<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advertisers: You&#8217;re next</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marketing.fm &#187; Jeff Jarvis: The End of Advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-116316</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing.fm &#187; Jeff Jarvis: The End of Advertising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-116316</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis predicts a devastating upheaval for media and advertising agencies in a recent BuzzMachine post. Anyone involved in the Media, Marketing or Advertising industry should read this post. Most importantly, Jarvis accuses agencies of slowing down the natural progression and shift to new forms of media due to reliance on obsolete, siloed financial structures.  Advertising is the next big industry to suffer huge upheaval thanks to the internet. They may think theyâ€™re already there, but theyâ€™re not, not by a long shot. In fact, it is the ad industry that is holding up the progress of other industries â€” newspapers, TV, radio, cable â€” that are already getting tromped on by that elephant. Advertisers can get away with moving slowly â€” for now â€” because they are the ones with the money. Funny how that works. But this wonâ€™t last for long, as one client and then one agency discovers that the lazy, traditional, one-stop-shopping of TV upfront and the big-media lunch circuit is inefficient, wasteful, untargeted, irrelevant, and ultimately damned irritating to your customers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis predicts a devastating upheaval for media and advertising agencies in a recent BuzzMachine post. Anyone involved in the Media, Marketing or Advertising industry should read this post. Most importantly, Jarvis accuses agencies of slowing down the natural progression and shift to new forms of media due to reliance on obsolete, siloed financial structures.  Advertising is the next big industry to suffer huge upheaval thanks to the internet. They may think theyâ€™re already there, but theyâ€™re not, not by a long shot. In fact, it is the ad industry that is holding up the progress of other industries â€” newspapers, TV, radio, cable â€” that are already getting tromped on by that elephant. Advertisers can get away with moving slowly â€” for now â€” because they are the ones with the money. Funny how that works. But this wonâ€™t last for long, as one client and then one agency discovers that the lazy, traditional, one-stop-shopping of TV upfront and the big-media lunch circuit is inefficient, wasteful, untargeted, irrelevant, and ultimately damned irritating to your customers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chan Hon Wai</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-112541</link>
		<dc:creator>chan Hon Wai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-112541</guid>
		<description>Chan Loan Company wants to loan out part of our money to private firms, individuals, and cooperative bodies who are into finacial crisis with good credit interested persons shouldcontact me via my mail chanhonloans@yahoo.com.sg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chan Loan Company wants to loan out part of our money to private firms, individuals, and cooperative bodies who are into finacial crisis with good credit interested persons shouldcontact me via my mail <a href="mailto:chanhonloans@yahoo.com.sg">chanhonloans@yahoo.com.sg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LEI WONG</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-89207</link>
		<dc:creator>LEI WONG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-89207</guid>
		<description>DO YOU NEED A LOAN FOR A BUSINESS START UP, OR YOU HAVE A FINANCIAL 
STRESS DUE TO THE FACT YOU CAN'T EARN YOU DEMANDS. HERE IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR YOU TO GET YOUR DESIRED PLANS YOU HAVE BEEN THINKING OF BY OBTAINING A LOAN FROM OUR COMPANY AT LOW INTEREST RATE AND AT EXACT TIME WHEN NEEDED INTERESTED APPLICANTS SHOULD CONTACT THE LOAN DEPARTMENT MANAGER VIA EMAIL leiwong24712@yahoo.com OR BETTER STILL CALL +447024063953 FOR EFFECTIVE DETAILS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DO YOU NEED A LOAN FOR A BUSINESS START UP, OR YOU HAVE A FINANCIAL<br />
STRESS DUE TO THE FACT YOU CAN&#8217;T EARN YOU DEMANDS. HERE IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR YOU TO GET YOUR DESIRED PLANS YOU HAVE BEEN THINKING OF BY OBTAINING A LOAN FROM OUR COMPANY AT LOW INTEREST RATE AND AT EXACT TIME WHEN NEEDED INTERESTED APPLICANTS SHOULD CONTACT THE LOAN DEPARTMENT MANAGER VIA EMAIL <a href="mailto:leiwong24712@yahoo.com">leiwong24712@yahoo.com</a> OR BETTER STILL CALL +447024063953 FOR EFFECTIVE DETAILS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Linky Goodness - 7/3/2006</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-83946</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Linky Goodness - 7/3/2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 09:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-83946</guid>
		<description>[...] Advertising will soon be disrupted Jeff Jarvis writes about how advertising agencies are soon in for a rude awakening. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Advertising will soon be disrupted Jeff Jarvis writes about how advertising agencies are soon in for a rude awakening. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twiddle</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-80862</link>
		<dc:creator>Twiddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-80862</guid>
		<description>The aadvertising industry is due for some change. Consumtion models are changing. Rich boomers now ready to retire or retiring are keeping that  odel flowing. Once the boomers hit the beach or whatever the fuck boomers do when they retire. The model with change internet will be a bigger part of a model.  I work in the dog eat dog world of local retail, for a newspaper.  

