<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You tell us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/05/10/you-tell-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/05/10/you-tell-us/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PSGInfinity</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/05/10/you-tell-us/#comment-47396</link>
		<dc:creator>PSGInfinity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 23:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/05/10/you-tell-us/#comment-47396</guid>
		<description>Angelos,

There are Good Leaks, and Bad Leaks.  Killing brown people can be a Very Good Thing, especially when it's Al Qaida.  And huge deficits disappoint and enrage us, too.  Although I'd REALLY like to see Bush given a little credit for practicing a little Keynesian economics back in '01 - '03.

The National Intelligence Estimate, like all good summaries, has the sources and methods carefully delineated, easy to obscure when leaking.  Summary leaking can mobilize support, justify action, and counteract lies.  

Counteract lies.  Precisely why Leftists hate what he did.

Forced question: Is engaging AlQaqa, with soldiers, in a Foreign Land, better or worse than letting AlQ engage our civilians here?  (Y/N)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angelos,</p>
<p>There are Good Leaks, and Bad Leaks.  Killing brown people can be a Very Good Thing, especially when it&#8217;s Al Qaida.  And huge deficits disappoint and enrage us, too.  Although I&#8217;d REALLY like to see Bush given a little credit for practicing a little Keynesian economics back in &#8216;01 - &#8216;03.</p>
<p>The National Intelligence Estimate, like all good summaries, has the sources and methods carefully delineated, easy to obscure when leaking.  Summary leaking can mobilize support, justify action, and counteract lies.  </p>
<p>Counteract lies.  Precisely why Leftists hate what he did.</p>
<p>Forced question: Is engaging AlQaqa, with soldiers, in a Foreign Land, better or worse than letting AlQ engage our civilians here?  (Y/N)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/05/10/you-tell-us/#comment-45657</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 20:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/05/10/you-tell-us/#comment-45657</guid>
		<description>Clear thinking like "A Good Leak"? Like killing brown people across the world will make us stronger? Like staggering deficits are OK?

Who said anything about markets anyway? Nice buzzwords, though. I almost filled in a bingo card in two short paragraphs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clear thinking like &#8220;A Good Leak&#8221;? Like killing brown people across the world will make us stronger? Like staggering deficits are OK?</p>
<p>Who said anything about markets anyway? Nice buzzwords, though. I almost filled in a bingo card in two short paragraphs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hey</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/05/10/you-tell-us/#comment-45625</link>
		<dc:creator>hey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 18:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/05/10/you-tell-us/#comment-45625</guid>
		<description>You'll also find that the customers love the clear thinking that's on the editorial pages. A few dilettante limousine leftists that despise the system that keeps them in luxury excepted. You might want to rethink how you make money Angelos: if markets are so evil, should you really be involved with them? 

If you think WSJ ed board is full of "wingers" I wonder where you think the centre is? Probably substantially to the Left of our host. Hope that keeps working out for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll also find that the customers love the clear thinking that&#8217;s on the editorial pages. A few dilettante limousine leftists that despise the system that keeps them in luxury excepted. You might want to rethink how you make money Angelos: if markets are so evil, should you really be involved with them? </p>
<p>If you think WSJ ed board is full of &#8220;wingers&#8221; I wonder where you think the centre is? Probably substantially to the Left of our host. Hope that keeps working out for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/05/10/you-tell-us/#comment-45583</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 15:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/05/10/you-tell-us/#comment-45583</guid>
		<description>True. I let my paper subscription run out, and don't really miss the outright lying on the editorial page. I do buy the Friday issue, though, for the Weekend Journal. 

Business news, there's enough around elsewhere, that I'm not sure even subscribing to WSJ.com is worth it. Besides, I stopped active trading a while ago (back when it was fun) and have let things run up on their own along with the Dow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True. I let my paper subscription run out, and don&#8217;t really miss the outright lying on the editorial page. I do buy the Friday issue, though, for the Weekend Journal. </p>
<p>Business news, there&#8217;s enough around elsewhere, that I&#8217;m not sure even subscribing to WSJ.com is worth it. Besides, I stopped active trading a while ago (back when it was fun) and have let things run up on their own along with the Dow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/05/10/you-tell-us/#comment-45575</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 15:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/05/10/you-tell-us/#comment-45575</guid>
		<description>You'll find the winger BS on OpinionJournal.com, Angelos, not WSJ.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll find the winger BS on OpinionJournal.com, Angelos, not WSJ.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/05/10/you-tell-us/#comment-45543</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 13:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/05/10/you-tell-us/#comment-45543</guid>
		<description>Funny stuff.

How about, less outright winger bullshit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny stuff.</p>
<p>How about, less outright winger bullshit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
