<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Waking up the Brigadoon book business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/1828/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/1828/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Exploding books: Decaf prose</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/1828/#comment-115665</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Exploding books: Decaf prose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1828#comment-115665</guid>
		<description>[...] See this post on the role of print-on-demand in the business. [via Hal Halladay] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See this post on the role of print-on-demand in the business. [via Hal Halladay] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Netflix of life</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/1828/#comment-109811</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Netflix of life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 15:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1828#comment-109811</guid>
		<description>[...] I just got the pitch from Staples for their new ink replacement program: You mail in your empty cartridge and they mail a new one back; you pay what you&#8217;d pay if you went to the store. It&#8217;s Netflix for ink. It&#8217;s a small step to having your printer tell Staples through the internet that you just ran out of juice. And that&#8217;s not a big step from RFID tags on other merchandise sending in an order. Not to take this too far (as if I haven&#8217;t already), but there&#8217;s another reason not to go to stores. I&#8217;ve been saying for years that retail will become, more and more, a showroom and not always the point of purchase. Oh, of course, most retail will remain mostly instant gratification. But here we talked about looking at books in a store but then ordering them online (that&#8217;s what I do already). I wish I could go to a car showroom and not be accosted by the guy who&#8217;s going to make the commission (and the only reason the automakers don&#8217;t sell direct is regulation). Retailers might take less inventory risk but will also need to be compensated differently: manufacturers pay them for display space, perhaps. OK, I went too far. But we&#8217;ll keep seeing these small changes in retail that add up. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I just got the pitch from Staples for their new ink replacement program: You mail in your empty cartridge and they mail a new one back; you pay what you&#8217;d pay if you went to the store. It&#8217;s Netflix for ink. It&#8217;s a small step to having your printer tell Staples through the internet that you just ran out of juice. And that&#8217;s not a big step from RFID tags on other merchandise sending in an order. Not to take this too far (as if I haven&#8217;t already), but there&#8217;s another reason not to go to stores. I&#8217;ve been saying for years that retail will become, more and more, a showroom and not always the point of purchase. Oh, of course, most retail will remain mostly instant gratification. But here we talked about looking at books in a store but then ordering them online (that&#8217;s what I do already). I wish I could go to a car showroom and not be accosted by the guy who&#8217;s going to make the commission (and the only reason the automakers don&#8217;t sell direct is regulation). Retailers might take less inventory risk but will also need to be compensated differently: manufacturers pay them for display space, perhaps. OK, I went too far. But we&#8217;ll keep seeing these small changes in retail that add up. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/1828/#comment-107555</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1828#comment-107555</guid>
		<description>hmm, jeff. up for a little experiment?

why don't you just write your book, offer it online as a free pdf (or for a small fee or donation), offer it also as a pod book, and through the pod, put it eventually on ingram for global distribution.

i've been dabbling in online and offline publishing for a long time. my latest scheme is to set up a colophon (basically a publishing house 'lite'). if you are interested, you write your book and i can take it from there (or we could share tasks). let's see what happens. it wouldn't be like random house, though it might seem random.

and i think i'll also mention something to g.i.horton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm, jeff. up for a little experiment?</p>
<p>why don&#8217;t you just write your book, offer it online as a free pdf (or for a small fee or donation), offer it also as a pod book, and through the pod, put it eventually on ingram for global distribution.</p>
<p>i&#8217;ve been dabbling in online and offline publishing for a long time. my latest scheme is to set up a colophon (basically a publishing house &#8216;lite&#8217;). if you are interested, you write your book and i can take it from there (or we could share tasks). let&#8217;s see what happens. it wouldn&#8217;t be like random house, though it might seem random.</p>
<p>and i think i&#8217;ll also mention something to g.i.horton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eri</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/1828/#comment-102852</link>
		<dc:creator>Eri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 22:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1828#comment-102852</guid>
		<description>Check out the model that many Print-on-Demand houses use, such as Authorhouse and others.  They use the printer Lightening Source, which keeps 1 - 5 books in storage until more or ordered, then they print more volumes.  It literally is printing on demand and is much more economical (Not to mention environmentally conscious) than stocking hundreds of books that don't sell and eventually get destroyed by sellers who can't sell what they've got because they can't reach their buyers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the model that many Print-on-Demand houses use, such as Authorhouse and others.  They use the printer Lightening Source, which keeps 1 - 5 books in storage until more or ordered, then they print more volumes.  It literally is printing on demand and is much more economical (Not to mention environmentally conscious) than stocking hundreds of books that don&#8217;t sell and eventually get destroyed by sellers who can&#8217;t sell what they&#8217;ve got because they can&#8217;t reach their buyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoePub</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/1828/#comment-102569</link>
		<dc:creator>JoePub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 14:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1828#comment-102569</guid>
		<description>Book publishing companies are definitely a swamp of frustrating anachronisms.  I didn't realize just how much so unitl I stopped working at one.  However, there are a few thing's you've proposed that I'd like to throw my two pennies at:

