<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who owns the wisdom of the crowd? The crowd.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:40:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: My cyberspace bill of rights &#124; Richard Hartley</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-459271</link>
		<dc:creator>My cyberspace bill of rights &#124; Richard Hartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 23:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-459271</guid>
		<description>[...] of control or creation. This principle also raises questions about whether the wisdom of the crowd belongs to the crowdVII. We have the right to our own identity. This is not as simple as a name. Our identity online is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of control or creation. This principle also raises questions about whether the wisdom of the crowd belongs to the crowdVII. We have the right to our own identity. This is not as simple as a name. Our identity online is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Consultoría artesana en red &#187; Propiedad del conocimiento</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-459250</link>
		<dc:creator>Consultoría artesana en red &#187; Propiedad del conocimiento</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 16:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-459250</guid>
		<description>[...] superinteresantes las reflexiones que leo en este post acerca de la &#8220;propiedad de la sabiduría de las multitudes&#8221;. Está en el blog de BuzzMachine, de Jeff Jarvis. Llego a él, como otras muchas veces, a través [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] superinteresantes las reflexiones que leo en este post acerca de la &#8220;propiedad de la sabiduría de las multitudes&#8221;. Está en el blog de BuzzMachine, de Jeff Jarvis. Llego a él, como otras muchas veces, a través [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;getting Attention&#8221; &#8211; Identity Woman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-446601</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;getting Attention&#8221; &#8211; Identity Woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-446601</guid>
		<description>[...] the crowd really could not follow what he was saying or get it. This article makes it really clear. Who owns the wisdom of the crowd? The Crowd. There was much discussion about the point at which things do get screwed up: Somebody grows by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the crowd really could not follow what he was saying or get it. This article makes it really clear. Who owns the wisdom of the crowd? The Crowd. There was much discussion about the point at which things do get screwed up: Somebody grows by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: INFO Kappa &#187; Esentialul despre cautarea pe Internet IK 171</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-430991</link>
		<dc:creator>INFO Kappa &#187; Esentialul despre cautarea pe Internet IK 171</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 07:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-430991</guid>
		<description>[...] Cui ii apartine intelepciunea maselor? http://www.buzzmachine.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cui ii apartine intelepciunea maselor? <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.buzzmachine.com</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Consultoría artesana en red &#187; ¿Quién se beneficia de tu trabajo?</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-429089</link>
		<dc:creator>Consultoría artesana en red &#187; ¿Quién se beneficia de tu trabajo?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 04:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-429089</guid>
		<description>[...] interesante la de Howard Rheingold en Smart Mobs a partir de dos artículos: Who owns the wisdom of the crowd de Jeff Jarvis y What the MySpace generation should know about working for free de Trevor Scholz. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] interesante la de Howard Rheingold en Smart Mobs a partir de dos artículos: Who owns the wisdom of the crowd de Jeff Jarvis y What the MySpace generation should know about working for free de Trevor Scholz. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The price of privacy &#171; BuzzMachine</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-420811</link>
		<dc:creator>The price of privacy &#171; BuzzMachine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-420811</guid>
		<description>[...] publicness raises all sorts of issues around ownership. Who owns the wisdom of the crowed? The crowd? Or the company that adds value to it? See also the questions above about making free [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] publicness raises all sorts of issues around ownership. Who owns the wisdom of the crowed? The crowd? Or the company that adds value to it? See also the questions above about making free [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stumblers.Net &#8250; Jarvis: Google is defending citizens of the net</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-411025</link>
		<dc:creator>Stumblers.Net &#8250; Jarvis: Google is defending citizens of the net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-411025</guid>
