<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disclosure, continued</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/19/disclosure-continued/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/19/disclosure-continued/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:27:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Grey - Liberty Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/19/disclosure-continued/#comment-39970</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Grey - Liberty Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/04/19/disclosure-continued/#comment-39970</guid>
		<description>No two-tiered system of disclosure will remain valid, for long.  Calls of bias will become calls of secret bias, and the cover-up of bias -- so I&#039;m sure your crusade will be successful on more up-front bio info.

What won&#039;t happen as quickly is to present evidence for, and against, any particular policy, and its main alternative.  Like &quot;more troops&quot; as the big error in Iraq.  What the results with more troops would have been has not been clearly said (or I&#039;ve missed it), so it&#039;s a vague &quot;things would be better&quot;.

But disclosure&#039;s a good start.  I&#039;d add three or four specific political policy issues:
1) for or against Bush&#039;s invasion of Iraq (I&#039;m for);
2) for or against Bush&#039;s Tax Cuts (I&#039;m for);
2b) for or against Bush&#039;s Spending increases (I&#039;m against);
3) for or against Bush&#039;s moral positions of pro-life, civil unions not marriage for gays (I&#039;m for).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No two-tiered system of disclosure will remain valid, for long.  Calls of bias will become calls of secret bias, and the cover-up of bias &#8212; so I&#8217;m sure your crusade will be successful on more up-front bio info.</p>
<p>What won&#8217;t happen as quickly is to present evidence for, and against, any particular policy, and its main alternative.  Like &#8220;more troops&#8221; as the big error in Iraq.  What the results with more troops would have been has not been clearly said (or I&#8217;ve missed it), so it&#8217;s a vague &#8220;things would be better&#8221;.</p>
<p>But disclosure&#8217;s a good start.  I&#8217;d add three or four specific political policy issues:<br />
1) for or against Bush&#8217;s invasion of Iraq (I&#8217;m for);<br />
2) for or against Bush&#8217;s Tax Cuts (I&#8217;m for);<br />
2b) for or against Bush&#8217;s Spending increases (I&#8217;m against);<br />
3) for or against Bush&#8217;s moral positions of pro-life, civil unions not marriage for gays (I&#8217;m for).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gordon ramsey</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/04/19/disclosure-continued/#comment-39906</link>
		<dc:creator>gordon ramsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 03:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/04/19/disclosure-continued/#comment-39906</guid>
		<description>i was a little surprised about todays news about david the chamaeloan
i think the new labour spin doctors have shot themselves in the foot big time
http://www.easyburger.eu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was a little surprised about todays news about david the chamaeloan<br />
i think the new labour spin doctors have shot themselves in the foot big time<br />
<a href="http://www.easyburger.eu" rel="nofollow">http://www.easyburger.eu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

