<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 98.5% of blog comments now illegal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:40:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Trolls, Beware: You Are Breaking Federal Laws &#124; The Online Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-422735</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Trolls, Beware: You Are Breaking Federal Laws &#124; The Online Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 21:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-422735</guid>
		<description>[...] from Jeff Jarvis, who notes &quot;The way we’re headed — from the PC left and the religious right — it surely will [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from Jeff Jarvis, who notes &quot;The way we’re headed — from the PC left and the religious right — it surely will [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-114185</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-114185</guid>
		<description>Very pretty site! Keep working. thnx!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very pretty site! Keep working. thnx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Nevins</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-100965</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Nevins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 23:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-100965</guid>
		<description>Super color scheme, I like it! Keep up the good work. Thanks for sharing this wonderful site with us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super color scheme, I like it! Keep up the good work. Thanks for sharing this wonderful site with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Diva</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-91954</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Diva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 04:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-91954</guid>
		<description>I say briefly: Best! Useful information. Good job guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say briefly: Best! Useful information. Good job guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belfast Blogger &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Anonymous Comments Are Now a Federal Offense</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-88925</link>
		<dc:creator>Belfast Blogger &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Anonymous Comments Are Now a Federal Offense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 23:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-88925</guid>
		<description>[...] According to this post from Jeff Jarvis, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without disclosing your true identity. No joke. So here&#8217;s my question. Does this mean that hosting a blog that allows for people to comment anonymously is breaking the law? Micro Persuasion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] According to this post from Jeff Jarvis, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without disclosing your true identity. No joke. So here&#8217;s my question. Does this mean that hosting a blog that allows for people to comment anonymously is breaking the law? Micro Persuasion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herman Appleton</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-71478</link>
		<dc:creator>Herman Appleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 17:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-71478</guid>
		<description>Hallo I absolutely adore your site. You have beautiful graphics I have ever seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hallo I absolutely adore your site. You have beautiful graphics I have ever seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Throat</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-43688</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Throat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 10:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-43688</guid>
		<description>98.5%? You seem to be assuming that 100% of blogs are in the USA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>98.5%? You seem to be assuming that 100% of blogs are in the USA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Porno Sex Pic</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-43285</link>
		<dc:creator>Porno Sex Pic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 21:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-43285</guid>
		<description>Free porno pictures ! Free porn videos ! Hot porno movies at pornosexpic.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free porno pictures ! Free porn videos ! Hot porno movies at pornosexpic.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: picture of zoroastrianism</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-33170</link>
		<dc:creator>picture of zoroastrianism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 07:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-33170</guid>
		<description>98.5%??? Where exactly did you get that figure from Jeff? Anyhow, I think the law is rediculous. We are going too far and creating too much clutter and burden in what people should be paying attention to. Yet on the other hand some individual might use a platform to sound an opinion about a person or a group of people and there might be a lack of access to that platform for the purpose of defending one&#039;s good name. Even if there is access to the same platform you may miss the audience that was at the receiving end of the negative campaign. Why are people so rude? Why can&#039;t we just accept the moto that we should all be as good to each other as humanly possible. And then, there won&#039;t be any need for laws of such kind.

