<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reuters gets it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; If you can&#8217;t beat &#8216;em&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-78027</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; If you can&#8217;t beat &#8216;em&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 12:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-78027</guid>
		<description>[...] Shane Richmond, news editor of Telegraph.co.uk, is writing a most sensible blog where he sometimes beats his newspaper cohorts upside the head about the ways of the future. In this post, he argues that journalists must be seeders, not leaders (echoing Reuters chief Tom Glocer). And here he says to those complaining about Google and aggregators: Deal with it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shane Richmond, news editor of Telegraph.co.uk, is writing a most sensible blog where he sometimes beats his newspaper cohorts upside the head about the ways of the future. In this post, he argues that journalists must be seeders, not leaders (echoing Reuters chief Tom Glocer). And here he says to those complaining about Google and aggregators: Deal with it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ponto Media &#187; PatrÃ£o da Reuters fala do jornalismo do futuro</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-66430</link>
		<dc:creator>Ponto Media &#187; PatrÃ£o da Reuters fala do jornalismo do futuro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 11:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-66430</guid>
		<description>[...] O PATRÃƒO da Reuters falou do jornalismo do futuro na conferÃªncia da Online Publishers Association e o que ele disse Ã© mesmo importante. Jeff Jarvis, da Buzz Machine, comenta a intervenÃ§Ã£o. Segundo o journalism.co.uk, a principal novidade do discurso terÃ¡ sido o relaxamento dos direitos de autor da agÃªncia a favor dos bloggers: We like to encourage bloggers to take our RSS feed content and start a conversation around it,â€ Kiss quoted him as saying. So if a blogger copies and pastes one of our stories on their site, you wonâ€™t find us going after them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] O PATRÃƒO da Reuters falou do jornalismo do futuro na conferÃªncia da Online Publishers Association e o que ele disse Ã© mesmo importante. Jeff Jarvis, da Buzz Machine, comenta a intervenÃ§Ã£o. Segundo o journalism.co.uk, a principal novidade do discurso terÃ¡ sido o relaxamento dos direitos de autor da agÃªncia a favor dos bloggers: We like to encourage bloggers to take our RSS feed content and start a conversation around it,â€ Kiss quoted him as saying. So if a blogger copies and pastes one of our stories on their site, you wonâ€™t find us going after them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Royal Shell</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-64320</link>
		<dc:creator>Royal Shell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 23:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-64320</guid>
		<description>Yes the Internet is exactly that, the Revolution of our generation.
It will take some time, but it will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes the Internet is exactly that, the Revolution of our generation.<br />
It will take some time, but it will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Royal Shell</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-64315</link>
		<dc:creator>Royal Shell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 22:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-64315</guid>
		<description>Which is something many journalists do not have any more.
That is the freedom to say what they really think and not what they think the reader would like to read, or what is convenient that the reader reads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which is something many journalists do not have any more.<br />
That is the freedom to say what they really think and not what they think the reader would like to read, or what is convenient that the reader reads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve L.</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-51242</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 18:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-51242</guid>
		<description>Were do i find some new MS layouts?

Thanks,
Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were do i find some new MS layouts?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ç¤¾åŒº2.0 - å›¾æž—ä¸­æ–‡è¯‘ç«™</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-48040</link>
		<dc:creator>ç¤¾åŒº2.0 - å›¾æž—ä¸­æ–‡è¯‘ç«™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 18:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-48040</guid>
		<description>[...] Jarvis, Jeff. â€œReuters Gets Itâ€ BuzzMachine. 3/2/06. http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/ 03/02/1205/ Viewed 3/16/06. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jarvis, Jeff. â€œReuters Gets Itâ€ BuzzMachine. 3/2/06. <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/" rel="nofollow">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/</a> 03/02/1205/ Viewed 3/16/06. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; We Media, continued</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-43935</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; We Media, continued</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 08:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-43935</guid>
		<description>[...] We start with Tom Glocer, head of Reuters, (his last speech here) who says that the plumbing (read: media) doesn&#8217;t matter, the message does. Note again that the smartest media execs in the world are trying their best to throw off the shackles of their media. Reuters&#8217; media history includes horses, pigeons, boats, and wires. He says that Reuters has an advantage over other media, trapped in schedules, because they&#8217;ve always been 24/7. Note that he is competing with those in other media. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We start with Tom Glocer, head of Reuters, (his last speech here) who says that the plumbing (read: media) doesn&#8217;t matter, the message does. Note again that the smartest media execs in the world are trying their best to throw off the shackles of their media. Reuters&#8217; media history includes horses, pigeons, boats, and wires. He says that Reuters has an advantage over other media, trapped in schedules, because they&#8217;ve always been 24/7. Note that he is competing with those in other media. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InfoTangle :: Community 2.0 :: April :: 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-36016</link>
		<dc:creator>InfoTangle :: Community 2.0 :: April :: 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 01:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-36016</guid>
		<description>[...] Jarvis, Jeff. â€œReuters Gets Itâ€ BuzzMachine. 3/2/06. http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/ 03/02/1205/ Viewed 3/16/06. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jarvis, Jeff. â€œReuters Gets Itâ€ BuzzMachine. 3/2/06. <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/" rel="nofollow">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/</a> 03/02/1205/ Viewed 3/16/06. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Ragone &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Future of Journalism?</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-33251</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Ragone &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Future of Journalism?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-33251</guid>
		<description>[...] This is an amazing post about a Keynote Address given by Tom Glocer, CEO of Reuters. Check it out. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is an amazing post about a Keynote Address given by Tom Glocer, CEO of Reuters. Check it out. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrizia Broghammer</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31837</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrizia Broghammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31837</guid>
		<description>â€œThereâ€™s no monopoly on being in the right place at the right time.â€