My client base is largely Mom &#38; Pops little guys, how does all this high flying branding strategies apply to a local Jewellery store.....the paper is still the most cost effective way to reach this crowd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The aadvertising industry is due for some change. Consumtion models are changing. Rich boomers now ready to retire or retiring are keeping that  odel flowing. Once the boomers hit the beach or whatever the fuck boomers do when they retire. The model with change internet will be a bigger part of a model.  I work in the dog eat dog world of local retail, for a newspaper.  </p>
<p>My client base is largely Mom &amp; Pops little guys, how does all this high flying branding strategies apply to a local Jewellery store&#8230;..the paper is still the most cost effective way to reach this crowd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt McAlister &#187; A good marketer doesn&#8217;t have to advertise</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-80828</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt McAlister &#187; A good marketer doesn&#8217;t have to advertise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-80828</guid>
		<description>[...] Similarly, Jeff Jarvis sees a tipping point coming for the advertising industry: &#8220;Advertisers can get away with moving slowly - for now - because they are the ones with the money. Funny how that works. But this wonâ€™t last for long, as one client and then one agency discovers that the lazy, traditional, one-stop-shopping of TV upfront and the big-media lunch circuit is inefficient, wasteful, untargeted, irrelevant, and ultimately damned irritating to your customers.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Similarly, Jeff Jarvis sees a tipping point coming for the advertising industry: &#8220;Advertisers can get away with moving slowly - for now - because they are the ones with the money. Funny how that works. But this wonâ€™t last for long, as one client and then one agency discovers that the lazy, traditional, one-stop-shopping of TV upfront and the big-media lunch circuit is inefficient, wasteful, untargeted, irrelevant, and ultimately damned irritating to your customers.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paw</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-80286</link>
		<dc:creator>Paw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-80286</guid>
		<description>CaptiousNut-

Generalize much?

I'm no socialist, Cap, I just know what I'm talking about.  Check the stats at the Economic Policy Institute - wage based income, adjusted for inflation, isn't rising, period.  It isn't whether your beloved "fossils" can afford the $12 a month for the service - it's whether the service is potentially worth giving up something else to have.  Believe it or not, some people don't have the financial capability to have it all, unless they spend themselves into debt; a bad move considering how much more difficult it is to declare personal bankruptcy than it used to be.  You may have all the discretionary income in the world, Cap, but you're definitely not the majority.

BTW, the "meaningless number" you refer to was the tens of millions of fossils you cite in your initial post - read your own words, schmuck, you may learn something...or maybe not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CaptiousNut-</p>
<p>Generalize much?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m no socialist, Cap, I just know what I&#8217;m talking about.  Check the stats at the Economic Policy Institute - wage based income, adjusted for inflation, isn&#8217;t rising, period.  It isn&#8217;t whether your beloved &#8220;fossils&#8221; can afford the $12 a month for the service - it&#8217;s whether the service is potentially worth giving up something else to have.  Believe it or not, some people don&#8217;t have the financial capability to have it all, unless they spend themselves into debt; a bad move considering how much more difficult it is to declare personal bankruptcy than it used to be.  You may have all the discretionary income in the world, Cap, but you&#8217;re definitely not the majority.</p>
<p>BTW, the &#8220;meaningless number&#8221; you refer to was the tens of millions of fossils you cite in your initial post - read your own words, schmuck, you may learn something&#8230;or maybe not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exitcreative &#187; Just what I was thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-80221</link>
		<dc:creator>exitcreative &#187; Just what I was thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 19:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-80221</guid>
		<description>[...] I found the following via Buzz Machine. It&#8217;s a quote from a report from Canne by Liz Hoggard of the Observer. A gorgeous little nugget about where we&#8217;ve got to go. When I say &#8216;we&#8217;, of course, I mean the ad industry. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I found the following via Buzz Machine. It&#8217;s a quote from a report from Canne by Liz Hoggard of the Observer. A gorgeous little nugget about where we&#8217;ve got to go. When I say &#8216;we&#8217;, of course, I mean the ad industry. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heiko</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-79837</link>
		<dc:creator>Heiko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 07:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-79837</guid>
		<description>I was quiet enthiastic reading the article and asked myself five minutes later what I read. Someow it seemed to me that it was kind of "The end is nigh'" - a statement probably older than language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was quiet enthiastic reading the article and asked myself five minutes later what I read. Someow it seemed to me that it was kind of &#8220;The end is nigh&#8217;&#8221; - a statement probably older than language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chico haas</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-79471</link>
		<dc:creator>chico haas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-79471</guid>
		<description>TV advertising ain't going anywhere. Some people may spend 24/7 online, but, frankly, they're freakshows. I spend maybe eight hours on and off a day. I also read newspapers, magazines, listen to radio, watch TV, play music and - omg - read books. The internet is just another venue. Another choice. And Interactive is already part of the mix in the creative departments of any good ad agency and has been for a while. Just like radio, print, OOH, sponsorships, NSP and TV. I love the web and it is taking share of attention away from other things, but, honestly, it ain't the only thing. And if you think it is, you've got Stockholm Syndrome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TV advertising ain&#8217;t going anywhere. Some people may spend 24/7 online, but, frankly, they&#8217;re freakshows. I spend maybe eight hours on and off a day. I also read newspapers, magazines, listen to radio, watch TV, play music and - omg - read books. The internet is just another venue. Another choice. And Interactive is already part of the mix in the creative departments of any good ad agency and has been for a while. Just like radio, print, OOH, sponsorships, NSP and TV. I love the web and it is taking share of attention away from other things, but, honestly, it ain&#8217;t the only thing. And if you think it is, you&#8217;ve got Stockholm Syndrome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptiousNut</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-79320</link>
		<dc:creator>CaptiousNut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-79320</guid>
		<description>Paw,

