<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More secrets about secrets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:21:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim S</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22858</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 01:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22858</guid>
		<description>kat, I think I see some pot calling the kettle black here. What I said was right. The special prosecutor was the one who said that Plame&#039;s status was classified. It was not simply some claim that I made because of what Ron called &quot;magical thinking&quot;. So if someone tries to claim that I made it up then I will call him stupid and you are his match in intellect. Your post proves it. But frankly I don&#039;t really care what you think of me. You&#039;d have to be capable of generating a thought worthy of the name before that would happen. The truth is that you are one of those current excuses for conservatives who are just blind followers. GWB is no Hitler. He never will be. But if through some bizarre twist of unreality he was, you&#039;d still follow him, just like so many citizens of Germany in the &#039;30s followed their leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kat, I think I see some pot calling the kettle black here. What I said was right. The special prosecutor was the one who said that Plame&#8217;s status was classified. It was not simply some claim that I made because of what Ron called &#8220;magical thinking&#8221;. So if someone tries to claim that I made it up then I will call him stupid and you are his match in intellect. Your post proves it. But frankly I don&#8217;t really care what you think of me. You&#8217;d have to be capable of generating a thought worthy of the name before that would happen. The truth is that you are one of those current excuses for conservatives who are just blind followers. GWB is no Hitler. He never will be. But if through some bizarre twist of unreality he was, you&#8217;d still follow him, just like so many citizens of Germany in the &#8217;30s followed their leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kat</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22726</link>
		<dc:creator>kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 16:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22726</guid>
		<description>Well, Jimmy, I hope you got &#039;stupid&#039; out of your system in that little rant--but when &#039;stupid&#039; is part of your very fibre, that&#039;s not likely. Rage on, Jimmy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Jimmy, I hope you got &#8217;stupid&#8217; out of your system in that little rant&#8211;but when &#8217;stupid&#8217; is part of your very fibre, that&#8217;s not likely. Rage on, Jimmy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim S</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22434</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 03:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22434</guid>
		<description>Ron, what&#039;s the matter? Too busy to actually read what I posted? Or just too stupid to understand it after you scooped out most of your gray cells to replace them with RNC talking points and RWR transcripts? It was Fitzgerald who explicitly stated that her status was classified. I think he knows. You, on the other hand are (at least when it comes to the intersection of fact and politics) are just too utterly stupid to be believed. You and your raging bigot friend kat are a perfect pair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron, what&#8217;s the matter? Too busy to actually read what I posted? Or just too stupid to understand it after you scooped out most of your gray cells to replace them with RNC talking points and RWR transcripts? It was Fitzgerald who explicitly stated that her status was classified. I think he knows. You, on the other hand are (at least when it comes to the intersection of fact and politics) are just too utterly stupid to be believed. You and your raging bigot friend kat are a perfect pair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Pettengill</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22151</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Pettengill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 21:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22151</guid>
		<description>the irony of the situation is that angelenos and his cohorts are right in line (from a foriegn policy perspective) with the realpolitik of Kissinger, Eagleburger and Scowcroft.  whats black is white and whats up is down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the irony of the situation is that angelenos and his cohorts are right in line (from a foriegn policy perspective) with the realpolitik of Kissinger, Eagleburger and Scowcroft.  whats black is white and whats up is down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravo</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22144</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 19:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22144</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;The body of one woman was found still clutching a baby. The infant had been shot in the back of the head and the woman in the face. 

&quot;The youngest foetus we have was 18 to 20 foetal weeks,&quot; said US investigating anthropologist P Willey.&quot; &lt;/i&gt;


&lt;b&gt;Angelos rants about war deaths - perhaps one tenth of the murders during Saddam&#039;s reign.&lt;/b&gt; 


there may be as many as &lt;b&gt;1 million people&lt;/b&gt; buried in mass graves from that time period.