It is the monopoly of money.
Being in the right place at the right time has a cost that the journalist "in fieri" couldn,t afford.
He can be a better writer, a better commenter, but till now he was not able to express himself.

What Media will face in the near future is competition.
From the small man of the road.
Because hardware and broadcasting means have change to a point that whoever can be a writer and an editor.
Of course he also needs some brain.
It will be the competiton of brains more than the competition of means.

This capitalistic society will have to revaluate the human part and the skill.
A big newspaper could in theory loose the game against a one man journalist.
At the end of the day this small man could win for the simple reason he does something he likes to do, he wants to do, he believes in.
Which is something many journalists do not have any more.
That is the freedom to say what they really think and not what they think the reader would like to read, or what is convenient that the reader reads.
Which is something that once they used to call truth and meant truth.

Yes the Internet is exactly that, the Revolution of our generation.
It will take some time, but it will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€œThereâ€™s no monopoly on being in the right place at the right time.â€</p>
<p>It is the monopoly of money.<br />
Being in the right place at the right time has a cost that the journalist &#8220;in fieri&#8221; couldn,t afford.<br />
He can be a better writer, a better commenter, but till now he was not able to express himself.</p>
<p>What Media will face in the near future is competition.<br />
From the small man of the road.<br />
Because hardware and broadcasting means have change to a point that whoever can be a writer and an editor.<br />
Of course he also needs some brain.<br />
It will be the competiton of brains more than the competition of means.</p>
<p>This capitalistic society will have to revaluate the human part and the skill.<br />
A big newspaper could in theory loose the game against a one man journalist.<br />
At the end of the day this small man could win for the simple reason he does something he likes to do, he wants to do, he believes in.<br />
Which is something many journalists do not have any more.<br />
That is the freedom to say what they really think and not what they think the reader would like to read, or what is convenient that the reader reads.<br />
Which is something that once they used to call truth and meant truth.</p>
<p>Yes the Internet is exactly that, the Revolution of our generation.<br />
It will take some time, but it will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic Fulton</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31759</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic Fulton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31759</guid>
		<description>If there are Reuters Journalists out there who want to blog 'publicly' then let me know. I run Reuters Newsblogs (that Brian mentioned above) and I can create you account and take you through how to publish etc. Normal Reuters rules apply - fact based reporting, two-pairs of eyes, attribution to sources etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there are Reuters Journalists out there who want to blog &#8216;publicly&#8217; then let me know. I run Reuters Newsblogs (that Brian mentioned above) and I can create you account and take you through how to publish etc. Normal Reuters rules apply - fact based reporting, two-pairs of eyes, attribution to sources etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Reuters speech</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31680</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Reuters speech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 16:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31680</guid>
		<description>[...] A version of the speech by Reuters head Tom Glocer that I lauded is now online at the FT. While media companies are catching up with this demand for â€œpersonalisationâ€, our audiences have moved on dramatically. Now they are consuming, creating, sharing and publishing their own content online. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A version of the speech by Reuters head Tom Glocer that I lauded is now online at the FT. While media companies are catching up with this demand for â€œpersonalisationâ€, our audiences have moved on dramatically. Now they are consuming, creating, sharing and publishing their own content online. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Glocer gets it at Gavin&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31663</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Glocer gets it at Gavin&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 09:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31663</guid>
		<description>[...] [via Jeff] This is probably the most important speech since Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s address to the American Society of Newspaper Editors in April last year. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [via Jeff] This is probably the most important speech since Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s address to the American Society of Newspaper Editors in April last year. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davos Newbies &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;Integrate or become less relevant&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31638</link>
		<dc:creator>Davos Newbies &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;Integrate or become less relevant&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 00:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31638</guid>
		<description>[...] The speech by Reuters&#8217; Tom Glocer hailed by Jeff Jarvis has been published in the Financial Times (a couple of weeks after it published a snarky, fairly clueless piece diminishing blogs). It has been a long time since I thought of Reuters as anything other than a dozy company, but Glocer is pretty spot on: First, media companies need to be â€œseeders of cloudsâ€. To have access to high-value new content, we need to attract a community around us. To achieve that we have to produce high-quality content ourselves, then display it and let people interact with it. If you attract an audience to your content and build a brand, people will want to join your community. This is as true for traditional â€œletters to the editorâ€ as for MySpace.com. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The speech by Reuters&#8217; Tom Glocer hailed by Jeff Jarvis has been published in the Financial Times (a couple of weeks after it published a snarky, fairly clueless piece diminishing blogs). It has been a long time since I thought of Reuters as anything other than a dozy company, but Glocer is pretty spot on: First, media companies need to be â€œseeders of cloudsâ€. To have access to high-value new content, we need to attract a community around us. To achieve that we have to produce high-quality content ourselves, then display it and let people interact with it. If you attract an audience to your content and build a brand, people will want to join your community. This is as true for traditional â€œletters to the editorâ€ as for MySpace.com. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Successful Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31530</link>
		<dc:creator>Successful Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 02:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31530</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis of Buzz Machine says Reuters gets it, and to his Jarvis&#8217; credit, he was there. But . . . [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis of Buzz Machine says Reuters gets it, and to his Jarvis&#8217; credit, he was there. But . . . [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Devlin</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31377</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Devlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 05:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31377</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Sites like Myspace are rebuilding our world because they provide a means for anyone who has anything to share to do so. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Good post. I think you may be interested in my site, &lt;a href="http://www.crisscross.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Crisscross&lt;/a&gt;. We are the first major news site to directly apply social networking to news. We believe that social networking plays to the major strength of the Internet: person-to-person communication. In the same way that CNN used the strengths of the cable network to grow, news companies have to play to the strengths of the new medium.

