<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Got jargon?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/07/got-jargon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/07/got-jargon/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:43:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/07/got-jargon/#comment-17665</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=868#comment-17665</guid>
		<description>Ooh, ooh, ooh!  A Jim Treacher comment!  Must find more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh, ooh, ooh!  A Jim Treacher comment!  Must find more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Treacher</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/07/got-jargon/#comment-17579</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Treacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 06:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=868#comment-17579</guid>
		<description>Stewed, bombed, pickled, hammered, three sheets to the wind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stewed, bombed, pickled, hammered, three sheets to the wind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike G</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/07/got-jargon/#comment-17516</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=868#comment-17516</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t the other direction be more revealing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t the other direction be more revealing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire in Paris</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/07/got-jargon/#comment-17477</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire in Paris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 11:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=868#comment-17477</guid>
		<description>&quot;Deadline&quot; of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Deadline&#8221; of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Rambow</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/07/got-jargon/#comment-17373</link>
		<dc:creator>John Rambow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 02:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=868#comment-17373</guid>
		<description>the Daily Observer&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.observer.com/themediamob/2005/12/wood-war-xxvi.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wood  War features&lt;/a&gt; are popularizing that term for the headlines of dead-tree tabs, but I&#039;m not sure if that counts.  &quot;After the jump&quot; seems by far the most common newspaper-to-blog term. It&#039;s such a useful phrase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the Daily Observer&#8217;s <a href="http://www.observer.com/themediamob/2005/12/wood-war-xxvi.html" rel="nofollow">Wood  War features</a> are popularizing that term for the headlines of dead-tree tabs, but I&#8217;m not sure if that counts.  &#8220;After the jump&#8221; seems by far the most common newspaper-to-blog term. It&#8217;s such a useful phrase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/07/got-jargon/#comment-17343</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 21:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=868#comment-17343</guid>
		<description>&quot;Buried lede&quot; and &quot;after the jump&quot; are the ones I see most frequently.

Typography terms are comon, but they&#039;re printing lingo, not newspaper lingo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Buried lede&#8221; and &#8220;after the jump&#8221; are the ones I see most frequently.</p>
<p>Typography terms are comon, but they&#8217;re printing lingo, not newspaper lingo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Bramanti</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/07/got-jargon/#comment-17341</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Bramanti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 21:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=868#comment-17341</guid>
		<description>Jump, banner, masthead, leading, kerning, lede (buried lede), graf, spike, slug, wire, sidebar, teaser, byline, dateline</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jump, banner, masthead, leading, kerning, lede (buried lede), graf, spike, slug, wire, sidebar, teaser, byline, dateline</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/07/got-jargon/#comment-17338</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 21:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=868#comment-17338</guid>
		<description>I use &quot;after the jump&quot; too, as does most of Gawker Media.

I&#039;ve discussed pullquotes (which make less sense for the average-length blog post), but that&#039;s a general layout term.

Again stealing from GM, I treat suggested stories as &quot;tips&quot; and violently avoid &quot;fact-checking.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use &#8220;after the jump&#8221; too, as does most of Gawker Media.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve discussed pullquotes (which make less sense for the average-length blog post), but that&#8217;s a general layout term.</p>
<p>Again stealing from GM, I treat suggested stories as &#8220;tips&#8221; and violently avoid &#8220;fact-checking.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/07/got-jargon/#comment-17328</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 19:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=868#comment-17328</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Deck or pullquote has entered popular blog lexicon, but there they are.

The &quot;put the paper to bed&quot; likewise is lost in blogging parlance because of how the workflow operates.

Google Images = the AP LeafDesk now I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Deck or pullquote has entered popular blog lexicon, but there they are.</p>
<p>The &#8220;put the paper to bed&#8221; likewise is lost in blogging parlance because of how the workflow operates.</p>
<p>Google Images = the AP LeafDesk now I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen VanDyke</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/07/got-jargon/#comment-17323</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen VanDyke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=868#comment-17323</guid>
		<description>Scoop, masthead (though I see this more on design blogs), sidebar, spike, teaser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scoop, masthead (though I see this more on design blogs), sidebar, spike, teaser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/07/got-jargon/#comment-17310</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=868#comment-17310</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... putting my thinking cap on:

&quot;Above the Fold&quot; has seaped into the web-design lexicon to indicate the area shown in a browser before scrolling.