1) "Charge less if the reader is willing to wait" will never work.  No one would use the cheaper/free Amazon shipping options if their projected wait time was an extra 5 days to 7 months, depending on how many other people decided to order the books they were interested in.  

You can't look to Netflix here,  because the customer isn't going to be sent another book while they wait for the one they want.  And if they are, well, then we've just re-invented the Book of the Month Club. 

2) Almost nobody is interested in a $15 pdf.  If they were, e-books would already be selling like literary flapjacks.  They're not.  Last time I checked, audio books sold better.  And who the hell buys audio books?

A really groovy e-reader might up the number of sales a little bit, particularly if Appple did one, but until we're taught to read on screens, most people will still want their books in ink.  

Give e-books away for free to promote the hardcover.  Give up on making a profit on them.  Just give the damn things away already! Either in chapter size bits on the web or in their entirety with purchase of the hardcover.  I haven't checked in on Baen books lately, but they really nailed this with their free e-library a few years back.  

3) Publishers have been talking about using technology to get rid of the "current retailing middlemen" since at least the advent of the CD-ROM.  It won't happen &#38; it shouldn't happen.  People hanging out at a B&#38;N are a captive audience.  Don't lose them. Hell, just having a legion of cyclopean B&#38;Ns looming over the mini-malls gives the book industry a level of exposure that just didn't exist back in the days of the independent bookseller.  Trying to build up the publishing industry by knocking down B&#38;N won't work. 

4) There's no reason that two (or 12) books-about-books shouldn't be written and available in some sort of form on the web.  There's a very good reason a publisher shouldn't &lt;i&gt;release&lt;/i&gt; one when another's just come out, though: the advance.  It won't earn back quickly if the market is "saturated" when a book hits the market. 

Tell publishers you'll forgo your advance payment and they may be more interested in obtaining an "instant backlist" title that will slowly generate revenue for both you &#38; them over the years.  You may want to leave your agent out of this discussion.  ;)


4)" The internet is not the enemy of books, authors, publishers, and ideas."  Too true.  There are many things that need to change in order to make the industry more appealing to my fellow 21st-century-digital-boys &#38; girls.  I'd particularly like to see the demise of the now largely irrelevant distinction between the US/UK market.  

