<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pro-am news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/05/18/pro-am-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/05/18/pro-am-news/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Worstall</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/05/18/pro-am-news/#comment-49581</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Worstall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 08:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/05/18/pro-am-news/#comment-49581</guid>
		<description>Glad you saw that Jeff. Weâ€™re in the process of setting up a system thatâ€™ll try to address exactly this, how to get those expert views into a form that can be used by editorial teams. Very much an alpha (not even beta) version at www.nightcapsyndication.com. Aiming at first at the market for reviews: so many of those are syndicated now already across mutliple newspapers that it seems a logical target.

The genesis? Really from my own experience. Started blogging two years ago (and a bit) and from doing so have been able to develop a freelance career of sorts. Various pieces for think tanks, TCS Daily....OK, thatâ€™s simply more online writing, new rather than old media, but also book reviews for The Telegraph and Comment page pieces for The Times (both London). If I can do that then given that there are many writers currently blogging who are vastly more capable than I then why not offer a helping hand?  
Another way of looking at it would be that there could be two ways for the "war" between new and old media to end. It might be between the two models of business....or we could simply infiltrate the old media. If many of the writers for them are in fact bloggers, fitting into those editorial teams, then havenâ€™t we actually got what we want anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you saw that Jeff. Weâ€™re in the process of setting up a system thatâ€™ll try to address exactly this, how to get those expert views into a form that can be used by editorial teams. Very much an alpha (not even beta) version at <a href="http://www.nightcapsyndication.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nightcapsyndication.com</a>. Aiming at first at the market for reviews: so many of those are syndicated now already across mutliple newspapers that it seems a logical target.</p>
<p>The genesis? Really from my own experience. Started blogging two years ago (and a bit) and from doing so have been able to develop a freelance career of sorts. Various pieces for think tanks, TCS Daily&#8230;.OK, thatâ€™s simply more online writing, new rather than old media, but also book reviews for The Telegraph and Comment page pieces for The Times (both London). If I can do that then given that there are many writers currently blogging who are vastly more capable than I then why not offer a helping hand?<br />
Another way of looking at it would be that there could be two ways for the &#8220;war&#8221; between new and old media to end. It might be between the two models of business&#8230;.or we could simply infiltrate the old media. If many of the writers for them are in fact bloggers, fitting into those editorial teams, then havenâ€™t we actually got what we want anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/05/18/pro-am-news/#comment-49462</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 00:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/05/18/pro-am-news/#comment-49462</guid>
		<description>But, what do professional journalists do a good job of?

While they may know more about "their topic" than the typical reader member, they're no-where near being domain experts.

They usually write better than the typical domain expert.  Does that trump expertise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, what do professional journalists do a good job of?</p>
<p>While they may know more about &#8220;their topic&#8221; than the typical reader member, they&#8217;re no-where near being domain experts.</p>
<p>They usually write better than the typical domain expert.  Does that trump expertise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rjh</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/05/18/pro-am-news/#comment-49360</link>
		<dc:creator>rjh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 19:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/05/18/pro-am-news/#comment-49360</guid>
		<description>I am reminded of an aphorism I learned in the context of sports:

"An amateur can do a great job whenever they want to; a professional will do a good job when they do not want to."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am reminded of an aphorism I learned in the context of sports:</p>
<p>&#8220;An amateur can do a great job whenever they want to; a professional will do a good job when they do not want to.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
