<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If Digg wore high-heels and lipstick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-373833</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-373833</guid>
		<description>Hahaha I use Digg a lot but I only bother with the geeky stuff because otherwise no-one else Diggs it. I have read some good appraisals of different markets for social network sites here. Otherwise it&#039;s quite difficult to find anything with decent women&#039;s interest stuff so thank God for lipstick.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha I use Digg a lot but I only bother with the geeky stuff because otherwise no-one else Diggs it. I have read some good appraisals of different markets for social network sites here. Otherwise it&#8217;s quite difficult to find anything with decent women&#8217;s interest stuff so thank God for lipstick.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-99317</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 06:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-99317</guid>
		<description>I use digg.com, blinklist.com, del.icio.us, and wirefan.com.. 
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use digg.com, blinklist.com, del.icio.us, and wirefan.com..<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashok</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-67152</link>
		<dc:creator>ashok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 21:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-67152</guid>
		<description>You can make your own digg or reddit instantly right now:

http://www.crispynews.com

I&#039;ve created one for conservatives, myself:

http://conservatism.crispynews.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can make your own digg or reddit instantly right now:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.crispynews.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.crispynews.com</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve created one for conservatives, myself:</p>
<p><a href="http://conservatism.crispynews.com/" rel="nofollow">http://conservatism.crispynews.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Cashmore</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-65889</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Cashmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 15:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-65889</guid>
		<description>Seems like a weak attempt, but Gabe&#039;s WeSmirch.com is excellent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like a weak attempt, but Gabe&#8217;s WeSmirch.com is excellent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-65616</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 09:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-65616</guid>
		<description>guys,
reddit provides the functionality. conde nast is the publishing company creating lipstick. nothing mysterious here. it&#039;s like me using wordpress. powered by and all that. 
gabe:
what wasn&#039;t  known publicly was the parentage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guys,<br />
reddit provides the functionality. conde nast is the publishing company creating lipstick. nothing mysterious here. it&#8217;s like me using wordpress. powered by and all that.<br />
gabe:<br />
what wasn&#8217;t  known publicly was the parentage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nuno</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-65591</link>
		<dc:creator>nuno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 08:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-65591</guid>
		<description>Brian is absolutely right. Taken from the &#039;Help&#039; section: &quot;reddit is a source for what&#039;s new and popular on the web -- personalized for you.&quot; Lipstick may be just easier to remember as a landing domain name. That could explain they didn&#039;t keep it as a subdomain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian is absolutely right. Taken from the &#8216;Help&#8217; section: &#8220;reddit is a source for what&#8217;s new and popular on the web &#8212; personalized for you.&#8221; Lipstick may be just easier to remember as a landing domain name. That could explain they didn&#8217;t keep it as a subdomain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-65304</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 03:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-65304</guid>
		<description>update:apparently reddit owns lipstick.com...why they would want to separate it from reddit is beyond me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>update:apparently reddit owns lipstick.com&#8230;why they would want to separate it from reddit is beyond me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-65294</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 02:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-65294</guid>
		<description>go to reddit.com and then go to lipstick.com. lipstick.com stole reddit&#039;s layout code. they are a fraud. reddit&#039;s alexa rank is 2,335 and lipstick is 357,679.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go to reddit.com and then go to lipstick.com. lipstick.com stole reddit&#8217;s layout code. they are a fraud. reddit&#8217;s alexa rank is 2,335 and lipstick is 357,679.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-65214</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 01:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-65214</guid>
		<description>Dunno if there&#039;s a relaunch or official launch coming, but this has been out for over a month, and it never seemed to pick up all that much during that time.  (Very few digg clones have in fact.)  It&#039;ll be interesting to see if they can change that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dunno if there&#8217;s a relaunch or official launch coming, but this has been out for over a month, and it never seemed to pick up all that much during that time.  (Very few digg clones have in fact.)  It&#8217;ll be interesting to see if they can change that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infotainment rules &#187; Blog Archive &#187; when he&#8217;s 64</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-65201</link>
		<dc:creator>infotainment rules &#187; Blog Archive &#187; when he&#8217;s 64</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 01:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-65201</guid>