But at the same time, book publishers shouldn't try to become web publishers.  They need to use the net to find nifty ways to sell their sliced up, ink stained, bundles of bark, not ape the business model of whatever nifty web startup that's captured our hearts and minds this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Book publishing companies are definitely a swamp of frustrating anachronisms.  I didn&#8217;t realize just how much so unitl I stopped working at one.  However, there are a few thing&#8217;s you&#8217;ve proposed that I&#8217;d like to throw my two pennies at:</p>
<p>1) &#8220;Charge less if the reader is willing to wait&#8221; will never work.  No one would use the cheaper/free Amazon shipping options if their projected wait time was an extra 5 days to 7 months, depending on how many other people decided to order the books they were interested in.  </p>
<p>You can&#8217;t look to Netflix here,  because the customer isn&#8217;t going to be sent another book while they wait for the one they want.  And if they are, well, then we&#8217;ve just re-invented the Book of the Month Club. </p>
<p>2) Almost nobody is interested in a $15 pdf.  If they were, e-books would already be selling like literary flapjacks.  They&#8217;re not.  Last time I checked, audio books sold better.  And who the hell buys audio books?</p>
<p>A really groovy e-reader might up the number of sales a little bit, particularly if Appple did one, but until we&#8217;re taught to read on screens, most people will still want their books in ink.  </p>
<p>Give e-books away for free to promote the hardcover.  Give up on making a profit on them.  Just give the damn things away already! Either in chapter size bits on the web or in their entirety with purchase of the hardcover.  I haven&#8217;t checked in on Baen books lately, but they really nailed this with their free e-library a few years back.  </p>
<p>3) Publishers have been talking about using technology to get rid of the &#8220;current retailing middlemen&#8221; since at least the advent of the CD-ROM.  It won&#8217;t happen &amp; it shouldn&#8217;t happen.  People hanging out at a B&amp;N are a captive audience.  Don&#8217;t lose them. Hell, just having a legion of cyclopean B&amp;Ns looming over the mini-malls gives the book industry a level of exposure that just didn&#8217;t exist back in the days of the independent bookseller.  Trying to build up the publishing industry by knocking down B&amp;N won&#8217;t work. </p>
<p>4) There&#8217;s no reason that two (or 12) books-about-books shouldn&#8217;t be written and available in some sort of form on the web.  There&#8217;s a very good reason a publisher shouldn&#8217;t <i>release</i> one when another&#8217;s just come out, though: the advance.  It won&#8217;t earn back quickly if the market is &#8220;saturated&#8221; when a book hits the market. </p>
<p>Tell publishers you&#8217;ll forgo your advance payment and they may be more interested in obtaining an &#8220;instant backlist&#8221; title that will slowly generate revenue for both you &amp; them over the years.  You may want to leave your agent out of this discussion.  <img src='http://www.buzzmachine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>4)&#8221; The internet is not the enemy of books, authors, publishers, and ideas.&#8221;  Too true.  There are many things that need to change in order to make the industry more appealing to my fellow 21st-century-digital-boys &amp; girls.  I&#8217;d particularly like to see the demise of the now largely irrelevant distinction between the US/UK market.  </p>
<p>But at the same time, book publishers shouldn&#8217;t try to become web publishers.  They need to use the net to find nifty ways to sell their sliced up, ink stained, bundles of bark, not ape the business model of whatever nifty web startup that&#8217;s captured our hearts and minds this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/1828/#comment-101800</link>
		<dc:creator>frank patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 20:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1828#comment-101800</guid>
		<description>Jeff's proposed strategies are a great example of segmenting one's market. A  bit more at http://www.focusedperformance.com/2006/08/book-business-externally-constrained.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff&#8217;s proposed strategies are a great example of segmenting one&#8217;s market. A  bit more at <a href="http://www.focusedperformance.com/2006/08/book-business-externally-constrained.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.focusedperformance.com/2006/08/book-business-externally-constrained.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/1828/#comment-101376</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1828#comment-101376</guid>
		<description>You need to read the editorials at http://www.baens-universe.com/ especially the bit about eBooks in the current issue - http://www.baens-universe.com/articles/ed2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to read the editorials at <a href="http://www.baens-universe.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.baens-universe.com/</a> especially the bit about eBooks in the current issue - <a href="http://www.baens-universe.com/articles/ed2" rel="nofollow">http://www.baens-universe.com/articles/ed2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KirstenMortensen.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wagging the backlist</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/1828/#comment-101101</link>
		<dc:creator>KirstenMortensen.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wagging the backlist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 03:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1828#comment-101101</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis, a couple of days ago, offered some ideas to publishers about how to make money from their long tail &#8212; i.e., their backlists. The basic idea is to offset the cost of storing all those books by charging a premium for them&#8211;while simultaneously offering a discount on electronic/PDF versions. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis, a couple of days ago, offered some ideas to publishers about how to make money from their long tail &#8212; i.e., their backlists. The basic idea is to offset the cost of storing all those books by charging a premium for them&#8211;while simultaneously offering a discount on electronic/PDF versions. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.l.Horton</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/1828/#comment-99806</link>
		<dc:creator>G.l.Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 18:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1828#comment-99806</guid>
		<description>This is a topic I'm VERY much interested in!  But for plays, not books.
I've reconciled myself to the idea that my plays  just do not appeal to most audiences or to the gatekeepers at most theatres.  But there 300 million people in the USA, 6-7 billion on the planet.   There are a few people do love my work-- I get a fan email at least once a week from some one who has read some  play(s) of mine on my webpage and wants to thank me for my writing.   For the last decade I've been trying to figure out how to skip the gatekeepers of the (very expense indeed, in time as well as money) submission process and bring my work to the attention of people who might read and perform it.  I have a huge website, well ranked by Google.  This week my husband and I made podcasts of a couple of my monologues and posted them to Google and PodOmatic.  The Internet and other recent telecommunication technology has made it possible to do such things: the problem is to figure what to do and out how to do it effectively.   The model you laid out for "long tail" publication of niche marketable books on this blog is very attractive.  My question is: Can playwrights come up with a similar model for the distribution of their play scripts, unpublished as well as out-of-print? Can we "think expansion"?  I don't need to be on Broadway to be a happy playwright. A production on an aircraft carrier at sea or in the Bangladeshi School of the Arts will be just fine, thank you.

