<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cookie monsters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/15/cookie-monsters-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/15/cookie-monsters-2/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 Newspapers &#187; Roundup, Part 3: Privacy, Neutrality, Recognition and Other Interweb-Blogosphere Question Marks</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/15/cookie-monsters-2/#comment-111741</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 Newspapers &#187; Roundup, Part 3: Privacy, Neutrality, Recognition and Other Interweb-Blogosphere Question Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/15/cookie-monsters-2/#comment-111741</guid>
		<description>[...] Just ask AOL User No. 4417749 (via BoingBoing, NYTimes, ZDNet and whole lot more including BuzzMachine on Internet cookies and stupidity ruining a good thing), with or without the CEO&#39;s personal apology phone call (thanks, Techdirt). Then again, biz blogger Bernhard Wagner writes that bloggers are in some cases the watchdogs, and bound by journalistic ethics if they take on such a role: blog post in brief, longer piece at the Times of London. (&#34;Watchdogs, Blogs and Wild Hogs &#34; might be a good bet for further reading, thanks Poynter.)&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just ask AOL User No. 4417749 (via BoingBoing, NYTimes, ZDNet and whole lot more including BuzzMachine on Internet cookies and stupidity ruining a good thing), with or without the CEO&#39;s personal apology phone call (thanks, Techdirt). Then again, biz blogger Bernhard Wagner writes that bloggers are in some cases the watchdogs, and bound by journalistic ethics if they take on such a role: blog post in brief, longer piece at the Times of London. (&quot;Watchdogs, Blogs and Wild Hogs &quot; might be a good bet for further reading, thanks Poynter.)&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Len Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/15/cookie-monsters-2/#comment-111721</link>
		<dc:creator>Len Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/15/cookie-monsters-2/#comment-111721</guid>
		<description>Once again, a security breach is being confused with a privacy problem.  Data security and informational privacy are two different matters and until these are clearly differentiated, reporters will continue to use the former to raise the specter of the latter.  So, the critique of Hansell is on point.

At the same time, the rational benefit of cookies, relevance, is not likely to overcome the emotional reaction to surveillance.  Champion cookies and stored search data all you want, but this won't change until consumers embrace transparency (publicity) and the opportunity to "advertise themselves" to marketers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, a security breach is being confused with a privacy problem.  Data security and informational privacy are two different matters and until these are clearly differentiated, reporters will continue to use the former to raise the specter of the latter.  So, the critique of Hansell is on point.</p>
<p>At the same time, the rational benefit of cookies, relevance, is not likely to overcome the emotional reaction to surveillance.  Champion cookies and stored search data all you want, but this won&#8217;t change until consumers embrace transparency (publicity) and the opportunity to &#8220;advertise themselves&#8221; to marketers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cookie monsters</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/15/cookie-monsters-2/#comment-111235</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cookie monsters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/15/cookie-monsters-2/#comment-111235</guid>
		<description>[...] Cookie monsters Read More: Ad, cookies, privacy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cookie monsters Read More: Ad, cookies, privacy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