....can&#039;t argue -----  it nets out to &lt;b&gt;LIVES SAVED!&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;The body of one woman was found still clutching a baby. The infant had been shot in the back of the head and the woman in the face. </p>
<p>&#8220;The youngest foetus we have was 18 to 20 foetal weeks,&#8221; said US investigating anthropologist P Willey.&#8221; </i></p>
<p><b>Angelos rants about war deaths &#8211; perhaps one tenth of the murders during Saddam&#8217;s reign.</b> </p>
<p>there may be as many as <b>1 million people</b> buried in mass graves from that time period.</p>
<p>&#8230;.can&#8217;t argue &#8212;&#8211;  it nets out to <b>LIVES SAVED!</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Pettengill</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22141</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Pettengill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 18:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22141</guid>
		<description>kat:  exactly right.  i&#039;m an agnostic and have no use for religion. but facts is facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kat:  exactly right.  i&#8217;m an agnostic and have no use for religion. but facts is facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kat</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22135</link>
		<dc:creator>kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 17:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22135</guid>
		<description>I have no desire to ban anything--except terrorists.  And you are really stuck with your head up your ass re this color thing.  I don&#039;t hate people of any color--I just hate terrorists--like John Walker Lindh.  Don&#039;t be a freakin&#039; asshole all your life.  Being a drama queen does nothing for you.
What about non religion--after all atheism has killed more people in a short timespan than all religions combined--the atheists have the religionists beat by a mile. Notorious atheist butchers like Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, Stalin, Enver Hoxha,and that Korean asshole killed and slaughtered their own people at an unheard-of rate. Â When it comes to piling up a body count, atheists take second place to none. But these atheists could not be wrong. After all, their knowledge was scientific...they believed in the Darwin &#039;religion&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no desire to ban anything&#8211;except terrorists.  And you are really stuck with your head up your ass re this color thing.  I don&#8217;t hate people of any color&#8211;I just hate terrorists&#8211;like John Walker Lindh.  Don&#8217;t be a freakin&#8217; asshole all your life.  Being a drama queen does nothing for you.<br />
What about non religion&#8211;after all atheism has killed more people in a short timespan than all religions combined&#8211;the atheists have the religionists beat by a mile. Notorious atheist butchers like Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, Stalin, Enver Hoxha,and that Korean asshole killed and slaughtered their own people at an unheard-of rate. Â When it comes to piling up a body count, atheists take second place to none. But these atheists could not be wrong. After all, their knowledge was scientific&#8230;they believed in the Darwin &#8216;religion&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22132</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 16:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22132</guid>
		<description>30000 is the most the government will admit to, but there are a few independent estimates that have gone up to low six digits. I don&#039;t know the exact answer, and neither do you. I thought I would give the full range, because it also illustrates the folly of our exercise, and the irresposibility with which it&#039;s being carried out. 

GA, Truth and Justice? Where? When was the last time a Bush official spoke the truth? Justice = Shipment to Uzbekistan, in your formula.

Yes, I hate religion of the organized variety, any smart person would, having seen the damage it does, and how the mindless are led around by their fear of imaginary beings. But you extrapolated wildily to come up with the rest of your conclusions. It&#039;s what you do.

It would be really silly of me to hate &quot;white people&quot; considering that I am one. I mean, there are specific white people that I hate, but their color has nothing to do with it.

Kat, you&#039;re right. We should ban the web, telephones, TV, newspapers, everything. Uncle George will take care of us. Oh, where should we intern all the blacks, browns, and yellows? I&#039;m thinking Wyoming. Nothing really going on there, and the square shape would be easy to fence. Of course, since we&#039;re warring in Iraq and will soon be in Iran, we&#039;ll need upstanding citizens such as yourself to guard the borders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>30000 is the most the government will admit to, but there are a few independent estimates that have gone up to low six digits. I don&#8217;t know the exact answer, and neither do you. I thought I would give the full range, because it also illustrates the folly of our exercise, and the irresposibility with which it&#8217;s being carried out. </p>
<p>GA, Truth and Justice? Where? When was the last time a Bush official spoke the truth? Justice = Shipment to Uzbekistan, in your formula.</p>
<p>Yes, I hate religion of the organized variety, any smart person would, having seen the damage it does, and how the mindless are led around by their fear of imaginary beings. But you extrapolated wildily to come up with the rest of your conclusions. It&#8217;s what you do.</p>
<p>It would be really silly of me to hate &#8220;white people&#8221; considering that I am one. I mean, there are specific white people that I hate, but their color has nothing to do with it.</p>
<p>Kat, you&#8217;re right. We should ban the web, telephones, TV, newspapers, everything. Uncle George will take care of us. Oh, where should we intern all the blacks, browns, and yellows? I&#8217;m thinking Wyoming. Nothing really going on there, and the square shape would be easy to fence. Of course, since we&#8217;re warring in Iraq and will soon be in Iran, we&#8217;ll need upstanding citizens such as yourself to guard the borders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kat</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22129</link>
		<dc:creator>kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 16:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22129</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a well known fact that terrorists use the Web as a base of operations.  The Web has become one large madrasa for teaching, funding,  planning murder and then showing vidios of their barbaric and sick acts.  It is bloody well time to snoop big time on this scum.  Terrorists are using the web to plan attacks worldwide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a well known fact that terrorists use the Web as a base of operations.  The Web has become one large madrasa for teaching, funding,  planning murder and then showing vidios of their barbaric and sick acts.  It is bloody well time to snoop big time on this scum.  Terrorists are using the web to plan attacks worldwide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius Arbo</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22128</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius Arbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 16:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22128</guid>
		<description>Wow, just look at all we&#039;ve learned.