G.L. Horton
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a topic I&#8217;m VERY much interested in!  But for plays, not books.<br />
I&#8217;ve reconciled myself to the idea that my plays  just do not appeal to most audiences or to the gatekeepers at most theatres.  But there 300 million people in the USA, 6-7 billion on the planet.   There are a few people do love my work&#8211; I get a fan email at least once a week from some one who has read some  play(s) of mine on my webpage and wants to thank me for my writing.   For the last decade I&#8217;ve been trying to figure out how to skip the gatekeepers of the (very expense indeed, in time as well as money) submission process and bring my work to the attention of people who might read and perform it.  I have a huge website, well ranked by Google.  This week my husband and I made podcasts of a couple of my monologues and posted them to Google and PodOmatic.  The Internet and other recent telecommunication technology has made it possible to do such things: the problem is to figure what to do and out how to do it effectively.   The model you laid out for &#8220;long tail&#8221; publication of niche marketable books on this blog is very attractive.  My question is: Can playwrights come up with a similar model for the distribution of their play scripts, unpublished as well as out-of-print? Can we &#8220;think expansion&#8221;?  I don&#8217;t need to be on Broadway to be a happy playwright. A production on an aircraft carrier at sea or in the Bangladeshi School of the Arts will be just fine, thank you.</p>
<p>G.L. Horton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnnyL</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/1828/#comment-99779</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnnyL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 18:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1828#comment-99779</guid>
		<description>I'd buy a digital copy of a book downloadable in an instant to a really good e-book reader....howabout that one from Sony with the new electronic ink. Take that down in price and give me a way to transfer my e-book to someone else when I'm done with it just like when I now pass a copy on to someone else when I'm through with it. 

The problem with most e-books is the pricing doesn't take into account that no physical book exists....thus none of the old-ommerce distribution costs. You end up with a digital book that costs almost as much as a physical one and no way to pass it on to someone else. If you can't pass it on then an e-book should cost maybe 20% of the costs of a hardbound book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d buy a digital copy of a book downloadable in an instant to a really good e-book reader&#8230;.howabout that one from Sony with the new electronic ink. Take that down in price and give me a way to transfer my e-book to someone else when I&#8217;m done with it just like when I now pass a copy on to someone else when I&#8217;m through with it. </p>
<p>The problem with most e-books is the pricing doesn&#8217;t take into account that no physical book exists&#8230;.thus none of the old-ommerce distribution costs. You end up with a digital book that costs almost as much as a physical one and no way to pass it on to someone else. If you can&#8217;t pass it on then an e-book should cost maybe 20% of the costs of a hardbound book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Kellogg</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/1828/#comment-99530</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Kellogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1828#comment-99530</guid>
		<description>Suggestion: PDF only at first. When the book has sold enough copies to pay for an initial print run, then you produce a hardcopy edition and offer the PDF buyers the first run as a free upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suggestion: PDF only at first. When the book has sold enough copies to pay for an initial print run, then you produce a hardcopy edition and offer the PDF buyers the first run as a free upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Kellogg</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/1828/#comment-99526</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Kellogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1828#comment-99526</guid>
		<description>Steve,

People have been offering faster delivery at extra cost since well before the Internet. The U. S. Postal Service offered premium delivery back when it was the U. S. Post Office. People will pay for faster delivery when they are convinced it is worth it.

