<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From small seeds&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/26/from-small-seeds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/26/from-small-seeds/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:20:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew James Didier</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/26/from-small-seeds/#comment-79677</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew James Didier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 02:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/06/26/from-small-seeds/#comment-79677</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Small isnâ€™t the new big. Small is just the old small. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Took the words right out of my mouth.

It&#039;s inevitable that, like decent websites, the cream will rise to the top and cluster to form larger entities... trick is, figuring out where that cluster will form around.

Aye, there&#039;s where the money will be with &quot;small niche online publications&quot; be they blogs or journals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Small isnâ€™t the new big. Small is just the old small. </p></blockquote>
<p>Took the words right out of my mouth.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s inevitable that, like decent websites, the cream will rise to the top and cluster to form larger entities&#8230; trick is, figuring out where that cluster will form around.</p>
<p>Aye, there&#8217;s where the money will be with &#8220;small niche online publications&#8221; be they blogs or journals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Daily Om : &#187; Starting is easy, Finishing is hard</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/26/from-small-seeds/#comment-79539</link>
		<dc:creator>The Daily Om : &#187; Starting is easy, Finishing is hard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 23:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/06/26/from-small-seeds/#comment-79539</guid>
		<description>[...] Jason Calacanis rightfully says, Starting is easy, Finishing is Hard. Jeff Jarvis has his thoughts. Mathew Ingram is just a kind generous man, who has nice things to say about us. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jason Calacanis rightfully says, Starting is easy, Finishing is Hard. Jeff Jarvis has his thoughts. Mathew Ingram is just a kind generous man, who has nice things to say about us. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/26/from-small-seeds/#comment-79417</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/06/26/from-small-seeds/#comment-79417</guid>
		<description>Small isn&#039;t the new big. Small is just the old small. But apparantly folks like Patricof (and you Jeff) are scared (probably with good reason) of the notion of investing in big expensive product development, like it took to create and launch and normalize EW. 

That is, until you aren&#039;t scared. I read VentureWire every day and I am stunned with amount of venture capital, in big huge gobs, being thrown at new media ideas. 

Also, entities like Huffington Post and Federated Media kind of show the &quot;small is the new big&quot; idea to itself be, well, small. Aggregation is still the way to scale, and prosper, whether you are aggregating journalists and journalism and reviews and pretty pictures (say, in EW, or GigaOm) or aggregating blogs (Huff and Federated et. al.) or aggregating personal home pages (ooops, I mean User Generated Content).

Any case, big media companies aren&#039;t going away, nor are big energy companies or big food companies or big anythings. Patricof put in his money to try to get a venture-size return... meaning to hopefully sell the venture (too small for IPO) to (drum roll please) a big media company.

Oh, and I don&#039;t think the nation state is going to wither away either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small isn&#8217;t the new big. Small is just the old small. But apparantly folks like Patricof (and you Jeff) are scared (probably with good reason) of the notion of investing in big expensive product development, like it took to create and launch and normalize EW. </p>
<p>That is, until you aren&#8217;t scared. I read VentureWire every day and I am stunned with amount of venture capital, in big huge gobs, being thrown at new media ideas. </p>
<p>Also, entities like Huffington Post and Federated Media kind of show the &#8220;small is the new big&#8221; idea to itself be, well, small. Aggregation is still the way to scale, and prosper, whether you are aggregating journalists and journalism and reviews and pretty pictures (say, in EW, or GigaOm) or aggregating blogs (Huff and Federated et. al.) or aggregating personal home pages (ooops, I mean User Generated Content).</p>
<p>Any case, big media companies aren&#8217;t going away, nor are big energy companies or big food companies or big anythings. Patricof put in his money to try to get a venture-size return&#8230; meaning to hopefully sell the venture (too small for IPO) to (drum roll please) a big media company.</p>
<p>Oh, and I don&#8217;t think the nation state is going to wither away either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/26/from-small-seeds/#comment-79168</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 15:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/06/26/from-small-seeds/#comment-79168</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have to agree with that final statement. Blogs are still in a very embryonic stage. Most of the blogosphere&#039;s critics are reacting to one paticular type of blog while ignoring the mediums wider potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to agree with that final statement. Blogs are still in a very embryonic stage. Most of the blogosphere&#8217;s critics are reacting to one paticular type of blog while ignoring the mediums wider potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om and Rafat are the future of news &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/06/26/from-small-seeds/#comment-79140</link>
		<dc:creator>Om and Rafat are the future of news &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 14:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/06/26/from-small-seeds/#comment-79140</guid>
		<description>[...] with del.icio.us &#160; &#124; &#160; Email this entry  &#160; &#124; &#160; TrackBack URI &#160; &#124; &#160; Digg it &#160; &#124; &#160; Track with co.mments &#160; &#124; &#160;      Click here for copyright permissions!  Copyright 2006 Mathew Ingram [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with del.icio.us &nbsp; | &nbsp; Email this entry  &nbsp; | &nbsp; TrackBack URI &nbsp; | &nbsp; Digg it &nbsp; | &nbsp; Track with co.mments &nbsp; | &nbsp;      Click here for copyright permissions!  Copyright 2006 Mathew Ingram [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

