<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog, Boss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/blog-boss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/blog-boss/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CEOs Should Not Go Into the Blogosphere Alone - Orbit Now! Troy Worman&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-99941</link>
		<dc:creator>CEOs Should Not Go Into the Blogosphere Alone - Orbit Now! Troy Worman&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-99941</guid>
		<description>[...] Steve Rubel writes, &#8220;Don&#8217;t get me wrong. I would rather see a company have a CEO blog than none at all. However, having multiple online touch-points, not just at the executive level, is the best scenario. It lets readers find individuals they can relate to. Sun does this quite well.&#8221; (Via Jeff Jarvis)   Posted in Technology, Blogging + Monday July 31, 2006 + permalink [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steve Rubel writes, &#8220;Don&#8217;t get me wrong. I would rather see a company have a CEO blog than none at all. However, having multiple online touch-points, not just at the executive level, is the best scenario. It lets readers find individuals they can relate to. Sun does this quite well.&#8221; (Via Jeff Jarvis)   Posted in Technology, Blogging + Monday July 31, 2006 + permalink [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronbo</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-99546</link>
		<dc:creator>ronbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-99546</guid>
		<description>I must have missed the part where CEOs learned how to write.  I understand the value of transparency and interactivity, but a badly done blog doesn't add value at all.  

Here's an &lt;a href="http://blog.makovsky.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;example&lt;/a&gt; from the CEO of a successful public relations/investor relations agency.  Decide for yourself if he has anything useful to say on his blog.  

&lt;i&gt;Footnote: I know this guy and he is very intelligent.  I haven't spoken to him about his blog, but perhaps he is simply taking the blog format for a test drive so he has a better idea what he is talking about when he recommends it to clients.  I hope so.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must have missed the part where CEOs learned how to write.  I understand the value of transparency and interactivity, but a badly done blog doesn&#8217;t add value at all.  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an <a href="http://blog.makovsky.com/" rel="nofollow">example</a> from the CEO of a successful public relations/investor relations agency.  Decide for yourself if he has anything useful to say on his blog.  </p>
<p><i>Footnote: I know this guy and he is very intelligent.  I haven&#8217;t spoken to him about his blog, but perhaps he is simply taking the blog format for a test drive so he has a better idea what he is talking about when he recommends it to clients.  I hope so.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Garfunkel</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-99320</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Garfunkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 06:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-99320</guid>
		<description>Amanda,

Actually, the most delicious part of the piece was a PR blogging evangelist trumpet "one to many thousands" communications. So much for one-to-one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amanda,</p>
<p>Actually, the most delicious part of the piece was a PR blogging evangelist trumpet &#8220;one to many thousands&#8221; communications. So much for one-to-one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Chapel</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-99017</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Chapel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 20:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-99017</guid>
		<description>Debbie,

Always the ad hominemâ€¦ always. Itâ€™s so weak.  Seems to be a particular trait among the PR blogging evangelists.  It certainly doesnâ€™t make a strong case for your book.  Quite the opposite.

Here, this is a depiction that isnâ€™t a personal attack but does address you and the issue: http://www.strumpette.com/uploads/july06/snakeoil.jpg .

Get it?!

- Amanda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Debbie,</p>
<p>Always the ad hominemâ€¦ always. Itâ€™s so weak.  Seems to be a particular trait among the PR blogging evangelists.  It certainly doesnâ€™t make a strong case for your book.  Quite the opposite.</p>
<p>Here, this is a depiction that isnâ€™t a personal attack but does address you and the issue: <a href="http://www.strumpette.com/uploads/july06/snakeoil.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.strumpette.com/uploads/july06/snakeoil.jpg</a> .</p>
<p>Get it?!</p>
<p>- Amanda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian O'Connell</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-99003</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian O'Connell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 19:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-99003</guid>
		<description>It's hardly surprising that the Amanda pr collective is against disintermediation in this area. They're not much different from liquor or auto retailers in this regard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hardly surprising that the Amanda pr collective is against disintermediation in this area. They&#8217;re not much different from liquor or auto retailers in this regard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie Weil</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-99002</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Weil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 19:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-99002</guid>
		<description>Interesting question, Jeff. You seem to be asking, "OK who's got the most to hide -- and therefore would risk the most by having to reveal stuff in a a blog?"  I think a more pertinent question is, what CEOs have interesting stuff to tell us and can write well and would be worth reading? I don't have the answer to that (at least not an offhand answer).

