_archive.html#112836485644404749&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2005_10_02_digbysblog_archive.html#112841044831282887&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;some interesting history here.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bible-thumpers wanted to, and felt they had earned the right to,  appoint a fellow thumper. They don&#8217;t want anyone that would seem to be anywhere near the middle. &#8220;Rule the nation as God intended&#8221; and all that.</p>
<p>The really scary part of this nomination, however, is the true intent, and it ties into what I said above &#8211; she would be nothing more than a tool, a bought jurist, to advance Republican agendas.</p>
<p>They plan on dirty dealing in elections from years to come, on gutting environmental and social legislation, on destroying public schools, etc. They can&#8217;t have any pesky judges who are actually familiar with constitutional law interfering with their plans. They&#8217;re putting in their rubber stamp.</p>
<p>More <a href="http://www.slingshot.org/?p=134" rel="nofollow">here</a> and <a href="http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2005_10_02_digbysblog_archive.html#112836485644404749" rel="nofollow">here</a> and <a href="http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2005_10_02_digbysblog_archive.html#112841044831282887" rel="nofollow">some interesting history here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8753</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 10:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8753</guid>
		<description>It seems the religious conservatives are at least as put off about the general good reception this appointment is getting as by the lack of credentials Ms. Miers has for membership in their camp.   Let&#039;s see now, did a big puncture just call off the coming storm?  Maybe it&#039;s a big loss in fundraising opportunities, to cite the administrations most recent line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems the religious conservatives are at least as put off about the general good reception this appointment is getting as by the lack of credentials Ms. Miers has for membership in their camp.   Let&#8217;s see now, did a big puncture just call off the coming storm?  Maybe it&#8217;s a big loss in fundraising opportunities, to cite the administrations most recent line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8566</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 02:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8566</guid>
		<description>Okay, that&#039;s just stupid.  How about if we take the lamest job you ever had and introduce you as that. I know it would be a killer for me.

Former convenience store emloyee
Former bartender
Former bar owner
Former tree trimmer

You see, you can make anyone look like a dumbass if you try hard enough. It&#039;s also very classy that you cited the ever-reputable Wonkette for the gay-baiting comment. Of course, being a member of the NY elite, I&#039;m sure you never stooped to those lows to pay for school.

None of you know the first thing about this woman, not her beliefs, not her philosophy, not her moral positions. Is this the sum of citizen journalism? If it is, it doesn&#039;t sound much different than the crap that the AP makes up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, that&#8217;s just stupid.  How about if we take the lamest job you ever had and introduce you as that. I know it would be a killer for me.</p>
<p>Former convenience store emloyee<br />
Former bartender<br />
Former bar owner<br />
Former tree trimmer</p>
<p>You see, you can make anyone look like a dumbass if you try hard enough. It&#8217;s also very classy that you cited the ever-reputable Wonkette for the gay-baiting comment. Of course, being a member of the NY elite, I&#8217;m sure you never stooped to those lows to pay for school.</p>
<p>None of you know the first thing about this woman, not her beliefs, not her philosophy, not her moral positions. Is this the sum of citizen journalism? If it is, it doesn&#8217;t sound much different than the crap that the AP makes up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8461</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 18:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8461</guid>
		<description>&quot;Harriet could have become a conservative in Washington, but unless she did, she doesnâ€™t have any particular judicial philosophyâ€¦ I never heard her take a position on anythingâ€¦ Weâ€™ll have another Sandra Day Oâ€™Connorâ€¦ Harriet worships the president and has called him the smartest man sheâ€™s known. Sheâ€™s a pretty good lawyerâ€¦. This president can be bamboozled by anyone he feels close to. If a person fawns on him enough, is loyal, works 25 hours a day and says youâ€™re the smartest man I ever met, all of a sudden youâ€™re right for the Supreme Court.&quot;

This is from a Christian/Conservative web site that doesn&#039;t think she is Christian/Conservative enough. 

Powerline isn&#039;t too pleased either.

