<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog or perish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/03/blog-or-perish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/03/blog-or-perish/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 10:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Multimedia Journalist &#187; Blogging &#38; Citizen Journalism in the UK</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/03/blog-or-perish/#comment-360389</link>
		<dc:creator>The Multimedia Journalist &#187; Blogging &#38; Citizen Journalism in the UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1603#comment-360389</guid>
		<description>[...] Why journalists should blog: http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/03/blog-or-perish/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why journalists should blog: <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/03/blog-or-perish/" rel="nofollow">http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/03/blog-or-perish/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LacyLewJones</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/03/blog-or-perish/#comment-346428</link>
		<dc:creator>LacyLewJones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1603#comment-346428</guid>
		<description>Well I don't know about you but I think the Tournament has been quite boring. Too many top seeds winning. 
I'll put my money on UCLA for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I don&#8217;t know about you but I think the Tournament has been quite boring. Too many top seeds winning.<br />
I&#8217;ll put my money on UCLA for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen Stanley Surman M.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/03/blog-or-perish/#comment-89640</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen Stanley Surman M.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 03:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1603#comment-89640</guid>
		<description>Ben Vershbow ( Institute for the Future of the Book ) quoted  Jorge Luis Borges, â€œA book is not an isolated being: it is a relationship, an axis of innumerable relationships.â€ 
 Yes. Here is another view: At a June  reading for The Library of the Boston Athenaeum, psychiatrist,  Owen Stanley Surman M.D. ( "After Eden: A Love Story") said, "The book is a transparent sphere  wherein one may view the circle of life through unlimited turns and perspectives."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben Vershbow ( Institute for the Future of the Book ) quoted  Jorge Luis Borges, â€œA book is not an isolated being: it is a relationship, an axis of innumerable relationships.â€<br />
 Yes. Here is another view: At a June  reading for The Library of the Boston Athenaeum, psychiatrist,  Owen Stanley Surman M.D. ( &#8220;After Eden: A Love Story&#8221;) said, &#8220;The book is a transparent sphere  wherein one may view the circle of life through unlimited turns and perspectives.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LItlove</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/03/blog-or-perish/#comment-64105</link>
		<dc:creator>LItlove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 16:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1603#comment-64105</guid>
		<description>I'm a literary professor who blogs but I wouldn't dream of letting the students see it. I've got a whole programme lined up for them that doesn't include any more of the internet than they already see. However, I love the blog for the freedom it gives me to explore what I think about, and how I respond to, the texts I regularly teach in ways that are personal and (probably only to me) entertaining. That can only be good for my teaching, ultimately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a literary professor who blogs but I wouldn&#8217;t dream of letting the students see it. I&#8217;ve got a whole programme lined up for them that doesn&#8217;t include any more of the internet than they already see. However, I love the blog for the freedom it gives me to explore what I think about, and how I respond to, the texts I regularly teach in ways that are personal and (probably only to me) entertaining. That can only be good for my teaching, ultimately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ponto Media &#187; Bloga ou morre</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/03/blog-or-perish/#comment-64033</link>
		<dc:creator>Ponto Media &#187; Bloga ou morre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 14:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1603#comment-64033</guid>
		<description>[...] DE JEFF Jarvis, no seu Buzz Machine: Blog or perish. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DE JEFF Jarvis, no seu Buzz Machine: Blog or perish. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/03/blog-or-perish/#comment-62778</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 00:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1603#comment-62778</guid>
		<description>I think it's great that professors like Susan Crawford blog. Any kid thinking of taking her courses can evaluate her intellect by reading her blog and make an informed prediction about the content and value of the course. I should also think the tenure committee would find it interesting to read the sort of thing she posts on her blog. 

Many professors today seem to be more like cheerleaders for political viewpoints than scholars. It would be good if we could herd all the cheerleaders into friendly schools for them, such as Bob Jones University or The New School. Then the scholars could collect somewhere else and all the moms and dads could send their little darlings to a place that aligned with their values. At Bob Jones, there's no upsetting discussion of evolution, and at The New School there's no disquieting suggestion that the Free Market is anything but a rapist.  Scholarship is hard, and the old-style professor who played it straight and kept his politics to himself is a dinosaur. 

But given that, why even bother with higher education at all? If a graduate education is simply an exercise in partisan blog-picking, why not just go to Starbucks and use the free WiFi to read Daily Kos? All you really need to know is there, and no scary contrarian views.