Angelos hates (in no particular order) religion, republicans, women, white people and any infringement of civil liberties. He also believes, without question, anything he reads in the NYT.

He&#039;s also incapable of posting any comment without name calling at minimum and a descent into outright obscenity when he really gets rolling.

He&#039;s also in favor of locking up all of the above groups judging from his last statement. Which hardly fits with his champion of civil liberties view of himself, but logical consistency isn&#039;t really needed.

Keep commenting, Angelos. You are doing a mighty fine job of representing your views and winning converts to the side of Truth and Justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, just look at all we&#8217;ve learned.</p>
<p>Angelos hates (in no particular order) religion, republicans, women, white people and any infringement of civil liberties. He also believes, without question, anything he reads in the NYT.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s also incapable of posting any comment without name calling at minimum and a descent into outright obscenity when he really gets rolling.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s also in favor of locking up all of the above groups judging from his last statement. Which hardly fits with his champion of civil liberties view of himself, but logical consistency isn&#8217;t really needed.</p>
<p>Keep commenting, Angelos. You are doing a mighty fine job of representing your views and winning converts to the side of Truth and Justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Pettengill (the artist formerly known as RonP)</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22123</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Pettengill (the artist formerly known as RonP)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 15:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22123</guid>
		<description>sorry dude.  but its not a minority - check the polls.  check the electoral results since 2000.  2006 ain&#039;t going to be any better.  you are led by buffoons.  btw if i&#039;m giving away my civil liberties should it be a qualified moron?

wow 30,000 to 100,000+!  quite a delta.  hope your not calibrating lab equipment.  naw.  civil service is my bet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry dude.  but its not a minority &#8211; check the polls.  check the electoral results since 2000.  2006 ain&#8217;t going to be any better.  you are led by buffoons.  btw if i&#8217;m giving away my civil liberties should it be a qualified moron?</p>
<p>wow 30,000 to 100,000+!  quite a delta.  hope your not calibrating lab equipment.  naw.  civil service is my bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22122</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 15:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22122</guid>
		<description>Our government&#039;s wonderful history of paranoia and illegal snooping, compounded by the power of today&#039;s computers, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slate.com/id/2133564/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

Ah Ron, nice try, but no. See, I&#039;m smart enough to be able to differentiate between military action that was valid, justified, and actually successful until it was sabotaged (Afghanistan), and a total clusterfuck of an uncalled for and  mismanaged disaster that is Iraq. See, Al Qaeda attacked us, killed 3000 people. So we attacked... Iraq. And killed 30000-100000+ Iraqis. Yeah, that makes sense.

