<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The eternal spin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:21:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shnide</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-75539</link>
		<dc:creator>Shnide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-75539</guid>
		<description>Some interesting questions.  I agree with you that a Christ who hasn&#039;t risen makes Christianity kind of useless.  The Apostle Paul agrees with you, too (1 Corinthians 15:1-19).  

And as for you Toblerone, you wrote: &quot;But then, being automatically forgiven for everything that you did, and everything that you will do in the future, with no requirement to better your behavior - that is quite a tempting way to see God. Why attempt to refrain from sinning, since Jesus will forgive it all anyway?&quot;

You might want to check out my blog for an answer to that.  Christianity DOES have a requirement to better your behaviour!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some interesting questions.  I agree with you that a Christ who hasn&#8217;t risen makes Christianity kind of useless.  The Apostle Paul agrees with you, too (1 Corinthians 15:1-19).  </p>
<p>And as for you Toblerone, you wrote: &#8220;But then, being automatically forgiven for everything that you did, and everything that you will do in the future, with no requirement to better your behavior &#8211; that is quite a tempting way to see God. Why attempt to refrain from sinning, since Jesus will forgive it all anyway?&#8221;</p>
<p>You might want to check out my blog for an answer to that.  Christianity DOES have a requirement to better your behaviour!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelton Bumgarner</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39779</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelton Bumgarner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39779</guid>
		<description>I think the modern world says more about the sinning....er....spinning of Paul than it does anything else. It was Paul who decided to sell the koolaid to the gentiles.

The rest, as they say....Is History.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the modern world says more about the sinning&#8230;.er&#8230;.spinning of Paul than it does anything else. It was Paul who decided to sell the koolaid to the gentiles.</p>
<p>The rest, as they say&#8230;.Is History&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.J. Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39613</link>
		<dc:creator>W.J. Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39613</guid>
		<description>Good. So if I read &quot;Huck Finn&quot; or &quot;Tom Sawyer&quot; but don&#039;t appreciate Twain&#039;s theme about racism and slavery, then I can call it a book about rafts. 

Or maybe it can be a novel about two boys and their adventures on the Mississippi River in the 1800s. Nope, that&#039;s too much of a &quot;specific historical narrative,&quot; which may lead me to read deeper and investigate why they were rafting on the river, which leads back to all that sermonizing.  

I better just stick to a book about rafts. I do have a choice, right? To believe what I want to believe? That doesn&#039;t make me a fool, does it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good. So if I read &#8220;Huck Finn&#8221; or &#8220;Tom Sawyer&#8221; but don&#8217;t appreciate Twain&#8217;s theme about racism and slavery, then I can call it a book about rafts. </p>
<p>Or maybe it can be a novel about two boys and their adventures on the Mississippi River in the 1800s. Nope, that&#8217;s too much of a &#8220;specific historical narrative,&#8221; which may lead me to read deeper and investigate why they were rafting on the river, which leads back to all that sermonizing.  </p>
<p>I better just stick to a book about rafts. I do have a choice, right? To believe what I want to believe? That doesn&#8217;t make me a fool, does it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Feinman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39597</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Feinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39597</guid>
		<description>Relgion has two aspects, one is the stories of the origins of the world and those of the religions founder(s). The other is the moral lessons it wants society to follow.

Most religions seem to be based upon some version of the golden rule as a moral framework. Thus, if a person becomes disenchanted with the story telling aspects of religion they can still use the moral parts as a way to guide their own personal behavior.