Best</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>98.5%??? Where exactly did you get that figure from Jeff? Anyhow, I think the law is rediculous. We are going too far and creating too much clutter and burden in what people should be paying attention to. Yet on the other hand some individual might use a platform to sound an opinion about a person or a group of people and there might be a lack of access to that platform for the purpose of defending one&#8217;s good name. Even if there is access to the same platform you may miss the audience that was at the receiving end of the negative campaign. Why are people so rude? Why can&#8217;t we just accept the moto that we should all be as good to each other as humanly possible. And then, there won&#8217;t be any need for laws of such kind.</p>
<p>Best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Comments Are Now a Federal Offense at BelfastBlogger.com</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-29771</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Comments Are Now a Federal Offense at BelfastBlogger.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 00:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-29771</guid>
		<description>[...] According to this post from Jeff Jarvis, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without disclosing your true identity. No joke. So here&#8217;s my question. Does this mean that hosting a blog that allows for people to comment anonymously is breaking the law? Micro Persuasion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] According to this post from Jeff Jarvis, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without disclosing your true identity. No joke. So here&#8217;s my question. Does this mean that hosting a blog that allows for people to comment anonymously is breaking the law? Micro Persuasion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nexus</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-29288</link>
		<dc:creator>Nexus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 20:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-29288</guid>
		<description>Everyone is getting so worked up over this ammended law that it is truly funny!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone is getting so worked up over this ammended law that it is truly funny!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Step</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-26547</link>
		<dc:creator>Step</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 04:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-26547</guid>
		<description>There should be a law stating that the only people allowed to annoy others are public relations people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There should be a law stating that the only people allowed to annoy others are public relations people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helzerman&#8217;s Odd Bits &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-01-23</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-26520</link>
		<dc:creator>Helzerman&#8217;s Odd Bits &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-01-23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-26520</guid>
		<description>[...] BuzzMachine Â» Blog Archive Â» 98.5% of blog comments now illegal (tags: media, censorship, government, Bush) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BuzzMachine Â» Blog Archive Â» 98.5% of blog comments now illegal (tags: media, censorship, government, Bush) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helzerman&#8217;s Odd Bits &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Guests, you&#8217;ve been warned&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-26509</link>
		<dc:creator>Helzerman&#8217;s Odd Bits &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Guests, you&#8217;ve been warned&#8230;.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-26509</guid>
		<description>[...] Steve Rubel andÂ  Jeff Jarvis have conversations going about this on their blogs.Â  I&#8217;ve also started a forum topic which, after seeing some of the comments on the Google thread, ought to be very &#8220;interesting.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steve Rubel andÂ  Jeff Jarvis have conversations going about this on their blogs.Â  I&#8217;ve also started a forum topic which, after seeing some of the comments on the Google thread, ought to be very &#8220;interesting.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: louis brown</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-26406</link>
		<dc:creator>louis brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-26406</guid>
		<description>Ode to Carl Rove

A republican known as Carl Rove
Has a darkly brown stain on his nose
He got it I hear
From thinking the rear
Of his oleTexas boss was a rose</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ode to Carl Rove</p>
<p>A republican known as Carl Rove<br />
Has a darkly brown stain on his nose<br />
He got it I hear<br />
From thinking the rear<br />
Of his oleTexas boss was a rose</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-25356</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 01:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-25356</guid>
		<description>98.5%? You seem to be assuming that 100% of blogs are in the USA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>98.5%? You seem to be assuming that 100% of blogs are in the USA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-25061</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-25061</guid>
		<description>Everyone is getting so worked up over this ammended law that it is truly funny! 

Nothing has changed except the new law &quot;expands the definition of a telecommunications device to include any device or software that uses the Internet and possible Internet technologies such as voice over internet services. This amendment will allow federal prosecutors more discretion in charging stalking cases that occur entirely over the internet.â€

If you,  your wife or your kids were threatened over the Internet, you would want a means by which to stop it. Anything short of that, is just annoying and no one will be bothered.  Before this law was expanded to cover the Internet, did you ever hear of anyone having their wife arrested for an annoying phone conversation? So, don&#039;t stress!

