<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not so Current</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:43:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gokula</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-469257</link>
		<dc:creator>Gokula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-469257</guid>
		<description>Hi,I just ddlowoaned. i start to promote your ebook right now&#8230;Sheriffs last blog post..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,I just ddlowoaned. i start to promote your ebook right now&#8230;Sheriffs last blog post..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Not so Current</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-138925</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Not so Current</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-138925</guid>
		<description>[...] Al Gore, inventor of Current and the internet, has been dissing the latter lately. He respects broadcast to the masses more than conversation with the niches. That&#8217;s the old way to look at the world in both media and political terms. I&#8217;m surprised he hasn&#8217;t updated that view and started living it. He also has created venues that are closed, controlled at the center, not generous at the edges. That, too, is the old way of media and politics. So what does this say about Gore the politician these days? I&#8217;d say it makes him look out-of-date, not so current. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Al Gore, inventor of Current and the internet, has been dissing the latter lately. He respects broadcast to the masses more than conversation with the niches. That&#8217;s the old way to look at the world in both media and political terms. I&#8217;m surprised he hasn&#8217;t updated that view and started living it. He also has created venues that are closed, controlled at the center, not generous at the edges. That, too, is the old way of media and politics. So what does this say about Gore the politician these days? I&#8217;d say it makes him look out-of-date, not so current. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119827</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119827</guid>
		<description>i would NEVER vote for Hilary Clinton for president. It has nothing to do with democrats or republicans or man or woman, it&#039;s just that she is Hilary Clinton. Her actions as a senator have proven to me that having Hilary Clinton in office would be the equivalent of having Tipper Gore as our president. America needs help, a role model...not a mother-like figure to tell us what video games we shouldn&#039;t play because they have too much violence in them.  She&#039;s just not fit for the job, and trust me, the majority of america will feel the same way if she runs...and in 2008 there will be yet ANOTHER republican president in office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would NEVER vote for Hilary Clinton for president. It has nothing to do with democrats or republicans or man or woman, it&#8217;s just that she is Hilary Clinton. Her actions as a senator have proven to me that having Hilary Clinton in office would be the equivalent of having Tipper Gore as our president. America needs help, a role model&#8230;not a mother-like figure to tell us what video games we shouldn&#8217;t play because they have too much violence in them.  She&#8217;s just not fit for the job, and trust me, the majority of america will feel the same way if she runs&#8230;and in 2008 there will be yet ANOTHER republican president in office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119821</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119821</guid>
		<description>Al  (Who) Gore; not important what he says. I say Hillary Clinton  president; Al Vice President; Jimmy Carter Sec of State. Now that s what I call a ticket.
Will Bill vote for his wife? Any comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al  (Who) Gore; not important what he says. I say Hillary Clinton  president; Al Vice President; Jimmy Carter Sec of State. Now that s what I call a ticket.<br />
Will Bill vote for his wife? Any comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poster</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119802</link>
		<dc:creator>Poster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119802</guid>
		<description>Jeff&#039;s Buzzmachine picture shows him on MSNBC (tv, not website)... Was this intended for irony or validation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff&#8217;s Buzzmachine picture shows him on MSNBC (tv, not website)&#8230; Was this intended for irony or validation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis Jonnes</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119779</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis Jonnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119779</guid>
		<description>TV is a corpse serving up the same old mummified stuff--football games, sit coms, quiz shows, talk shows, the lies-and-more-damn-lies news shows (that as Jon Stewart has shown are already parodies of themselves) which  nobody watches--I barely watch TV of any sort anymore (maybe Letterman if a decent band is on, but that band will already have its stuff on Youtube).  It&#039;s only matter of time before everyone has their own channel  (i.e. it they want it) via the internet.  For me, Tv&#039;s dead.  Been dead for a long time.  RIP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TV is a corpse serving up the same old mummified stuff&#8211;football games, sit coms, quiz shows, talk shows, the lies-and-more-damn-lies news shows (that as Jon Stewart has shown are already parodies of themselves) which  nobody watches&#8211;I barely watch TV of any sort anymore (maybe Letterman if a decent band is on, but that band will already have its stuff on Youtube).  It&#8217;s only matter of time before everyone has their own channel  (i.e. it they want it) via the internet.  For me, Tv&#8217;s dead.  Been dead for a long time.  RIP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1-2-Oscar</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119734</link>
		<dc:creator>1-2-Oscar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 03:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119734</guid>
		<description>I wonder if this is the same &quot;Penny&quot; who participated regularly on excite.com several years ago.  The superior tone she adopts, the unwillingness to consider the arguments of others; all these are eerily similar.

