<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: F****d 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/fd-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/fd-20/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:31:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 &#187; Blog Archives &#187; &#8230; I wrote a post called &#8221; Web</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/fd-20/#comment-276869</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 &#187; Blog Archives &#187; &#8230; I wrote a post called &#8221; Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1956#comment-276869</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8230; by the ad spending of fellow (unprofitable but VC-backed) web 2.0 companies. &#8230; Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and &#8230; Similar Pages [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8230; by the ad spending of fellow (unprofitable but VC-backed) web 2.0 companies. &#8230; Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and &#8230; Similar Pages [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/fd-20/#comment-119238</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1956#comment-119238</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the kind words, they are appreciated.  Also glad to hear I&#039;m not too snarky!  :)
-s

ps - I tried emailing you, not sure if you&#039;ve heard from me... check the spam box, that&#039;s where i usually end up (and probably belong)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kind words, they are appreciated.  Also glad to hear I&#8217;m not too snarky!  <img src='http://www.buzzmachine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
-s</p>
<p>ps &#8211; I tried emailing you, not sure if you&#8217;ve heard from me&#8230; check the spam box, that&#8217;s where i usually end up (and probably belong)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knight Ridder: histoire de la chute d&#8217;un des plus grands groupes de presse mondiaux &#171; ecosphere</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/fd-20/#comment-118878</link>
		<dc:creator>Knight Ridder: histoire de la chute d&#8217;un des plus grands groupes de presse mondiaux &#171; ecosphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1956#comment-118878</guid>
		<description>[...] Nous autres, groupes de presse, nous savons maintenant que nous sommes mortels. Pour paraphraser Paul Valery c&#8217;est un peu ce que l&#8217;on ressentÂ Ã  l&#8217;heure ou un article de The Economist sur la mort des journaux d&#8217;informationÂ suscite Ã§a et lÃ  (et encore iciÂ et encore lÃ ) de tÃ©nÃ©breux commentaires. Cet article n&#8217;apporte pourtant rien de bien neuf au dÃ©bat. Plus spectaculaire il faut lire ce trÃ¨s long article du New York Times qui analyse la chute du groupe de presse amÃ©ricain Knight Ridder. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nous autres, groupes de presse, nous savons maintenant que nous sommes mortels. Pour paraphraser Paul Valery c&#8217;est un peu ce que l&#8217;on ressentÂ Ã  l&#8217;heure ou un article de The Economist sur la mort des journaux d&#8217;informationÂ suscite Ã§a et lÃ  (et encore iciÂ et encore lÃ ) de tÃ©nÃ©breux commentaires. Cet article n&#8217;apporte pourtant rien de bien neuf au dÃ©bat. Plus spectaculaire il faut lire ce trÃ¨s long article du New York Times qui analyse la chute du groupe de presse amÃ©ricain Knight Ridder. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine Â» Blog Archive Â» F****d 2.0 at blackrimglasses.com</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/fd-20/#comment-118870</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine Â» Blog Archive Â» F****d 2.0 at blackrimglasses.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1956#comment-118870</guid>
		<description>[...] BuzzMachine Â» Blog Archive Â» F****d 2.0: everyone should read this post. That being said, I think what is happening now is a bit different than the first bubble, because it is not so much a bubble born out of the &#8220;newness&#8221; of the media itself, but the &#8220;newness&#8221; of the concept of People as Product. However, People as Product doesn&#8217;t translate to a business. And the fact that the machine around Web++/2.0 is feeding itself (that oroboros again) means that when there is a mass of failures, the bottom is pulled out from everyone. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BuzzMachine Â» Blog Archive Â» F****d 2.0: everyone should read this post. That being said, I think what is happening now is a bit different than the first bubble, because it is not so much a bubble born out of the &#8220;newness&#8221; of the media itself, but the &#8220;newness&#8221; of the concept of People as Product. However, People as Product doesn&#8217;t translate to a business. And the fact that the machine around Web++/2.0 is feeding itself (that oroboros again) means that when there is a mass of failures, the bottom is pulled out from everyone. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Kellogg</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/fd-20/#comment-118851</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Kellogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1956#comment-118851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got a deal for venture capitalists. Invest in Mythusmage Opines and you won&#039;t have to worry about your rate of return. There is none. You can send me any amount of money you want to, and you won&#039;t see any of it back.

No worries about what happens to your money. No concerns about its impact on your bottom line. It&#039;s all wasted! And since Mythusmage Opines is not a charity of any kind, you get no tax break.

Send in pennies. Send in c-notes. No matter what you send you&#039;ll never see it again.

Web 2.1, where at least we&#039;re honest about what happens to your cash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got a deal for venture capitalists. Invest in Mythusmage Opines and you won&#8217;t have to worry about your rate of return. There is none. You can send me any amount of money you want to, and you won&#8217;t see any of it back.</p>
<p>No worries about what happens to your money. No concerns about its impact on your bottom line. It&#8217;s all wasted! And since Mythusmage Opines is not a charity of any kind, you get no tax break.</p>
<p>Send in pennies. Send in c-notes. No matter what you send you&#8217;ll never see it again.</p>
<p>Web 2.1, where at least we&#8217;re honest about what happens to your cash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Text messaging at Free Roaming</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/fd-20/#comment-118782</link>
		<dc:creator>Text messaging at Free Roaming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=1956#comment-118782</guid>
		<description>[...] A post on mobilecrunch regarding 3jam got me thinking. Where is the business ? Ok its a cute site with more MBA&#8217;s onboard than Bank of America but text messages have a cost factor to send. Our company can buy them wholesale @ around 3 cents so if a person has 10 friends and you have 10k of these people online every day texting,well you catch my drift. There are a bunch of these out there at the moment Mozes really beautiful people Twitter Cmon guys what am I missing ? Am I turning into a skeptic or is it just Fuc*** as Jarvis said today ?  Technorati Tags: 3jam, buzz machine, dead20, free roaming, Jeff Jarvis, mobilecrunch, mozes, pat phelan, roam4free, roaming charges, twitterShare and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A post on mobilecrunch regarding 3jam got me thinking. Where is the business ? Ok its a cute site with more MBA&#8217;s onboard than Bank of America but text messages have a cost factor to send. Our company can buy them wholesale @ around 3 cents so if a person has 10 friends and you have 10k of these people online every day texting,well you catch my drift. There are a bunch of these out there at the moment Mozes really beautiful people Twitter Cmon guys what am I missing ? Am I turning into a skeptic or is it just Fuc*** as Jarvis said today ?  Technorati Tags: 3jam, buzz machine, dead20, free roaming, Jeff Jarvis, mobilecrunch, mozes, pat phelan, roam4free, roaming charges, twitterShare and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

