<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Out of Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/18/out-of-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/18/out-of-time/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:43:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Colin Crawford</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/18/out-of-time/#comment-140027</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2042#comment-140027</guid>
		<description>For Brands to prosper in a world of search, aggregation and social networking they need to focus on the engagement of their communites. In the end the Brands are the voice of the special interest communities.  Brands can play a huge role in helping surface and showcase quality content but only if they realize that great content, while coming from professional journalist also comes from their communities. Colin Crawford, SVP Online IDG Communications</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Brands to prosper in a world of search, aggregation and social networking they need to focus on the engagement of their communites. In the end the Brands are the voice of the special interest communities.  Brands can play a huge role in helping surface and showcase quality content but only if they realize that great content, while coming from professional journalist also comes from their communities. Colin Crawford, SVP Online IDG Communications</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lark Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/18/out-of-time/#comment-137072</link>
		<dc:creator>Lark Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2042#comment-137072</guid>
		<description>Folio, the magazine publishing trade book, published an article on this subject. I think it is worth a read

http://www.foliomag.com/viewMedia.asp?prmMID=5958</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folio, the magazine publishing trade book, published an article on this subject. I think it is worth a read</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foliomag.com/viewMedia.asp?prmMID=5958" rel="nofollow">http://www.foliomag.com/viewMedia.asp?prmMID=5958</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robhyndman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why I Have No Time for Time</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/18/out-of-time/#comment-136852</link>
		<dc:creator>robhyndman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why I Have No Time for Time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2042#comment-136852</guid>
		<description>[...] As usual, Jeff Jarvis is on the case, preaching the wisdom of being the core of a community of interest. Smart stuff, and I would quote him, but this is a family blog and he uses bad words. In short, take one Time Magazine, add several pounds of the Huffington Post, a few gallons of community and drop the gates. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As usual, Jeff Jarvis is on the case, preaching the wisdom of being the core of a community of interest. Smart stuff, and I would quote him, but this is a family blog and he uses bad words. In short, take one Time Magazine, add several pounds of the Huffington Post, a few gallons of community and drop the gates. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Â» SYNTAGMA - 40-Site Web Network Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/18/out-of-time/#comment-136756</link>
		<dc:creator>Â» SYNTAGMA - 40-Site Web Network Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2042#comment-136756</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis gets it in one: &#8220;Magazines could have had a unique benefit in the internet if they had thought of themselves not as slick paper but instead of networks of interest and information. &#8230; Sadly, not many in the business view it this way. Theyâ€™re still thinking content and control. Theyâ€™re still thinking centralized. Break out and think distributed and think community and new things become possible.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis gets it in one: &#8220;Magazines could have had a unique benefit in the internet if they had thought of themselves not as slick paper but instead of networks of interest and information. &#8230; Sadly, not many in the business view it this way. Theyâ€™re still thinking content and control. Theyâ€™re still thinking centralized. Break out and think distributed and think community and new things become possible.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virt</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/18/out-of-time/#comment-136717</link>
		<dc:creator>Virt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 09:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2042#comment-136717</guid>
		<description>These are different times. It isn&#039;t only the established magazine publishers who are feeling the parched air of death sucking out their last breaths of oxygen. Companies that were once considered as solid as the US government are being put on life support, companies like General Motors and Ford. Of course, the US government isn&#039;t exactly what it was only a few short years ago.

Assimilated Press
Read &lt;a href=&quot;http://assimilatedpress.blogspot.com/2006/09/wall-street-journal-editorial-board.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wall Street Journal Editorial Board Resigns In Disgrace&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are different times. It isn&#8217;t only the established magazine publishers who are feeling the parched air of death sucking out their last breaths of oxygen. Companies that were once considered as solid as the US government are being put on life support, companies like General Motors and Ford. Of course, the US government isn&#8217;t exactly what it was only a few short years ago.</p>
<p>Assimilated Press<br />
Read <a href="http://assimilatedpress.blogspot.com/2006/09/wall-street-journal-editorial-board.html" rel="nofollow">Wall Street Journal Editorial Board Resigns In Disgrace</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carson Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/18/out-of-time/#comment-136622</link>
		<dc:creator>Carson Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 07:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2042#comment-136622</guid>
		<description>At a meeting about six months ago in Washington, the editor of one well known political journal and the assoc. editor of another well known political journal on the other side both commented, in answer to a question about blogs and newspapers in their own work, that in addition to blogs they found they still read newspapers but that, amazingly, in the past year they found themselves writing -- and finishing -- pieces without consulting the news magazines to be sure they hadn&#039;t missed something.  That would have been unheard of ten years ago -- even five.  It says a lot about their relevance in today&#039;s portfolio of media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a meeting about six months ago in Washington, the editor of one well known political journal and the assoc. editor of another well known political journal on the other side both commented, in answer to a question about blogs and newspapers in their own work, that in addition to blogs they found they still read newspapers but that, amazingly, in the past year they found themselves writing &#8212; and finishing &#8212; pieces without consulting the news magazines to be sure they hadn&#8217;t missed something.  That would have been unheard of ten years ago &#8212; even five.  It says a lot about their relevance in today&#8217;s portfolio of media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adslfan</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/18/out-of-time/#comment-136465</link>
		<dc:creator>adslfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 03:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2042#comment-136465</guid>
		<description>use your millions and buy all the time magazines. then you can put yourself
on the cover of time .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>use your millions and buy all the time magazines. then you can put yourself<br />
on the cover of time .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/18/out-of-time/#comment-136438</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 02:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2042#comment-136438</guid>
		<description>I like the point you make about viewing your audience with the networks of interest and information lens.