All Jeff is doing is suggesting that publishing firms offer what other companies are already offering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>People have been offering faster delivery at extra cost since well before the Internet. The U. S. Postal Service offered premium delivery back when it was the U. S. Post Office. People will pay for faster delivery when they are convinced it is worth it.</p>
<p>All Jeff is doing is suggesting that publishing firms offer what other companies are already offering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/1828/#comment-99397</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1828#comment-99397</guid>
		<description>Jeff, aside from going digital (that is, PDF not print), you mention but then don't address the Times article's main point at all -- that *manufacturing* and *warehousing* a long tail of a huge number of small runs of rarely sought titles is impractical and potentially ruinous financially. the problem isnt that one cant make money off a single title -- whenever a book actually sells everyone makes money and gouging folks for rapid delivery would only pile on, not create original profit. the problem is the time and finances and resources needed to get to the place where one can even offer the tiny-run book when it is requested. 

i'm guessing that you have never managed a manufacturing concern. i have. inventory production and management (of physical goods, not digital) can't simply be dismissed by saying "jack up the price" (e.g. by gouging folks on delivery costs.) otherwise, it would make perfect sense to build huge inventories of say, very high end jewelry, and of course it doesn't. for the resources needed to get to market and stay there cause failure long before the volume of sales activity -- no matter how high margin -- justify the entire exercise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, aside from going digital (that is, PDF not print), you mention but then don&#8217;t address the Times article&#8217;s main point at all &#8212; that *manufacturing* and *warehousing* a long tail of a huge number of small runs of rarely sought titles is impractical and potentially ruinous financially. the problem isnt that one cant make money off a single title &#8212; whenever a book actually sells everyone makes money and gouging folks for rapid delivery would only pile on, not create original profit. the problem is the time and finances and resources needed to get to the place where one can even offer the tiny-run book when it is requested. </p>
<p>i&#8217;m guessing that you have never managed a manufacturing concern. i have. inventory production and management (of physical goods, not digital) can&#8217;t simply be dismissed by saying &#8220;jack up the price&#8221; (e.g. by gouging folks on delivery costs.) otherwise, it would make perfect sense to build huge inventories of say, very high end jewelry, and of course it doesn&#8217;t. for the resources needed to get to market and stay there cause failure long before the volume of sales activity &#8212; no matter how high margin &#8212; justify the entire exercise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jowfair</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/1828/#comment-99316</link>
		<dc:creator>jowfair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 06:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1828#comment-99316</guid>
		<description>hey, differential rights was just a way of making at least some money without all of the expense of researching and entering a new market. Some income was better than none or a loss. As it becomes absurdly easy to provide international services, the only (though still sizeable) barrier to content providers keeping all of their lucrative rights will be politicians.

Jeff, please either write the book quickly or send off copies to the publishing houses' editors / stock-holders. These ideas could've been implemented eight years ago, and Lord knows, I wish they had! Here in China, the majority of English-language books are badly typeset "classics" and practically nothing bothers including marginalia, appendixes, or notes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, differential rights was just a way of making at least some money without all of the expense of researching and entering a new market. Some income was better than none or a loss. As it becomes absurdly easy to provide international services, the only (though still sizeable) barrier to content providers keeping all of their lucrative rights will be politicians.</p>
<p>Jeff, please either write the book quickly or send off copies to the publishing houses&#8217; editors / stock-holders. These ideas could&#8217;ve been implemented eight years ago, and Lord knows, I wish they had! Here in China, the majority of English-language books are badly typeset &#8220;classics&#8221; and practically nothing bothers including marginalia, appendixes, or notes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hey</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/1828/#comment-99291</link>
		<dc:creator>hey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 04:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1828#comment-99291</guid>
		<description>Every publisher needs to look at what Baen Books is doing. And then smash their face into their desk until they get that it is the only way forward.

