<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bowing to bigots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: briatheangel</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-62079</link>
		<dc:creator>briatheangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 19:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-62079</guid>
		<description>christian apoligietics are a one sided biased argument for christianity. i whouldnt waste my time with such tripe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>christian apoligietics are a one sided biased argument for christianity. i whouldnt waste my time with such tripe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Zoner</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-23961</link>
		<dc:creator>The Zoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-23961</guid>
		<description>Now I'm confused--is it a novel?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I&#8217;m confused&#8211;is it a novel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Zoner</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-23960</link>
		<dc:creator>The Zoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-23960</guid>
		<description>Sweet--thanks Noel. From what your webpage says, it seems you would really like Eichenwald's books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet&#8211;thanks Noel. From what your webpage says, it seems you would really like Eichenwald&#8217;s books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy S.</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-23599</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 16:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-23599</guid>
		<description>Jeff, Jeff, Jeff
Silencing the billboards of Stern and strippers is against the first amendment but when you talk religion, you do the same thing.  You do not want them to have their say.  Shame on you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, Jeff, Jeff<br />
Silencing the billboards of Stern and strippers is against the first amendment but when you talk religion, you do the same thing.  You do not want them to have their say.  Shame on you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaNN :: We started it.</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-23507</link>
		<dc:creator>CaNN :: We started it.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 03:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-23507</guid>
		<description>[...] - BUZZMACHINE CONNIPTIONS: Bowing to bigots &#8230; (buzzmachine) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] - BUZZMACHINE CONNIPTIONS: Bowing to bigots &#8230; (buzzmachine) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Guinane</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-23498</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Guinane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 01:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-23498</guid>
		<description>Zoner, sorry, I didn't see your comment til just now. I'll take a look at the books you recommend. Our book has just been released though I'm not sure it's anything like Kurt Eichenwald has written.

It's on &lt;a HREF="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/1905558007" rel="nofollow"&gt;Amazon&lt;/a&gt; if you'd like more information on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zoner, sorry, I didn&#8217;t see your comment til just now. I&#8217;ll take a look at the books you recommend. Our book has just been released though I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s anything like Kurt Eichenwald has written.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s on <a HREF="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/1905558007" rel="nofollow">Amazon</a> if you&#8217;d like more information on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Fat Guy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why I Don&#8217;t Watch Teevee Shows, #1,207</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-23456</link>
		<dc:creator>The Fat Guy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why I Don&#8217;t Watch Teevee Shows, #1,207</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2006 21:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-23456</guid>
		<description>[...] I probably wouldn&#8217;t bother typing about this if I hadn&#8217;t read Professional Web Panelist Jeff Jarvis&#8217; bitchy and whiny reaction to someone else&#8217;s bitchy and whiny reaction to it. What everybody somebody should be bitching and whining** about is the stupidity and banality of an America that would need to both produce and consume such horseshit. But that particular horse left the barn a long damn time, so never mind. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I probably wouldn&#8217;t bother typing about this if I hadn&#8217;t read Professional Web Panelist Jeff Jarvis&#8217; bitchy and whiny reaction to someone else&#8217;s bitchy and whiny reaction to it. What everybody somebody should be bitching and whining** about is the stupidity and banality of an America that would need to both produce and consume such horseshit. But that particular horse left the barn a long damn time, so never mind. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-23213</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2006 02:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-23213</guid>
		<description>IIRC = if I recall/remember correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IIRC = if I recall/remember correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Zoner</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-23116</link>
		<dc:creator>The Zoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 18:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-23116</guid>
		<description>Chris--
Jimmy Swaggart (his episode with a hooker in a motel room brought new meaning to the term â€œlay ministryâ€)
That's hilarious.