It's interesting that you can interject a socialist talking point about income growth into your comment.  Yeah, everyone is broke but can somehow afford two homes, hybrid cars, iPods, $4 lattes, and lawn service these days.

It never fails.  One mention of "fossil" and someone always gets offended.

I can't fathom how Paw can discern the exact number of fossils that I &lt;em&gt;imagine&lt;/em&gt;.  Whatever the meaningless number, Luddite fossils are a shrinking demographic - not to mention an advertising audience not as coveted as the higher spending 18-35 year old population.

If someone thinks they can't afford an extra $12 a month for a dvr, then they are stupid.  What is 12 bucks?  Two extra brown bag lunches?  Three less lattes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paw,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting that you can interject a socialist talking point about income growth into your comment.  Yeah, everyone is broke but can somehow afford two homes, hybrid cars, iPods, $4 lattes, and lawn service these days.</p>
<p>It never fails.  One mention of &#8220;fossil&#8221; and someone always gets offended.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t fathom how Paw can discern the exact number of fossils that I <em>imagine</em>.  Whatever the meaningless number, Luddite fossils are a shrinking demographic - not to mention an advertising audience not as coveted as the higher spending 18-35 year old population.</p>
<p>If someone thinks they can&#8217;t afford an extra $12 a month for a dvr, then they are stupid.  What is 12 bucks?  Two extra brown bag lunches?  Three less lattes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shig Odani Online Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-79287</link>
		<dc:creator>Shig Odani Online Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-79287</guid>
		<description>[...] Advertisers: You&#8217;re Next - from BuzzMachine on what&#8217;s broken in the ad industry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Advertisers: You&#8217;re Next - from BuzzMachine on what&#8217;s broken in the ad industry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-79253</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-79253</guid>
		<description>"Jeff has a tremendous post here. Long, but worth it.

Lines up with my view of the world, big time - as anyone who has been listening to me for..."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Jeff has a tremendous post here. Long, but worth it.</p>
<p>Lines up with my view of the world, big time - as anyone who has been listening to me for&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qcontent</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-79222</link>
		<dc:creator>qcontent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-79222</guid>
		<description>Old School Media propaganda-verses- New School Media propaganda, one self-interest -versus- another; BOTH lying their asses off, who knows what the truth is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old School Media propaganda-verses- New School Media propaganda, one self-interest -versus- another; BOTH lying their asses off, who knows what the truth is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ad Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-79195</link>
		<dc:creator>Ad Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 15:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-79195</guid>
		<description>I work for a large agency in New York City and from my perspective, I see a couple of bottlenecks for change...

