<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian column: Network 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/24/guardian-column-network-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/24/guardian-column-network-20/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Exploding public media</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/24/guardian-column-network-20/#comment-96325</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Exploding public media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1804#comment-96325</guid>
		<description>[...] Asked whether NPR will end up competing with newspapers, Marimow said they&#8217;ll more likely be complementary, for NPR will have the foreign correspondents they don&#8217;t have. And, I&#8217;d argue, newspapers will have the local depth radio doesn&#8217;t have. They need to link to each other. As I said below, they don&#8217;t own networks; they&#8217;re in networks. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Asked whether NPR will end up competing with newspapers, Marimow said they&#8217;ll more likely be complementary, for NPR will have the foreign correspondents they don&#8217;t have. And, I&#8217;d argue, newspapers will have the local depth radio doesn&#8217;t have. They need to link to each other. As I said below, they don&#8217;t own networks; they&#8217;re in networks. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Dabble do ya</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/24/guardian-column-network-20/#comment-96319</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Dabble do ya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1804#comment-96319</guid>
		<description>[...] Mary Hodder, one of the most respected thinkers of the blog world, has launched her new company, Dabble. It&#8217;s a video search across many sites and a place where you can find the good stuff. In that sense, it is just what I was saying the world needs this morning: network 2.0. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mary Hodder, one of the most respected thinkers of the blog world, has launched her new company, Dabble. It&#8217;s a video search across many sites and a place where you can find the good stuff. In that sense, it is just what I was saying the world needs this morning: network 2.0. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Brain</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/24/guardian-column-network-20/#comment-96313</link>
		<dc:creator>David Brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1804#comment-96313</guid>
		<description>Top stuff Jeff, but I wondered where you are on the issue of monetising creative content now that the networks and newspapers are no longer cutting as many cheques for creatives and journalists (see Friday's &lt;a href="http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/archives/2006/07/0721006.html" title="Ze Frank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Ze Frank&lt;/a&gt; for a pretty funny account of how YouTube is asking people to sign-over a number of their rights on upload).  &lt;a href="http://www.revver.com/" title="Revver" rel="nofollow"&gt;Revver&lt;/a&gt; (an Edelman client) for example are very open about their terms and split the fees earned for the ads that are tagged on the videos . . . . any other models you see out there that might financially grease the wheels of the revolution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top stuff Jeff, but I wondered where you are on the issue of monetising creative content now that the networks and newspapers are no longer cutting as many cheques for creatives and journalists (see Friday&#8217;s <a href="http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/archives/2006/07/0721006.html" title="Ze Frank" rel="nofollow">Ze Frank</a> for a pretty funny account of how YouTube is asking people to sign-over a number of their rights on upload).  <a href="http://www.revver.com/" title="Revver" rel="nofollow">Revver</a> (an Edelman client) for example are very open about their terms and split the fees earned for the ads that are tagged on the videos . . . . any other models you see out there that might financially grease the wheels of the revolution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Kasava</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/24/guardian-column-network-20/#comment-96292</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Kasava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1804#comment-96292</guid>
		<description>Brilliant, concise, on the button. Trusted content needs to be a combination of editorial authority and quality, plus participant guidance. Media owner as network node is the best way I've seen of describing this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant, concise, on the button. Trusted content needs to be a combination of editorial authority and quality, plus participant guidance. Media owner as network node is the best way I&#8217;ve seen of describing this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