Currently we use the social network to let user's track their goals and favorites. We can then use this information to enhance the news presentation. Readers who have a goal of "go to Japan" can be given Japan news, readers whose favorite music is pop can be dircted to news about Madonna and so on.

I am confident that old media can adapt to the strengths of new media, but in the meantime there are opportunities for smaller companies like ours to compete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Sites like Myspace are rebuilding our world because they provide a means for anyone who has anything to share to do so. </p></blockquote>
<p>Good post. I think you may be interested in my site, <a href="http://www.crisscross.com" rel="nofollow">Crisscross</a>. We are the first major news site to directly apply social networking to news. We believe that social networking plays to the major strength of the Internet: person-to-person communication. In the same way that CNN used the strengths of the cable network to grow, news companies have to play to the strengths of the new medium.</p>
<p>Currently we use the social network to let user&#8217;s track their goals and favorites. We can then use this information to enhance the news presentation. Readers who have a goal of &#8220;go to Japan&#8221; can be given Japan news, readers whose favorite music is pop can be dircted to news about Madonna and so on.</p>
<p>I am confident that old media can adapt to the strengths of new media, but in the meantime there are opportunities for smaller companies like ours to compete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; Two views</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31285</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; Two views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 06:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31285</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis live-blogged the event and gave it the title Reuters gets it. He wrote, in part: â€œIf the user wants to be both author and editor, and technology is increasingly enabling this, what will be the role of the media companyâ€¦?â€ He has three answers: Media companies will be a â€œseeder of clouds.â€ Nice analogy. I call it a magnet and would recommend that to him for he says that just creating content is not enough; they must attract the people. The second role is to be a â€œprovider of toolsâ€¦ We need to produce open standards and interoperability to allowâ€ disparate people to create content of disparate types. â€œLetâ€™s not make the same mistakes newspapers did with the protectionist online strategies that characterized Internet 1.â€ By that he means not recreating the old content in the new medium. The third role, he says, is that media companies will be â€œfilter and editor.â€ He says that â€œthe good stuff will rise to the topâ€ online. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis live-blogged the event and gave it the title Reuters gets it. He wrote, in part: â€œIf the user wants to be both author and editor, and technology is increasingly enabling this, what will be the role of the media companyâ€¦?â€ He has three answers: Media companies will be a â€œseeder of clouds.â€ Nice analogy. I call it a magnet and would recommend that to him for he says that just creating content is not enough; they must attract the people. The second role is to be a â€œprovider of toolsâ€¦ We need to produce open standards and interoperability to allowâ€ disparate people to create content of disparate types. â€œLetâ€™s not make the same mistakes newspapers did with the protectionist online strategies that characterized Internet 1.â€ By that he means not recreating the old content in the new medium. The third role, he says, is that media companies will be â€œfilter and editor.â€ He says that â€œthe good stuff will rise to the topâ€ online. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H.A. Page</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31281</link>
		<dc:creator>H.A. Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 02:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31281</guid>
		<description>Help, I'm too "newbie" to do the xhtml right but thanks, J. Jarvis, for blogging this from the event.  I have photos the London Reuters building and the new digital billboards -- always on, always changing -- with comments from you and links back to your site:
http://motherpie.typepad.com/motherpie/2006/03/reuters_and_dig.html

