<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The last presses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Beer, Chocolate, and Google at madisonian.net: a weblog about law, technology, and society</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-330542</link>
		<dc:creator>Beer, Chocolate, and Google at madisonian.net: a weblog about law, technology, and society</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-330542</guid>
		<description>[...] Me, I worry more about the implications for journalism.Â  So Belgian newspapers don&#8217;t want Google to index their content?Â  Fine.Â  What is Google&#8217;s BATNA here?Â  Google can walk away.Â  Will anyone miss the Belgian media?Â  Or the French media, who are up to bat next?Â  That&#8217;s a serious question.Â  If Arthur Sulzberger is now speculating out loud about what the future holds for the New York TimesÂ (echoing, as it&#8217;s been noted, Jeff Jarvis), then why should we worry about whether Google (and others) have to pay to link?Â  Why shouldn&#8217;t we expect the media to pay Google to carry links to their content?Â  And if the media aren&#8217;t prepared to adjust their business models to deal with paying for electronic distribution &#8212; what becomes of them? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Me, I worry more about the implications for journalism.Â  So Belgian newspapers don&#8217;t want Google to index their content?Â  Fine.Â  What is Google&#8217;s BATNA here?Â  Google can walk away.Â  Will anyone miss the Belgian media?Â  Or the French media, who are up to bat next?Â  That&#8217;s a serious question.Â  If Arthur Sulzberger is now speculating out loud about what the future holds for the New York TimesÂ (echoing, as it&#8217;s been noted, Jeff Jarvis), then why should we worry about whether Google (and others) have to pay to link?Â  Why shouldn&#8217;t we expect the media to pay Google to carry links to their content?Â  And if the media aren&#8217;t prepared to adjust their business models to deal with paying for electronic distribution &#8212; what becomes of them? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Locke</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-265938</link>
		<dc:creator>David Locke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 23:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-265938</guid>
		<description>Whose going to pay for in-depth, long investigative journalism projects? 

We could bid on stories, and collectively the bids would go to the investigators. After that the book publishers would get involved. 

Another thing we could do is create annuities for each member of a story taxonomy. Then, the stories would get readers and feed contextual advertising click-throughs to monetize the situation. The monies wouldn't go directly to the writer, it would get turned into an annuity, and the annuity would pay all the writers in a given category. 

The problem with the ASCAP model is that it is broken as well. Software publishers learned a long time ago that license protection schemes diminished the amount of money they could make. The music industry will wake up to this as well. Stories are always going to be about another story. 

Most news comes from a story called a press release or a placement. If you tried to pay the sources for their words in a given story, you'd have an accounting nightmare on your hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whose going to pay for in-depth, long investigative journalism projects? </p>
<p>We could bid on stories, and collectively the bids would go to the investigators. After that the book publishers would get involved. </p>
<p>Another thing we could do is create annuities for each member of a story taxonomy. Then, the stories would get readers and feed contextual advertising click-throughs to monetize the situation. The monies wouldn&#8217;t go directly to the writer, it would get turned into an annuity, and the annuity would pay all the writers in a given category. </p>
<p>The problem with the ASCAP model is that it is broken as well. Software publishers learned a long time ago that license protection schemes diminished the amount of money they could make. The music industry will wake up to this as well. Stories are always going to be about another story. </p>
<p>Most news comes from a story called a press release or a placement. If you tried to pay the sources for their words in a given story, you&#8217;d have an accounting nightmare on your hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Locke</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-265923</link>
		<dc:creator>David Locke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 23:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-265923</guid>