Living a moral life and trying to &quot;do right&quot; does not require belief in a specific historical narrative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Relgion has two aspects, one is the stories of the origins of the world and those of the religions founder(s). The other is the moral lessons it wants society to follow.</p>
<p>Most religions seem to be based upon some version of the golden rule as a moral framework. Thus, if a person becomes disenchanted with the story telling aspects of religion they can still use the moral parts as a way to guide their own personal behavior.</p>
<p>Living a moral life and trying to &#8220;do right&#8221; does not require belief in a specific historical narrative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chico haas</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39548</link>
		<dc:creator>chico haas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39548</guid>
		<description>JE

Long time no Latin. And the meditative experience is worse for it. Some parishes still do it. Dumbest changes resulted from Vatican II back in 60s. Altar flipped around, English. Worst of all, the music. Singing crapass Sebastian Temple tunes instead of centuries-old Latin hymns. Art that was created by people who were making a gift of their finest skills. I guess those changes qualify as bending to society&#039;s need for &quot;relevance&quot;, at least in the way Mass was celebrated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JE</p>
<p>Long time no Latin. And the meditative experience is worse for it. Some parishes still do it. Dumbest changes resulted from Vatican II back in 60s. Altar flipped around, English. Worst of all, the music. Singing crapass Sebastian Temple tunes instead of centuries-old Latin hymns. Art that was created by people who were making a gift of their finest skills. I guess those changes qualify as bending to society&#8217;s need for &#8220;relevance&#8221;, at least in the way Mass was celebrated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Zoner</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39542</link>
		<dc:creator>The Zoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39542</guid>
		<description>http://www.uu.edu/news/NewsReleases/release.cfm?ID=1021

A pretty good summary here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.uu.edu/news/NewsReleases/release.cfm?ID=1021" rel="nofollow">http://www.uu.edu/news/NewsReleases/release.cfm?ID=1021</a></p>
<p>A pretty good summary here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.J. Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39539</link>
		<dc:creator>W.J. Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39539</guid>
		<description>&quot;I never much bought the virgin birth, wasnâ€™t too clear on the meaning of the crucifixion, and wasnâ€™t 100 percent convinced about even the resurrection....&quot; 

Hmmmm.... Like someone asked earlier, then what the heck were you doing sitting in church Sunday, Jeff? Waiting for the lightning bolt to hit you with a revelation about the virgin birth?

And what&#039;s this about &quot;at least we believe in the message of Christianity and think the world is better off for his teaching. Right?&quot;

Uh, the message of Christianity is God in the flesh coming to earth to sacrifice himself for mankind to forever bridge the gap caused by man&#039;s sin and God&#039;s perfection. And since sin is passed on from one man to another through birth, then how does a perfect God become a man without becoming sin himself? Well, through a virgin birth.

Does that clear it up for you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I never much bought the virgin birth, wasnâ€™t too clear on the meaning of the crucifixion, and wasnâ€™t 100 percent convinced about even the resurrection&#8230;.&#8221; </p>
<p>Hmmmm&#8230;. Like someone asked earlier, then what the heck were you doing sitting in church Sunday, Jeff? Waiting for the lightning bolt to hit you with a revelation about the virgin birth?</p>
<p>And what&#8217;s this about &#8220;at least we believe in the message of Christianity and think the world is better off for his teaching. Right?&#8221;</p>
<p>Uh, the message of Christianity is God in the flesh coming to earth to sacrifice himself for mankind to forever bridge the gap caused by man&#8217;s sin and God&#8217;s perfection. And since sin is passed on from one man to another through birth, then how does a perfect God become a man without becoming sin himself? Well, through a virgin birth.</p>
<p>Does that clear it up for you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39509</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39509</guid>
		<description>Hey, i just read your sermon from the link Jeff, and that&#039;s a gorgeous piece of pastoral theology -- this from a pastor considered a wee bit too evangelical by many of my UCC clergy colleagues!  I&#039;m going to send it to my wife who was worrying this weekend about many of the same questions (actually, wondering if she should feel guilty about thinking the Incarnation makes more sense than the Atonement).

There&#039;s stuff i&#039;d put differently myself, but that&#039;s a sermon i&#039;d be delighted to hear from any lay member, let alone youth Sunday school teacher.