But back to spying... can you all readily give up your basic civil liberties that easily, to such an unqualified moron? It doesn&#039;t bother you? Well, your little minority has the power now, but the nation will survive, I guess. Later on, while we repair the damage, you can rant and rave in your little white padded rooms, about the bad brown people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our government&#8217;s wonderful history of paranoia and illegal snooping, compounded by the power of today&#8217;s computers, <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2133564/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
<p>Ah Ron, nice try, but no. See, I&#8217;m smart enough to be able to differentiate between military action that was valid, justified, and actually successful until it was sabotaged (Afghanistan), and a total clusterfuck of an uncalled for and  mismanaged disaster that is Iraq. See, Al Qaeda attacked us, killed 3000 people. So we attacked&#8230; Iraq. And killed 30000-100000+ Iraqis. Yeah, that makes sense.</p>
<p>But back to spying&#8230; can you all readily give up your basic civil liberties that easily, to such an unqualified moron? It doesn&#8217;t bother you? Well, your little minority has the power now, but the nation will survive, I guess. Later on, while we repair the damage, you can rant and rave in your little white padded rooms, about the bad brown people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Pettengill (the artist formerly known as RonP)</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22111</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Pettengill (the artist formerly known as RonP)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 14:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22111</guid>
		<description>as per your reference to Kat.  maybe not a terrorist - but you are certainly a copperhead - you know what that means right angelenos?  go ahead crack that history book and find out what it means.  you are what you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as per your reference to Kat.  maybe not a terrorist &#8211; but you are certainly a copperhead &#8211; you know what that means right angelenos?  go ahead crack that history book and find out what it means.  you are what you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Pettengill (the artist formerly known as RonP)</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22110</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Pettengill (the artist formerly known as RonP)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 14:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22110</guid>
		<description>UN attorney?  what is the relevance?  and if there is - no a UN attorney&#039;s opinion means nothing to me.  if you mean US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald - well yes it does.  the last time i checked no one was indicted for outing a covert op.  but i suppose if you keep wishing hard enough then maybe just maybe Rove will do the perp walk.  

Classified vs. Covert.  (time to turn the tv off)
there is a distinction.  she may have been working with classified material but she was not a covert op.  if she was then why wasn&#039;t someone charged with breaking the law?  

the front operation you are talking about is Brewster Jennings Associates.   its cover was blown well before the &quot;leak&quot;. 

also on cracking history books.  you might want crack a book on the activities of lincoln, wilson, and fdr to name a few.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UN attorney?  what is the relevance?  and if there is &#8211; no a UN attorney&#8217;s opinion means nothing to me.  if you mean US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald &#8211; well yes it does.  the last time i checked no one was indicted for outing a covert op.  but i suppose if you keep wishing hard enough then maybe just maybe Rove will do the perp walk.  </p>
<p>Classified vs. Covert.  (time to turn the tv off)<br />
there is a distinction.  she may have been working with classified material but she was not a covert op.  if she was then why wasn&#8217;t someone charged with breaking the law?  </p>
<p>the front operation you are talking about is Brewster Jennings Associates.   its cover was blown well before the &#8220;leak&#8221;. </p>
<p>also on cracking history books.  you might want crack a book on the activities of lincoln, wilson, and fdr to name a few.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22105</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 14:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22105</guid>
		<description>Brian, if you&#039;d ever cracked a history book, you&#039;d be familiar with many elected officials that kept claiming more and more power (in the name of protecting the nation), and wound up quite totalitarian. Bush has acted and spoken in exactly this manner. Congress has done nothing to disabuse him of the notion that he can make his own rules, and the media has been properly subservient, and the sheeple, well, dumb and gullible as always. Yes, the attacks on the saftey and security of the Constitution and the American people as a whole (not just the rich white ones) have been far more frequent and pernicious than the ones by the brown bogeymen. The result is a financially and militarily weakened nation, with an administration that uses war and terra in a Wag the Dog fashion. Realize, there need to be a country for us to &quot;be at war.&quot; We&#039;re not at war. We are occupying a foreing nation, and playing bitchslap with car-bombers. And that will end when? Any definable goals here? That can actually be met? Didn&#039;t think so.

Kat, you&#039;re fucking nuts. If your only response to anything anyone posts is to call them a terrorist, well, you done did good learning from Dear Leader, and President Cheney. Why do you hate your freedom so?