No one was upset until Declan McCullough cast his spin on it. Consider the source and ignore him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone is getting so worked up over this ammended law that it is truly funny! </p>
<p>Nothing has changed except the new law &#8220;expands the definition of a telecommunications device to include any device or software that uses the Internet and possible Internet technologies such as voice over internet services. This amendment will allow federal prosecutors more discretion in charging stalking cases that occur entirely over the internet.â€</p>
<p>If you,  your wife or your kids were threatened over the Internet, you would want a means by which to stop it. Anything short of that, is just annoying and no one will be bothered.  Before this law was expanded to cover the Internet, did you ever hear of anyone having their wife arrested for an annoying phone conversation? So, don&#8217;t stress!</p>
<p>No one was upset until Declan McCullough cast his spin on it. Consider the source and ignore him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin Reams &#124; Anti-Annoy Legislation &#124; devinreams.com</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-25030</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin Reams &#124; Anti-Annoy Legislation &#124; devinreams.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-25030</guid>
		<description>[...] Archives       &#171; MySpace Login Disabled        Published 0 minutes ago --&gt;   Â» Everyone is going crazy over the new anti-annoying law. First off, people will read a quick excerpt and conclude that this legislation was intended soley for the purpose of getting rid of â€˜annoying anonymousâ€™ comments online. As the original article points out, this was one of those â€œjust slipped it inâ€ laws that became part of the entire act. In any case, this is hardly surprising. Besides, we all, or should all know by now that anything can be passed into law. Just wait until it hits court; thatâ€™s when constitutionality will be decided. Can I also point out in order for this to be passed the Senate and House had to vote on it? So I guess what Iâ€™m saying is, the ignorant president bashing can promptly end now. In any case, I donâ€™t think allowing bloggers to post anonymous comments is the issue at hand here. I think any court would say â€˜noâ€™, Steve. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Archives       &laquo; MySpace Login Disabled        Published 0 minutes ago &#8211;&gt;   Â» Everyone is going crazy over the new anti-annoying law. First off, people will read a quick excerpt and conclude that this legislation was intended soley for the purpose of getting rid of â€˜annoying anonymousâ€™ comments online. As the original article points out, this was one of those â€œjust slipped it inâ€ laws that became part of the entire act. In any case, this is hardly surprising. Besides, we all, or should all know by now that anything can be passed into law. Just wait until it hits court; thatâ€™s when constitutionality will be decided. Can I also point out in order for this to be passed the Senate and House had to vote on it? So I guess what Iâ€™m saying is, the ignorant president bashing can promptly end now. In any case, I donâ€™t think allowing bloggers to post anonymous comments is the issue at hand here. I think any court would say â€˜noâ€™, Steve. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-24687</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 04:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-24687</guid>
		<description>Ummmmm screw Bush and his terrorist-fearing psychoses.  Fighting a war in Afghanistan is one thing, waging war against yourself and your people is stupid.  Why aren&#039;t there any competent leaders like King Solomon and Lorenzo de&#039; Medici anymore?  Even Nixon looks good compared to this monkey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummmmm screw Bush and his terrorist-fearing psychoses.  Fighting a war in Afghanistan is one thing, waging war against yourself and your people is stupid.  Why aren&#8217;t there any competent leaders like King Solomon and Lorenzo de&#8217; Medici anymore?  Even Nixon looks good compared to this monkey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Kellogg</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-24364</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Kellogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-24364</guid>
		<description>For your amusement, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=162692&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Am I Annoying You Yet?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; A light hearted look at the kerfuffle surrounding the new ennoyance law,

Yes, The Volokh Conspiracy gets mentioned.

BTW, I&#039;ve met people online who get annoyed when you ask that they think. Some people aint happy &#039;less they have something to be annoyed about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For your amusement, <a href="http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=162692" rel="nofollow"><b>Am I Annoying You Yet?</b></a> A light hearted look at the kerfuffle surrounding the new ennoyance law,</p>
<p>Yes, The Volokh Conspiracy gets mentioned.</p>
<p>BTW, I&#8217;ve met people online who get annoyed when you ask that they think. Some people aint happy &#8216;less they have something to be annoyed about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Back &#187; To Annoy Online Illegal</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-24351</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back &#187; To Annoy Online Illegal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-24351</guid>
		<description>[...] Many sources are reporting the cnet post Creata an e-nnoyance, go to jail, which notes that a new recently passed law (Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005) outlaws anonymous annoying: SEC. 113. PREVENTING CYBERSTALKING. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Many sources are reporting the cnet post Creata an e-nnoyance, go to jail, which notes that a new recently passed law (Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005) outlaws anonymous annoying: SEC. 113. PREVENTING CYBERSTALKING. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaius Arbo</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-24332</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaius Arbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-24332</guid>
		<description>Frankly, I spent a lot of time fact checking this one yesterday. McCullagh is NOT accurate. Not even close. I see others have already linked Volokh, so I won&#039;t bother. 