Pax, Jeff (the one in Ohio)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, i just read your sermon from the link Jeff, and that&#8217;s a gorgeous piece of pastoral theology &#8212; this from a pastor considered a wee bit too evangelical by many of my UCC clergy colleagues!  I&#8217;m going to send it to my wife who was worrying this weekend about many of the same questions (actually, wondering if she should feel guilty about thinking the Incarnation makes more sense than the Atonement).</p>
<p>There&#8217;s stuff i&#8217;d put differently myself, but that&#8217;s a sermon i&#8217;d be delighted to hear from any lay member, let alone youth Sunday school teacher.</p>
<p>Pax, Jeff (the one in Ohio)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39480</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39480</guid>
		<description>Rudely, but to save myself time retyping something i do have some thots on re: Judas Gospel --

http://knapsack.blogspot.com

Peace, Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rudely, but to save myself time retyping something i do have some thots on re: Judas Gospel &#8211;</p>
<p><a href="http://knapsack.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://knapsack.blogspot.com</a></p>
<p>Peace, Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jersey Exile</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39467</link>
		<dc:creator>Jersey Exile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39467</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The beautiful part of the Catholic Church is precisely its refusal to bend to the gusts of popular trends. &lt;/em&gt;

You&#039;re joking, right?  When&#039;s the last time you went to a Latin Mass?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The beautiful part of the Catholic Church is precisely its refusal to bend to the gusts of popular trends. </em></p>
<p>You&#8217;re joking, right?  When&#8217;s the last time you went to a Latin Mass?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drlivipr</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39313</link>
		<dc:creator>drlivipr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 22:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39313</guid>
		<description>Mr. Jarvis--

  If you&#039;re a Christian believer, you&#039;re already Jewish.  Christians are waiting for the same Messiah the Jews are.  The level of faith Paul talks about in Romans 8 is called &quot;emuna&quot; in Jewish theology.  Yeshua came out of the grave on the feast of First Fruits (sound familiar?  Paul talks about that, too).  Pentecost is a Jewish holiday celebrating the giving of the Word; Christians celebrate the same thing in a wider context.

  Don&#039;t confuse a religious structure with the spiritual truth it was established to represent.  Any organization can stray from its roots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Jarvis&#8211;</p>
<p>  If you&#8217;re a Christian believer, you&#8217;re already Jewish.  Christians are waiting for the same Messiah the Jews are.  The level of faith Paul talks about in Romans 8 is called &#8220;emuna&#8221; in Jewish theology.  Yeshua came out of the grave on the feast of First Fruits (sound familiar?  Paul talks about that, too).  Pentecost is a Jewish holiday celebrating the giving of the Word; Christians celebrate the same thing in a wider context.</p>
<p>  Don&#8217;t confuse a religious structure with the spiritual truth it was established to represent.  Any organization can stray from its roots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pangloss</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39301</link>
		<dc:creator>Pangloss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39301</guid>
		<description>The Judas Gospel is a gnostic text that was rejected precisely because its message was contrary to Jesus&#039; teachings. You cannot reconcile it with Christianity. It is a pythagorean greek philosophy that posits that the material world is Evil, created by an Evil creator (demiurge), to warp creation from its original, purely Spiritual Goodness as created by the original creator. In its most extreme versions gnosticism states that Yahweh is the evil principle and that Lucifer is the lightbringer and principle of good and freedom. The implications of this on the status of Jews should be obvious. Don&#039;t fall for the hype!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Judas Gospel is a gnostic text that was rejected precisely because its message was contrary to Jesus&#8217; teachings. You cannot reconcile it with Christianity. It is a pythagorean greek philosophy that posits that the material world is Evil, created by an Evil creator (demiurge), to warp creation from its original, purely Spiritual Goodness as created by the original creator. In its most extreme versions gnosticism states that Yahweh is the evil principle and that Lucifer is the lightbringer and principle of good and freedom. The implications of this on the status of Jews should be obvious. Don&#8217;t fall for the hype!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toblerone</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39300</link>
		<dc:creator>Toblerone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39300</guid>
		<description>Chico,
Certainly, if you consider gospels written at the same time as Mark to be &quot;popular trends&quot;, hehe.  But really, these gospels were labelled heretical in the 2nd and 3rd centuries, when the church was trying to avoid being wiped out through religious persecution by the romans.  So, to simplfy the message, only 4 gospels were retained, along with 20 something other texts which supported the basic message.  This is the Catholic church.  And I take back some of what I said before, in that the church has had to admit some things discovered by science to be true (earth actually does revolve around the sun for instance) when it became apparent that the people knew the truth anyway.