Face it, dude, higher education is dead: Blogs Rule!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s great that professors like Susan Crawford blog. Any kid thinking of taking her courses can evaluate her intellect by reading her blog and make an informed prediction about the content and value of the course. I should also think the tenure committee would find it interesting to read the sort of thing she posts on her blog. </p>
<p>Many professors today seem to be more like cheerleaders for political viewpoints than scholars. It would be good if we could herd all the cheerleaders into friendly schools for them, such as Bob Jones University or The New School. Then the scholars could collect somewhere else and all the moms and dads could send their little darlings to a place that aligned with their values. At Bob Jones, there&#8217;s no upsetting discussion of evolution, and at The New School there&#8217;s no disquieting suggestion that the Free Market is anything but a rapist.  Scholarship is hard, and the old-style professor who played it straight and kept his politics to himself is a dinosaur. </p>
<p>But given that, why even bother with higher education at all? If a graduate education is simply an exercise in partisan blog-picking, why not just go to Starbucks and use the free WiFi to read Daily Kos? All you really need to know is there, and no scary contrarian views.</p>
<p>Face it, dude, higher education is dead: Blogs Rule!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonitus.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blog or perish</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/03/blog-or-perish/#comment-62692</link>
		<dc:creator>sonitus.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blog or perish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 20:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1603#comment-62692</guid>
		<description>[...] BuzzMachine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BuzzMachine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/03/blog-or-perish/#comment-62611</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 17:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1603#comment-62611</guid>
		<description>Steve,
It's the academic pressure: publish or perish and all that. 
We publish daily, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,<br />
It&#8217;s the academic pressure: publish or perish and all that.<br />
We publish daily, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FieldNotes: Notes on the Anthropology of British Columbia &#187; Blogging and Tenure</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/03/blog-or-perish/#comment-62576</link>
		<dc:creator>FieldNotes: Notes on the Anthropology of British Columbia &#187; Blogging and Tenure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 15:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1603#comment-62576</guid>
		<description>[...] Entertainment, technology, and legal blogger &#8212; and soon to be professor &#8212; Jeff Jarvis takes on the place of blogging in tenure reviews. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Entertainment, technology, and legal blogger &#8212; and soon to be professor &#8212; Jeff Jarvis takes on the place of blogging in tenure reviews. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve baker</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/03/blog-or-perish/#comment-62569</link>
		<dc:creator>steve baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 15:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1603#comment-62569</guid>
		<description>Jeff, if you despair at finding the time to write a book, why bother? Is it part of your strategy to "get somewhere" or some hectoring from your superego (despite the weaknesses you've chronicled of the medium)? I'd bet that with or without a book, you've already arrived where you're supposed to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, if you despair at finding the time to write a book, why bother? Is it part of your strategy to &#8220;get somewhere&#8221; or some hectoring from your superego (despite the weaknesses you&#8217;ve chronicled of the medium)? I&#8217;d bet that with or without a book, you&#8217;ve already arrived where you&#8217;re supposed to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Feinman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/03/blog-or-perish/#comment-62564</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Feinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 15:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1603#comment-62564</guid>
		<description>In the scientific community there have been attempts to change from the peer reviewed scholarly article model. The defects are that the process is slow, the reviewers are anonymous and thus may be biased, and the publishers have a choke hold on the dissemination of knowledge. Libraries wouldn't mind seeing a new model either as some journals charge $10K+ per year for a subscription.

One of the models being tried (I don't know with what level of acceptance) is for anyone to be able to post an article. The peer reviewing would then take place online by the readers. Those articles which scored well would be highly regarded and end up being cited, those which were not would sink into obscurity. Being a self-regulated, online, community would also keep publishing and distribution costs down.

Much of what authors publish is aimed at getting tenure or promotion, so the success of this activity depends more on whether this type of publication will be allowed for such career decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the scientific community there have been attempts to change from the peer reviewed scholarly article model. The defects are that the process is slow, the reviewers are anonymous and thus may be biased, and the publishers have a choke hold on the dissemination of knowledge. Libraries wouldn&#8217;t mind seeing a new model either as some journals charge $10K+ per year for a subscription.</p>
<p>One of the models being tried (I don&#8217;t know with what level of acceptance) is for anyone to be able to post an article. The peer reviewing would then take place online by the readers. Those articles which scored well would be highly regarded and end up being cited, those which were not would sink into obscurity. Being a self-regulated, online, community would also keep publishing and distribution costs down.</p>
<p>Much of what authors publish is aimed at getting tenure or promotion, so the success of this activity depends more on whether this type of publication will be allowed for such career decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