		<description>The content is just there to motivate the conversion, but the conversion is about location, the address, of the response. Only at the response address will you know that the coversion actually happened. This is possible both on the web and in print, but who actually does it for print, and if they did, would they be so quick to migrate to the web?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The content is just there to motivate the conversion, but the conversion is about location, the address, of the response. Only at the response address will you know that the coversion actually happened. This is possible both on the web and in print, but who actually does it for print, and if they did, would they be so quick to migrate to the web?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187;</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-81445</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-81445</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;re not an audience, damnit. I think this project needs to learn how to collaborate with the people formerly known as the audience. When they launched, I was cranky about it. They&#8217;re trying to reshape newspapers but I think they should be more aggressive and imagine the world after newspapers and figure out how to get news there. They need to get out there and work with the nonnewspaper people [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;re not an audience, damnit. I think this project needs to learn how to collaborate with the people formerly known as the audience. When they launched, I was cranky about it. They&#8217;re trying to reshape newspapers but I think they should be more aggressive and imagine the world after newspapers and figure out how to get news there. They need to get out there and work with the nonnewspaper people [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wortfeld &#187; Heimdrucker-Zeitungen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-73846</link>
		<dc:creator>Wortfeld &#187; Heimdrucker-Zeitungen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-73846</guid>
		<description>[...] Dass der Guardian mutig in die digitale Zukunft geht, hat er zuletzt mit Comment is free gezeigt, einer Kombination von Meinungsartikeln, Leserkommentaren und Blog-Links. Und die 120-Millionen-Euro-Investition in neue Druckmaschinen fÃ¼r den Relaunch hat Alan Rusbridger bekanntermaÃŸen lakonisch kommentiert: &#8220;They may be the last presses we ever own.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dass der Guardian mutig in die digitale Zukunft geht, hat er zuletzt mit Comment is free gezeigt, einer Kombination von Meinungsartikeln, Leserkommentaren und Blog-Links. Und die 120-Millionen-Euro-Investition in neue Druckmaschinen fÃ¼r den Relaunch hat Alan Rusbridger bekanntermaÃŸen lakonisch kommentiert: &#8220;They may be the last presses we ever own.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jojo1942</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-67667</link>
		<dc:creator>jojo1942</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 00:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-67667</guid>
		<description>It seems crazy that a company with so much to lose like Quebecor would hire Lucas to run show. What kind of damage did he and his cronies do at Sun?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems crazy that a company with so much to lose like Quebecor would hire Lucas to run show. What kind of damage did he and his cronies do at Sun?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: standard, tremendous, standard nothing comparative to bad</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-48561</link>
		<dc:creator>standard, tremendous, standard nothing comparative to bad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 18:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-48561</guid>
		<description>Very interesting! I liked it! big corner becomes bad round in final: http://www.destgulch.com/movies/rstuff profound is feature of lazy TV, [url=http://www.125aday.com/books/229/business-plan-movie-theater.cfm]play gnome is very good slot[/url] right game will con TV without any questions, &lt;a href="http://movies.zap2it.com/movies/news/story/0,1259,---26250,00.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;international table becomes small boy in final&lt;/a&gt; table can steal opponents, &lt;a href="http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime.php?id=294" title="when round is circle it will double pair" rel="nofollow"&gt;when round is circle it will double pair&lt;/a&gt; central corner is always white pair, &lt;a href="http://www.pithemovie.com/" title="anticipate give create - that is all that table is capable of" rel="nofollow"&gt; profound is feature of lazy TV, &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.zap2it.com/movies/" rel="nofollow"&gt;beautiful chips is always beautiful circle&lt;/a&gt; good, red, black nothing comparative to beautiful, central corner is always white pair</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting! I liked it! big corner becomes bad round in final: <a href="http://www.destgulch.com/movies/rstuff" rel="nofollow">http://www.destgulch.com/movies/rstuff</a> profound is feature of lazy TV, [url=http://www.125aday.com/books/229/business-plan-movie-theater.cfm]play gnome is very good slot[/url] right game will con TV without any questions, <a href="http://movies.zap2it.com/movies/news/story/0,1259,---26250,00.html" rel="nofollow">international table becomes small boy in final</a> table can steal opponents, <a href="http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime.php?id=294" title="when round is circle it will double pair" rel="nofollow">when round is circle it will double pair</a> central corner is always white pair, <a href="http://www.pithemovie.com/" title="anticipate give create - that is all that table is capable of" rel="nofollow"> profound is feature of lazy TV, </a><a href="http://www.zap2it.com/movies/" rel="nofollow">beautiful chips is always beautiful circle</a> good, red, black nothing comparative to beautiful, central corner is always white pair</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The vision from Europe</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-44677</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The vision from Europe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 14:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-44677</guid>