In the long run, all religions must change if they are to survive.  No one believes in ancient pagan gods anymore, yet traditions from pagan religions can be found in christianity, which adopted these traditions so that those practicing them could be persuaded to join the Church.  It was &quot;Happy Saturnalia&quot; long before it was &quot;Merry Christmas&quot;.

Please go to the secular web (www.infidels.org) for further rantings along these lines.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chico,<br />
Certainly, if you consider gospels written at the same time as Mark to be &#8220;popular trends&#8221;, hehe.  But really, these gospels were labelled heretical in the 2nd and 3rd centuries, when the church was trying to avoid being wiped out through religious persecution by the romans.  So, to simplfy the message, only 4 gospels were retained, along with 20 something other texts which supported the basic message.  This is the Catholic church.  And I take back some of what I said before, in that the church has had to admit some things discovered by science to be true (earth actually does revolve around the sun for instance) when it became apparent that the people knew the truth anyway.</p>
<p>In the long run, all religions must change if they are to survive.  No one believes in ancient pagan gods anymore, yet traditions from pagan religions can be found in christianity, which adopted these traditions so that those practicing them could be persuaded to join the Church.  It was &#8220;Happy Saturnalia&#8221; long before it was &#8220;Merry Christmas&#8221;.</p>
<p>Please go to the secular web (www.infidels.org) for further rantings along these lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sami</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39297</link>
		<dc:creator>Sami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39297</guid>
		<description>I have to agree that the non-mutability of Catholisism makes it a stronger religion.  I don&#039;t understand people who say - I&#039;m a Catholic, but I don&#039;t belive the church about X Y or Z.  
A religion should be what it is, if you aren&#039;t what it does, you aren&#039;t

You don&#039;t change what a religion is, you accept or you find one that matches you.

That being said, I&#039;m a proof person.  While I believe there was a man named Jesus and the basic stories told in the gospels are based in truth, I don&#039;t see how any religion is reality.  While I could accept a way of life through the teachings of christianity, I can&#039;t accept the dogma baggage that goes with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree that the non-mutability of Catholisism makes it a stronger religion.  I don&#8217;t understand people who say &#8211; I&#8217;m a Catholic, but I don&#8217;t belive the church about X Y or Z.<br />
A religion should be what it is, if you aren&#8217;t what it does, you aren&#8217;t</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t change what a religion is, you accept or you find one that matches you.</p>
<p>That being said, I&#8217;m a proof person.  While I believe there was a man named Jesus and the basic stories told in the gospels are based in truth, I don&#8217;t see how any religion is reality.  While I could accept a way of life through the teachings of christianity, I can&#8217;t accept the dogma baggage that goes with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chico haas</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39294</link>
		<dc:creator>chico haas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 20:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39294</guid>
		<description>The beautiful part of the Catholic Church is precisely its refusal to bend to the gusts of popular trends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The beautiful part of the Catholic Church is precisely its refusal to bend to the gusts of popular trends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jersey Exile</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39287</link>
		<dc:creator>Jersey Exile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39287</guid>
		<description>The fortuitous return of the Judas Gospel to the theological fray at this stage of the game is part of the larger &quot;explosion&quot; of culture we are currently smack in the middle of.  Disintermediation is transforming every aspect of our lives, from where we get our news to whom/what we choose to believe in and why.  Bronze Age sky gods and their infallible and inflexible dictates are increasingly not going to cut it for Mankind -- this isn&#039;t to say God has to go, simply that one&#039;s relationship with the eternal is going to become increasingly personal and unique as time goes on.  Martin Luther started this whole process centuries ago by attempting to open source the Catholic Church.  Now in an age that is anathema to hierarchy of any sort, does organized religion as we know it stand any chance of survival whatsoever?  The savvier faiths will find a way to respond to the netroots parishioners, but the old brontosaurs are simply lumbering along on borrowed time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fortuitous return of the Judas Gospel to the theological fray at this stage of the game is part of the larger &#8220;explosion&#8221; of culture we are currently smack in the middle of.  Disintermediation is transforming every aspect of our lives, from where we get our news to whom/what we choose to believe in and why.  Bronze Age sky gods and their infallible and inflexible dictates are increasingly not going to cut it for Mankind &#8212; this isn&#8217;t to say God has to go, simply that one&#8217;s relationship with the eternal is going to become increasingly personal and unique as time goes on.  Martin Luther started this whole process centuries ago by attempting to open source the Catholic Church.  Now in an age that is anathema to hierarchy of any sort, does organized religion as we know it stand any chance of survival whatsoever?  The savvier faiths will find a way to respond to the netroots parishioners, but the old brontosaurs are simply lumbering along on borrowed time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39286</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39286</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been an analytical Christian since I was 13 years old, so I understand the doubting believer. But the message of Christianity IS the Crucifixion and Resurrection. If you do not believe in these 2 events why do you go to church?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been an analytical Christian since I was 13 years old, so I understand the doubting believer. But the message of Christianity IS the Crucifixion and Resurrection. If you do not believe in these 2 events why do you go to church?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darth87</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39285</link>
		<dc:creator>darth87</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39285</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s refreshing to see that you &quot;practice what you preach&quot; by opening your personal questions and doubts to public debate. Christian&#039;s  must never fear this debate. Our faith passes muster intellectually, emotionally, spiritually, and physically. By torturing our individual faith with questions and hypotheses until opinions and facts confess the truth, we energize our faith with the confidence that opens our hearts to our detractors.