		<description>[...] VI. We have the right to control our data. You should have access to data about you. And what&#8217;s yours is yours. We want the internet to operate on a principle of portability, so your information and creations cannot be held prisoner by a service or government and so you retain control. But keep in mind that when control is given to one, it is taken from another; in those details lurk devils. This principle thus speaks to copyright and its laws, which set the definitions and limits of control or creation. This principle also raises questions about whether the wisdom of the crowd belongs to the crowd [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VI. We have the right to control our data. You should have access to data about you. And what&#8217;s yours is yours. We want the internet to operate on a principle of portability, so your information and creations cannot be held prisoner by a service or government and so you retain control. But keep in mind that when control is given to one, it is taken from another; in those details lurk devils. This principle thus speaks to copyright and its laws, which set the definitions and limits of control or creation. This principle also raises questions about whether the wisdom of the crowd belongs to the crowd [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Bill of Rights in Cyberspace &#171; cubicgarden.com&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-411015</link>
		<dc:creator>A Bill of Rights in Cyberspace &#171; cubicgarden.com&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-411015</guid>
		<description>[...] of control or creation. This principle also raises questions about whether the wisdom of the crowd belongs to the crowd.   VII. We have the right to our own identity.  This is not as simple as a name. Our identity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of control or creation. This principle also raises questions about whether the wisdom of the crowd belongs to the crowd.   VII. We have the right to our own identity.  This is not as simple as a name. Our identity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Bill of Rights in Cyberspace &#171; BuzzMachine</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-410886</link>
		<dc:creator>A Bill of Rights in Cyberspace &#171; BuzzMachine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-410886</guid>
		<description>[...] VI. We have the right to control our data. You should have access to data about you. And what&#8217;s yours is yours. We want the internet to operate on a principle of portability, so your information and creations cannot be held prisoner by a service or government and so you retain control. But keep in mind that when control is given to one, it is taken from another; in those details lurk devils. This principle thus speaks to copyright and its laws, which set the definitions and limits of control or creation. This principle also raises questions about whether the wisdom of the crowd belongs to the crowd. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VI. We have the right to control our data. You should have access to data about you. And what&#8217;s yours is yours. We want the internet to operate on a principle of portability, so your information and creations cannot be held prisoner by a service or government and so you retain control. But keep in mind that when control is given to one, it is taken from another; in those details lurk devils. This principle thus speaks to copyright and its laws, which set the definitions and limits of control or creation. This principle also raises questions about whether the wisdom of the crowd belongs to the crowd. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truth, Taste and Talent Online &#171; Ida Noa</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-402997</link>
		<dc:creator>Truth, Taste and Talent Online &#171; Ida Noa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-402997</guid>
		<description>[...] as aiming for a day job with a dwindling news industry. Another approach will include accepting the wisdom of crowds and the flattening world of ‘expertise’, and crowdsource your information with the drive and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as aiming for a day job with a dwindling news industry. Another approach will include accepting the wisdom of crowds and the flattening world of ‘expertise’, and crowdsource your information with the drive and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Explain me the difference between Piratebay and Google Books&#8230; &#171; Wombat in media</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-400497</link>
		<dc:creator>Explain me the difference between Piratebay and Google Books&#8230; &#171; Wombat in media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 10:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-400497</guid>
		<description>[...] The new way of distributing files, the bit-torrent system and the development of search engines offers new opportunities. Nowadays it isn&#8217;t necessary to visit a page, like the still existing mininova which collect bit torrent links. It is much easier. Just type in a name of a file and the word “torrent” or “free download” in the input field in google You can find a lot of god replies. This is related to the google-way of thinking. Googles search engine algorithm based on the “wisdom of the crowd”-sys [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The new way of distributing files, the bit-torrent system and the development of search engines offers new opportunities. Nowadays it isn&#8217;t necessary to visit a page, like the still existing mininova which collect bit torrent links. It is much easier. Just type in a name of a file and the word “torrent” or “free download” in the input field in google You can find a lot of god replies. This is related to the google-way of thinking. Googles search engine algorithm based on the “wisdom of the crowd”-sys [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pixeladas aleatórias ???? Padrões emergindo da estática</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-393332</link>
		<dc:creator>pixeladas aleatórias ???? Padrões emergindo da estática</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-393332</guid>