Also what is IIRC? I've seen it a few times and I have no idea. And I agree with Chris even though I am a Christian. It's airing will do nothing to change people's perceptions of Christians and their beliefs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris&#8211;<br />
Jimmy Swaggart (his episode with a hooker in a motel room brought new meaning to the term â€œlay ministryâ€)<br />
That&#8217;s hilarious.</p>
<p>Also what is IIRC? I&#8217;ve seen it a few times and I have no idea. And I agree with Chris even though I am a Christian. It&#8217;s airing will do nothing to change people&#8217;s perceptions of Christians and their beliefs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Zoner</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-23115</link>
		<dc:creator>The Zoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 18:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-23115</guid>
		<description>Noel says: "Could it be that deep down you suspect the idea of â€˜Godâ€™ is a man-made explanation and that this does not sit well with what you told to believe as a child, and makes you therefore uncomfortable? I was taught these things too, but I grew up and thought for myself."

Actually I used to believe in Santa Claus and after further inspection I do not anymore. Upon further inspection of Science and textual criticism of the Bible and its manuscripts, I still believe in God--more now than ever. Noel I honestly don't think you have ever looked hard at Christian Apologetics. I recommend the books I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist by Norman Geisler and The Case for Christ by former atheist Lee Strobel. The first book goes point by point in their approach to arguments for faith. You certainly would be interested, if not persuaded, by both books.

All that said, your book looks very interesting and I wonder when it comes out and where I can purchase it. I'm hoping it's along the lines of Kurt Eichenwald's work on ADM and Enron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noel says: &#8220;Could it be that deep down you suspect the idea of â€˜Godâ€™ is a man-made explanation and that this does not sit well with what you told to believe as a child, and makes you therefore uncomfortable? I was taught these things too, but I grew up and thought for myself.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually I used to believe in Santa Claus and after further inspection I do not anymore. Upon further inspection of Science and textual criticism of the Bible and its manuscripts, I still believe in God&#8211;more now than ever. Noel I honestly don&#8217;t think you have ever looked hard at Christian Apologetics. I recommend the books I Don&#8217;t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist by Norman Geisler and The Case for Christ by former atheist Lee Strobel. The first book goes point by point in their approach to arguments for faith. You certainly would be interested, if not persuaded, by both books.</p>
<p>All that said, your book looks very interesting and I wonder when it comes out and where I can purchase it. I&#8217;m hoping it&#8217;s along the lines of Kurt Eichenwald&#8217;s work on ADM and Enron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Giving God a bad name</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-23071</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Giving God a bad name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 12:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-23071</guid>
		<description>[...] But when fringe extremists like the so-called American Family Association and the self-annointed Parents Television Council decry what they think is indecent or try to stop us from seeing a show they don&#8217;t approve of, media &#8212; not to mention the FCC &#8212; treat them as spokesman for the religious in a predominately religious nation. They are not. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But when fringe extremists like the so-called American Family Association and the self-annointed Parents Television Council decry what they think is indecent or try to stop us from seeing a show they don&#8217;t approve of, media &#8212; not to mention the FCC &#8212; treat them as spokesman for the religious in a predominately religious nation. They are not. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Francis</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22941</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 07:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22941</guid>
		<description>Sigh.

Only yesterday the extreme religious right complained about people taking Christ out of Christmas.

Now that the holidays are over, they're moving on to the next target.  Helluva way to start the new year.

What ARE these people afraid of?  That the whole of America will suddenly hold devout Christians up to mockery and ridicule because of a little 'ol TV show?  That suddenly our collective image of Christ will warp into some tripped-out caricature?  It's gonna take a lot more than that...

If the show is a chunk of fertilizer, it will collapse under the weight of its own vileness.  We shouldn't have to hear anybody tell us that, and especially before the first showing.  It's certainly all right to have worries and concerns, but give the show a fair shot.  Thank goodness the bosses at Mormon-owned KSL have enough tolerance.

And let us not forget this: not one but TWO TV movies recently aired on the late great Pope John Paul II.  Christianity is certainly no cheap laugh for the networks... especially when so many of the stars of said religion do it so well themselves:

Oral Roberts (lost many stations after the infamous "God will call me home" speech, claimed to see a gigantic Jesus behind his City Of Faith in Tulsa)
Pat Robertson (not on Hugo Chavez' Christmas card list this year, by any means... and hey, did you hear what he said about Sharon's stroke?)
Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker (you know the story)
Jimmy Swaggart (his episode with a hooker in a motel room brought new meaning to the term "lay ministry")

Thankfully, all of this is countered by the dedicated TV ministries of Dr. Robert Schuller (who recently stepped down, bless him) and Billy Graham.  And let us not forget the late great Mr. (Fred) Rodgers -- how many of us knew he was a Presbyterian minister? -- or Bishop Fulton J. Sheen, whose oratory trancended denominations.