Thought you might enjoy the photos.  You're right up front w/ the changes -- thanks for sharing and reporting.

Cheerio -- Hattie
new blog focusing on new media and motherhood
motherpie.com  (its a final project for media studies grad. class)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Help, I&#8217;m too &#8220;newbie&#8221; to do the xhtml right but thanks, J. Jarvis, for blogging this from the event.  I have photos the London Reuters building and the new digital billboards &#8212; always on, always changing &#8212; with comments from you and links back to your site:<br />
<a href="http://motherpie.typepad.com/motherpie/2006/03/reuters_and_dig.html" rel="nofollow">http://motherpie.typepad.com/motherpie/2006/03/reuters_and_dig.html</a></p>
<p>Thought you might enjoy the photos.  You&#8217;re right up front w/ the changes &#8212; thanks for sharing and reporting.</p>
<p>Cheerio &#8212; Hattie<br />
new blog focusing on new media and motherhood<br />
motherpie.com  (its a final project for media studies grad. class)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31258</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 20:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31258</guid>
		<description>Hey Jeff,

I guess Reuters didn't get the news from the &lt;a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-0602220029feb22,0,6109543.story" rel="nofollow"&gt;Trib&lt;/a&gt;, huh?

Will</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jeff,</p>
<p>I guess Reuters didn&#8217;t get the news from the <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-0602220029feb22,0,6109543.story" rel="nofollow">Trib</a>, huh?</p>
<p>Will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Theodore</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31254</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Theodore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 20:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31254</guid>
		<description>Not heavily advertised, but Reuters does have a &lt;a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;set of blogs&lt;/a&gt; that journalists post to and allow comments to... btw, for full disclosure I work for Reuters, but not as a journalist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not heavily advertised, but Reuters does have a <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/" rel="nofollow">set of blogs</a> that journalists post to and allow comments to&#8230; btw, for full disclosure I work for Reuters, but not as a journalist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom glocer</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31237</link>
		<dc:creator>tom glocer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 16:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31237</guid>
		<description>Reuters is in the process of adopting a formal policy on the right of our employees to blog. We do not have a ban in place, but we treat it similarly to other potential conflicts like writing a book on company time.  Employees need to speak to their managers about their blogging activities, so for example, the auto industry correspondent should not be blogging about Ford or GM if it might be seen as influencing his  or her ability to cover the industry objectively</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reuters is in the process of adopting a formal policy on the right of our employees to blog. We do not have a ban in place, but we treat it similarly to other potential conflicts like writing a book on company time.  Employees need to speak to their managers about their blogging activities, so for example, the auto industry correspondent should not be blogging about Ford or GM if it might be seen as influencing his  or her ability to cover the industry objectively</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Publishing 2.0 &#187; Web 2.0 And Media 2.0 Is Still In the 1.1 Phase</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31236</link>
		<dc:creator>Publishing 2.0 &#187; Web 2.0 And Media 2.0 Is Still In the 1.1 Phase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 16:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31236</guid>
		<description>[...] This is why I completely disagree with Jeff Jarvis and everyone else heaping praise on Tom Glocer, CEO of Reuters, who gave a keynote at the Online Publishers Association. According to Jeff, Tom has three ideas for how media companies can create value in Media 2.0: Media companies will be a â€œseeder of clouds.â€  The second role is to be a â€œprovider of toolsâ€¦ We need to produce open standards and interoperability to allowâ€ disparate people to create content of disparate types. â€œLetâ€™s not make the same mistakes newspapers did with the protectionist online strategies that characterized Internet 1.â€  The third role, he says, is that media companies will be â€œfilter and editor.â€ He says that â€œthe good stuff will rise to the topâ€ online. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is why I completely disagree with Jeff Jarvis and everyone else heaping praise on Tom Glocer, CEO of Reuters, who gave a keynote at the Online Publishers Association. According to Jeff, Tom has three ideas for how media companies can create value in Media 2.0: Media companies will be a â€œseeder of clouds.â€  The second role is to be a â€œprovider of toolsâ€¦ We need to produce open standards and interoperability to allowâ€ disparate people to create content of disparate types. â€œLetâ€™s not make the same mistakes newspapers did with the protectionist online strategies that characterized Internet 1.â€  The third role, he says, is that media companies will be â€œfilter and editor.â€ He says that â€œthe good stuff will rise to the topâ€ online. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Boyd Thinks About Information</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31232</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Boyd Thinks About Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 16:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31232</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Gimme Some Truth&lt;/strong&gt;