		<description>[...] Quando muitos falam, pouco se entende. No ciberespaço hoje, mais do que nunca, muitos falam para muitos de modo homogêneo, resultado da contínua facilitação dos meios de publicação de conteúdo on line, do hábito dos bloggers de apenas reproduzir notas para adicionar comentários ou splogs. Os weblogs ainda são considerados ruído comunicacional, mas admitimos que é um fenômeno tão poderoso quanto a própria WWW. Prever seu retrocesso é também apostar na descontinuação da Web. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Quando muitos falam, pouco se entende. No ciberespaço hoje, mais do que nunca, muitos falam para muitos de modo homogêneo, resultado da contínua facilitação dos meios de publicação de conteúdo on line, do hábito dos bloggers de apenas reproduzir notas para adicionar comentários ou splogs. Os weblogs ainda são considerados ruído comunicacional, mas admitimos que é um fenômeno tão poderoso quanto a própria WWW. Prever seu retrocesso é também apostar na descontinuação da Web. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kollaboratives und disloziertes arbeiten &#187; Wintersemester 0809</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-384481</link>
		<dc:creator>kollaboratives und disloziertes arbeiten &#187; Wintersemester 0809</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-384481</guid>
		<description>[...] Scholz: What the MySpace generation should know about working for free - 2007 dazu: Jeff Jarvis: Who owns the wisdom of the crowd - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scholz: What the MySpace generation should know about working for free &#8211; 2007 dazu: Jeff Jarvis: Who owns the wisdom of the crowd &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daytona Blogg</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-373433</link>
		<dc:creator>Daytona Blogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-373433</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jeff Jarvis fÃ¶rsta lag...&lt;/strong&gt;

Vi lever i en vÃ¤rld som pÃ¥ sistone har bÃ¶rjat kallas &quot;post-scarcity&quot;. Ã–verflÃ¶det av innehÃ¥ll och tjÃ¤nster Ã¤r Ã¶vervÃ¤ldigande - och gillar du inte nÃ¥got finns det alltid en annan nyhetsartikel, en annan e-posttjÃ¤nst, en annan sÃ¶kmotor som ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jeff Jarvis fÃ¶rsta lag&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Vi lever i en vÃ¤rld som pÃ¥ sistone har bÃ¶rjat kallas &#8220;post-scarcity&#8221;. Ã–verflÃ¶det av innehÃ¥ll och tjÃ¤nster Ã¤r Ã¶vervÃ¤ldigande &#8211; och gillar du inte nÃ¥got finns det alltid en annan nyhetsartikel, en annan e-posttjÃ¤nst, en annan sÃ¶kmotor som &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-04-15 &#124; Researcher</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-373403</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-04-15 &#124; Researcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-373403</guid>
		<description>[...] Who owns the wisdom of the crowd? The crowd. (tags: economics community web2.0 crowdsourcing)   Bookmark to: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Who owns the wisdom of the crowd? The crowd. (tags: economics community web2.0 crowdsourcing)   Bookmark to: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bwl zwei null &#187; Crowdsourcing und Wisdom of Crowds: Eine Unterscheidung</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-367871</link>
		<dc:creator>bwl zwei null &#187; Crowdsourcing und Wisdom of Crowds: Eine Unterscheidung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-367871</guid>
		<description>[...] so bleibt das PhÃ¤nomen Wisdom of Crowds vorlÃ¤ufig eher noch ein bewundertes Konzept, wÃ¤hrend Croudsourcing in vielen Facetten schon Verbreitung [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] so bleibt das PhÃ¤nomen Wisdom of Crowds vorlÃ¤ufig eher noch ein bewundertes Konzept, wÃ¤hrend Croudsourcing in vielen Facetten schon Verbreitung [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Networked Journalism Summit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The big buckets</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-361717</link>
		<dc:creator>Networked Journalism Summit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The big buckets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-361717</guid>
		<description>[...] And in the end, we mustn&#8217;t forget that we, the media, do not own the product of this collaboration. The community does. Jarah Euston said there was some resentment when her Fresno Famous was sold to the Fresno Bee. The community thought they owned this; that&#8217;s exactly what you hope will happen when you enable people to collaborate through you: they take on ownership. That&#8217;s thinking like a platform: you provide it and people build atop it. At the end, who owns the wisdom and effort of the crowd? Why, of course, the crowd does. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And in the end, we mustn&#8217;t forget that we, the media, do not own the product of this collaboration. The community does. Jarah Euston said there was some resentment when her Fresno Famous was sold to the Fresno Bee. The community thought they owned this; that&#8217;s exactly what you hope will happen when you enable people to collaborate through you: they take on ownership. That&#8217;s thinking like a platform: you provide it and people build atop it. At the end, who owns the wisdom and effort of the crowd? Why, of course, the crowd does. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Social Web</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-359228</link>
		<dc:creator>The Social Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-359228</guid>
