<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dumb and dumber money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:43:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JH</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10335</link>
		<dc:creator>JH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 16:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10335</guid>
		<description>Methinks this is an effort by Yahoo to drive up the price paid by Google/Comcast or Microsoft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Methinks this is an effort by Yahoo to drive up the price paid by Google/Comcast or Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EverKarl</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10276</link>
		<dc:creator>EverKarl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 23:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10276</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve mentioned it before -- the search engine dollars attached to AOL traffic makes a Google-Yahoo tussle inevitable.  It&#039;s just a matter of how rational the parties are in valuing those dollars going forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve mentioned it before &#8212; the search engine dollars attached to AOL traffic makes a Google-Yahoo tussle inevitable.  It&#8217;s just a matter of how rational the parties are in valuing those dollars going forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carson Fire</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10275</link>
		<dc:creator>Carson Fire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 23:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10275</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t get me wrong, I hate AOL. But from a ground view, there are still *metric tons* of people who use and rely on AOL. I can imagine a Google-AOL teaming would actually be quite a powerhouse.

AOL might have been a bad investment for Time-Warner at the time, but Time-Warner didn&#039;t seem to have any forward-thinking imagination about what to *do* with AOL. They *let* it become an albatross around their neck. A smarter company will exploit AOL&#039;s potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I hate AOL. But from a ground view, there are still *metric tons* of people who use and rely on AOL. I can imagine a Google-AOL teaming would actually be quite a powerhouse.</p>
<p>AOL might have been a bad investment for Time-Warner at the time, but Time-Warner didn&#8217;t seem to have any forward-thinking imagination about what to *do* with AOL. They *let* it become an albatross around their neck. A smarter company will exploit AOL&#8217;s potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Lanier</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10240</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Lanier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 04:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10240</guid>
		<description>Three letters:  AIM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three letters:  AIM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALT1040 &#187; AOL es una pesadilla</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10228</link>
		<dc:creator>ALT1040 &#187; AOL es una pesadilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 01:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10228</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8212; Jeff Jarvis refiriÃ©ndose al hecho que ahora Yahoo! tambiÃ©n quiere comprar AOL.   CategorÃ­as: Citas. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &mdash; Jeff Jarvis refiriÃ©ndose al hecho que ahora Yahoo! tambiÃ©n quiere comprar AOL.   CategorÃ­as: Citas. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10224</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 01:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10224</guid>
		<description>Well, Time Warner has done nothing with AOL (with the exception of rotating that little triangle 90 degrees clockwise). Hell, they&#039;ve even kept Road Runner and AOL separate. Yahoo and Google have made a boatload of cash on the Internet, and Microsoft ain&#039;t too shabby. These are companies that know how to handle the web; Time Warner has always done very well with its magazines and movie studios, not to mention networks and cable stations. Read: Old media. TW took a floater and left it in the pooper. These other companies might actually know what to do with the pieces of AOL they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Time Warner has done nothing with AOL (with the exception of rotating that little triangle 90 degrees clockwise). Hell, they&#8217;ve even kept Road Runner and AOL separate. Yahoo and Google have made a boatload of cash on the Internet, and Microsoft ain&#8217;t too shabby. These are companies that know how to handle the web; Time Warner has always done very well with its magazines and movie studios, not to mention networks and cable stations. Read: Old media. TW took a floater and left it in the pooper. These other companies might actually know what to do with the pieces of AOL they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Tolles</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10220</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Tolles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 23:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10220</guid>
		<description>Hey -- from one AOL..sorry..TWX..shareholder/ex-employee to another -- the best chance of TWX stock going up is a change in the perception of AOL by the market.  The $8B in revenues AOL brings to the party contributes a chunk of bottom line for these guys -- would be nice to get a nice Web 2.0 multiplier going...

Now, the chances of those sour grapes fermenting into anything worth drinking are somewhat remote for those of us holding since the 90&#039;s, but this is exactly the kind of thing we&#039;re going to need for things to be good here.

Besides, almost everyone involved in the initial transaction has had their Shakespearean stage exit already -- visiting the sins of the father unto the sons is what you&#039;re left with today...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey &#8212; from one AOL..sorry..TWX..shareholder/ex-employee to another &#8212; the best chance of TWX stock going up is a change in the perception of AOL by the market.  The $8B in revenues AOL brings to the party contributes a chunk of bottom line for these guys &#8212; would be nice to get a nice Web 2.0 multiplier going&#8230;</p>
<p>Now, the chances of those sour grapes fermenting into anything worth drinking are somewhat remote for those of us holding since the 90&#8217;s, but this is exactly the kind of thing we&#8217;re going to need for things to be good here.</p>
<p>Besides, almost everyone involved in the initial transaction has had their Shakespearean stage exit already &#8212; visiting the sins of the father unto the sons is what you&#8217;re left with today&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10215</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10215</guid>
		<description>Check out their ad biz turnaround... the company actually IS viable again...
http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2005/10/14/a_reinvented_aol_is_luring_big_time_suitors/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out their ad biz turnaround&#8230; the company actually IS viable again&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2005/10/14/a_reinvented_aol_is_luring_big_time_suitors/" rel="nofollow">http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2005/10/14/a_reinvented_aol_is_luring_big_time_suitors/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10213</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10213</guid>
		<description>Jeff -- You&#039;ve done your duty by sounding the &quot;buyer beware&quot; signal.  Now, shut up and let them swarm.  I too am holding from days gone by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff &#8212; You&#8217;ve done your duty by sounding the &#8220;buyer beware&#8221; signal.  Now, shut up and let them swarm.  I too am holding from days gone by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10209</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10209</guid>
		<description>But is it a &lt;em&gt;pump-and-dump&lt;/em&gt;-able nightmare? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But is it a <em>pump-and-dump</em>-able nightmare? <img src='http://www.buzzmachine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mumblix Grumph</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10206</link>
		<dc:creator>Mumblix Grumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 20:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/14/dumb-and-dumber-money/#comment-10206</guid>
		<description>What the hell?  Are people getting nostalgic for the good ol&#039; dot-com boom of the 90&#039;s?

Maybe I can finally unload all that Pets.com stock!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the hell?  Are people getting nostalgic for the good ol&#8217; dot-com boom of the 90&#8217;s?</p>
<p>Maybe I can finally unload all that Pets.com stock!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

