<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another dull blow to newspaper kidneys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/11/30/another-dull-blow-to-newspaper-kidneys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/11/30/another-dull-blow-to-newspaper-kidneys/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The last presses</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/11/30/another-dull-blow-to-newspaper-kidneys/#comment-16934</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The last presses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 12:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/11/30/another-dull-blow-to-newspaper-kidneys/#comment-16934</guid>
		<description>[...] Today, the news about newspapers in America is not good: more layoffs (despite MoveOn&#8217;s whining), more competition, more fear, less revenue, lower stocks. The time that many hoped was a long way off may be upon us already. Newspapers are going to start to die. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today, the news about newspapers in America is not good: more layoffs (despite MoveOn&#8217;s whining), more competition, more fear, less revenue, lower stocks. The time that many hoped was a long way off may be upon us already. Newspapers are going to start to die. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catablast.com</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/11/30/another-dull-blow-to-newspaper-kidneys/#comment-15981</link>
		<dc:creator>catablast.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/11/30/another-dull-blow-to-newspaper-kidneys/#comment-15981</guid>
		<description>too bad we can't short craig's list......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too bad we can&#8217;t short craig&#8217;s list&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Feinman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/11/30/another-dull-blow-to-newspaper-kidneys/#comment-15698</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Feinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/11/30/another-dull-blow-to-newspaper-kidneys/#comment-15698</guid>
		<description>Another thread on future of newspapers (geek view)

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/27/1645214</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thread on future of newspapers (geek view)</p>
<p><a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/27/1645214" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/27/1645214</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/11/30/another-dull-blow-to-newspaper-kidneys/#comment-15684</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/11/30/another-dull-blow-to-newspaper-kidneys/#comment-15684</guid>
		<description>As you know Mr. Jeff, the newspaper industry has missed the Internet ball for the past ten years - all they do now is repurpose the news (except for a select few). 

They allowed the old business model to ossify any gray matter they have between their gray hair. Nothing like large profits to dumb down management (anyone want to buy K-R?).  The death of newspaper classifieds we predicted just took a bit longer to happen. How long do we give the newspapers to keep this cash cow going? They not only have a small and getting smaller share of the under 35 crowd they have allowed the 55 plus crowd (not that there is anything wrong with these folks) to wander away to the smarter solutions. Man, the newspaper guys had it all and just let it slip away. No wonder the LA Times staff is shrinking so fast (OK, trying to be global and not local has also helped them dive.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you know Mr. Jeff, the newspaper industry has missed the Internet ball for the past ten years - all they do now is repurpose the news (except for a select few). </p>
<p>They allowed the old business model to ossify any gray matter they have between their gray hair. Nothing like large profits to dumb down management (anyone want to buy K-R?).  The death of newspaper classifieds we predicted just took a bit longer to happen. How long do we give the newspapers to keep this cash cow going? They not only have a small and getting smaller share of the under 35 crowd they have allowed the 55 plus crowd (not that there is anything wrong with these folks) to wander away to the smarter solutions. Man, the newspaper guys had it all and just let it slip away. No wonder the LA Times staff is shrinking so fast (OK, trying to be global and not local has also helped them dive.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Feinman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/11/30/another-dull-blow-to-newspaper-kidneys/#comment-15682</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Feinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/11/30/another-dull-blow-to-newspaper-kidneys/#comment-15682</guid>
		<description>Slightly off (today's) topic, but this thread may be of interest to those worrying about the fate of newspapers:
http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/11/29/111918/63

Some of the commentators are starting to make the distinction between investigative reporting (expensive) and news relaying (cheap and widespread).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slightly off (today&#8217;s) topic, but this thread may be of interest to those worrying about the fate of newspapers:<br />
<a href="http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/11/29/111918/63" rel="nofollow">http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/11/29/111918/63</a></p>
<p>Some of the commentators are starting to make the distinction between investigative reporting (expensive) and news relaying (cheap and widespread).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; WEDNESDAY SQUIBS</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/11/30/another-dull-blow-to-newspaper-kidneys/#comment-15681</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; WEDNESDAY SQUIBS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/11/30/another-dull-blow-to-newspaper-kidneys/#comment-15681</guid>
		<description>[...] Another dull blow to newspaper kidneys. Jeff Jarvis points to this article that says Microsoft is moving into the free classified space. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Another dull blow to newspaper kidneys. Jeff Jarvis points to this article that says Microsoft is moving into the free classified space. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/11/30/another-dull-blow-to-newspaper-kidneys/#comment-15664</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/11/30/another-dull-blow-to-newspaper-kidneys/#comment-15664</guid>
		<description>Gives new meaning to free speech.   Maybe SCOTUS was wrong!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gives new meaning to free speech.   Maybe SCOTUS was wrong!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