We have moved past the times, where creating a web presence, simply serves as another distribution channel for your brand. Oprah and ESPN, won that game, as the Kings and Queens of All Media (Sorry Howard). They &quot;got it&quot; better, than the pack. 

It will be great to see if the magazines, can figure how to adopt to the networked world, where distribution is infinite and connections are key...and video too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the point you make about viewing your audience with the networks of interest and information lens.</p>
<p>We have moved past the times, where creating a web presence, simply serves as another distribution channel for your brand. Oprah and ESPN, won that game, as the Kings and Queens of All Media (Sorry Howard). They &#8220;got it&#8221; better, than the pack. </p>
<p>It will be great to see if the magazines, can figure how to adopt to the networked world, where distribution is infinite and connections are key&#8230;and video too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike G</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/18/out-of-time/#comment-136424</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 02:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2042#comment-136424</guid>
		<description>Working in the ad biz in Chicago, most of the agencies I&#039;ve worked for have, at one time or another, worked for or wanted to work for Sears.  To which I always asked-- why?  I understood what Sears was in the era of mail order, and in the era of Main Street shopping.  But when there&#039;s a mall, what is Sears?  A single store trying to be everything a mall is, but not being able to pull it off because it&#039;s only one store.

Same for Time or Newsweek.  Maybe there&#039;s a business in being a weekly summarizer, but it seems doubtful to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Working in the ad biz in Chicago, most of the agencies I&#8217;ve worked for have, at one time or another, worked for or wanted to work for Sears.  To which I always asked&#8211; why?  I understood what Sears was in the era of mail order, and in the era of Main Street shopping.  But when there&#8217;s a mall, what is Sears?  A single store trying to be everything a mall is, but not being able to pull it off because it&#8217;s only one store.</p>
<p>Same for Time or Newsweek.  Maybe there&#8217;s a business in being a weekly summarizer, but it seems doubtful to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Blank</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/18/out-of-time/#comment-136378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Blank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 01:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2042#comment-136378</guid>
		<description>Part of the new dynamic on the Web is that &#039;promotional clout&#039; alone does not go very far. Many of the newer, smaller community sites were started in response to a direct need. Oftentimes the larger companies set their online strategy based on revenue projections, not actually solving a problem for someone or enhancing their readers lives. 
- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.danblank.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dan Blank&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the new dynamic on the Web is that &#8216;promotional clout&#8217; alone does not go very far. Many of the newer, smaller community sites were started in response to a direct need. Oftentimes the larger companies set their online strategy based on revenue projections, not actually solving a problem for someone or enhancing their readers lives.<br />
- <a href="http://www.danblank.com" rel="nofollow">Dan Blank</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Blank: Publishing, Innovation and the Web &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is it Too Late for Publishers?</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/18/out-of-time/#comment-136376</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Blank: Publishing, Innovation and the Web &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is it Too Late for Publishers?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 01:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2042#comment-136376</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis feels that it may indeed be too late for many print brands to gain traction online: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis feels that it may indeed be too late for many print brands to gain traction online: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web9.0</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/18/out-of-time/#comment-136264</link>
		<dc:creator>Web9.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2042#comment-136264</guid>
		<description>Why is it that those who tout the web2.0 mantra of edge content moderate their blogs and censor any contra-comment?

Umair Haque: â€œComment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.â€

Stowe Boyd: â€œComment moderation is onâ€</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that those who tout the web2.0 mantra of edge content moderate their blogs and censor any contra-comment?</p>
<p>Umair Haque: â€œComment moderation has been enabled. All comments must be approved by the blog author.â€</p>
<p>Stowe Boyd: â€œComment moderation is onâ€</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