	Jeff Jarvis reports some apparently hopeful news regarding an old, dead-tree media company &#8220;getting it.&#8221; Tom Glocer, CEO of Reuters, is recognizing consumers as producers and editors, and that Reuters&#8217; role as a media company, a firm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gimme Some Truth</strong></p>
<p>	Jeff Jarvis reports some apparently hopeful news regarding an old, dead-tree media company &#8220;getting it.&#8221; Tom Glocer, CEO of Reuters, is recognizing consumers as producers and editors, and that Reuters&#8217; role as a media company, a firm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Basic Thinking Blog &#187; Weblogs: Web- und Medienkonzerne stellen sich langsam ein</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31227</link>
		<dc:creator>Basic Thinking Blog &#187; Weblogs: Web- und Medienkonzerne stellen sich langsam ein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 15:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31227</guid>
		<description>[...] 1. Reuters Jeff Jarvis meint zum vom Reuters-CEO angek&#252;ndigten Vorhaben: Reuters gets it und zitiert Grocer:  Our industry is facing a profound challenge from home-created contentâ€¦. If we create the right crossroads, provide the consumers with the appropriate toolsâ€¦ we can harnass what otherwise from the outside would look like a punk revolutionâ€¦If the user wants to be both author and editor, and technology is increasingly enabling this, what will be the role of the media companyâ€¦?â€ &#8230; Speaking to fellow media companies, he concludes: â€œWe are the go-between providing the structure and supportâ€¦ between the information provider and the consumer, even if today they are the very same person.â€ He tells them that trust is critical and so he argues that in a world with so much information, â€œthe consumer gravitates to trustworthy brands.â€&#8230; He says content creators should have the right to set appropriate use; heâ€™s endorsing Creative Commons (-like) licenses. He says that Reuters puts its RSS feeds out in the hope that bloggers will use them and include them in the conversation and if we quote a story theyâ€™re happy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1. Reuters Jeff Jarvis meint zum vom Reuters-CEO angek&#252;ndigten Vorhaben: Reuters gets it und zitiert Grocer:  Our industry is facing a profound challenge from home-created contentâ€¦. If we create the right crossroads, provide the consumers with the appropriate toolsâ€¦ we can harnass what otherwise from the outside would look like a punk revolutionâ€¦If the user wants to be both author and editor, and technology is increasingly enabling this, what will be the role of the media companyâ€¦?â€ &#8230; Speaking to fellow media companies, he concludes: â€œWe are the go-between providing the structure and supportâ€¦ between the information provider and the consumer, even if today they are the very same person.â€ He tells them that trust is critical and so he argues that in a world with so much information, â€œthe consumer gravitates to trustworthy brands.â€&#8230; He says content creators should have the right to set appropriate use; heâ€™s endorsing Creative Commons (-like) licenses. He says that Reuters puts its RSS feeds out in the hope that bloggers will use them and include them in the conversation and if we quote a story theyâ€™re happy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Reuters cozies up to bloggers The Blog Herald: more blog news more often</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31226</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Reuters cozies up to bloggers The Blog Herald: more blog news more often</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 15:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/03/02/1205/#comment-31226</guid>
		<description>[...] A lot of folks are running around the net giving Reuters a pat on the back. Jeff Jarvis did. Richard McManus did. Im sure there is many many more. But the most clear thought that anyone can take away from the keynote at the Online Publishers Association meeting is this : &#8220;We like to encourage bloggers to take our RSS feed content and start a conversation around it,&#8221; Kiss quoted him as saying. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A lot of folks are running around the net giving Reuters a pat on the back. Jeff Jarvis did. Richard McManus did. Im sure there is many many more. But the most clear thought that anyone can take away from the keynote at the Online Publishers Association meeting is this : &#8220;We like to encourage bloggers to take our RSS feed content and start a conversation around it,&#8221; Kiss quoted him as saying. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