- like you said, big brand clients don't want to give their money, or at least significant budgets to small and nimble agencies. My client is huge, spends many millions on advertising and wants all work to go through their 2 agencies-of-record, so there's really no room for a smaller agency to get their foot in the door.
- people who work at these large agencies tend to be set in their ways. They get moulded. The nail that sticks out gets hammered down. People don't want change because they're so used to the way in which things have been done, and they'll hold on with both hands. They're glued to display media. What little online stuff we do on my account is not engaging. For a recent campaign, the online component was just some banners on large general sites and a few e-mail blasts. Lame. The people in the creative department are seen as the only people in the agency with creativity. Creative marketing ideas don't come from account management or strategy departments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work for a large agency in New York City and from my perspective, I see a couple of bottlenecks for change&#8230;</p>
<p>- like you said, big brand clients don&#8217;t want to give their money, or at least significant budgets to small and nimble agencies. My client is huge, spends many millions on advertising and wants all work to go through their 2 agencies-of-record, so there&#8217;s really no room for a smaller agency to get their foot in the door.<br />
- people who work at these large agencies tend to be set in their ways. They get moulded. The nail that sticks out gets hammered down. People don&#8217;t want change because they&#8217;re so used to the way in which things have been done, and they&#8217;ll hold on with both hands. They&#8217;re glued to display media. What little online stuff we do on my account is not engaging. For a recent campaign, the online component was just some banners on large general sites and a few e-mail blasts. Lame. The people in the creative department are seen as the only people in the agency with creativity. Creative marketing ideas don&#8217;t come from account management or strategy departments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paw</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-79187</link>
		<dc:creator>Paw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 15:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-79187</guid>
		<description>It's going to be fascinating to see how the TV business copes with the new reality of the marketplace.  It's not necessarily that viewers aren't enamored of what's on the air - I don't recall any Internet enthusiasts bemoaning the loss of a favorite website with the same passion as the viewers of 7TH HEAVEN or VERONICA MARS - it's the simple fact that Hollywood economics no longer function in the kind of fragmented media landscape we've created for ourselves.  The guilds have jammed the cost of producing primetime quality shows so high that they become self-defeating entities before they begin.  Will actors, writers, directors and the craftspeople learn to adjust their financial expectations before the goose is cooked for good?  Beats me.

I also believe the TV station business is done for good.  At some point soon, over 90% of homes that watch ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox will be doing so through a cable system.  Why keep the station going at that point?  All the networks mentioned above are owned by studios, all of which have tons of library product that can be used to fill the hours of the day the network currently doesn't program.  Local news?  Cable systems have that too as does the Internet.  Think of what could happen when broadcast networks are free to create a RESCUE ME or THE SHIELD...

Finally, a word to CaptiousNut:  there are a lot more of those "fossils" out there than you might imagine, and since real earned income hasn't grown for the vast majority of the population in years, maybe they have a point about not wanting to pay for the new whiz-bang services offered by their cable companies.  I still believe there is a significant portion of the population that just wants to be passively entertained, without monthly a la carte entertainment fees to worry about.  Isn't life complicated enough, after all?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s going to be fascinating to see how the TV business copes with the new reality of the marketplace.  It&#8217;s not necessarily that viewers aren&#8217;t enamored of what&#8217;s on the air - I don&#8217;t recall any Internet enthusiasts bemoaning the loss of a favorite website with the same passion as the viewers of 7TH HEAVEN or VERONICA MARS - it&#8217;s the simple fact that Hollywood economics no longer function in the kind of fragmented media landscape we&#8217;ve created for ourselves.  The guilds have jammed the cost of producing primetime quality shows so high that they become self-defeating entities before they begin.  Will actors, writers, directors and the craftspeople learn to adjust their financial expectations before the goose is cooked for good?  Beats me.</p>
<p>I also believe the TV station business is done for good.  At some point soon, over 90% of homes that watch ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox will be doing so through a cable system.  Why keep the station going at that point?  All the networks mentioned above are owned by studios, all of which have tons of library product that can be used to fill the hours of the day the network currently doesn&#8217;t program.  Local news?  Cable systems have that too as does the Internet.  Think of what could happen when broadcast networks are free to create a RESCUE ME or THE SHIELD&#8230;</p>
<p>Finally, a word to CaptiousNut:  there are a lot more of those &#8220;fossils&#8221; out there than you might imagine, and since real earned income hasn&#8217;t grown for the vast majority of the population in years, maybe they have a point about not wanting to pay for the new whiz-bang services offered by their cable companies.  I still believe there is a significant portion of the population that just wants to be passively entertained, without monthly a la carte entertainment fees to worry about.  Isn&#8217;t life complicated enough, after all?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptiousNut</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-79128</link>
		<dc:creator>CaptiousNut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-79128</guid>
		<description>Don't forget the DVR.  I think only 3-5% of homes have one.  It will do to tv ads what craigslist did to classifieds.

Inertia isn't limited to just ad agencies and marketing gurus.

There are tens of millions of fossils who:

1) Don't even know what a dvr is.