Ron, wrong again. I guess the statements of a UN Attorney mean nothing in your world of talking points and semantics. She wasn&#039;t covert, she wasn&#039;t covert! OK, you win. She was classified. And her outing was malicious, intentional, and damaging to national security, and she was involved with many other people and a till-then successful front operation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, if you&#8217;d ever cracked a history book, you&#8217;d be familiar with many elected officials that kept claiming more and more power (in the name of protecting the nation), and wound up quite totalitarian. Bush has acted and spoken in exactly this manner. Congress has done nothing to disabuse him of the notion that he can make his own rules, and the media has been properly subservient, and the sheeple, well, dumb and gullible as always. Yes, the attacks on the saftey and security of the Constitution and the American people as a whole (not just the rich white ones) have been far more frequent and pernicious than the ones by the brown bogeymen. The result is a financially and militarily weakened nation, with an administration that uses war and terra in a Wag the Dog fashion. Realize, there need to be a country for us to &#8220;be at war.&#8221; We&#8217;re not at war. We are occupying a foreing nation, and playing bitchslap with car-bombers. And that will end when? Any definable goals here? That can actually be met? Didn&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>Kat, you&#8217;re fucking nuts. If your only response to anything anyone posts is to call them a terrorist, well, you done did good learning from Dear Leader, and President Cheney. Why do you hate your freedom so?</p>
<p>Ron, wrong again. I guess the statements of a UN Attorney mean nothing in your world of talking points and semantics. She wasn&#8217;t covert, she wasn&#8217;t covert! OK, you win. She was classified. And her outing was malicious, intentional, and damaging to national security, and she was involved with many other people and a till-then successful front operation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Pettengill (the artist formerly known as RonP)</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22093</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Pettengill (the artist formerly known as RonP)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 13:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22093</guid>
		<description>Jim S.  

not to meddle with your &quot;magical&quot; thinking but Val &quot;pajama game&quot; Plame was not a covert op.  her cover was not blown by anybody.  she was an analyst.  if you know anyone who works for the CIA (I do) they are not all covert.  You can know that they work for the agency.  It is their responsibility to keep their cover (if indeed they have one)  she was not sydney bristow or mrs. kensington.  let me boil it down for you.  Scooter Libby was indicted for lying about telling the truth about a liar (joe wilson).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim S.  </p>
<p>not to meddle with your &#8220;magical&#8221; thinking but Val &#8220;pajama game&#8221; Plame was not a covert op.  her cover was not blown by anybody.  she was an analyst.  if you know anyone who works for the CIA (I do) they are not all covert.  You can know that they work for the agency.  It is their responsibility to keep their cover (if indeed they have one)  she was not sydney bristow or mrs. kensington.  let me boil it down for you.  Scooter Libby was indicted for lying about telling the truth about a liar (joe wilson).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kat</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22057</link>
		<dc:creator>kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 04:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22057</guid>
		<description>Well, I was reminded of his speech at the UN--and if I didn&#039;t know it was him, I&#039;d think it was you.  You sound just like him.
Eg.â€œLet me be blunt. State terrorism is being supported by those who claim to fight terrorism,â€(Mahmood Ahmadinejad)(the mad moonbat who sounds like Angelos or vice versa.)  Almadman doesn&#039;t believe al queda exists...just a western myth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I was reminded of his speech at the UN&#8211;and if I didn&#8217;t know it was him, I&#8217;d think it was you.  You sound just like him.<br />
Eg.â€œLet me be blunt. State terrorism is being supported by those who claim to fight terrorism,â€(Mahmood Ahmadinejad)(the mad moonbat who sounds like Angelos or vice versa.)  Almadman doesn&#8217;t believe al queda exists&#8230;just a western myth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22055</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 04:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22055</guid>
		<description>What about the money?  Where are we going to fund the continual special counsels from?  I seriosuly believe that the NYT article and the insuing Justice Dept probe, the Plame leak, the Abramoff situ, Tom Delay&#039;s troubles, Mel Martinez slurs, and the like should be funded by their respective parties - both prosecution and defense.  I&#039;m sick to death of the millions of dollars which could be dedicated to progress in any number of causes (of course, I&#039;d lobby for the tree-hugging types) being spent in DC courtrooms in a partisan snowball fight.  What&#039;s the current Fitzgerald total?  2 years of investigation and pursuit by him and a full staff must have hit several million by now.  In &#039;08 we should allow the candidates to raise an additional $10 million each that is placed in a pre-paid legal services account.  WHEN their respective scandal hits, they use their ATM card to pay and not our tax till.  I read in the Economist this summer that &#039;04&#039;s total cost for litigation in the U.S. was the equivalent to 2% of our entire GDP for that year.  The &quot;Hatfield&#039;s and McCoy&#039;s&quot; style that Washington has provoked since the start of the nation is nothing new, but I have to believe that it has never been this damn expensive even when adjusted for inflation. 

