<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The end of TV as we know it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/02/20/the-end-of-tv-as-we-know-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/02/20/the-end-of-tv-as-we-know-it/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:21:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd Lokken</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/02/20/the-end-of-tv-as-we-know-it/#comment-30685</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Lokken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/02/20/the-end-of-tv-as-we-know-it/#comment-30685</guid>
		<description>One last thought....you would think that with NBC mired in a season-long ratings disaster, they would want to get their shows out any way possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One last thought&#8230;.you would think that with NBC mired in a season-long ratings disaster, they would want to get their shows out any way possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Lokken</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/02/20/the-end-of-tv-as-we-know-it/#comment-30301</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Lokken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/02/20/the-end-of-tv-as-we-know-it/#comment-30301</guid>
		<description>I guess legally they did have the right...but I think the question is did it really make sense?  Sooner or later they are going to have to figure out how to embrace technology rather than fight it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess legally they did have the right&#8230;but I think the question is did it really make sense?  Sooner or later they are going to have to figure out how to embrace technology rather than fight it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I.F. Stoner</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/02/20/the-end-of-tv-as-we-know-it/#comment-30300</link>
		<dc:creator>I.F. Stoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/02/20/the-end-of-tv-as-we-know-it/#comment-30300</guid>
		<description>Jim: you nailed it. But that&#039;s the problem with MSM/Dinosaur-era/whatever media. It&#039;s run by people who start and end all inquiry with their rights, as opposed to what&#039;s RIGHT to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim: you nailed it. But that&#8217;s the problem with MSM/Dinosaur-era/whatever media. It&#8217;s run by people who start and end all inquiry with their rights, as opposed to what&#8217;s RIGHT to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Kerr</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/02/20/the-end-of-tv-as-we-know-it/#comment-30225</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 23:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/02/20/the-end-of-tv-as-we-know-it/#comment-30225</guid>
		<description>NBC had a RIGHT to request the video be pulled down, but that doesn&#039;t mean they should have done it, and you&#039;re right...they shouldn&#039;t have. How hard is it to simply request a copyright notification be added or some other intellectual property notification while still allowing free use of what is clearly by now a promotional package of short videos?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC had a RIGHT to request the video be pulled down, but that doesn&#8217;t mean they should have done it, and you&#8217;re right&#8230;they shouldn&#8217;t have. How hard is it to simply request a copyright notification be added or some other intellectual property notification while still allowing free use of what is clearly by now a promotional package of short videos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I.F. Stoner</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/02/20/the-end-of-tv-as-we-know-it/#comment-30219</link>
		<dc:creator>I.F. Stoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 22:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/02/20/the-end-of-tv-as-we-know-it/#comment-30219</guid>
		<description>NBC act like idiots...this surprises you?

They have a team of lawyers rooted in 1950&#039;s &quot;we&#039;re big, and we can do whatever we want&quot; mentality. It&#039;s OUR property. It&#039;s OURS OURS OURS.

They treat people as property, too. Next big scandal to break there: bookers at CNBC are threatening guests that &quot;if you appear on Fox, CNN or Bloomberg you will not be interviewed on CNBC.&quot; 

This is journalism? One thing to show enterprise and be the first to get to people with something to say. That&#039;s enterprise. But to threaten news sources NOT to talk to other outlets is akin to sneaking up to the competitor&#039;s office and cutting their phone lines.

Desperate people do desperate things, I guess....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC act like idiots&#8230;this surprises you?</p>
<p>They have a team of lawyers rooted in 1950&#8217;s &#8220;we&#8217;re big, and we can do whatever we want&#8221; mentality. It&#8217;s OUR property. It&#8217;s OURS OURS OURS.</p>
<p>They treat people as property, too. Next big scandal to break there: bookers at CNBC are threatening guests that &#8220;if you appear on Fox, CNN or Bloomberg you will not be interviewed on CNBC.&#8221; </p>
<p>This is journalism? One thing to show enterprise and be the first to get to people with something to say. That&#8217;s enterprise. But to threaten news sources NOT to talk to other outlets is akin to sneaking up to the competitor&#8217;s office and cutting their phone lines.</p>
<p>Desperate people do desperate things, I guess&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/02/20/the-end-of-tv-as-we-know-it/#comment-30188</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/02/20/the-end-of-tv-as-we-know-it/#comment-30188</guid>
		<description>TV Networks are running the risk of making the same mistakes the Music Business did, the one thing you can&#039;t ignore is change, you need to adapt, not resist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TV Networks are running the risk of making the same mistakes the Music Business did, the one thing you can&#8217;t ignore is change, you need to adapt, not resist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Lokken</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/02/20/the-end-of-tv-as-we-know-it/#comment-29948</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Lokken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/02/20/the-end-of-tv-as-we-know-it/#comment-29948</guid>
		<description>You have to remember...those old NBC guys...and I do mean old...probably just don&#039;t get new media!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to remember&#8230;those old NBC guys&#8230;and I do mean old&#8230;probably just don&#8217;t get new media!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