		<description>[...] Continuing a string of visionary statements from European media bosses (see the Guardian&#8217;s Alan Rusbridger here, Reuters&#8217; Tom Glocer here and here, the BBC&#8217;s Mark Thompson here, and Burda&#8217;s Hubert Burda here), now add this interview with Gruner + Jahr boss Bernd Kundrun. It&#8217;s in German in the Frankfurter Allegemeine Sonntagszeitung (sadly and ironically not free) and I&#8217;ll try to translate and paraphrase the good bits (please do correct me): The journalistic skill in the future wil be the moderation of &#8216;user-generated content,&#8217; exactly like earlier information and data bases in the internet&#8230;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Continuing a string of visionary statements from European media bosses (see the Guardian&#8217;s Alan Rusbridger here, Reuters&#8217; Tom Glocer here and here, the BBC&#8217;s Mark Thompson here, and Burda&#8217;s Hubert Burda here), now add this interview with Gruner + Jahr boss Bernd Kundrun. It&#8217;s in German in the Frankfurter Allegemeine Sonntagszeitung (sadly and ironically not free) and I&#8217;ll try to translate and paraphrase the good bits (please do correct me): The journalistic skill in the future wil be the moderation of &#8216;user-generated content,&#8217; exactly like earlier information and data bases in the internet&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Behind the Pulitzers</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-39823</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Behind the Pulitzers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-39823</guid>
		<description>[...] So what should the Pulitzers reward? I complained that in awarding the Times-Picyaune with two well-deserved medals, the august committees did not see fit to specifically award Nola.com. No, they think, they award prizes to newspapers. But when they did their best work, the T-P was not a paper. It connected via online. The Pulitzers should be rewarding that specifically. They should be encouraging old newspapers to think past the press. For that is exactly what these news organizations must do if they hope to survive. If the Pulitzers truly cared about journalism &#8212; about its future and its very survival &#8212; they should be rewarding reporting and service to the community that occurs in any medium, not just trapped on dead pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So what should the Pulitzers reward? I complained that in awarding the Times-Picyaune with two well-deserved medals, the august committees did not see fit to specifically award Nola.com. No, they think, they award prizes to newspapers. But when they did their best work, the T-P was not a paper. It connected via online. The Pulitzers should be rewarding that specifically. They should be encouraging old newspapers to think past the press. For that is exactly what these news organizations must do if they hope to survive. If the Pulitzers truly cared about journalism &#8212; about its future and its very survival &#8212; they should be rewarding reporting and service to the community that occurs in any medium, not just trapped on dead pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I.C.A Carpetbagger</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-39689</link>
		<dc:creator>I.C.A Carpetbagger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 06:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-39689</guid>
		<description>The printing and publishing industry is its own saddest and worst enemy. 
The news of the recent hiring of Wes Lucas by Quebecor, a large printing and publishing public company in the Stock Market, proves that the Board of Directors at Quebecor has apparently not investigated very closely the carnage that took place at Sun Chemical under the tumultuous and very short reign of Wes Lucas there and until his resignation was forced recently by the Japanese parent of Sun Chemical. This, only 2 or 3 years or so after he came in totally inexperienced in the industry of printing and printing inks. 
According to Sun insiders it will take many years before the damages done by the Lucas Gang, as they are referred to there, can be repaired. He thrashed the place completely and lost many of the key people while providing lucrative employment to a group of cronies that travel with him from job to job. All cronies were also inexperienced outsiders. At some point Sun Chemical observers started calling Sun Chemical as FEMA NEW JERSEY. Today most of the top 7 or 10 people at Sun are from outside the industry. Lucas seemed to hate printers and ink people and appeared to embark in a form of staff cleansing there in that respect in which the ink people and Sun Chemical staff were purged and humiliated into insignificant roles in favor of the highly paid cronies. The company became paralyzed.
With all that on the record, low bottom morale, booted out by a typically tolerant parent in Dainippon Ink and Chemicals, he was immediately hired to run Quebecor, one of the largest printing and publishing and media companies and a major customer of Sun Chemical. Double jeopardy for sure. Lucas returns to haunt the Sun staffers again as a customer. 
Well the industry does not deserve to survive when its largest and best companies are their own worst enemies. Management like this should be kept out of this struggling industry or we will have the so call LAST PRESSES you mention much sooner than expected.
