<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Viral Nielsens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Viral video tips and tricks &#171; Bad idea, indeed</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-380607</link>
		<dc:creator>Viral video tips and tricks &#171; Bad idea, indeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-380607</guid>
		<description>[...] not new at all (Jeff Jarvis was blogging about it 2 years [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not new at all (Jeff Jarvis was blogging about it 2 years [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-133579</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 17:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-133579</guid>
		<description>Hey wingnuts!

They're building a moat around Baghdad.

We must be winning!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey wingnuts!</p>
<p>They&#8217;re building a moat around Baghdad.</p>
<p>We must be winning!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Owens</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-133164</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-133164</guid>
		<description>Robdert's points above were more akin to my reaction -- a rather incredible bit of broadcast journalism in this day and age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robdert&#8217;s points above were more akin to my reaction &#8212; a rather incredible bit of broadcast journalism in this day and age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kat</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132981</link>
		<dc:creator>kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132981</guid>
		<description>If that's today's top video, then the bar is set awfully low--digging in the dirt level .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that&#8217;s today&#8217;s top video, then the bar is set awfully low&#8211;digging in the dirt level .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Feinman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132958</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Feinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132958</guid>
		<description>Fifty years ago when a newscaster read an editorial online it was on a major network and seen by millions (Murrow). Now it's on a minor cable network and seen by few (although the item is getting around on the net).

What does it say for the quality of network news that they don't even have editorials anymore? (Eric Sevareid comes to mind.)

When was the last time you saw someone face the camera and deliver a 10 minute opinion piece?

A bit off topic, but if you are interested in seeing what the scene at the World Trade Center site looked like this 9/11 I've added a few short slides shows of the day to my annual series.
(No pictures of ceremonies or grieving people, I leave that to the news media.)

Here is the link:

http://robertdfeinman.com/nyc_stroll/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fifty years ago when a newscaster read an editorial online it was on a major network and seen by millions (Murrow). Now it&#8217;s on a minor cable network and seen by few (although the item is getting around on the net).</p>
<p>What does it say for the quality of network news that they don&#8217;t even have editorials anymore? (Eric Sevareid comes to mind.)</p>
<p>When was the last time you saw someone face the camera and deliver a 10 minute opinion piece?</p>
<p>A bit off topic, but if you are interested in seeing what the scene at the World Trade Center site looked like this 9/11 I&#8217;ve added a few short slides shows of the day to my annual series.<br />
(No pictures of ceremonies or grieving people, I leave that to the news media.)</p>
<p>Here is the link:</p>
<p><a href="http://robertdfeinman.com/nyc_stroll/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://robertdfeinman.com/nyc_stroll/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptiousNut</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132957</link>
		<dc:creator>CaptiousNut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132957</guid>
		<description>Can a "winger" be "batty"(moon)?

I thought they referenced antipodes, huh Angelos?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can a &#8220;winger&#8221; be &#8220;batty&#8221;(moon)?</p>
<p>I thought they referenced antipodes, huh Angelos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Wermer</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132945</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Wermer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132945</guid>
		<description>Olbermann was once a local LA TV sports reporter.  He sucked.  Big time.  Then he became a local LA TV newscaster.  He still sucked.  Even more.  Then he sucked on ESPN and now he sucks on MSNBC.  As illogical, factually inaccurate, poorly reasoned, and self-righteous as always.  Failing upwards.  Though Olbermann's ratings may not be bad for the disaster that is MSNBC, given the ceiling on the number of people who can stand watching him, he's nevertheless a prime reason why MSNBC is unable to break out of its ratings doldrums.  Can't someone (I mean you Dan Abrams) make him go away?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olbermann was once a local LA TV sports reporter.  He sucked.  Big time.  Then he became a local LA TV newscaster.  He still sucked.  Even more.  Then he sucked on ESPN and now he sucks on MSNBC.  As illogical, factually inaccurate, poorly reasoned, and self-righteous as always.  Failing upwards.  Though Olbermann&#8217;s ratings may not be bad for the disaster that is MSNBC, given the ceiling on the number of people who can stand watching him, he&#8217;s nevertheless a prime reason why MSNBC is unable to break out of its ratings doldrums.  Can&#8217;t someone (I mean you Dan Abrams) make him go away?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132924</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132924</guid>
		<description>Nothing like the truth to drive you wingers batty, huh Captious?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing like the truth to drive you wingers batty, huh Captious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chico haas</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132911</link>
		<dc:creator>chico haas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132911</guid>
		<description>Imagine NY's response to the Bush Administration dictating what should be built on the site. As for Keith, no one, and I mean no one, ever read hoops scores better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine NY&#8217;s response to the Bush Administration dictating what should be built on the site. As for Keith, no one, and I mean no one, ever read hoops scores better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptiousNut</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132855</link>
		<dc:creator>CaptiousNut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 20:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132855</guid>
		<description>Just think how nuts Olbermann will be in his dotage.

These whackjobs age like bananas.  At least Dan Rather and Jimmy Carter weren't as noticebly certifiable as younger men.

Too bad you can't buy puts on a person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just think how nuts Olbermann will be in his dotage.</p>
<p>These whackjobs age like bananas.  At least Dan Rather and Jimmy Carter weren&#8217;t as noticebly certifiable as younger men.</p>
<p>Too bad you can&#8217;t buy puts on a person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelos</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132737</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/14/viral-nielsens/#comment-132737</guid>
		<description>A true American hero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A true American hero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