Yeah, TV's full of saints and sinners.  Shouldn't we be used to figuring out who's who by now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh.</p>
<p>Only yesterday the extreme religious right complained about people taking Christ out of Christmas.</p>
<p>Now that the holidays are over, they&#8217;re moving on to the next target.  Helluva way to start the new year.</p>
<p>What ARE these people afraid of?  That the whole of America will suddenly hold devout Christians up to mockery and ridicule because of a little &#8216;ol TV show?  That suddenly our collective image of Christ will warp into some tripped-out caricature?  It&#8217;s gonna take a lot more than that&#8230;</p>
<p>If the show is a chunk of fertilizer, it will collapse under the weight of its own vileness.  We shouldn&#8217;t have to hear anybody tell us that, and especially before the first showing.  It&#8217;s certainly all right to have worries and concerns, but give the show a fair shot.  Thank goodness the bosses at Mormon-owned KSL have enough tolerance.</p>
<p>And let us not forget this: not one but TWO TV movies recently aired on the late great Pope John Paul II.  Christianity is certainly no cheap laugh for the networks&#8230; especially when so many of the stars of said religion do it so well themselves:</p>
<p>Oral Roberts (lost many stations after the infamous &#8220;God will call me home&#8221; speech, claimed to see a gigantic Jesus behind his City Of Faith in Tulsa)<br />
Pat Robertson (not on Hugo Chavez&#8217; Christmas card list this year, by any means&#8230; and hey, did you hear what he said about Sharon&#8217;s stroke?)<br />
Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker (you know the story)<br />
Jimmy Swaggart (his episode with a hooker in a motel room brought new meaning to the term &#8220;lay ministry&#8221;)</p>
<p>Thankfully, all of this is countered by the dedicated TV ministries of Dr. Robert Schuller (who recently stepped down, bless him) and Billy Graham.  And let us not forget the late great Mr. (Fred) Rodgers &#8212; how many of us knew he was a Presbyterian minister? &#8212; or Bishop Fulton J. Sheen, whose oratory trancended denominations.</p>
<p>Yeah, TV&#8217;s full of saints and sinners.  Shouldn&#8217;t we be used to figuring out who&#8217;s who by now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Rockford</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22920</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Rockford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 07:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22920</guid>
		<description>Salt Lake City itself (as opposed to Utah in general) is fairly liberal. IIRC it's Mayor is Democratic, and openly gay. It also has a large illegal population, gang crime, and the usual ills you find in any large city. Went heavily for Kerry in 04; about 75% or so.

It's not surprising the Salt Lake City people decided to keep the show. The other stations serve a far more rural area, that is culturally more conservative. The show is not Will and Grace, it mocks the IDEA of Christianity while paying lip service to it. Imagine the guy being Desperate Housewives coming up with his idea of a show to appeal to those Red State Religious conservatives who paid out big bucks to see Passion (ugh not my kind of movie).

The show is bad TV and designed (because Hollywood can't help it) to offend the very people the show is supposed to attract. The people in Salt Lake City are likely to be middle class professionals in the suburbs, hip twentysomethings in the central city; mixed with working-class or poor Latinos; and rich urbanites. They won't watch the show because they won't care.

Anyway it's a mistake to characterize SLC with the rest of Utah. Very different.

The real story here is that Hollywood cannot for it's life make stuff that the fairly religious like. The Apostle is about the only thing that ever came close, and Duvall had to push that one himself. They see the money just lying on the table and have absolutely NO WAY to pick it up.

This isn't religious bigotry IMHO. AFAIK Will and Grace and the rest of the NBC lineup airs in these cities. The show is just designed because Hollywood can't help it to offend Christians.