I heard of this on another site and immediately began fact checking - had pretty well resolved it in under an hour, but it took about 2-3 hours real time (only about 40 minutes actual working time) to finalize that this was bogus. I&#039;m not even a lawyer, either. CNet needs to retract or correct this.

Mr. Jarvis, could you amend your story so it doesn&#039;t add fuel to foolish?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, I spent a lot of time fact checking this one yesterday. McCullagh is NOT accurate. Not even close. I see others have already linked Volokh, so I won&#8217;t bother. </p>
<p>I heard of this on another site and immediately began fact checking &#8211; had pretty well resolved it in under an hour, but it took about 2-3 hours real time (only about 40 minutes actual working time) to finalize that this was bogus. I&#8217;m not even a lawyer, either. CNet needs to retract or correct this.</p>
<p>Mr. Jarvis, could you amend your story so it doesn&#8217;t add fuel to foolish?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-24330</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-24330</guid>
		<description>Seth is right about McCullough, he&#039;s Urban Legend Central, just recently pushing that crazy story about the Mao&#039;s Little Red Book on his Politech list. The man&#039;s either a complete idiot or utterly deranged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth is right about McCullough, he&#8217;s Urban Legend Central, just recently pushing that crazy story about the Mao&#8217;s Little Red Book on his Politech list. The man&#8217;s either a complete idiot or utterly deranged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Original Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-24329</link>
		<dc:creator>The Original Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-24329</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Baiting the blogosphere&lt;/strong&gt;

	Declan McCullough is Cnet&#8217;s chief political correspondent and an ardent champion of civil liberties, EFF-style*. He runs the Politech e-mail list, a place where such stories as the Little Red Book hoax are given wide currency and writes a column...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Baiting the blogosphere</strong></p>
<p>	Declan McCullough is Cnet&#8217;s chief political correspondent and an ardent champion of civil liberties, EFF-style*. He runs the Politech e-mail list, a place where such stories as the Little Red Book hoax are given wide currency and writes a column&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-24321</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/09/985-of-comments-now-illegal/#comment-24321</guid>
		<description>More debunking, including discussion of &quot;annoy&quot;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://volokh.com/posts/1136873535.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://volokh.com/posts/1136873535.shtml&lt;/a&gt;

[Orin Kerr, January 10, 2006 at 1:12am]
A Skeptical Look at &quot;Create an E-annoyance, Go to Jail&quot;:

&quot;Declan McCullagh has penned a column that is custom-designed to race around the blogosphere. ...

This is just the perfect blogosphere story, isn&#039;t it? It combines threats to bloggers with government incompetence and Big Brother, all wrapped up and tied togther with a little bow. Unsurprisingly, a lot of bloggers are taking the bait.

Skeptical readers will be shocked, shocked to know that the truth is quite different. ...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More debunking, including discussion of &#8220;annoy&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://volokh.com/posts/1136873535.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://volokh.com/posts/1136873535.shtml</a></p>
<p>[Orin Kerr, January 10, 2006 at 1:12am]<br />
A Skeptical Look at &#8220;Create an E-annoyance, Go to Jail&#8221;:</p>
<p>&#8220;Declan McCullagh has penned a column that is custom-designed to race around the blogosphere. &#8230;</p>
<p>This is just the perfect blogosphere story, isn&#8217;t it? It combines threats to bloggers with government incompetence and Big Brother, all wrapped up and tied togther with a little bow. Unsurprisingly, a lot of bloggers are taking the bait.</p>
<p>Skeptical readers will be shocked, shocked to know that the truth is quite different. &#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