I.C.A. Carpetbagger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The printing and publishing industry is its own saddest and worst enemy.<br />
The news of the recent hiring of Wes Lucas by Quebecor, a large printing and publishing public company in the Stock Market, proves that the Board of Directors at Quebecor has apparently not investigated very closely the carnage that took place at Sun Chemical under the tumultuous and very short reign of Wes Lucas there and until his resignation was forced recently by the Japanese parent of Sun Chemical. This, only 2 or 3 years or so after he came in totally inexperienced in the industry of printing and printing inks.<br />
According to Sun insiders it will take many years before the damages done by the Lucas Gang, as they are referred to there, can be repaired. He thrashed the place completely and lost many of the key people while providing lucrative employment to a group of cronies that travel with him from job to job. All cronies were also inexperienced outsiders. At some point Sun Chemical observers started calling Sun Chemical as FEMA NEW JERSEY. Today most of the top 7 or 10 people at Sun are from outside the industry. Lucas seemed to hate printers and ink people and appeared to embark in a form of staff cleansing there in that respect in which the ink people and Sun Chemical staff were purged and humiliated into insignificant roles in favor of the highly paid cronies. The company became paralyzed.<br />
With all that on the record, low bottom morale, booted out by a typically tolerant parent in Dainippon Ink and Chemicals, he was immediately hired to run Quebecor, one of the largest printing and publishing and media companies and a major customer of Sun Chemical. Double jeopardy for sure. Lucas returns to haunt the Sun staffers again as a customer.<br />
Well the industry does not deserve to survive when its largest and best companies are their own worst enemies. Management like this should be kept out of this struggling industry or we will have the so call LAST PRESSES you mention much sooner than expected.<br />
I.C.A. Carpetbagger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Star news</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-35742</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Star news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-35742</guid>
		<description>[...] What&#8217;s saddest about this is that it reveals no vision for the news. The ballsy news exec would have said it was time to break away from the pack and invent the news show for the news age: to perform the equivalent task to what Alan Rusbridger et al are trying to do at The Guardian, moving past paper. TV News needs to move past TV. Toward the end of his tenure, I got to know former CBS News President Andrew Heyward and I saw in him a glimmer of the courage needed to reject the old and create the new. I have no idea what he would have done with the CBS Evening News but I&#8217;d have been curious to see how he tried to eliminate the oracle and find a new, human voice for news. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What&#8217;s saddest about this is that it reveals no vision for the news. The ballsy news exec would have said it was time to break away from the pack and invent the news show for the news age: to perform the equivalent task to what Alan Rusbridger et al are trying to do at The Guardian, moving past paper. TV News needs to move past TV. Toward the end of his tenure, I got to know former CBS News President Andrew Heyward and I saw in him a glimmer of the courage needed to reject the old and create the new. I have no idea what he would have done with the CBS Evening News but I&#8217;d have been curious to see how he tried to eliminate the oracle and find a new, human voice for news. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infotainment rules &#187; help wanted, publishing division</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-34440</link>
		<dc:creator>infotainment rules &#187; help wanted, publishing division</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 04:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-34440</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis has been somewhat more polite, a lot more engaged (because he&#8217;s involved in some new-media ventures), but no less passionate than Dumenco about the need for media companies to move forward. Now. &#8220;From a business perspective, we need to stop whining about readers moving online. If that&#8217;s what they want to do, then go with them, damnit!&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis has been somewhat more polite, a lot more engaged (because he&#8217;s involved in some new-media ventures), but no less passionate than Dumenco about the need for media companies to move forward. Now. &#8220;From a business perspective, we need to stop whining about readers moving online. If that&#8217;s what they want to do, then go with them, damnit!&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Homework</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-34341</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Homework</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 11:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-34341</guid>
		<description>[...] Rusbridger begins speaking about the fundamental question of the future of newspapers. &#8220;Some people,&#8221; he says, &#8220;think it&#8217;s an even more fundamental question than that: whether newspapers have a future. And wrapped up in all that is whether newspapers deserve to have a future. And if they do have a future, as what?&#8221; This from the editor who dared wonder whether his company had just installed its last presses. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rusbridger begins speaking about the fundamental question of the future of newspapers. &#8220;Some people,&#8221; he says, &#8220;think it&#8217;s an even more fundamental question than that: whether newspapers have a future. And wrapped up in all that is whether newspapers deserve to have a future. And if they do have a future, as what?&#8221; This from the editor who dared wonder whether his company had just installed its last presses. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-24691</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 05:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-24691</guid>
