<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Break my heart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/05/22/break-my-heart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/05/22/break-my-heart/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/05/22/break-my-heart/#comment-55160</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 15:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/05/22/break-my-heart/#comment-55160</guid>
		<description>"reporters at the paper continue to receive salaries and demand raises even though they've already earned millions of dollars since the paper's inception..."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;reporters at the paper continue to receive salaries and demand raises even though they&#8217;ve already earned millions of dollars since the paper&#8217;s inception&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaap</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/05/22/break-my-heart/#comment-52705</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 07:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/05/22/break-my-heart/#comment-52705</guid>
		<description>Is it about growth? I don't necessarily disagree, I just don't get that one. Take this hypothetical situation: if readership is stable, the ads keep pouring in and you're making lots of money - actually, you're making the same amount each year, which is an excellent profit margin - and you can't see how you would do better as a journalist organisation as well as a profit-driven company, why cut costs in order to pursue profit growth?

Sure, the shareholders will want that. So, you might want to buy some other newspapers, start selling books to, do whatever you want. But is a growth in profit a goal in itself when it comes to a succesfull product which only lets you make more money out of it when you make it less good? I hope someone can clarify this.

When I was an intern at a local Dutch newspaper last year, people said things like that all the time, by the way. They fear cutbacks, and have every right to do so, since only a few months later, the publisher announced a further round of cutbacks; many journalists are being fired. And it's not that they don't see anything in internet journalism; in fact, when their newspaper section will have been deleted, in favor of some new internet initiative, they hope they will be the staff that runs it. 'What, I have to guide and counsel citizen journalists instead of writing my own articles? But I can write, that's what I do! Ah well, I'll have to keep my job, I got mortgage you now, haha, yeah, well, I'll be the citizen journalists' coach, why the hell not right, that's modern times they say, who wants coffee?'

I felt that they're not in the journalism business - they are in the newspaper business. I think journalism is too often considered something medium-independent, while both in essence as well as in practice it's to a high degree something that's interwoven with the medium. They have a newspaper page to feel. They know that page through and through, and they visit the newspaper website only as readers.

(by the way, my CoComment plugin gave an error while trying to post, I had to shutdown the CoComment Firefox extension.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it about growth? I don&#8217;t necessarily disagree, I just don&#8217;t get that one. Take this hypothetical situation: if readership is stable, the ads keep pouring in and you&#8217;re making lots of money - actually, you&#8217;re making the same amount each year, which is an excellent profit margin - and you can&#8217;t see how you would do better as a journalist organisation as well as a profit-driven company, why cut costs in order to pursue profit growth?</p>
<p>Sure, the shareholders will want that. So, you might want to buy some other newspapers, start selling books to, do whatever you want. But is a growth in profit a goal in itself when it comes to a succesfull product which only lets you make more money out of it when you make it less good? I hope someone can clarify this.</p>
<p>When I was an intern at a local Dutch newspaper last year, people said things like that all the time, by the way. They fear cutbacks, and have every right to do so, since only a few months later, the publisher announced a further round of cutbacks; many journalists are being fired. And it&#8217;s not that they don&#8217;t see anything in internet journalism; in fact, when their newspaper section will have been deleted, in favor of some new internet initiative, they hope they will be the staff that runs it. &#8216;What, I have to guide and counsel citizen journalists instead of writing my own articles? But I can write, that&#8217;s what I do! Ah well, I&#8217;ll have to keep my job, I got mortgage you now, haha, yeah, well, I&#8217;ll be the citizen journalists&#8217; coach, why the hell not right, that&#8217;s modern times they say, who wants coffee?&#8217;</p>
<p>I felt that they&#8217;re not in the journalism business - they are in the newspaper business. I think journalism is too often considered something medium-independent, while both in essence as well as in practice it&#8217;s to a high degree something that&#8217;s interwoven with the medium. They have a newspaper page to feel. They know that page through and through, and they visit the newspaper website only as readers.</p>
<p>(by the way, my CoComment plugin gave an error while trying to post, I had to shutdown the CoComment Firefox extension.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZF</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/05/22/break-my-heart/#comment-52292</link>
		<dc:creator>ZF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 20:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/05/22/break-my-heart/#comment-52292</guid>
		<description>This response to incoming new technology is very familiar within the military. At NATO headquarters in Brussels it used to be labeled R.I.P. - 'Retired In Post'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This response to incoming new technology is very familiar within the military. At NATO headquarters in Brussels it used to be labeled R.I.P. - &#8216;Retired In Post&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