Scary how unabashedly psychotic conservative commentators are, when government officials aren&#039;t as wingnutty as them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Harriet could have become a conservative in Washington, but unless she did, she doesnâ€™t have any particular judicial philosophyâ€¦ I never heard her take a position on anythingâ€¦ Weâ€™ll have another Sandra Day Oâ€™Connorâ€¦ Harriet worships the president and has called him the smartest man sheâ€™s known. Sheâ€™s a pretty good lawyerâ€¦. This president can be bamboozled by anyone he feels close to. If a person fawns on him enough, is loyal, works 25 hours a day and says youâ€™re the smartest man I ever met, all of a sudden youâ€™re right for the Supreme Court.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is from a Christian/Conservative web site that doesn&#8217;t think she is Christian/Conservative enough. </p>
<p>Powerline isn&#8217;t too pleased either.</p>
<p>Scary how unabashedly psychotic conservative commentators are, when government officials aren&#8217;t as wingnutty as them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8460</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 18:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8460</guid>
		<description>Ah Mike D, you&#039;ve been tricked for 5 years now.

He also said he didn&#039;t think our military should be used for nation-building. He&#039;s &lt;i&gt;said&lt;/i&gt; hundreds of things, while &lt;i&gt;doing&lt;/i&gt; the complete opposite.

GWB is the creation of corporate lobbyists. He is no more a conservative than I am a unicorn.

Money and power for his buddies and sycophants. That is the Bush presidency.

And it always kills me when wingers decry &quot;activist judges,&quot; when that&#039;s exactly what they want, but just &quot;activisting&quot; in their general direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah Mike D, you&#8217;ve been tricked for 5 years now.</p>
<p>He also said he didn&#8217;t think our military should be used for nation-building. He&#8217;s <i>said</i> hundreds of things, while <i>doing</i> the complete opposite.</p>
<p>GWB is the creation of corporate lobbyists. He is no more a conservative than I am a unicorn.</p>
<p>Money and power for his buddies and sycophants. That is the Bush presidency.</p>
<p>And it always kills me when wingers decry &#8220;activist judges,&#8221; when that&#8217;s exactly what they want, but just &#8220;activisting&#8221; in their general direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Donovan</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8458</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Donovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8458</guid>
		<description>I voted for Bush SOLELY because of his campaign statements that his &quot;models&quot; for a Supreme Court justice were Scalia and Thomas. There are plenty of people with track records of fighting back the judicial activism in the courts - he picks two with ZERO experience on the front lines. The reason? GWB does not WANT to change the direction of the court. On too many issues GWB has proven he is simply not an activist conservative, but a squishy establishment Republican just like his father. Immigration comes to mind. The deficit. However, I really thought his campaign promise with SCOTUS would be kept. He has chosen two people with no track record that shows a constructionist view ala Scalia and Thomas. Bottom line: I FEEL TRICKED.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I voted for Bush SOLELY because of his campaign statements that his &#8220;models&#8221; for a Supreme Court justice were Scalia and Thomas. There are plenty of people with track records of fighting back the judicial activism in the courts &#8211; he picks two with ZERO experience on the front lines. The reason? GWB does not WANT to change the direction of the court. On too many issues GWB has proven he is simply not an activist conservative, but a squishy establishment Republican just like his father. Immigration comes to mind. The deficit. However, I really thought his campaign promise with SCOTUS would be kept. He has chosen two people with no track record that shows a constructionist view ala Scalia and Thomas. Bottom line: I FEEL TRICKED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8457</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8457</guid>
		<description>i&#039;d hit it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;d hit it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8455</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8455</guid>
		<description>http://harrietmiers.blogspot.com/