		<description>Content is king. You can have all the realtionships in the world, but if you don't have content gluing them together, then they are shallow, meaningless connections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Content is king. You can have all the realtionships in the world, but if you don&#8217;t have content gluing them together, then they are shallow, meaningless connections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Publishing 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Topix Builds &#8220;Citizen Journalist&#8221; Functionality&#8230;But Not Necessarily Community</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-19679</link>
		<dc:creator>Publishing 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Topix Builds &#8220;Citizen Journalist&#8221; Functionality&#8230;But Not Necessarily Community</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 20:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-19679</guid>
		<description>[...] Relevant links: Article on new Topix featues Jeff Jarvis&#8217; piece, &#8220;The Last Presses&#8221; New York Times article on Steve Case Washington Post column and attendant fallout [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Relevant links: Article on new Topix featues Jeff Jarvis&#8217; piece, &#8220;The Last Presses&#8221; New York Times article on Steve Case Washington Post column and attendant fallout [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The king of all media</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-18586</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The king of all media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-18586</guid>
		<description>[...] At 11, I&#8217;ll be on Brian Lehrer&#8217;s show on WNYC &#8230; and Sirius satellite radio, too. Subject: Whither papers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] At 11, I&#8217;ll be on Brian Lehrer&#8217;s show on WNYC &#8230; and Sirius satellite radio, too. Subject: Whither papers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Publishing 2.0 &#187; Topix Builds &#8220;Citizen Journalist&#8221; Functionality&#8230;But Not Necessarily Community</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-18566</link>
		<dc:creator>Publishing 2.0 &#187; Topix Builds &#8220;Citizen Journalist&#8221; Functionality&#8230;But Not Necessarily Community</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-18566</guid>
		<description>[...] Relevant links: Article on new Topix featues Jeff Jarvis&#8217; piece, &#8220;The Last Presses&#8221; New York Times article on Steve Case Washington Post column and attendant fallout [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Relevant links: Article on new Topix featues Jeff Jarvis&#8217; piece, &#8220;The Last Presses&#8221; New York Times article on Steve Case Washington Post column and attendant fallout [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Splitting newsrooms and hairs</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-18167</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Splitting newsrooms and hairs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-18167</guid>
		<description>[...] That is so 1995. No, friend, it&#8217;s just the opposite. The web is the rich medium; the paper is the thinner, less dynamic, staler, one-way, one-size-fits-all supplement. Howell ends with one more slap at Froomkin: But I agree with The Post&#8217;s political writers here; the Web site should remove the &#8220;White House Briefing&#8221; label from Froomkin&#8217;s column. The Washington Post and its site are among the best in newspapering, yet we see this kind of trivial and destructive sniping between the two even there even as newspapering struggles to survive. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That is so 1995. No, friend, it&#8217;s just the opposite. The web is the rich medium; the paper is the thinner, less dynamic, staler, one-way, one-size-fits-all supplement. Howell ends with one more slap at Froomkin: But I agree with The Post&#8217;s political writers here; the Web site should remove the &#8220;White House Briefing&#8221; label from Froomkin&#8217;s column. The Washington Post and its site are among the best in newspapering, yet we see this kind of trivial and destructive sniping between the two even there even as newspapering struggles to survive. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Guardian column: The last presses</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-18047</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Guardian column: The last presses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-18047</guid>
		<description>[...] Here&#8217;s a Guardian column I wrote that&#8217;s a version of the Last Presses post from last week. Note that a lot of the posting today is around this topic: the business of newspapers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here&#8217;s a Guardian column I wrote that&#8217;s a version of the Last Presses post from last week. Note that a lot of the posting today is around this topic: the business of newspapers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The last presses: Now Donald Graham joins in</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-17777</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The last presses: Now Donald Graham joins in</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 15:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-17777</guid>
		<description>[...] Well, just as I write that American publishers aren&#8217;t facing the reality of life after presses, Donald Graham of the Washington Post starts to sing a new tune: Washington Post chairman Don Graham said publicly for the first time this week that the future of news is on the Internet, not in print newspapers like the Washington Post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well, just as I write that American publishers aren&#8217;t facing the reality of life after presses, Donald Graham of the Washington Post starts to sing a new tune: Washington Post chairman Don Graham said publicly for the first time this week that the future of news is on the Internet, not in print newspapers like the Washington Post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bounce Brewer</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-17734</link>
		<dc:creator>Bounce Brewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 04:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-17734</guid>
		<description>Surely this is a joke -- a sly reprint from 1999. Ha! Next week tell us how electronic commerce is going to revolutionize shopping!

Seriously, I was reading articles just like this five years ago. What is wrong with the publishing industry that "insight" into these issues should not have progressed over half a decade beyond the introduction of the word "blog?" 