In addition, all&#039;s fair in love and media.  If the NYT, WaPo, or O&#039;Reilly&#039;s can drum up some news that effects the credibility of our democracy, they should be within their rights to tell the nation.  You can&#039;t embrace freedom of the press only when it&#039;s in your favor - you take the good (Anderson Cooper) and the bad (Bill O&#039;Reilly) and then get to bed early.  The president says that the leaks have compromised our security.  Well, I would hope that all those with access to that kind of information would be under oath and at their level be able to know left from wrong. If he wasn&#039;t full of causeless anger, maybe he&#039;d have bi-partisan support to prevent these levee breaches.  It&#039;s a war in our nations capital, and the leaks are just the most recent rounds of mortar fire.  Build trust, be a visionary, support a bi-partisan agenda, George, and maybe you&#039;ll have lieutenants outside your party who will watch out for you.  Learning English would help, too.

Auguri,

Fred</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the money?  Where are we going to fund the continual special counsels from?  I seriosuly believe that the NYT article and the insuing Justice Dept probe, the Plame leak, the Abramoff situ, Tom Delay&#8217;s troubles, Mel Martinez slurs, and the like should be funded by their respective parties &#8211; both prosecution and defense.  I&#8217;m sick to death of the millions of dollars which could be dedicated to progress in any number of causes (of course, I&#8217;d lobby for the tree-hugging types) being spent in DC courtrooms in a partisan snowball fight.  What&#8217;s the current Fitzgerald total?  2 years of investigation and pursuit by him and a full staff must have hit several million by now.  In &#8216;08 we should allow the candidates to raise an additional $10 million each that is placed in a pre-paid legal services account.  WHEN their respective scandal hits, they use their ATM card to pay and not our tax till.  I read in the Economist this summer that &#8217;04&#8217;s total cost for litigation in the U.S. was the equivalent to 2% of our entire GDP for that year.  The &#8220;Hatfield&#8217;s and McCoy&#8217;s&#8221; style that Washington has provoked since the start of the nation is nothing new, but I have to believe that it has never been this damn expensive even when adjusted for inflation. </p>
<p>In addition, all&#8217;s fair in love and media.  If the NYT, WaPo, or O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s can drum up some news that effects the credibility of our democracy, they should be within their rights to tell the nation.  You can&#8217;t embrace freedom of the press only when it&#8217;s in your favor &#8211; you take the good (Anderson Cooper) and the bad (Bill O&#8217;Reilly) and then get to bed early.  The president says that the leaks have compromised our security.  Well, I would hope that all those with access to that kind of information would be under oath and at their level be able to know left from wrong. If he wasn&#8217;t full of causeless anger, maybe he&#8217;d have bi-partisan support to prevent these levee breaches.  It&#8217;s a war in our nations capital, and the leaks are just the most recent rounds of mortar fire.  Build trust, be a visionary, support a bi-partisan agenda, George, and maybe you&#8217;ll have lieutenants outside your party who will watch out for you.  Learning English would help, too.</p>
<p>Auguri,</p>
<p>Fred</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian O'Connell</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22053</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian O'Connell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 03:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22053</guid>
		<description>Angelos: &lt;i&gt;Iâ€™m much more worried about the threat to my liberty from my own government, than I am from katâ€™s Koranic bogeymen.&lt;/i&gt;

And that&#039;s really the last word.

There&#039;s no point in arguing about the details of US govt actions in the middle of a war with someone who thinks that the US govt is a bigger problem than the enemy (if there is such a thing). I think this view informs much of the left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angelos: <i>Iâ€™m much more worried about the threat to my liberty from my own government, than I am from katâ€™s Koranic bogeymen.</i></p>
<p>And that&#8217;s really the last word.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no point in arguing about the details of US govt actions in the middle of a war with someone who thinks that the US govt is a bigger problem than the enemy (if there is such a thing). I think this view informs much of the left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22052</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 03:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22052</guid>
		<description>That was original.

Wouldn&#039;t want to hurt yourself thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was original.</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t want to hurt yourself thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kat</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22051</link>
		<dc:creator>kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 03:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22051</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re sounding more and more like that Mahmoud Moonbatah guy--gotta stop that headbanging or reading  too much al jazeera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re sounding more and more like that Mahmoud Moonbatah guy&#8211;gotta stop that headbanging or reading  too much al jazeera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22047</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 03:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22047</guid>
		<description>William Safire on the Nixon years:
 