		<description>[...] Who owns the wisdom of the crowd? The crowd..&#8221; BuzzMachine. 26 Oct 2005. 12 Jun 2007 &lt;http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/&gt;.  Suggested [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Who owns the wisdom of the crowd? The crowd..&#8221; BuzzMachine. 26 Oct 2005. 12 Jun 2007 &lt;http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/&gt;.  Suggested [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; The Social Web (Web 2.0: What went wrong?) - Paolo blog: Ramblings on Trust, Reputation, Recommender Systems, Social Software, Free Software, ICT4D and much more</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-358680</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; The Social Web (Web 2.0: What went wrong?) - Paolo blog: Ramblings on Trust, Reputation, Recommender Systems, Social Software, Free Software, ICT4D and much more</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-358680</guid>
		<description>[...] Who owns the wisdom of the crowd? The crowd..&quot; BuzzMachine. 26 Oct 2005. 12 Jun 2007 &lt;http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/&gt;.Suggested Reading:&#160;Wyrick, Brian, and Dmytri&#160;&#160; Kleiner. &quot;Infoenclosure [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Who owns the wisdom of the crowd? The crowd..&quot; BuzzMachine. 26 Oct 2005. 12 Jun 2007 &lt;http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/&gt;.Suggested Reading:&nbsp;Wyrick, Brian, and Dmytri&nbsp;&nbsp; Kleiner. &quot;Infoenclosure [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Justice of Truth and Money</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-358315</link>
		<dc:creator>The Justice of Truth and Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-358315</guid>
		<description>[...] Jarvis almost two years ago made what to my reading was the seminal stab in this direction with his Who owns the wisdom of the crowd? The crowd. In this fledgling age of crowdsourcing, micropayment systems are already well established, both in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jarvis almost two years ago made what to my reading was the seminal stab in this direction with his Who owns the wisdom of the crowd? The crowd. In this fledgling age of crowdsourcing, micropayment systems are already well established, both in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco Raaphorst &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MP3.com, hebben we er iets van geleerd?</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-353671</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco Raaphorst &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MP3.com, hebben we er iets van geleerd?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-353671</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: Lees ook Jeff Jarvis&#8217; artikel &#8216;Who owns the wisdom of the crowd? The crowd.&#8217;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: Lees ook Jeff Jarvis&#8217; artikel &#8216;Who owns the wisdom of the crowd? The crowd.&#8217;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Open Data</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-344760</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Open Data</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-344760</guid>
		<description>[...] end, it is our data). She doesn&#8217;t quite get it, talking about sharing data with a company. Who owns the wisdom of the crowd?  She shows a chart that associates words with the concept safety and groups them: children, life, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] end, it is our data). She doesn&#8217;t quite get it, talking about sharing data with a company. Who owns the wisdom of the crowd?  She shows a chart that associates words with the concept safety and groups them: children, life, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Batuhan Yukselen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-344554</link>
		<dc:creator>Batuhan Yukselen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-344554</guid>
		<description>Jeff,

I really found your thoughts very interesting so want to add my two cents. 

The first thing worth mentioning is there is a pradox in all of us. We want to control our contribution, our profiles, our behaviors but at the same time we want to access all kinds of information. These two approaches are ad odds with each other. I am fond of my privacy as much as you. On the other hand, I&#039;m getting very frustrated when I&#039;m unable to access research material because it is propriatery. This is very frustrating to me but from the property owner standpoint he is putting much labor to create that property and my desire is accessing it without any labor, in other words returning no value to the owner.  

The second thing, from the content we create, the bookmarks we share some parties are making money out of it. Google, Yahoo, etc. are selling ads, creating value-added services but I cannot say that this is very unfair. Well, I agree that they are using my shared material(annoying) but some people working for those companies are making a living and they are putting effort to improve the value they&#039;re adding to us. One more thing, ad-supported business model is not actually very bad because at least they are not charging me. Are we paying money to use the search engine? No..Are we paying money to use YouTube, Facebook? No... I think this is something good for all of us, right? The content is mine but the platform is theirs. 

Some people could say then we can create a free web space and keep using web 2.0 gifted tools but I&#039;m pretty sure some people&#039;ll eventually start thinking how we can commercialize this space. Most of us are unfortunately money-oriented. 