As far as Christians in general being treated; well world-wide they are persecuted. Three Catholic High School Girls were beheaded in Indonesia for their faith; Christians are routinely killed for their religion in Africa, South-West Asia, South-East Asia (ask the East Timorian Christians) and various other places like China or North Korea. Al Qaeda specifically cited UN Ambassador Mendes's support for Christian East Timor's independence against Muslim Indonesia as reason for killing him in Iraq. Sudanese Muslims justify enslaving and castrating Christian men from the south by their religion. So yes, Christians have a VERY good point world-wide about oppression, since it's well, factually correct.

In this country it is allowable to have something like "Piss Christ" whereas it's defacto against the Law to offend Muslims. Not on the order of other places but yes Christians are the least valued people in the US. Pat Robertson is an idiot (and it's good to say he is as often as possible); but it's not allowed to say that Dallas Muslims are idiots for hosting a celebration of Khomeni and his lunatic Revolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salt Lake City itself (as opposed to Utah in general) is fairly liberal. IIRC it&#8217;s Mayor is Democratic, and openly gay. It also has a large illegal population, gang crime, and the usual ills you find in any large city. Went heavily for Kerry in 04; about 75% or so.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not surprising the Salt Lake City people decided to keep the show. The other stations serve a far more rural area, that is culturally more conservative. The show is not Will and Grace, it mocks the IDEA of Christianity while paying lip service to it. Imagine the guy being Desperate Housewives coming up with his idea of a show to appeal to those Red State Religious conservatives who paid out big bucks to see Passion (ugh not my kind of movie).</p>
<p>The show is bad TV and designed (because Hollywood can&#8217;t help it) to offend the very people the show is supposed to attract. The people in Salt Lake City are likely to be middle class professionals in the suburbs, hip twentysomethings in the central city; mixed with working-class or poor Latinos; and rich urbanites. They won&#8217;t watch the show because they won&#8217;t care.</p>
<p>Anyway it&#8217;s a mistake to characterize SLC with the rest of Utah. Very different.</p>
<p>The real story here is that Hollywood cannot for it&#8217;s life make stuff that the fairly religious like. The Apostle is about the only thing that ever came close, and Duvall had to push that one himself. They see the money just lying on the table and have absolutely NO WAY to pick it up.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t religious bigotry IMHO. AFAIK Will and Grace and the rest of the NBC lineup airs in these cities. The show is just designed because Hollywood can&#8217;t help it to offend Christians.</p>
<p>As far as Christians in general being treated; well world-wide they are persecuted. Three Catholic High School Girls were beheaded in Indonesia for their faith; Christians are routinely killed for their religion in Africa, South-West Asia, South-East Asia (ask the East Timorian Christians) and various other places like China or North Korea. Al Qaeda specifically cited UN Ambassador Mendes&#8217;s support for Christian East Timor&#8217;s independence against Muslim Indonesia as reason for killing him in Iraq. Sudanese Muslims justify enslaving and castrating Christian men from the south by their religion. So yes, Christians have a VERY good point world-wide about oppression, since it&#8217;s well, factually correct.</p>
<p>In this country it is allowable to have something like &#8220;Piss Christ&#8221; whereas it&#8217;s defacto against the Law to offend Muslims. Not on the order of other places but yes Christians are the least valued people in the US. Pat Robertson is an idiot (and it&#8217;s good to say he is as often as possible); but it&#8217;s not allowed to say that Dallas Muslims are idiots for hosting a celebration of Khomeni and his lunatic Revolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22872</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 03:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22872</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure I agree with you a hundred percent on your police work, there, Jeff.  

Say what you want about the Little Rock affiliate, but according to the Reuters article you cited, it appears that WTWO's decision not to carry The Book of Daniel has nothing to do with the American Family Association:

&lt;blockquote&gt;WTWO general manager Duane Lammers said he is not pre-empting "Daniel" due to its content but rather to protest what he views as the networks' strong-arm approach to affiliates, as well inconsistent federal oversight of indecent content.