I was writing a speech on welfare reform, and the president looks at it and says, &quot;OK, I&#039;ll go with it, but this is not going to get covered. Leak it as far and wide as you can beforehand. Maybe we&#039;ll get something in the paper.&quot; And so I go back to my office and I get a call from a reporter, and he wants to know about foreign affairs or something, and I said, &quot;Hey, you want a leak? I&#039;ll tell you what the president will say tomorrow about welfare reform.&quot; And he took it down and wrote a little story about it. But the FBI was illegally tapping his phone at the time, and so they hear a White House speechwriter say, &quot;Hey, you want a leak?&quot; And so they tapped my phone, and for six months, every home phone call I got was tapped. I didn&#039;t like that. And when it finally broke--it did me a lot of good at the time, frankly, because then I was on the right side--but it told me how easy it was to just take somebody who is not really suspected of anything for any good reason and listen to every conversation in his home--you know, my wife talking to her doctor, my--everything.


I&#039;m much more worried about the threat to my liberty from my own government, than I am from kat&#039;s Koranic bogeymen.

But it is funny to point out that when kat says &quot;Followers of allah have openly and proudly declared they donâ€™t have to obey the very constitution that is the USA.&quot;, she ignores that her own King George doesn&#039;t think he has to either. And what exactly is the &quot;constitution that is the USA?&quot; Bizarre.

Yup, to Koran has a lot of crazy shit in it. So does the Bible. And both books have literalist followers, imbeciles really, that will kill to enforce the tenets of their respective books. Whoopie! 

And how this this excuse illegal wiretapping of private American citizens? And what does this have to do with our sending undocumented prisoner to our wonderful &quot;allies&quot; un Uzbekistan to be boiled alive? Are you saying, kat, that your fear of the brown people justifies the spying on and torture of innocents? Torture that only results in faulty information, when the torturees are just willing to anythig to make it stop. A fact that is widely accepted by intelligence experts worldwide? How much false info do we have (and are we acting on) that was extracted via torture?

Keep thumping that bible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William Safire on the Nixon years:</p>
<p>I was writing a speech on welfare reform, and the president looks at it and says, &#8220;OK, I&#8217;ll go with it, but this is not going to get covered. Leak it as far and wide as you can beforehand. Maybe we&#8217;ll get something in the paper.&#8221; And so I go back to my office and I get a call from a reporter, and he wants to know about foreign affairs or something, and I said, &#8220;Hey, you want a leak? I&#8217;ll tell you what the president will say tomorrow about welfare reform.&#8221; And he took it down and wrote a little story about it. But the FBI was illegally tapping his phone at the time, and so they hear a White House speechwriter say, &#8220;Hey, you want a leak?&#8221; And so they tapped my phone, and for six months, every home phone call I got was tapped. I didn&#8217;t like that. And when it finally broke&#8211;it did me a lot of good at the time, frankly, because then I was on the right side&#8211;but it told me how easy it was to just take somebody who is not really suspected of anything for any good reason and listen to every conversation in his home&#8211;you know, my wife talking to her doctor, my&#8211;everything.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m much more worried about the threat to my liberty from my own government, than I am from kat&#8217;s Koranic bogeymen.</p>
<p>But it is funny to point out that when kat says &#8220;Followers of allah have openly and proudly declared they donâ€™t have to obey the very constitution that is the USA.&#8221;, she ignores that her own King George doesn&#8217;t think he has to either. And what exactly is the &#8220;constitution that is the USA?&#8221; Bizarre.</p>
<p>Yup, to Koran has a lot of crazy shit in it. So does the Bible. And both books have literalist followers, imbeciles really, that will kill to enforce the tenets of their respective books. Whoopie! </p>
<p>And how this this excuse illegal wiretapping of private American citizens? And what does this have to do with our sending undocumented prisoner to our wonderful &#8220;allies&#8221; un Uzbekistan to be boiled alive? Are you saying, kat, that your fear of the brown people justifies the spying on and torture of innocents? Torture that only results in faulty information, when the torturees are just willing to anythig to make it stop. A fact that is widely accepted by intelligence experts worldwide? How much false info do we have (and are we acting on) that was extracted via torture?</p>
<p>Keep thumping that bible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim S</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22040</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 01:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22040</guid>
		<description>&#039;At his October 28, 2005, press conference, Special Counsel Fitzgerald was asked if he knew whether Libby revealed Plame&#039;s covert status knowingly; he responded:

    Let me say two things. Number one, I am not speaking to whether or not Valerie Wilson was covert. And anything I say is not intended to say anything beyond this: that she was a CIA officer from January 1st, 2002, forward. I will confirm that her association with the CIA was classified at that time through July 2003. And all I&#039;ll say is that, look, we have not made any allegation that Mr. Libby knowingly, intentionally outed a covert agent. We have not charged that. And so I&#039;m not making that assertion.