That &quot;Penny&quot; claimed to be an Australian, but was the world&#039;s foremost authority on everything American.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if this is the same &#8220;Penny&#8221; who participated regularly on excite.com several years ago.  The superior tone she adopts, the unwillingness to consider the arguments of others; all these are eerily similar.</p>
<p>That &#8220;Penny&#8221; claimed to be an Australian, but was the world&#8217;s foremost authority on everything American.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penny</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119725</link>
		<dc:creator>penny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 02:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119725</guid>
		<description>tdw - so what have you outed me at?  Smacking down a potty mouthed dimwitted bully in his own style?  I&#039;m guilty.  Big deal.  Deal with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tdw &#8211; so what have you outed me at?  Smacking down a potty mouthed dimwitted bully in his own style?  I&#8217;m guilty.  Big deal.  Deal with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jsmclean</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119704</link>
		<dc:creator>jsmclean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119704</guid>
		<description>Dear CaptiousNut,

Forgive me. Should have been clearer. I should have said I spoke a language in addition to English when I was talking about how translation technology doesn&#039;t work all that well. 
Guess that makes me an EFL dope!
Have a nice day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear CaptiousNut,</p>
<p>Forgive me. Should have been clearer. I should have said I spoke a language in addition to English when I was talking about how translation technology doesn&#8217;t work all that well.<br />
Guess that makes me an EFL dope!<br />
Have a nice day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality? We don&#8217;t need no stinkin&#8217; reality. &#171; Suicidal Snowflakes</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119683</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality? We don&#8217;t need no stinkin&#8217; reality. &#171; Suicidal Snowflakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119683</guid>
		<description>[...] Algore (one word) says the darnedest things.Â  And by darndest, I mean dumbest.Â  Aparently TV&#8217;s more important than the Internet, which he invented.Â  Y&#8217;know. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Algore (one word) says the darnedest things.Â  And by darndest, I mean dumbest.Â  Aparently TV&#8217;s more important than the Internet, which he invented.Â  Y&#8217;know. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leigh</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119667</link>
		<dc:creator>leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119667</guid>
		<description>EXCELENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EXCELENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119665</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119665</guid>
		<description>Next president? I think not! We need one with a Brain! Hillary Clinton At least she can decipher t.v. from internet. We All Know the  net is and, from now on be the most powererful media there has been and will always be. Gore ,Keep your mouth shut. we all know you want office but, It Just won&#039;t Happen. go back to school. You were a piss-por vice to begin with. stay in tenn and get a  real life farm the feilds,pick cotton, do what you are best at , keep your mouth shut, and let the u.s.a.take care of things as, It it is very obvious  you need to concentrate on  divocing your downfall(Tipper,To tipsy Gore.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next president? I think not! We need one with a Brain! Hillary Clinton At least she can decipher t.v. from internet. We All Know the  net is and, from now on be the most powererful media there has been and will always be. Gore ,Keep your mouth shut. we all know you want office but, It Just won&#8217;t Happen. go back to school. You were a piss-por vice to begin with. stay in tenn and get a  real life farm the feilds,pick cotton, do what you are best at , keep your mouth shut, and let the u.s.a.take care of things as, It it is very obvious  you need to concentrate on  divocing your downfall(Tipper,To tipsy Gore.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooklyn Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119660</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooklyn Kitchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119660</guid>
		<description>Hey CaptiousNut, show me where I contradict myself! I don&#039;t understand.  