"This has nothing to do with the program and has nothing to do with the AFA," Lammers said. "I think the system is screwed up. I think the network thinks we are going to do whatever they tell us to do. I think the regulatory environment is flawed."&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Inconsistent oversight of indecent content?  A flawed regulatory environment?  That sounds like a man after your own heart, Jeff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I agree with you a hundred percent on your police work, there, Jeff.  </p>
<p>Say what you want about the Little Rock affiliate, but according to the Reuters article you cited, it appears that WTWO&#8217;s decision not to carry The Book of Daniel has nothing to do with the American Family Association:</p>
<blockquote><p>WTWO general manager Duane Lammers said he is not pre-empting &#8220;Daniel&#8221; due to its content but rather to protest what he views as the networks&#8217; strong-arm approach to affiliates, as well inconsistent federal oversight of indecent content.</p>
<p>&#8220;This has nothing to do with the program and has nothing to do with the AFA,&#8221; Lammers said. &#8220;I think the system is screwed up. I think the network thinks we are going to do whatever they tell us to do. I think the regulatory environment is flawed.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Inconsistent oversight of indecent content?  A flawed regulatory environment?  That sounds like a man after your own heart, Jeff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim S</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22854</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 01:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22854</guid>
		<description>Ummm....Christopher, Jeff is a Christian. Just not a fundamentalist one.

I'm fascinated that no one has pointed out that a very simple reality is that it's perfectly fine for Jews to make fun of aspects of Judaism and Christians to make fun of aspects of Christianity (or at least how some people practice it) whereas pointing the finger at each other won't be seen the same way for the foreseeable future. I leave Islam out of that equation because let's face it, far too many Muslims (so far as I can tell) don't understand enough about free speech and why it's important when it comes to their faith. Bigotry? I don't think it is when it is a simple fact that in most (Or is it all?) Muslim nations blasphemy is a crime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm&#8230;.Christopher, Jeff is a Christian. Just not a fundamentalist one.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m fascinated that no one has pointed out that a very simple reality is that it&#8217;s perfectly fine for Jews to make fun of aspects of Judaism and Christians to make fun of aspects of Christianity (or at least how some people practice it) whereas pointing the finger at each other won&#8217;t be seen the same way for the foreseeable future. I leave Islam out of that equation because let&#8217;s face it, far too many Muslims (so far as I can tell) don&#8217;t understand enough about free speech and why it&#8217;s important when it comes to their faith. Bigotry? I don&#8217;t think it is when it is a simple fact that in most (Or is it all?) Muslim nations blasphemy is a crime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Fotos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22843</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Fotos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 00:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22843</guid>
		<description>Something there is about Christianity that transforms admirable, rational intellects like those possessed by Jarvis and Christopher Hitchens into rage-spewing maniacs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something there is about Christianity that transforms admirable, rational intellects like those possessed by Jarvis and Christopher Hitchens into rage-spewing maniacs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravo</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22835</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 00:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22835</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;No where, in this country, the law is saying that we have to care about God.&lt;/i&gt;

Of course not...nor should it.