2) Would never consider anything that might raise their cable bill $12-$15 per month.

3) Are intimidated by further complicating the remote control.

This is a rapidly aging and shrinking demographic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget the DVR.  I think only 3-5% of homes have one.  It will do to tv ads what craigslist did to classifieds.</p>
<p>Inertia isn&#8217;t limited to just ad agencies and marketing gurus.</p>
<p>There are tens of millions of fossils who:</p>
<p>1) Don&#8217;t even know what a dvr is.</p>
<p>2) Would never consider anything that might raise their cable bill $12-$15 per month.</p>
<p>3) Are intimidated by further complicating the remote control.</p>
<p>This is a rapidly aging and shrinking demographic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Pope</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-78996</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Pope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 09:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-78996</guid>
		<description>How about this, ITV down 25% year on year, from today's Media Guardian:
'The pressures on ITV are immense. July TV advertising revenue is now expected to be down by 15% but ITV will be hit worst, between 23-25% down year-on-year. Ratings at ITV1 continue to slide - down 8% year-on-year so far.'
http://media.guardian.co.uk/mediaguardian/story/0,,1805718,00.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about this, ITV down 25% year on year, from today&#8217;s Media Guardian:<br />
&#8216;The pressures on ITV are immense. July TV advertising revenue is now expected to be down by 15% but ITV will be hit worst, between 23-25% down year-on-year. Ratings at ITV1 continue to slide - down 8% year-on-year so far.&#8217;<br />
<a href="http://media.guardian.co.uk/mediaguardian/story/0,,1805718,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://media.guardian.co.uk/mediaguardian/story/0,,1805718,00.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ at Knowing Art</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-78992</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ at Knowing Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 09:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-78992</guid>
		<description>You inspired me.  I might even blog about toothpaste, just to see what AdSense ads come up for toothpaste.  The wonderful thing about blogging is  you can write about anything and the ads magically appear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You inspired me.  I might even blog about toothpaste, just to see what AdSense ads come up for toothpaste.  The wonderful thing about blogging is  you can write about anything and the ads magically appear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pau Elosegui</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-78987</link>
		<dc:creator>Pau Elosegui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 09:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-78987</guid>
		<description>It has been long in coming , and when it comes it shalt be a Tsunami. The head of sales of an internet portal in my portfolio &lt;a href="http://www.hispavista.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;hispavista&lt;/a&gt; has been preaching the arrival of the online advertising Tsunami for years. Maybe he is right ? 

Interesting news in the UK; ITV, second commercial TV station, is $400m in the red with huge downturn of its advertising sales...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been long in coming , and when it comes it shalt be a Tsunami. The head of sales of an internet portal in my portfolio <a href="http://www.hispavista.com" rel="nofollow">hispavista</a> has been preaching the arrival of the online advertising Tsunami for years. Maybe he is right ? </p>
<p>Interesting news in the UK; ITV, second commercial TV station, is $400m in the red with huge downturn of its advertising sales&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DIGITAL STREET JOURNAL &#187; Understanding the fear, but not the resistance</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-78807</link>
		<dc:creator>DIGITAL STREET JOURNAL &#187; Understanding the fear, but not the resistance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 02:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-78807</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis has a great post today in BuzzMachine on the changing state of the business of advertising. And the resistance of many of today&#8217;s &#8220;leaders&#8221; who seem to be pissed that it&#8217;s actually changing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis has a great post today in BuzzMachine on the changing state of the business of advertising. And the resistance of many of today&#8217;s &#8220;leaders&#8221; who seem to be pissed that it&#8217;s actually changing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Trenn</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/25/advertisers-youre-next/#comment-78797</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Trenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 02:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1693#comment-78797</guid>
		<description>Jeff

You're spot on with this one, but I fear that you've got two sets of folks dragging their feet.  The agencies for one and the marketing execs that hire them for the second.  I'm seeing a lot of internal decison makers think in terms of the internet as a top down delivery vehicle.  Send out a message and tell 'em how great we are.

Solid interactive methodologies are now being developed, but at times it's with client reisistance.  The education process is a battle.  But at least now they're listening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff</p>
<p>You&#8217;re spot on with this one, but I fear that you&#8217;ve got two sets of folks dragging their feet.  The agencies for one and the marketing execs that hire them for the second.  I&#8217;m seeing a lot of internal decison makers think in terms of the internet as a top down delivery vehicle.  Send out a message and tell &#8216;em how great we are.</p>
<p>Solid interactive methodologies are now being developed, but at times it&#8217;s with client reisistance.  The education process is a battle.  But at least now they&#8217;re listening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