She&#039;s blogging already!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://harrietmiers.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://harrietmiers.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>She&#8217;s blogging already!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EverKarl</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8454</link>
		<dc:creator>EverKarl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8454</guid>
		<description>Looks like Harry Reid and even Chuck Schumer are happy, so I wouldn&#039;t be predicting she gets rejected.  The GOP taking a bath in &#039;06 would be a safer bet (though I wouldn&#039;t predict that more than a year out, either).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Harry Reid and even Chuck Schumer are happy, so I wouldn&#8217;t be predicting she gets rejected.  The GOP taking a bath in &#8216;06 would be a safer bet (though I wouldn&#8217;t predict that more than a year out, either).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marym</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8449</link>
		<dc:creator>marym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 16:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8449</guid>
		<description>Who knew Bush was looking for his own Janet Reno?  Perfect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who knew Bush was looking for his own Janet Reno?  Perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Attila (Pillage Idiot)</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8443</link>
		<dc:creator>Attila (Pillage Idiot)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 16:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8443</guid>
		<description>From a man who campaigned on appointing justices like Scalia and Thomas, this no-paper-trail garbage makes him look like he&#039;s embarrassed by his own position.  I suspect the trouble he had with the Bolton nomination has made him a little gunshy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a man who campaigned on appointing justices like Scalia and Thomas, this no-paper-trail garbage makes him look like he&#8217;s embarrassed by his own position.  I suspect the trouble he had with the Bolton nomination has made him a little gunshy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff m</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8442</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 16:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8442</guid>
		<description>She is the throwaway nomination.
Bush knows the next one will be rejected no matter what.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She is the throwaway nomination.<br />
Bush knows the next one will be rejected no matter what.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duneview</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8441</link>
		<dc:creator>Duneview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 16:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8441</guid>
		<description>The right is dissappointed; the left is perplexed. 

I learned long ago not to blithely wager against W - &quot;misunderestimate&quot; and all that.

But if you&#039;re looking for a little action, I&#039;d look into the Under/Over pool - I&#039;m heavy on the Over for use of the words &quot;crony&quot; and &quot;inexperienced&quot; by the MSM during the next few days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The right is dissappointed; the left is perplexed. </p>
<p>I learned long ago not to blithely wager against W &#8211; &#8220;misunderestimate&#8221; and all that.</p>
<p>But if you&#8217;re looking for a little action, I&#8217;d look into the Under/Over pool &#8211; I&#8217;m heavy on the Over for use of the words &#8220;crony&#8221; and &#8220;inexperienced&#8221; by the MSM during the next few days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8439</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 15:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8439</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/attytood/archives/002383.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;More&lt;/a&gt; good stuff...

I would think that if they were trying a fakeout nomination, they would bring up a REALLY scray religious wingnut. That would appease the Robertsons and Dobsons of the world. When the nomination gets blocked, Bush shrugs and nominates a regular-strength winger.

But this woman? She&#039;s a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/attytood/archives/002383.html" rel="nofollow">More</a> good stuff&#8230;</p>
<p>I would think that if they were trying a fakeout nomination, they would bring up a REALLY scray religious wingnut. That would appease the Robertsons and Dobsons of the world. When the nomination gets blocked, Bush shrugs and nominates a regular-strength winger.</p>
<p>But this woman? She&#8217;s a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8436</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 15:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/03/take-your-chances/#comment-8436</guid>
		<description>I thought this part of Wonkette&#039;s post was funnier:
She&#039;s nit-picky micromanager who failed upwards at the White House: &quot;She failed in Card&#039;s office for two reasons,&quot; the [former White House] official says. &quot;First, because she can&#039;t make a decision, and second, because she can&#039;t delegate, she can&#039;t let anything go. And having failed for those two reasons, they move her to be the counsel for the president, which requires exactly those two talents.&quot;

Yet another sign of the incompetence running rampant in this administration.

Political hacks for Supreme Court! What could go wrong?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this part of Wonkette&#8217;s post was funnier:<br />
She&#8217;s nit-picky micromanager who failed upwards at the White House: &#8220;She failed in Card&#8217;s office for two reasons,&#8221; the [former White House] official says. &#8220;First, because she can&#8217;t make a decision, and second, because she can&#8217;t delegate, she can&#8217;t let anything go. And having failed for those two reasons, they move her to be the counsel for the president, which requires exactly those two talents.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yet another sign of the incompetence running rampant in this administration.</p>
<p>Political hacks for Supreme Court! What could go wrong?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