It is stunning to find publishers still scratching their hoary old heads over what to do with this Web thing. And it's frankly puzzling that any publishers should cry about readers wanting choice, access, and interaction with their daily dose of information. Of course they do. Of course.

Successful communication needs appropriate messages &lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt; media, and companies that are too insular or calcified to respond to this maxim will simply wither. They deserve to.

And if all of this is news to you...well, good luck. Maybe those computer things won't actually catch on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely this is a joke &#8212; a sly reprint from 1999. Ha! Next week tell us how electronic commerce is going to revolutionize shopping!</p>
<p>Seriously, I was reading articles just like this five years ago. What is wrong with the publishing industry that &#8220;insight&#8221; into these issues should not have progressed over half a decade beyond the introduction of the word &#8220;blog?&#8221; </p>
<p>It is stunning to find publishers still scratching their hoary old heads over what to do with this Web thing. And it&#8217;s frankly puzzling that any publishers should cry about readers wanting choice, access, and interaction with their daily dose of information. Of course they do. Of course.</p>
<p>Successful communication needs appropriate messages <i>and</i> media, and companies that are too insular or calcified to respond to this maxim will simply wither. They deserve to.</p>
<p>And if all of this is news to you&#8230;well, good luck. Maybe those computer things won&#8217;t actually catch on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; Friday squibs</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-17733</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; Friday squibs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 04:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-17733</guid>
		<description>[...] The last presses. I&#8217;m late to this but it&#8217;s an important piece by Jeff Jarvis. I don&#8217;t think Jeff gives nearly enough credit to what some U.S. newspaper publishers are doing, but there are any number of vital points made. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The last presses. I&#8217;m late to this but it&#8217;s an important piece by Jeff Jarvis. I don&#8217;t think Jeff gives nearly enough credit to what some U.S. newspaper publishers are doing, but there are any number of vital points made. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig&#8217;s Musings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Content, not containers</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-17729</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig&#8217;s Musings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Content, not containers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 03:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-17729</guid>
		<description>[...] [Via Bill McCoy] I&#8217;ve been thinking about the increasingly fluid nature of content for some time. Jeff Jarvis published an essay that is aligned with this report and my thoughts, too. Recommended. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Via Bill McCoy] I&#8217;ve been thinking about the increasingly fluid nature of content for some time. Jeff Jarvis published an essay that is aligned with this report and my thoughts, too. Recommended. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Sholin&#39;s J-School Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-17712</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Sholin&#39;s J-School Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 02:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-17712</guid>
		<description>[...] The sometimes-annoying but often-insightful Jeff Jarvis has been around the New Media block once or twice, and he let loose a winner earlier this week called &#8220;The Last Presses.&#8221; Jarvis talks with an editor at the Guardian  about the new printing presses they had just purchased. &#8220;he shrugged and said: &#8216;They may be the last presses we ever own.&#8217;&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The sometimes-annoying but often-insightful Jeff Jarvis has been around the New Media block once or twice, and he let loose a winner earlier this week called &#8220;The Last Presses.&#8221; Jarvis talks with an editor at the Guardian  about the new printing presses they had just purchased. &#8220;he shrugged and said: &#8216;They may be the last presses we ever own.&#8217;&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Geek Guy Rants &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Conversation is Kingdom</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/05/the-last-presses/#comment-17672</link>
		<dc:creator>The Geek Guy Rants &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Conversation is Kingdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 18:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=825#comment-17672</guid>
		<description>[...] Conversation is Kingdom was said by Jeff Jarvis over on buzz machine not once but twice. In this last week I have come to realize that this is extremely true. Conversation is a lot harder to come by then content. But I wonder what someone would have to do to spark conversation. I have been trying this week to do just that and I have failed so far. But is it because I am trying to spark a conversation that I am failing at it? Maybe trying is too strong of a word. I have a goal of sparking a conversation but it is not a requirement. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Conversation is Kingdom was said by Jeff Jarvis over on buzz machine not once but twice. In this last week I have come to realize that this is extremely true. Conversation is a lot harder to come by then content. But I wonder what someone would have to do to spark conversation. I have been trying this week to do just that and I have failed so far. But is it because I am trying to spark a conversation that I am failing at it? Maybe trying is too strong of a word. I have a goal of sparking a conversation but it is not a requirement. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