Randy Stross (the NYTimes columnist) and I spoke at length on the phone about CEO blogging. Very thoughtful guy - a fun interview. We debated back and forth on whether Bill Gates could/should blog. I say "no" in my book (I have a chapter called "Should the CEO blog?"). But I wrote that chapter before Gates announced he was stepping down to concentrate on his foundation. I think Gates could in fact blog about the foundation and what he wants to do with it, specific success stories, details of his trips to Africa, etc. Apparently he's quite a good writer. And blogging on that topic would be unlikely to affect MSFT's share price.

Oh and it's spelled  A-MAN-DUH, get it?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting question, Jeff. You seem to be asking, &#8220;OK who&#8217;s got the most to hide &#8212; and therefore would risk the most by having to reveal stuff in a a blog?&#8221;  I think a more pertinent question is, what CEOs have interesting stuff to tell us and can write well and would be worth reading? I don&#8217;t have the answer to that (at least not an offhand answer).</p>
<p>Randy Stross (the NYTimes columnist) and I spoke at length on the phone about CEO blogging. Very thoughtful guy - a fun interview. We debated back and forth on whether Bill Gates could/should blog. I say &#8220;no&#8221; in my book (I have a chapter called &#8220;Should the CEO blog?&#8221;). But I wrote that chapter before Gates announced he was stepping down to concentrate on his foundation. I think Gates could in fact blog about the foundation and what he wants to do with it, specific success stories, details of his trips to Africa, etc. Apparently he&#8217;s quite a good writer. And blogging on that topic would be unlikely to affect MSFT&#8217;s share price.</p>
<p>Oh and it&#8217;s spelled  A-MAN-DUH, get it?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-98955</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 17:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-98955</guid>
		<description>Uh-oh: s/he/it is baaack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh-oh: s/he/it is baaack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Chapel</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-98928</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Chapel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 16:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-98928</guid>
		<description>The NYT article was a sales pitch indeed.  Itâ€™s simply a PR promo placement for Debbie Weil's new book, â€œThe Corporate Blogging Book.â€
 
Okay, here's a more realistic and exact review: Sometimes when a girl says "yes," it is completely obvious she means "no." Debbieâ€™s â€œHow Toâ€ ironically does more to say â€œIf Youâ€™re Smart, Donâ€™t!!â€  See http://www.strumpette.com/archives/156-When-a-Girl-Says-Yes,-But-Means-No.html .
 
Now if you decide to buy this corporate-blog stuff or Debbieâ€™s book, I might also suggest the â€œFlaming Swords Corporate Juggling Manual.â€  Other similar Amazon buyers have gotten the â€œHow to Give Yourself a Lobotomyâ€ handbook, and the â€œBeirut on 10 Bullets a Dayâ€ travel guide.
 
- Amanda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NYT article was a sales pitch indeed.  Itâ€™s simply a PR promo placement for Debbie Weil&#8217;s new book, â€œThe Corporate Blogging Book.â€</p>
<p>Okay, here&#8217;s a more realistic and exact review: Sometimes when a girl says &#8220;yes,&#8221; it is completely obvious she means &#8220;no.&#8221; Debbieâ€™s â€œHow Toâ€ ironically does more to say â€œIf Youâ€™re Smart, Donâ€™t!!â€  See <a href="http://www.strumpette.com/archives/156-When-a-Girl-Says-Yes,-But-Means-No.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.strumpette.com/archives/156-When-a-Girl-Says-Yes,-But-Means-No.html</a> .</p>
<p>Now if you decide to buy this corporate-blog stuff or Debbieâ€™s book, I might also suggest the â€œFlaming Swords Corporate Juggling Manual.â€  Other similar Amazon buyers have gotten the â€œHow to Give Yourself a Lobotomyâ€ handbook, and the â€œBeirut on 10 Bullets a Dayâ€ travel guide.</p>
<p>- Amanda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-98905</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-98905</guid>
		<description>Robert,

What a great question... PR is not about customer relations directly, but about media relations. PR folks don't aim to have townhalls with the consumer, but with journalists. They deal with intermediaries, so they are interactive that way, but not with consumers.