Keep up the debate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s refreshing to see that you &#8220;practice what you preach&#8221; by opening your personal questions and doubts to public debate. Christian&#8217;s  must never fear this debate. Our faith passes muster intellectually, emotionally, spiritually, and physically. By torturing our individual faith with questions and hypotheses until opinions and facts confess the truth, we energize our faith with the confidence that opens our hearts to our detractors.</p>
<p>Keep up the debate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39277</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39277</guid>
		<description>Why would anyone go to church in the 21st century? It&#039;s beyond obvious that God doesn&#039;t exist. JJ expects us to take him seriously with what he writes, but reveals that he believes in fairy tales. Says a lot about his intelligence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would anyone go to church in the 21st century? It&#8217;s beyond obvious that God doesn&#8217;t exist. JJ expects us to take him seriously with what he writes, but reveals that he believes in fairy tales. Says a lot about his intelligence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toblerone</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39276</link>
		<dc:creator>Toblerone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39276</guid>
		<description>The more I study christianity and other religions, the more perplexing I find it to be.  No other religion seems to mandate absolute thoughts to the exclusion of all others the way christianity does.  

But then, being automatically forgiven for everything that you did, and everything that you will do in the future, with no requirement to better your behavior - that is quite a tempting way to see God.  Why attempt to refrain from sinning, since Jesus will forgive it all anyway?

I like your treatise on learning from one&#039;s mistakes, but I fear it is not shared by the Catholic church.  This is the same church that refuses to include other gospels - those of Judas, Mary, Thomas, etc. and instead picks only the 4 gospels that tell the same story in the same words.  If scholars were to find that the other gospels had meaning and relevance, or that a heretical gospel shed some additional light on the life of Jesus, would the church be willing to say &quot;sorry, it was a mistake to leave that part out!&quot;  I doubt it.

As to what kind of God is in the Old Testament bible - the Bible was written for the people of the time.  When they needed a warlike god, Yahweh was warlike.  When they needed him to be jealous, he was jealous.  When they (later) needed him to be compassionate, kind, loving, he was.  Yahweh has always, and only, been what the people at the time needed him to be.