And, by the way, you sound like a jerk when you call somebody an &#039;ESL dope.&#039;  Are you a jerk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey CaptiousNut, show me where I contradict myself! I don&#8217;t understand.  </p>
<p>And, by the way, you sound like a jerk when you call somebody an &#8216;ESL dope.&#8217;  Are you a jerk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curley</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119647</link>
		<dc:creator>Curley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119647</guid>
		<description>Virulent prejudicial thoughts released from the subconcious of millions by Karl Rove, Rush Limbaugh, Pat Robertson, et. al.  Zombie apes who dream they are theological experts - able to read tall bibles, literally, well, not actually read, but know what mommy, daddy, &amp; backwoods preacher told me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virulent prejudicial thoughts released from the subconcious of millions by Karl Rove, Rush Limbaugh, Pat Robertson, et. al.  Zombie apes who dream they are theological experts &#8211; able to read tall bibles, literally, well, not actually read, but know what mommy, daddy, &amp; backwoods preacher told me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curley</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119643</link>
		<dc:creator>Curley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119643</guid>
		<description>Too many of these thoughts actually came from Karl Rove?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too many of these thoughts actually came from Karl Rove?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curley</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119642</link>
		<dc:creator>Curley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119642</guid>
		<description>&quot;Most humans are honest.&quot; ?

Honestly ignorant, yet overflowing with Rush Limbaugh like hubris.

&quot;Know Thyself&quot; obviously means knowing that any thoughts you have cum from God. Socrates was considered to be the wisest of men because he he could quote Apollo by heart? Not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Most humans are honest.&#8221; ?</p>
<p>Honestly ignorant, yet overflowing with Rush Limbaugh like hubris.</p>
<p>&#8220;Know Thyself&#8221; obviously means knowing that any thoughts you have cum from God. Socrates was considered to be the wisest of men because he he could quote Apollo by heart? Not!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119639</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119639</guid>
		<description>who knew that the only way to find out the details of a particular meeting is to use eavesdropping equipment? you know, there&#039;s this thing called sources. a real citizen journalist should be able to find and use them. 
what some call bush bias, others call reporting the damn news. if it&#039;s not pleasing to bush and his minions, that&#039;s not the fault of the news--that&#039;s the fault of bush. unless, of course, there was a plan to systematically attack and criticize the administration. if you can present evidence of such a plan, you deserve a pulitzer. but you obviously can&#039;t. you can&#039;t even argue a point without resorting to name-calling of the worst sort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who knew that the only way to find out the details of a particular meeting is to use eavesdropping equipment? you know, there&#8217;s this thing called sources. a real citizen journalist should be able to find and use them.<br />
what some call bush bias, others call reporting the damn news. if it&#8217;s not pleasing to bush and his minions, that&#8217;s not the fault of the news&#8211;that&#8217;s the fault of bush. unless, of course, there was a plan to systematically attack and criticize the administration. if you can present evidence of such a plan, you deserve a pulitzer. but you obviously can&#8217;t. you can&#8217;t even argue a point without resorting to name-calling of the worst sort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Daniels &#187; Al Gore Says the Internet Isn&#8217;t as Powerful as TV</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119637</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Daniels &#187; Al Gore Says the Internet Isn&#8217;t as Powerful as TV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119637</guid>
		<description>[...] I found this article via Jeff Jarvis&#8217; Buzzmachine, in his article Jeff mentions &#8220;my West Virginia father&#8221;, so I think I will have to drop him an email and see if he is from the area, etc, you know the usual questions.   Politics West Virginia And here are some related posts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I found this article via Jeff Jarvis&#8217; Buzzmachine, in his article Jeff mentions &#8220;my West Virginia father&#8221;, so I think I will have to drop him an email and see if he is from the area, etc, you know the usual questions.   Politics West Virginia And here are some related posts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdw</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119636</link>
		<dc:creator>tdw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119636</guid>
		<description>Penny

While it is clear that you are enamored of the American lexicon and thesaurus, your true colors are revealed when presented with arguments in contrast to your own view. Obviously your opinion of your own intellect and command of the language is, shall we say, celestial. Unfortunately for you, you have been revealed as a pouting bully. Resorting to name-calling and attitude are the simple resort/retort of the uninventive and lazy conscience.