&quot;After the jump&quot; - Defamer uses this a lot, referencing jumps in newspapers.

&quot;Infographic&quot; - illustration used to analyze quantified data.



Some things that should cross over into blogging:

Agate - (unit of measuurement for columns in classifieds) small fonts used to compress statistics, advertisng, etc. Translate it to a unit of measurement for banners? Or classis?

A good H&amp;J (hyphenation and justification) algorithm that would let us do constant length columns and predictive length jumps in an easier fashion.

Measuring everything in picas - only because its fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; putting my thinking cap on:</p>
<p>&#8220;Above the Fold&#8221; has seaped into the web-design lexicon to indicate the area shown in a browser before scrolling.</p>
<p>&#8220;After the jump&#8221; &#8211; Defamer uses this a lot, referencing jumps in newspapers.</p>
<p>&#8220;Infographic&#8221; &#8211; illustration used to analyze quantified data.</p>
<p>Some things that should cross over into blogging:</p>
<p>Agate &#8211; (unit of measuurement for columns in classifieds) small fonts used to compress statistics, advertisng, etc. Translate it to a unit of measurement for banners? Or classis?</p>
<p>A good H&amp;J (hyphenation and justification) algorithm that would let us do constant length columns and predictive length jumps in an easier fashion.</p>
<p>Measuring everything in picas &#8211; only because its fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravo</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/07/got-jargon/#comment-17305</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=868#comment-17305</guid>
		<description>More alarming is what has slipped &lt;b&gt;into&lt;/b&gt; our newspaper and TV media.

&lt;i&gt;Fox News - the last bastion of fair and balanced news on network and worldwide TV - has sold part of itself to the Saudis.  This comes from reliable sources.  I refused to believe this at first, since in Rupert Murdoch we trusted, but there it is.  

So, again from reliable sources, this news flash: Saudi Prince Walid bin Talal told a gathering that, during last monthâ€™s rioting in France by Muslims, Walid objected to Foxâ€™s banner that ran, well, the facts, such as, MUSLIM RIOTS.

â€œI picked up the phone,â€ said the Saudi prince, who is now a voting shareholder of Fox, â€œand within 30 minutes the title was changed to CIVIL RIOTS.â€&lt;/i&gt;
http://chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=18274</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More alarming is what has slipped <b>into</b> our newspaper and TV media.</p>
<p><i>Fox News &#8211; the last bastion of fair and balanced news on network and worldwide TV &#8211; has sold part of itself to the Saudis.  This comes from reliable sources.  I refused to believe this at first, since in Rupert Murdoch we trusted, but there it is.  </p>
<p>So, again from reliable sources, this news flash: Saudi Prince Walid bin Talal told a gathering that, during last monthâ€™s rioting in France by Muslims, Walid objected to Foxâ€™s banner that ran, well, the facts, such as, MUSLIM RIOTS.</p>
<p>â€œI picked up the phone,â€ said the Saudi prince, who is now a voting shareholder of Fox, â€œand within 30 minutes the title was changed to CIVIL RIOTS.â€</i><br />
<a href="http://chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=18274" rel="nofollow">http://chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=18274</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Stodder</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/07/got-jargon/#comment-17303</link>
		<dc:creator>John Stodder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=868#comment-17303</guid>
		<description>A point of clarification.  Does he mean internal newspaper jargon (graf, lede), or newswriting cliches (much-ballyhooed, knowledgeable sources)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A point of clarification.  Does he mean internal newspaper jargon (graf, lede), or newswriting cliches (much-ballyhooed, knowledgeable sources)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right of Center</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/07/got-jargon/#comment-17301</link>
		<dc:creator>Right of Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 16:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=868#comment-17301</guid>
		<description>&quot;pink slip&quot;  but only by way of example.

&quot;bye-line&quot;  (as in &quot;adios&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;pink slip&#8221;  but only by way of example.</p>
<p>&#8220;bye-line&#8221;  (as in &#8220;adios&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