I tried to buy a book online from Ballantine, only to be told that I couldn't buy an ebook since I wasn't in the US. Huh? One of the problems I have is that Ballantine just isn't getting distribution for their books in Canada. So I try to buy an e-book, which is essentially all profit to them, but I can't. Some BS contract implications about foreign rights and what rights the ebook people have... Idiotic. Same as how shows on iTunes are released (for free!) only to US and not Canadian iTunes, where you need a US credit card to access free content. 

Far too many media companies just are not crafting their internet presence to take advantage of its characteristics and are grafting on the detritus of the offline world. There are reasons why everyone used to have subsidiaries all over the world, different rights, etc. Those reasons don't exist or are dieing, but everyone does the charade to appease them, rather than thinking about what they are trying to do. Frustating as all hell. Not surprising given that media is a business run by English Majors and Lawyers (but I repeat myself).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every publisher needs to look at what Baen Books is doing. And then smash their face into their desk until they get that it is the only way forward.</p>
<p>I tried to buy a book online from Ballantine, only to be told that I couldn&#8217;t buy an ebook since I wasn&#8217;t in the US. Huh? One of the problems I have is that Ballantine just isn&#8217;t getting distribution for their books in Canada. So I try to buy an e-book, which is essentially all profit to them, but I can&#8217;t. Some BS contract implications about foreign rights and what rights the ebook people have&#8230; Idiotic. Same as how shows on iTunes are released (for free!) only to US and not Canadian iTunes, where you need a US credit card to access free content. </p>
<p>Far too many media companies just are not crafting their internet presence to take advantage of its characteristics and are grafting on the detritus of the offline world. There are reasons why everyone used to have subsidiaries all over the world, different rights, etc. Those reasons don&#8217;t exist or are dieing, but everyone does the charade to appease them, rather than thinking about what they are trying to do. Frustating as all hell. Not surprising given that media is a business run by English Majors and Lawyers (but I repeat myself).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mle</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/1828/#comment-99212</link>
		<dc:creator>mle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 01:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1828#comment-99212</guid>
		<description>Here's a trivia question...I don't know the answer, maybe someone does:  how long after the Postal Service started ZIP codes did they add ZIP+4?  The reason I ask is this.  ISBN, the book's ID number, has been around a while.  ISBN+ASBN (Author Standard Book Number) would identify the creator and her or his financial depository.  Then every time a book passed through a turnstile at Amazon or eBay or Alibris, the author could be paid a nickel or two.  Wouldn't that be loverly!  -mle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a trivia question&#8230;I don&#8217;t know the answer, maybe someone does:  how long after the Postal Service started ZIP codes did they add ZIP+4?  The reason I ask is this.  ISBN, the book&#8217;s ID number, has been around a while.  ISBN+ASBN (Author Standard Book Number) would identify the creator and her or his financial depository.  Then every time a book passed through a turnstile at Amazon or eBay or Alibris, the author could be paid a nickel or two.  Wouldn&#8217;t that be loverly!  -mle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mythusmage Opines &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rethinking How to Achieve One&#8217;s Goals</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/1828/#comment-99203</link>
		<dc:creator>Mythusmage Opines &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rethinking How to Achieve One&#8217;s Goals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 01:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1828#comment-99203</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis of Buzz Machine has a post up on book publishing, and how it can adapt to the new methods of publication and publicizing now available. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis of Buzz Machine has a post up on book publishing, and how it can adapt to the new methods of publication and publicizing now available. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonitus.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Waking up the Brigadoon book business</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/1828/#comment-99090</link>
		<dc:creator>sonitus.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Waking up the Brigadoon book business</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1828#comment-99090</guid>
		<description>[...] BuzzMachine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BuzzMachine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogging - or, Who Needs Gatekeepers Anymore? - from The Zero Boss by Jay Andrew Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/1828/#comment-99029</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogging - or, Who Needs Gatekeepers Anymore? - from The Zero Boss by Jay Andrew Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 20:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1828#comment-99029</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis has a great post up about why the print publishing industry is so infuriating, and what it must do to adapt to the digital age. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis has a great post up about why the print publishing industry is so infuriating, and what it must do to adapt to the digital age. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
