<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Viral Nielsens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:43:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Viral video tips and tricks &#171; Bad idea, indeed</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-380607</link>
		<dc:creator>Viral video tips and tricks &#171; Bad idea, indeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-380607</guid>
		<description>[...] not new at all (Jeff Jarvis was blogging about it 2 years [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not new at all (Jeff Jarvis was blogging about it 2 years [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-133579</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 17:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-133579</guid>
		<description>Hey wingnuts!

They&#039;re building a moat around Baghdad.

We must be winning!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey wingnuts!</p>
<p>They&#8217;re building a moat around Baghdad.</p>
<p>We must be winning!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Owens</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-133164</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-133164</guid>
		<description>Robdert&#039;s points above were more akin to my reaction -- a rather incredible bit of broadcast journalism in this day and age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robdert&#8217;s points above were more akin to my reaction &#8212; a rather incredible bit of broadcast journalism in this day and age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kat</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132981</link>
		<dc:creator>kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132981</guid>
		<description>If that&#039;s today&#039;s top video, then the bar is set awfully low--digging in the dirt level .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that&#8217;s today&#8217;s top video, then the bar is set awfully low&#8211;digging in the dirt level .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Feinman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132958</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Feinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132958</guid>
		<description>Fifty years ago when a newscaster read an editorial online it was on a major network and seen by millions (Murrow). Now it&#039;s on a minor cable network and seen by few (although the item is getting around on the net).

What does it say for the quality of network news that they don&#039;t even have editorials anymore? (Eric Sevareid comes to mind.)

When was the last time you saw someone face the camera and deliver a 10 minute opinion piece?

A bit off topic, but if you are interested in seeing what the scene at the World Trade Center site looked like this 9/11 I&#039;ve added a few short slides shows of the day to my annual series.
(No pictures of ceremonies or grieving people, I leave that to the news media.)

Here is the link:

http://robertdfeinman.com/nyc_stroll/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fifty years ago when a newscaster read an editorial online it was on a major network and seen by millions (Murrow). Now it&#8217;s on a minor cable network and seen by few (although the item is getting around on the net).</p>
<p>What does it say for the quality of network news that they don&#8217;t even have editorials anymore? (Eric Sevareid comes to mind.)</p>
<p>When was the last time you saw someone face the camera and deliver a 10 minute opinion piece?</p>
<p>A bit off topic, but if you are interested in seeing what the scene at the World Trade Center site looked like this 9/11 I&#8217;ve added a few short slides shows of the day to my annual series.<br />
(No pictures of ceremonies or grieving people, I leave that to the news media.)</p>
<p>Here is the link:</p>
<p><a href="http://robertdfeinman.com/nyc_stroll/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://robertdfeinman.com/nyc_stroll/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptiousNut</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132957</link>
		<dc:creator>CaptiousNut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132957</guid>
		<description>Can a &quot;winger&quot; be &quot;batty&quot;(moon)?

I thought they referenced antipodes, huh Angelos?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can a &#8220;winger&#8221; be &#8220;batty&#8221;(moon)?</p>
<p>I thought they referenced antipodes, huh Angelos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Wermer</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132945</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Wermer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132945</guid>
		<description>Olbermann was once a local LA TV sports reporter.  He sucked.  Big time.  Then he became a local LA TV newscaster.  He still sucked.  Even more.  Then he sucked on ESPN and now he sucks on MSNBC.  As illogical, factually inaccurate, poorly reasoned, and self-righteous as always.  Failing upwards.  Though Olbermann&#039;s ratings may not be bad for the disaster that is MSNBC, given the ceiling on the number of people who can stand watching him, he&#039;s nevertheless a prime reason why MSNBC is unable to break out of its ratings doldrums.  Can&#039;t someone (I mean you Dan Abrams) make him go away?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olbermann was once a local LA TV sports reporter.  He sucked.  Big time.  Then he became a local LA TV newscaster.  He still sucked.  Even more.  Then he sucked on ESPN and now he sucks on MSNBC.  As illogical, factually inaccurate, poorly reasoned, and self-righteous as always.  Failing upwards.  Though Olbermann&#8217;s ratings may not be bad for the disaster that is MSNBC, given the ceiling on the number of people who can stand watching him, he&#8217;s nevertheless a prime reason why MSNBC is unable to break out of its ratings doldrums.  Can&#8217;t someone (I mean you Dan Abrams) make him go away?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132924</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132924</guid>
		<description>Nothing like the truth to drive you wingers batty, huh Captious?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing like the truth to drive you wingers batty, huh Captious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chico haas</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132911</link>
		<dc:creator>chico haas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132911</guid>
		<description>Imagine NY&#039;s response to the Bush Administration dictating what should be built on the site. As for Keith, no one, and I mean no one, ever read hoops scores better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine NY&#8217;s response to the Bush Administration dictating what should be built on the site. As for Keith, no one, and I mean no one, ever read hoops scores better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptiousNut</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132855</link>
		<dc:creator>CaptiousNut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 20:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132855</guid>
		<description>Just think how nuts Olbermann will be in his dotage.

These whackjobs age like bananas.  At least Dan Rather and Jimmy Carter weren&#039;t as noticebly certifiable as younger men.

Too bad you can&#039;t buy puts on a person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just think how nuts Olbermann will be in his dotage.</p>
<p>These whackjobs age like bananas.  At least Dan Rather and Jimmy Carter weren&#8217;t as noticebly certifiable as younger men.</p>
<p>Too bad you can&#8217;t buy puts on a person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132737</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132737</guid>
		<description>A true American hero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A true American hero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