To back the response, may I present a a direct quote from yourself: &quot;...you idiot ...is beyond lame ...you are brain dead ...only a moron...  Itâ€™s revealing how fast youâ€™ve morphed into a crude mouthed punk&quot;.

For shame. My respect has dwindled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Penny</p>
<p>While it is clear that you are enamored of the American lexicon and thesaurus, your true colors are revealed when presented with arguments in contrast to your own view. Obviously your opinion of your own intellect and command of the language is, shall we say, celestial. Unfortunately for you, you have been revealed as a pouting bully. Resorting to name-calling and attitude are the simple resort/retort of the uninventive and lazy conscience.</p>
<p>To back the response, may I present a a direct quote from yourself: &#8220;&#8230;you idiot &#8230;is beyond lame &#8230;you are brain dead &#8230;only a moron&#8230;  Itâ€™s revealing how fast youâ€™ve morphed into a crude mouthed punk&#8221;.</p>
<p>For shame. My respect has dwindled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penny</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119618</link>
		<dc:creator>penny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119618</guid>
		<description>Of course, there is no specific meeting that I can present with my eavesdropping equipment, you idiot.  &lt;i&gt;That&lt;/i&gt; as the challenge to my statement is beyond lame.   If you haven&#039;t noticed 5 years of collective anti-Bush bias with the Usual Suspects I cited, then, you are brain dead. 

What you &quot;want&quot;, only a moron would entertain as a serious question. 

It&#039;s revealing how fast you&#039;ve morphed into a crude mouthed punk. 

And, please, don&#039;t bother to reply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, there is no specific meeting that I can present with my eavesdropping equipment, you idiot.  <i>That</i> as the challenge to my statement is beyond lame.   If you haven&#8217;t noticed 5 years of collective anti-Bush bias with the Usual Suspects I cited, then, you are brain dead. </p>
<p>What you &#8220;want&#8221;, only a moron would entertain as a serious question. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s revealing how fast you&#8217;ve morphed into a crude mouthed punk. </p>
<p>And, please, don&#8217;t bother to reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119616</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119616</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, Mr. Gore is right. 

98.2% of US households have televisions
64% of US households have internet access

end of story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, Mr. Gore is right. </p>
<p>98.2% of US households have televisions<br />
64% of US households have internet access</p>
<p>end of story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119578</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119578</guid>
		<description>Again, I&#039;m looking for specifics penny! You alleged some kind of broad conspiracy among media outlets...if you can point to a specific meeting, that&#039;d be great. If not, you&#039;re just a crazy fucking paranoid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, I&#8217;m looking for specifics penny! You alleged some kind of broad conspiracy among media outlets&#8230;if you can point to a specific meeting, that&#8217;d be great. If not, you&#8217;re just a crazy fucking paranoid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penny</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119277</link>
		<dc:creator>penny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 23:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119277</guid>
		<description>Place?  Try any of the highly politicized anti-Bush editorial offices of the NYT&#039;s, BBC, CNN, ABC, MSNBC, LA Times, CBC, The Guardian, Reuters, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Place?  Try any of the highly politicized anti-Bush editorial offices of the NYT&#8217;s, BBC, CNN, ABC, MSNBC, LA Times, CBC, The Guardian, Reuters, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119260</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119260</guid>
		<description>hey penny,
i&#039;d really like to know when &quot;the media&quot; decided that 9/11 was &quot;too friendly&quot; to bush. enterprising citizen journalist that you are, i&#039;m sure you can point me to a specific meeting that took place.
thanks,
ethan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey penny,<br />
i&#8217;d really like to know when &#8220;the media&#8221; decided that 9/11 was &#8220;too friendly&#8221; to bush. enterprising citizen journalist that you are, i&#8217;m sure you can point me to a specific meeting that took place.<br />
thanks,<br />
ethan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penny</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119250</link>
		<dc:creator>penny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 20:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/08/28/not-so-current/#comment-119250</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Having said this, I would ask you to consider just how the wealth of content on the web is organized and navigated? How is it that you arrived at and bookmarked this site, for example? How do you use your search engines? How do you find the issues and discussions that appeal to you in a potentially limitless many-to-many conversation of global scope?&lt;/i&gt;