Fitzgerald said also broadly about her status in CIA, in the beginning of his press conference: &quot;Valerie Wilson was a CIA officer. In July 2003, the fact that Valerie Wilson was a CIA officer was classified&quot;. And: &quot;Valerie Wilson&#039;s cover was blown in July 2003. The first sign of that cover being blown, was when Mr. Novak published a column on July 14th, 2003.&quot;&#039;

So Fitzgerald in that press conference doesn&#039;t address her covert status but does speciify that her association with the agency was classified. In addition I notice that the right wingers never address that outing her also destroyed a carefully constructed cover operation and tainted everyone who had ever used it and eliminated its usefulness for any future operations. So your friends most definitely did something that had negative repercussions for American security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;At his October 28, 2005, press conference, Special Counsel Fitzgerald was asked if he knew whether Libby revealed Plame&#8217;s covert status knowingly; he responded:</p>
<p>    Let me say two things. Number one, I am not speaking to whether or not Valerie Wilson was covert. And anything I say is not intended to say anything beyond this: that she was a CIA officer from January 1st, 2002, forward. I will confirm that her association with the CIA was classified at that time through July 2003. And all I&#8217;ll say is that, look, we have not made any allegation that Mr. Libby knowingly, intentionally outed a covert agent. We have not charged that. And so I&#8217;m not making that assertion.</p>
<p>Fitzgerald said also broadly about her status in CIA, in the beginning of his press conference: &#8220;Valerie Wilson was a CIA officer. In July 2003, the fact that Valerie Wilson was a CIA officer was classified&#8221;. And: &#8220;Valerie Wilson&#8217;s cover was blown in July 2003. The first sign of that cover being blown, was when Mr. Novak published a column on July 14th, 2003.&#8221;&#8216;</p>
<p>So Fitzgerald in that press conference doesn&#8217;t address her covert status but does speciify that her association with the agency was classified. In addition I notice that the right wingers never address that outing her also destroyed a carefully constructed cover operation and tainted everyone who had ever used it and eliminated its usefulness for any future operations. So your friends most definitely did something that had negative repercussions for American security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buzz</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22036</link>
		<dc:creator>buzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 00:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22036</guid>
		<description>btw i live in the UK - so not a Fox News watcher. the facts are this. (and i learned this from the clinton administration) the people speak - right now you and the rest of the buffoons in the US left - MSM included are on the wrong side of history. u canâ€™t believe that GW beats you at every turn, i mean how can he? after all i listen to NPR, I read the New Yorker. its just not fair!. well try this on for size - it only gets worse. 2006 - 4 more house seats and 2 more senate seatsâ€¦â€¦..republican&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.highclass-escorts.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;.&lt;/a&gt; Alito gets confirmed not with a bang but with a whimper - the boob, the dunce, chimpy bushitlerburton leaves office changing everything. the only thing you have left is the media and that is dissoving before your very eyes. get thee to toronto.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw i live in the UK &#8211; so not a Fox News watcher. the facts are this. (and i learned this from the clinton administration) the people speak &#8211; right now you and the rest of the buffoons in the US left &#8211; MSM included are on the wrong side of history. u canâ€™t believe that GW beats you at every turn, i mean how can he? after all i listen to NPR, I read the New Yorker. its just not fair!. well try this on for size &#8211; it only gets worse. 2006 &#8211; 4 more house seats and 2 more senate seatsâ€¦â€¦..republican<a href="http://www.highclass-escorts.com" rel="nofollow">.</a> Alito gets confirmed not with a bang but with a whimper &#8211; the boob, the dunce, chimpy bushitlerburton leaves office changing everything. the only thing you have left is the media and that is dissoving before your very eyes. get thee to toronto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pradeep</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22035</link>
		<dc:creator>Pradeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 00:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/01/more-secrets-about-secrets/#comment-22035</guid>
		<description>We have an Imperial Presidency and now we also have Imperial Editor. Citizens and readers be damned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have an Imperial Presidency and now we also have Imperial Editor. Citizens and readers be damned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