But while your caring about having the politically "correct sensitivity" about all the left's little pet groups ,how about giving the same respect to Christians, which only number 85% of the population.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>No where, in this country, the law is saying that we have to care about God.</i></p>
<p>Of course not&#8230;nor should it.</p>
<p>But while your caring about having the politically &#8220;correct sensitivity&#8221; about all the left&#8217;s little pet groups ,how about giving the same respect to Christians, which only number 85% of the population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Tree &#187; AFA Against the Book of Daniel - Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22832</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Tree &#187; AFA Against the Book of Daniel - Part II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 00:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22832</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis (aka. &#8220;The Buzzmachine&#8221;) is pissed - very pissed - and damn right he is: So these NBC scumbags went along with it. Would they have gone alone with the KKK trying to kill I Spy because it had a black star? Same thing. Bigotry is bigotry. One station tried to make up a spin that itâ€™s a protest again the regulatory environment. Well, bullshit. Shows with homosexual characters are not â€” yet â€” a subject of regulation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis (aka. &#8220;The Buzzmachine&#8221;) is pissed - very pissed - and damn right he is: So these NBC scumbags went along with it. Would they have gone alone with the KKK trying to kill I Spy because it had a black star? Same thing. Bigotry is bigotry. One station tried to make up a spin that itâ€™s a protest again the regulatory environment. Well, bullshit. Shows with homosexual characters are not â€” yet â€” a subject of regulation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claude Brunel</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22831</link>
		<dc:creator>Claude Brunel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 00:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22831</guid>
		<description>I was thinking that the US are a SECULAR State. Did something changed in the last hour? Why should we have a sincere reverence for God? Religion is a personal mater, that should stay a personal mater. Except if Americans vote to have a theocracy. No where, in this country, the law is saying that we have to care about God. Freedom of religion means also freedom of not having one. Respect is due to all of ours believes, not just one of them. And not by obligation, but by respect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking that the US are a SECULAR State. Did something changed in the last hour? Why should we have a sincere reverence for God? Religion is a personal mater, that should stay a personal mater. Except if Americans vote to have a theocracy. No where, in this country, the law is saying that we have to care about God. Freedom of religion means also freedom of not having one. Respect is due to all of ours believes, not just one of them. And not by obligation, but by respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Guinane</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22830</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Guinane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 00:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22830</guid>
		<description>Glad to hear it, Ravo. It would certainly put a dampener on the fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear it, Ravo. It would certainly put a dampener on the fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravo</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22826</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 00:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22826</guid>
		<description>Noel. I thought we were discussing about disrespecting Christianity on a TV show while prohibiting the same kind of disrespect on TV re: PC subjects.

I have no problem with the debate here...gheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noel. I thought we were discussing about disrespecting Christianity on a TV show while prohibiting the same kind of disrespect on TV re: PC subjects.</p>
<p>I have no problem with the debate here&#8230;gheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Guinane</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22824</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Guinane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 23:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22824</guid>
		<description>That's ridiculous. I have the right to disagree with you, Ravo, and you have the right to disagree with me. This is a forum for debate. I have not walked into your church, gestured obscenely and told you to stick your God where the sun don't shine. Both of us have come to this open forum to debate. If you find it offensive or disrespectful, no one is forcing you to type in www.buzzmachine.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s ridiculous. I have the right to disagree with you, Ravo, and you have the right to disagree with me. This is a forum for debate. I have not walked into your church, gestured obscenely and told you to stick your God where the sun don&#8217;t shine. Both of us have come to this open forum to debate. If you find it offensive or disrespectful, no one is forcing you to type in <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.buzzmachine.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravo</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22822</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 23:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22822</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Why is it okay to be un-PC in one area and not another?&lt;/i&gt; 
That is exactly what the PC police are perpetrating now.

If perchance God is real, Noel, I suspect you will be finding out why within the next hundred years. lol


If I was in another country, I wouldn't disrespect what the host country reverently believed in.  Here, most have a sincere reverence for God, and to disrespect that is to disrespect 85% of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Why is it okay to be un-PC in one area and not another?</i><br />
That is exactly what the PC police are perpetrating now.</p>
<p>If perchance God is real, Noel, I suspect you will be finding out why within the next hundred years. lol</p>
<p>If I was in another country, I wouldn&#8217;t disrespect what the host country reverently believed in.  Here, most have a sincere reverence for God, and to disrespect that is to disrespect 85% of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22821</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 23:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22821</guid>
		<description>Noel, Why do you come on this board and make a mockery of the Lord Jesus, God, and all that we patriotic Americans hold sacred?  Do you have no limits to your vile diatribes? Will you now stoop so low as to blaspheme the Spaghetti Monster?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noel, Why do you come on this board and make a mockery of the Lord Jesus, God, and all that we patriotic Americans hold sacred?  Do you have no limits to your vile diatribes? Will you now stoop so low as to blaspheme the Spaghetti Monster?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Guinane</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22820</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Guinane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 23:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/05/972/#comment-22820</guid>
		<description>How devout are those 85% you say revere God because they're certainly not going to church on Sunday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How devout are those 85% you say revere God because they&#8217;re certainly not going to church on Sunday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
