<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Starship Telegraph</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/07/starship-telegraph/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/07/starship-telegraph/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: I.F. Stoner</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/07/starship-telegraph/#comment-127353</link>
		<dc:creator>I.F. Stoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 20:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/07/starship-telegraph/#comment-127353</guid>
		<description>Professor Greenslade has taken "cracktard" to a new level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor Greenslade has taken &#8220;cracktard&#8221; to a new level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Knuewer</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/07/starship-telegraph/#comment-126987</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Knuewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 08:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/07/starship-telegraph/#comment-126987</guid>
		<description>If this whole concept is running smoothly it sounds like the future. But I see 2 problems:
- Not every journalist is able to work in all kinds of media. Should a publisher fire the excellent writer who looks and talks like a nerd, only because you can't put him in front of a camera or a microphone?
- Where will all the content come from? More media means less time for research. Less time for research means less exclusivity. Less exclusivity means less interest of your reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this whole concept is running smoothly it sounds like the future. But I see 2 problems:<br />
- Not every journalist is able to work in all kinds of media. Should a publisher fire the excellent writer who looks and talks like a nerd, only because you can&#8217;t put him in front of a camera or a microphone?<br />
- Where will all the content come from? More media means less time for research. Less time for research means less exclusivity. Less exclusivity means less interest of your reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 Newspapers &#187; Updating Telegraph Newsroom News, Line Length Study Says Go Long &#8230; or Short</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/07/starship-telegraph/#comment-126622</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 Newspapers &#187; Updating Telegraph Newsroom News, Line Length Study Says Go Long &#8230; or Short</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 20:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/07/starship-telegraph/#comment-126622</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE: Jeff Jarvis quotes Greenslade &#8212; &#34;It is sobering to learn, even after the passing of hot metal printing 20 years ago, that many articles currently pass through 12 pairs of hands before reaching the reader. That is obviously unnecessary and a key reason for job losses.&#34; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE: Jeff Jarvis quotes Greenslade &#8212; &quot;It is sobering to learn, even after the passing of hot metal printing 20 years ago, that many articles currently pass through 12 pairs of hands before reaching the reader. That is obviously unnecessary and a key reason for job losses.&quot; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Feinman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/07/starship-telegraph/#comment-126595</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Feinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 19:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/07/starship-telegraph/#comment-126595</guid>
		<description>These changes still show a limited understanding. The schedule is aimed at the local market, but the web opens distribution to the world. The BBC seems to get this, especially since they have had decades of experience with the world service.

Just since the start of the month I've had visitors to my web site from 50 countries. Its time media firms learned they are now in a global market (or should be).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These changes still show a limited understanding. The schedule is aimed at the local market, but the web opens distribution to the world. The BBC seems to get this, especially since they have had decades of experience with the world service.</p>
<p>Just since the start of the month I&#8217;ve had visitors to my web site from 50 countries. Its time media firms learned they are now in a global market (or should be).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