		<description>[...] From Lipstick.com, via Jeff Jarvis. What a great link&#8212;I love celebrity gossip! Plus, it&#8217;s completely legit. Don&#8217;t believe me? Check out Claims to Fame by [Professor] Joshua Gamson):  Moving from People magazine to publicists&#8217; offices to tours of stars&#8217; homes, Joshua Gamson investigates the larger-than-life terrain of American celebrity culture. In the first major academic work since the early 1940s to seriously analyze the meaning of fame in American life, Gamson begins with the often-heard criticisms that today&#8217;s heroes have been replaced by pseudoheroes, that notoriety has become detached from merit. He draws on literary and sociological theory, as well as interviews with celebrity-industry workers, to untangle the paradoxical nature of an American popular culture that is both obsessively invested in glamour and fantasy yet also aware of celebrity&#8217;s transparency and commercialism.Gamson examines the contemporary dream machine that publicists, tabloid newspapers, journalists, and TV interviewers use to create semi-fictional icons. He finds that celebrity watchers, for whom spotting celebrities becomes a spectator sport akin to watching football or fireworks, glean their own rewards in a game that turns as often on playing with inauthenticity as on identifying with stars.Gamson also looks at the celebritization of politics and the complex questions it poses regarding image and reality. He makes clear that to understand American public culture, we must understand that strange, ubiquitous phenomenon, celebrity. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From Lipstick.com, via Jeff Jarvis. What a great link&#8212;I love celebrity gossip! Plus, it&#8217;s completely legit. Don&#8217;t believe me? Check out Claims to Fame by [Professor] Joshua Gamson):  Moving from People magazine to publicists&#8217; offices to tours of stars&#8217; homes, Joshua Gamson investigates the larger-than-life terrain of American celebrity culture. In the first major academic work since the early 1940s to seriously analyze the meaning of fame in American life, Gamson begins with the often-heard criticisms that today&#8217;s heroes have been replaced by pseudoheroes, that notoriety has become detached from merit. He draws on literary and sociological theory, as well as interviews with celebrity-industry workers, to untangle the paradoxical nature of an American popular culture that is both obsessively invested in glamour and fantasy yet also aware of celebrity&#8217;s transparency and commercialism.Gamson examines the contemporary dream machine that publicists, tabloid newspapers, journalists, and TV interviewers use to create semi-fictional icons. He finds that celebrity watchers, for whom spotting celebrities becomes a spectator sport akin to watching football or fireworks, glean their own rewards in a game that turns as often on playing with inauthenticity as on identifying with stars.Gamson also looks at the celebritization of politics and the complex questions it poses regarding image and reality. He makes clear that to understand American public culture, we must understand that strange, ubiquitous phenomenon, celebrity. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Daily Om : &#187; Lipstick on a pig</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-65159</link>
		<dc:creator>The Daily Om : &#187; Lipstick on a pig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 00:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-65159</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis points to Lipstick.com, a digg clone for the gossip crowd. Jeff&#8217;s says, &#8220;if Digg wore high-heels and lipstick.&#8221; I bet you it won&#8217;t look anything like Lipstick.com.It is horrible design, and it is not glam even by farthest stretch of imagination. &#8220;Geeks v. glam. Rose v. Newhouse,&#8221; Jeff writes. Geeks and Rose win hands down. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis points to Lipstick.com, a digg clone for the gossip crowd. Jeff&#8217;s says, &#8220;if Digg wore high-heels and lipstick.&#8221; I bet you it won&#8217;t look anything like Lipstick.com.It is horrible design, and it is not glam even by farthest stretch of imagination. &#8220;Geeks v. glam. Rose v. Newhouse,&#8221; Jeff writes. Geeks and Rose win hands down. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n00854180t</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-65099</link>
		<dc:creator>n00854180t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 22:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-65099</guid>
		<description>Damn, I don&#039;t even know who half the people are in those stories, much less give a crap what they&#039;re doing.  Give me science and tech any day over celebrity gossip.  If I wanted that brain dead shit I&#039;d watch &quot;Extra&quot; or something (perish the thought!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, I don&#8217;t even know who half the people are in those stories, much less give a crap what they&#8217;re doing.  Give me science and tech any day over celebrity gossip.  If I wanted that brain dead shit I&#8217;d watch &#8220;Extra&#8221; or something (perish the thought!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-64983</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 19:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-64983</guid>
		<description>I was expecting there to be a punch-line following that title.  Something about a 2-bit hooker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was expecting there to be a punch-line following that title.  Something about a 2-bit hooker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soup</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-64964</link>
		<dc:creator>Soup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 19:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/06/06/if-digg-wore-high-heels-and-lipstick/#comment-64964</guid>
		<description>They had better start supporting Firefox.

I go to their page with Firefox, and it is blank.  I go with IE, there it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They had better start supporting Firefox.</p>
<p>I go to their page with Firefox, and it is blank.  I go with IE, there it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