A blog cuts out the middle-man. It's direct to the consumer. No PR people, no journalists necessary. I hope that explains my point better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,</p>
<p>What a great question&#8230; PR is not about customer relations directly, but about media relations. PR folks don&#8217;t aim to have townhalls with the consumer, but with journalists. They deal with intermediaries, so they are interactive that way, but not with consumers.</p>
<p>A blog cuts out the middle-man. It&#8217;s direct to the consumer. No PR people, no journalists necessary. I hope that explains my point better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert J. Ricci</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-98872</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert J. Ricci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 14:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-98872</guid>
		<description>Good points, Brett, but let's forget blogging for a minute and turn the table on one of the points you made in your response to Armin: "PR is not interactive." Do you really believe that???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, Brett, but let&#8217;s forget blogging for a minute and turn the table on one of the points you made in your response to Armin: &#8220;PR is not interactive.&#8221; Do you really believe that???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-98851</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 13:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-98851</guid>
		<description>Armin,

PR is not interactive; blogging is. While blogging has a certain amount of PR to it, inviting the customer into the conversation is how to engage the customer and not just manage or sell the customer. It's more experience and not just product.

Jeff,

Any CEO that doesn't interact with customers today. Which, in the Fortune 1000, is pretty much all of them because of the size of each company and the diversity of strengths in its workforce. I agree with Schwarz that CEOs must be communicators, but isn't a CEO's first job to extend the life of the company and grow it? Communicating by blog might help that, but would all CEOs be good bloggers and help the company by blogging? If it's a skill that they're willing to learn and not just hand over to marketing, then the CEO should. But if they don't do it well, they'll only hurt the company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Armin,</p>
<p>PR is not interactive; blogging is. While blogging has a certain amount of PR to it, inviting the customer into the conversation is how to engage the customer and not just manage or sell the customer. It&#8217;s more experience and not just product.</p>
<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>Any CEO that doesn&#8217;t interact with customers today. Which, in the Fortune 1000, is pretty much all of them because of the size of each company and the diversity of strengths in its workforce. I agree with Schwarz that CEOs must be communicators, but isn&#8217;t a CEO&#8217;s first job to extend the life of the company and grow it? Communicating by blog might help that, but would all CEOs be good bloggers and help the company by blogging? If it&#8217;s a skill that they&#8217;re willing to learn and not just hand over to marketing, then the CEO should. But if they don&#8217;t do it well, they&#8217;ll only hurt the company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antony Mayfield</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-98808</link>
		<dc:creator>Antony Mayfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 12:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-98808</guid>
		<description>I'd like to CEOs of some publishing houses in the UK blogging. 

Not necessarily for the communications benefits, but for the personal experience of seeing the  power of networks first hand. They'd see how content and dialogue flows between nodes in the network - blogs and media websites - and how intricate and powerful the interplay of influences are. 

It would be educational for them, they really would learn something about how their industry is changing.

The publishing bosses who would benefit from it most are those who have trade and specialist publications in their portfolios, as some of these are most ripe for the communities they supposedly serve to disntermediate their services. 

I wrote about this yesterday here: http://open.typepad.com/open/2006/07/guardian_takes_.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to CEOs of some publishing houses in the UK blogging. </p>
<p>Not necessarily for the communications benefits, but for the personal experience of seeing the  power of networks first hand. They&#8217;d see how content and dialogue flows between nodes in the network - blogs and media websites - and how intricate and powerful the interplay of influences are. </p>
<p>It would be educational for them, they really would learn something about how their industry is changing.</p>
<p>The publishing bosses who would benefit from it most are those who have trade and specialist publications in their portfolios, as some of these are most ripe for the communities they supposedly serve to disntermediate their services. </p>
<p>I wrote about this yesterday here: <a href="http://open.typepad.com/open/2006/07/guardian_takes_.html" rel="nofollow">http://open.typepad.com/open/2006/07/guardian_takes_.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Armin</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-98771</link>
		<dc:creator>Armin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 12:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/07/30/blog-boss/#comment-98771</guid>
		<description>It's all PR, nothing more. Very few CEO/corporate blogs actauly give any information or talk about the future of the company.

You wouldn't wanna reveal secrets to the competitors, right?

Blogging is teh new "hip" things, and corporations trying to show off that "Hey, look, we can too".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all PR, nothing more. Very few CEO/corporate blogs actauly give any information or talk about the future of the company.</p>
<p>You wouldn&#8217;t wanna reveal secrets to the competitors, right?</p>
<p>Blogging is teh new &#8220;hip&#8221; things, and corporations trying to show off that &#8220;Hey, look, we can too&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
