<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A picture is worth a thousand apologies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/16/a-picture-is-worth-a-thousand-apologies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/16/a-picture-is-worth-a-thousand-apologies/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:30:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/16/a-picture-is-worth-a-thousand-apologies/#comment-113276</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 00:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/16/a-picture-is-worth-a-thousand-apologies/#comment-113276</guid>
		<description>Good article here:
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/columns/shoptalk_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003019475</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article here:<br />
<a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/columns/shoptalk_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003019475" rel="nofollow">http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/columns/shoptalk_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003019475</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyJ</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/16/a-picture-is-worth-a-thousand-apologies/#comment-112008</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 00:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/16/a-picture-is-worth-a-thousand-apologies/#comment-112008</guid>
		<description>A lie, once exposed makes suspect all past and future reports... There is no such thing as a &quot;little bit corrupt&quot;.  The attack on Johnson and others who expose the lies only confirms that it was intentional misrepresentation. 

Years of unfailing truth may diminish the lies. But that is only a &quot;maybe&quot;. Each mistake will be seen as a repeat of the lying and return to the old ways... Too bad the truth had such small value in the Executive Suite</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lie, once exposed makes suspect all past and future reports&#8230; There is no such thing as a &#8220;little bit corrupt&#8221;.  The attack on Johnson and others who expose the lies only confirms that it was intentional misrepresentation. </p>
<p>Years of unfailing truth may diminish the lies. But that is only a &#8220;maybe&#8221;. Each mistake will be seen as a repeat of the lying and return to the old ways&#8230; Too bad the truth had such small value in the Executive Suite</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Project Syndicate &#187; Pictures That Lie</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/16/a-picture-is-worth-a-thousand-apologies/#comment-111831</link>
		<dc:creator>Project Syndicate &#187; Pictures That Lie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/16/a-picture-is-worth-a-thousand-apologies/#comment-111831</guid>
		<description>[...] CNet has an interesting gallery of doctored photos&#8211;worth a look, especially given the recent Reuters brouhaha (via Buzzmachine). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CNet has an interesting gallery of doctored photos&#8211;worth a look, especially given the recent Reuters brouhaha (via Buzzmachine). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Venture Forth &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pictures That Lie</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/16/a-picture-is-worth-a-thousand-apologies/#comment-111825</link>
		<dc:creator>A Venture Forth &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pictures That Lie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/16/a-picture-is-worth-a-thousand-apologies/#comment-111825</guid>
		<description>[...] CNet has an interesting gallery of doctored photos&#8211;worth a look, especially given the recent Reuters brouhaha (via Buzzmachine). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CNet has an interesting gallery of doctored photos&#8211;worth a look, especially given the recent Reuters brouhaha (via Buzzmachine). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kl</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/16/a-picture-is-worth-a-thousand-apologies/#comment-111771</link>
		<dc:creator>kl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/16/a-picture-is-worth-a-thousand-apologies/#comment-111771</guid>
		<description>Staging photos is part of their &lt;i&gt;culture&lt;/i&gt;. Who are we to judge them? Americans lie too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Staging photos is part of their <i>culture</i>. Who are we to judge them? Americans lie too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I. F. Stoner</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/16/a-picture-is-worth-a-thousand-apologies/#comment-111729</link>
		<dc:creator>I. F. Stoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/16/a-picture-is-worth-a-thousand-apologies/#comment-111729</guid>
		<description>Speaking of photographic phunny buisness, check out the obfuscation over at The Guardian. Journalism professor and media critic Roy Greenslade writes that the AP explained to his satisfaction the identity of &quot;Green Helmet Guy&quot;: http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/greenslade/2006/08/green_helmet_is_a_civil_defenc.html  

Sadly, The guardian turns a blind eye -- is it intentional? -- to the fact that Green Helmet Guy was caught in the act of staging scenes for cameras. A German TV show shows Green Helmet Guy actually off-loading a child&#039;s body from an ambulance onto a stretcher and putting it back into an ambulance for the benefit of cameras: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vPAkc5CLgc&amp;eurl=http%3A%2F%2Foutcut%2Eblogspot%2
Ecom%2F2006%2F08%2Fndr%2Dlsst%2Ddie%2Dgrne%2Dbombe%2Dplatzen%2Ehtm

Too bad neither the AP nor The Guardian want to face the facts: they&#039;d both been had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of photographic phunny buisness, check out the obfuscation over at The Guardian. Journalism professor and media critic Roy Greenslade writes that the AP explained to his satisfaction the identity of &#8220;Green Helmet Guy&#8221;: <a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/greenslade/2006/08/green_helmet_is_a_civil_defenc.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/greenslade/2006/08/green_helmet_is_a_civil_defenc.html</a>  </p>
<p>Sadly, The guardian turns a blind eye &#8212; is it intentional? &#8212; to the fact that Green Helmet Guy was caught in the act of staging scenes for cameras. A German TV show shows Green Helmet Guy actually off-loading a child&#8217;s body from an ambulance onto a stretcher and putting it back into an ambulance for the benefit of cameras:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vPAkc5CLgc&amp;eurl=http%3A%2F%2Foutcut%2Eblogspot%2" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vPAkc5CLgc&amp;eurl=http%3A%2F%2Foutcut%2Eblogspot%2</a><br />
Ecom%2F2006%2F08%2Fndr%2Dlsst%2Ddie%2Dgrne%2Dbombe%2Dplatzen%2Ehtm</p>
<p>Too bad neither the AP nor The Guardian want to face the facts: they&#8217;d both been had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 Newspapers &#187; Roundup 2: Bloggers Rule, But Remember Traffic Goes Both Ways</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/16/a-picture-is-worth-a-thousand-apologies/#comment-111691</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 Newspapers &#187; Roundup 2: Bloggers Rule, But Remember Traffic Goes Both Ways</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/16/a-picture-is-worth-a-thousand-apologies/#comment-111691</guid>
		<description>[...] (By the way, everyone and their photo editor&#039;s dog has been reading about blogger Charles Johnson at little green balls discovering doctored AP photos and related Israel-Lebanon photo-shop-type business (update: again (and here), and again&#160; and again &#8230; and CNET (via BuzzMachine) shows that fake lying pictures are not a new phenomenon.) so we&#039;re not going there for the moment. Maybe ever. And once more, we will get to all things New Assignment.net, &quot;Nick Lemann vs. bloggers&quot; and CJRDaily stories ASAP). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (By the way, everyone and their photo editor&#39;s dog has been reading about blogger Charles Johnson at little green balls discovering doctored AP photos and related Israel-Lebanon photo-shop-type business (update: again (and here), and again&nbsp; and again &#8230; and CNET (via BuzzMachine) shows that fake lying pictures are not a new phenomenon.) so we&#39;re not going there for the moment. Maybe ever. And once more, we will get to all things New Assignment.net, &quot;Nick Lemann vs. bloggers&quot; and CJRDaily stories ASAP). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

