http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/02/the-norad-tapes/ by Jeff Jarvis Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:03:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/02/the-norad-tapes/#comment-354043 Carol Lynn Sun, 01 Jul 2007 20:24:01 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/02/the-norad-tapes/#comment-354043 I also have been trying to get the Tapes on my computer, but am not able too. Any ideas of how I can get them. calynn@ptd.net I also have been trying to get the Tapes on my computer, but am not able too. Any ideas of how I can get them. calynn@ptd.net

]]> http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/02/the-norad-tapes/#comment-210877 Gina Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:44:04 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/02/the-norad-tapes/#comment-210877 Why did Vanity Fair take off the NORAD TAPES. I CAN NOT REACH THEM FROM YOUR WEB SITE. Please help me find these transcripts, I have been looking and looking, I am most interested in the plane that hit the Pentagon. Thank you,,,, Why did Vanity Fair take off the NORAD TAPES. I CAN NOT REACH THEM FROM YOUR WEB SITE. Please help me find these transcripts, I have been looking and looking, I am most interested in the plane that hit the Pentagon. Thank you,,,,

]]> http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/02/the-norad-tapes/#comment-102938 Lost Remote TV Blog Fri, 04 Aug 2006 02:02:24 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/02/the-norad-tapes/#comment-102938 [...] Vanity Fair’s report on the NORAD recordings from 9/11 is a simple and elegant integration of audio and writing. The reporter, Michael Bronner, pored through 30 hours of the recordings when he was doing research for his work as associate producer on the movie “United 93.” He then wrote the report for Vanity Fair. The online version takes reporting one simple step further: it includes audio with the transcripts. The result is more immediate and far more compelling. Multimedia doesn’t have to be complex and Flash-intensive; it can be as simple as incorporating the material you already have into your work. (via Buzzmachine) [...] [...] Vanity Fair’s report on the NORAD recordings from 9/11 is a simple and elegant integration of audio and writing. The reporter, Michael Bronner, pored through 30 hours of the recordings when he was doing research for his work as associate producer on the movie “United 93.” He then wrote the report for Vanity Fair. The online version takes reporting one simple step further: it includes audio with the transcripts. The result is more immediate and far more compelling. Multimedia doesn’t have to be complex and Flash-intensive; it can be as simple as incorporating the material you already have into your work. (via Buzzmachine) [...]

]]> http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/02/the-norad-tapes/#comment-102585 chico haas Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:16:27 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/02/the-norad-tapes/#comment-102585 Thanks for link. Inspiring to hear the moments of grace under pressure. Thanks for link. Inspiring to hear the moments of grace under pressure.

]]> http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/02/the-norad-tapes/#comment-101938 J Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:11:53 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/02/the-norad-tapes/#comment-101938 I'm not clear on the "discrepancies" in the military account; if the Langley fighters were launched to protect DC, not intercept AA77, and an hour later UA93 was determined to be headed for DC, then the fighters were indeed launched to protect DC from UA 93. The fact that they didn't know about UA93 at the time doesn't make that statement false or misleading in any way. Is there more to this, or is this guy desperately looking for some way to claim a cover up of some sort? Why are "journalists" so desperate to throw that charge at people? I’m not clear on the “discrepancies” in the military account; if the Langley fighters were launched to protect DC, not intercept AA77, and an hour later UA93 was determined to be headed for DC, then the fighters were indeed launched to protect DC from UA 93. The fact that they didn’t know about UA93 at the time doesn’t make that statement false or misleading in any way. Is there more to this, or is this guy desperately looking for some way to claim a cover up of some sort? Why are “journalists” so desperate to throw that charge at people?

]]> http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/02/the-norad-tapes/#comment-101690 Diane Ensey Wed, 02 Aug 2006 18:36:01 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/02/the-norad-tapes/#comment-101690 Wow. I clicked over to VF just expecting to glance at it and now it is 45 minutes later. Absolutely riveting and a great use of writing and audio to convey the total chaos and urgency of that day at NORAD. Wow. I clicked over to VF just expecting to glance at it and now it is 45 minutes later. Absolutely riveting and a great use of writing and audio to convey the total chaos and urgency of that day at NORAD.

]]> http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/02/the-norad-tapes/#comment-101572 Esteban Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:33:15 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/02/the-norad-tapes/#comment-101572 So much for those who think Jarvis has consigned traditional journalism to the (pick a figure of speech). So much for those who think Jarvis has consigned traditional journalism to the (pick a figure of speech).

]]>