I recommend reading Karen Armstrong, Elaine Pagels, and John Shelby Spong, to give you further questions to ponder...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I study christianity and other religions, the more perplexing I find it to be.  No other religion seems to mandate absolute thoughts to the exclusion of all others the way christianity does.  </p>
<p>But then, being automatically forgiven for everything that you did, and everything that you will do in the future, with no requirement to better your behavior &#8211; that is quite a tempting way to see God.  Why attempt to refrain from sinning, since Jesus will forgive it all anyway?</p>
<p>I like your treatise on learning from one&#8217;s mistakes, but I fear it is not shared by the Catholic church.  This is the same church that refuses to include other gospels &#8211; those of Judas, Mary, Thomas, etc. and instead picks only the 4 gospels that tell the same story in the same words.  If scholars were to find that the other gospels had meaning and relevance, or that a heretical gospel shed some additional light on the life of Jesus, would the church be willing to say &#8220;sorry, it was a mistake to leave that part out!&#8221;  I doubt it.</p>
<p>As to what kind of God is in the Old Testament bible &#8211; the Bible was written for the people of the time.  When they needed a warlike god, Yahweh was warlike.  When they needed him to be jealous, he was jealous.  When they (later) needed him to be compassionate, kind, loving, he was.  Yahweh has always, and only, been what the people at the time needed him to be.</p>
<p>I recommend reading Karen Armstrong, Elaine Pagels, and John Shelby Spong, to give you further questions to ponder&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashok</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39272</link>
		<dc:creator>ashok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39272</guid>
		<description>For whatever reason, I don&#039;t find myself drawn to thinking about Jesus the man. He lived, he died, he had motives, he did stuff. I don&#039;t know that I can expect answers about such things that would be unbiased.

As a devotional this Easter, I sat and thought about a few words of his, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.writingup.com/ashok/on_the_beatitudes_commandments&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the Beatitudes, and how they measured up to the 10 Commandments&lt;/a&gt;. I always thought the 10 Commandments were wise, so if the Beatitudes said something about them that I needed to know, maybe I could appreciate Christianity all the more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For whatever reason, I don&#8217;t find myself drawn to thinking about Jesus the man. He lived, he died, he had motives, he did stuff. I don&#8217;t know that I can expect answers about such things that would be unbiased.</p>
<p>As a devotional this Easter, I sat and thought about a few words of his, <a href="http://www.writingup.com/ashok/on_the_beatitudes_commandments" rel="nofollow">the Beatitudes, and how they measured up to the 10 Commandments</a>. I always thought the 10 Commandments were wise, so if the Beatitudes said something about them that I needed to know, maybe I could appreciate Christianity all the more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39265</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39265</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t really paid much attention to the whole Judas Gospel brouhaha, but is it really so heretical?  Jesus knew he was destined to die for our sins.  Judas had a role to play and he did.  What the Judas Gospel really does is change what we&#039;ve been taught in Sunday School our entire lives:  Judas was a traitor who committeed suicide rather than face the consequences of his actions; condemned to eternal damnation for his role in the death of the Messiah.  If anything, this makes Judas less of a boogey-man and more human.  And if we&#039;ve learned anything in the last five years it&#039;s that humanizing a perceived enemy is tantamount to treason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t really paid much attention to the whole Judas Gospel brouhaha, but is it really so heretical?  Jesus knew he was destined to die for our sins.  Judas had a role to play and he did.  What the Judas Gospel really does is change what we&#8217;ve been taught in Sunday School our entire lives:  Judas was a traitor who committeed suicide rather than face the consequences of his actions; condemned to eternal damnation for his role in the death of the Messiah.  If anything, this makes Judas less of a boogey-man and more human.  And if we&#8217;ve learned anything in the last five years it&#8217;s that humanizing a perceived enemy is tantamount to treason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/17/the-eternal-spin/#comment-39262</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1390#comment-39262</guid>
		<description>Yes, Jeff, you SHOULD be Jewish!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Jeff, you SHOULD be Jewish!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