Batu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>I really found your thoughts very interesting so want to add my two cents. </p>
<p>The first thing worth mentioning is there is a pradox in all of us. We want to control our contribution, our profiles, our behaviors but at the same time we want to access all kinds of information. These two approaches are ad odds with each other. I am fond of my privacy as much as you. On the other hand, I&#8217;m getting very frustrated when I&#8217;m unable to access research material because it is propriatery. This is very frustrating to me but from the property owner standpoint he is putting much labor to create that property and my desire is accessing it without any labor, in other words returning no value to the owner.  </p>
<p>The second thing, from the content we create, the bookmarks we share some parties are making money out of it. Google, Yahoo, etc. are selling ads, creating value-added services but I cannot say that this is very unfair. Well, I agree that they are using my shared material(annoying) but some people working for those companies are making a living and they are putting effort to improve the value they&#8217;re adding to us. One more thing, ad-supported business model is not actually very bad because at least they are not charging me. Are we paying money to use the search engine? No..Are we paying money to use YouTube, Facebook? No&#8230; I think this is something good for all of us, right? The content is mine but the platform is theirs. </p>
<p>Some people could say then we can create a free web space and keep using web 2.0 gifted tools but I&#8217;m pretty sure some people&#8217;ll eventually start thinking how we can commercialize this space. Most of us are unfortunately money-oriented. </p>
<p>Batu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Smoking Foot &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Alan Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-330143</link>
		<dc:creator>The Smoking Foot &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Alan Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-330143</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis writing on his blog Buzzmachine, posted in late 2005 â€œ Who owns the wisdom of the crowd?â€ in which he said, â€œâ€¦thereâ€™s one more fundamental notion that informs this new society, a notion that big companies and institutions invariably forget because they were built in the old order.   This is no longer a centralized world, a world controlled by those institutions.   This is a decentralized world, a world controlled by us.   And if you try to take control away from us, you will lose.   It used to be that you could take control away from us and we had nowhere to go. But in this post-scarcity world, we can always go somewhere else for content or information or service.   Thereâ€™s always another news story, always another email service, always another search engine.   Thus my first law, once again: Give us control and we will use it. Donâ€™t and you will lose us.â€ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis writing on his blog Buzzmachine, posted in late 2005 â€œ Who owns the wisdom of the crowd?â€ in which he said, â€œâ€¦thereâ€™s one more fundamental notion that informs this new society, a notion that big companies and institutions invariably forget because they were built in the old order.   This is no longer a centralized world, a world controlled by those institutions.   This is a decentralized world, a world controlled by us.   And if you try to take control away from us, you will lose.   It used to be that you could take control away from us and we had nowhere to go. But in this post-scarcity world, we can always go somewhere else for content or information or service.   Thereâ€™s always another news story, always another email service, always another search engine.   Thus my first law, once again: Give us control and we will use it. Donâ€™t and you will lose us.â€ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Readers Edition &#187; Von Risiken und Nebenwirkungen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/10/26/who-owns-the-wisdom-of-the-crowd-the-crowd/#comment-324930</link>
		<dc:creator>Readers Edition &#187; Von Risiken und Nebenwirkungen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 04:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=678#comment-324930</guid>
		<description>[...] Â Ich bin mir sicher, dass die Readers Edition in wenigen Monaten ganz anders aussehen wird als heute. Wie? Das wird, weil ich ein &#252;berzeugter Fan der &#8220;Weisheit der Massen&#8221; bin, sehr stark davon abh&#228;ngen, wer mitmacht und uns auf diesem spannenden Weg aktiv und kritisch begleitet. Es wird auf diesem Weg &#220;berraschungen und Entt&#228;uschungen geben, Fortschritte, Korrekturen, Quantenspr&#252;nge und R&#252;ckschl&#228;ge. Lassen wir uns gemeinsam &#252;berraschen. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Â Ich bin mir sicher, dass die Readers Edition in wenigen Monaten ganz anders aussehen wird als heute. Wie? Das wird, weil ich ein &#252;berzeugter Fan der &#8220;Weisheit der Massen&#8221; bin, sehr stark davon abh&#228;ngen, wer mitmacht und uns auf diesem spannenden Weg aktiv und kritisch begleitet. Es wird auf diesem Weg &#220;berraschungen und Entt&#228;uschungen geben, Fortschritte, Korrekturen, Quantenspr&#252;nge und R&#252;ckschl&#228;ge. Lassen wir uns gemeinsam &#252;berraschen. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

