<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian column: Lessons of West Virginia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/16/guardian-column-lessons-of-west-virginia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/16/guardian-column-lessons-of-west-virginia/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:40:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Valerie Stivers-Isakova</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/16/guardian-column-lessons-of-west-virginia/#comment-25948</link>
		<dc:creator>Valerie Stivers-Isakova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1035#comment-25948</guid>
		<description>Some of this stuff about news being a collaborative process seems like empty repackaging of what news, and reporting has always been when it&#039;s doing its job right. The reporter should have called some cookie experts anyway, in moves known as &quot;sourcing,&quot; &quot;reporting&quot; and &quot;fact-checking.&quot; I don&#039;t see why he or she needs a blog to ask the advice of blog buddies on the topic. If blogs facilitate research, that&#039;s nice, but just doing the research is the ultimate point here, on the Internet or no.  I&#039;d also disagree with the notion that &quot;It&#039;s time for reporters to start telling the audience what they don&#039;t know.&quot; Your job, as a reporter is to find stuff out. If you don&#039;t know what&#039;s going on, you aren&#039;t doing your job. Asking those who do know, firsthand, what&#039;s happening can be called &#039;sharing with the community&#039; if you like, but it used to be called reporting, and I&#039;m not sure how it&#039;s changed. There are so many exciting ways that the blogosphere is changing news, but these may not be they.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of this stuff about news being a collaborative process seems like empty repackaging of what news, and reporting has always been when it&#8217;s doing its job right. The reporter should have called some cookie experts anyway, in moves known as &#8220;sourcing,&#8221; &#8220;reporting&#8221; and &#8220;fact-checking.&#8221; I don&#8217;t see why he or she needs a blog to ask the advice of blog buddies on the topic. If blogs facilitate research, that&#8217;s nice, but just doing the research is the ultimate point here, on the Internet or no.  I&#8217;d also disagree with the notion that &#8220;It&#8217;s time for reporters to start telling the audience what they don&#8217;t know.&#8221; Your job, as a reporter is to find stuff out. If you don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s going on, you aren&#8217;t doing your job. Asking those who do know, firsthand, what&#8217;s happening can be called &#8217;sharing with the community&#8217; if you like, but it used to be called reporting, and I&#8217;m not sure how it&#8217;s changed. There are so many exciting ways that the blogosphere is changing news, but these may not be they.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FJ</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/01/16/guardian-column-lessons-of-west-virginia/#comment-25714</link>
		<dc:creator>FJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1035#comment-25714</guid>
		<description>Mr Jarvis, what you seem to be saying is that newsmaking is some sort of democratic process where everyone chips in and we then decide whether a piece is worth running. That simply is not the case.

&lt;i&gt;Opinions&lt;/i&gt; are cheap, nay free, and the more the merrier. But there is no substitute for a well-researched, well-written news story and the NSA item was one of those, whatever you may think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Jarvis, what you seem to be saying is that newsmaking is some sort of democratic process where everyone chips in and we then decide whether a piece is worth running. That simply is not the case.</p>
<p><i>Opinions</i> are cheap, nay free, and the more the merrier. But there is no substitute for a well-researched, well-written news story and the NSA item was one of those, whatever you may think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

