Comments on: Ourpedia http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/18/ourpedia/ by Jeff Jarvis Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:08:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: nofollow breaks blogs http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/18/ourpedia/#comment-18973 nofollow breaks blogs Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:48:17 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/12/18/ourpedia/#comment-18973 The problem is that even in tech areas there might be disagreements. ANSI might say something is correct, but ECMA might disagree. Faced with two respected standards bodies saying different things, which should the user choose? Related: see http://www.wikipediaclassaction.org/ That appears to have something to do with this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OfficialWire The problem is that even in tech areas there might be disagreements. ANSI might say something is correct, but ECMA might disagree. Faced with two respected standards bodies saying different things, which should the user choose?

Related: see http://www.wikipediaclassaction.org/ That appears to have something to do with this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OfficialWire

]]> By: Anonymoose http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/18/ourpedia/#comment-18972 Anonymoose Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:34:22 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/12/18/ourpedia/#comment-18972 I love wikipedia, even when it's wrong. Check out this <a href="http://www.blinkpop.com" rel="nofollow">joint wikipedia/google search thingy</a> I made for a home page. I love wikipedia, even when it’s wrong.

Check out this joint wikipedia/google search thingy
I made for a home page.

]]> By: Eric M http://www.buzzmachine.com/2005/12/18/ourpedia/#comment-18957 Eric M Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:59:11 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/12/18/ourpedia/#comment-18957 Wikipedia definately needs vetting- I recently looked up a description of First Angle projection ( a way of viewing orientation in blueprints) versus Third Angle- The description was great- I just didn't trust it- If someone from ANSI or SAE had signed off on it- I would have used it- Wikipedia definately needs vetting- I recently looked up a description of First Angle projection ( a way of viewing orientation in blueprints) versus Third Angle- The description was great- I just didn’t trust it-

If someone from ANSI or SAE had signed off on it- I would have used it-

]]>