It&#039;s very simple to accomplish those tasks.  Anyone can do it.  I have had for years a blog site which I share with family and friends.  It&#039;s most important function is that it is where I organize what I want from the web:  MSM links, periodical links,  blog sites, retail shopping links, whatever I want.  I can add to them, change them, delete them.   Anyone can avail themselves with a free blogger site and build their own relevant links.  This is exponentially people are doing. 

Don&#039;t we all insert bias in the newspapers and magazines we subscribe to or the tv channels we select?  I don&#039;t see your point.  If a search engine returns conflicting sides to an issue, then I&#039;m free to examine both. Can&#039;t do that instantly with the fixed print on a newspaper.  Better to read the article online. 

&lt;i&gt;Television, and radio, and newspapers still have the ability and the responsibility to organize a â€œclearingâ€ for the discussion of matters pertaining to the public(s) good&lt;/i&gt;

But, are they acting in any qualitative or relevant manner anymore? And, that&#039;s the point.  Perhaps, what the MSM wants to discuss isn&#039;t what we want to discuss like their 24/7 John Mark Karr garbage.  Nor should a handful of editors have a monopoly on what they deem is in the public&#039;s best interest.  Case in point, we have diminishing 9/11 anniversary coverage, because the media has decided that it isn&#039;t in the public&#039;s best interest, too gruesome, not nuanced, too politically friendly to Bush.  Are they acting out of feedback from the public?  I doubt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Having said this, I would ask you to consider just how the wealth of content on the web is organized and navigated? How is it that you arrived at and bookmarked this site, for example? How do you use your search engines? How do you find the issues and discussions that appeal to you in a potentially limitless many-to-many conversation of global scope?</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s very simple to accomplish those tasks.  Anyone can do it.  I have had for years a blog site which I share with family and friends.  It&#8217;s most important function is that it is where I organize what I want from the web:  MSM links, periodical links,  blog sites, retail shopping links, whatever I want.  I can add to them, change them, delete them.   Anyone can avail themselves with a free blogger site and build their own relevant links.  This is exponentially people are doing. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t we all insert bias in the newspapers and magazines we subscribe to or the tv channels we select?  I don&#8217;t see your point.  If a search engine returns conflicting sides to an issue, then I&#8217;m free to examine both. Can&#8217;t do that instantly with the fixed print on a newspaper.  Better to read the article online. </p>
<p><i>Television, and radio, and newspapers still have the ability and the responsibility to organize a â€œclearingâ€ for the discussion of matters pertaining to the public(s) good</i></p>
<p>But, are they acting in any qualitative or relevant manner anymore? And, that&#8217;s the point.  Perhaps, what the MSM wants to discuss isn&#8217;t what we want to discuss like their 24/7 John Mark Karr garbage.  Nor should a handful of editors have a monopoly on what they deem is in the public&#8217;s best interest.  Case in point, we have diminishing 9/11 anniversary coverage, because the media has decided that it isn&#8217;t in the public&#8217;s best interest, too gruesome, not nuanced, too politically friendly to Bush.  Are they acting out of feedback from the public?  I doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

