<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Idiots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-360415</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-360415</guid>
		<description>I have to say, that I could not agree with you in 100% regarding Idiots, but it's just my opinion, which could be wrong :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, that I could not agree with you in 100% regarding Idiots, but it&#8217;s just my opinion, which could be wrong <img src='http://www.buzzmachine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mekka@rotterdam &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Clinton gegen Fox: Â»nice little conservative hit&#160;jobÂ«</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-151137</link>
		<dc:creator>mekka@rotterdam &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Clinton gegen Fox: Â»nice little conservative hit&#160;jobÂ«</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 12:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-151137</guid>
		<description>[...] Ich gebe hier einmal keinen direkten Link zu einem YouTube- oder Google-Video an, denn scheinbar interveniert hier Fox, um die Videos zu sperren. Oder doch nicht? Wie dem auch sei: Ãœber die vorhin schon verlinkte Crooks-and-Liars-Seite kann man auch den Video-Mitschnitt sehen. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ich gebe hier einmal keinen direkten Link zu einem YouTube- oder Google-Video an, denn scheinbar interveniert hier Fox, um die Videos zu sperren. Oder doch nicht? Wie dem auch sei: Ãœber die vorhin schon verlinkte Crooks-and-Liars-Seite kann man auch den Video-Mitschnitt sehen. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Mathews</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-150532</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mathews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-150532</guid>
		<description>Here's a &lt;a href="http://www.warandpiece.com/blogdirs/004952.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Message&lt;/a&gt; for you GOP'ers:

&lt;blockquote&gt;When historians look back on the 2006 midterms and the Democratic sweep of both the House and Senate, they will look back on Friday, September 29th as the day that sealed the GOP's fate.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.warandpiece.com/blogdirs/004952.html" rel="nofollow">Message</a> for you GOP&#8217;ers:</p>
<blockquote><p>When historians look back on the 2006 midterms and the Democratic sweep of both the House and Senate, they will look back on Friday, September 29th as the day that sealed the GOP&#8217;s fate.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Lester</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-149358</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Lester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-149358</guid>
		<description>People of every persuasion and who come to every possible conclusion about the interview would all like to have it handy for reference. You are absolutely right; this is network stupidity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People of every persuasion and who come to every possible conclusion about the interview would all like to have it handy for reference. You are absolutely right; this is network stupidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chico haas</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-148823</link>
		<dc:creator>chico haas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-148823</guid>
		<description>I never liked or voted for Clinton. Thought he steered his presidency by focus group. But I will give him his due: he's an articulate conversationalist. Miss that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never liked or voted for Clinton. Thought he steered his presidency by focus group. But I will give him his due: he&#8217;s an articulate conversationalist. Miss that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penny</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-148085</link>
		<dc:creator>penny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-148085</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;"The recently declassified NIE judgements seem to indirectly bolster Clintonâ€™s point "...&lt;/i&gt;

Only when you cherry pick it.  Nice try though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;The recently declassified NIE judgements seem to indirectly bolster Clintonâ€™s point &#8220;&#8230;</i></p>
<p>Only when you cherry pick it.  Nice try though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kapusta Brothers &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another Win for the Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-147802</link>
		<dc:creator>Kapusta Brothers &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another Win for the Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-147802</guid>
		<description>[...] Bloggers win again! It all started when President Clinton sat down with Chris Wallace of Fox News Sunday for an interview. What an interview it was because the next day it was all over the news and internet. Eventually within a day or so it was already on youtube and many other sites included political blogs and message boards. The video became very popular and was all over the internet which must have made Fox News very unhappy. On Monday the internet division of Fox sent out cease and desist letters to all users on youtube which had referenced this movie due to copyright claims. However, a 180 degree turn back in the right direction let youtube users restore these videos because of the popularity and blogger outrage of there previous decision to remove the content. In a statement Fox said the following as to why the videos where allowed to be published again [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bloggers win again! It all started when President Clinton sat down with Chris Wallace of Fox News Sunday for an interview. What an interview it was because the next day it was all over the news and internet. Eventually within a day or so it was already on youtube and many other sites included political blogs and message boards. The video became very popular and was all over the internet which must have made Fox News very unhappy. On Monday the internet division of Fox sent out cease and desist letters to all users on youtube which had referenced this movie due to copyright claims. However, a 180 degree turn back in the right direction let youtube users restore these videos because of the popularity and blogger outrage of there previous decision to remove the content. In a statement Fox said the following as to why the videos where allowed to be published again [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146907</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146907</guid>
		<description>NBC has worked out a finanical deal with YouTube to air network clips on the service, though I assume those are clips chosen by the network itself. The other networks and their movie studio partners have balked at allowing their content up on YouTube, since (as a previous poster mentioned) they don't see any money in it for them. 

Some YouTube accounts have  been suspended and content taken down when people have posted even segments of copyrighted material, so Fox's action with the Clinton video falls into that category. It's self-defeating, since as much as this brohaha may be stirring up passions right now, nobody's going to care much about it six months down the line, and few if any people will be heading over to the Fox site to download the video. Get it out their as much as possible, and let the silly slow-spinning box in the lower left corner of the screen remind everyone they're watching a Fox News show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC has worked out a finanical deal with YouTube to air network clips on the service, though I assume those are clips chosen by the network itself. The other networks and their movie studio partners have balked at allowing their content up on YouTube, since (as a previous poster mentioned) they don&#8217;t see any money in it for them. </p>
<p>Some YouTube accounts have  been suspended and content taken down when people have posted even segments of copyrighted material, so Fox&#8217;s action with the Clinton video falls into that category. It&#8217;s self-defeating, since as much as this brohaha may be stirring up passions right now, nobody&#8217;s going to care much about it six months down the line, and few if any people will be heading over to the Fox site to download the video. Get it out their as much as possible, and let the silly slow-spinning box in the lower left corner of the screen remind everyone they&#8217;re watching a Fox News show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RonP</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146634</link>
		<dc:creator>RonP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146634</guid>
		<description>In the wider context do you really think that capturing Bin Laden matters?  since this is an asymetrical war, do you really think Bin Laden has any knowledge of what is going on in conflict based on individual cells?  the time to get bin laden has passed and unfortunately Mr. Clinton could have pulled the trigger on that at least twice (what he has admitted to).  Now we have the martyr effect to deal with.  had he been dispatched (relatively) quietly he would have shown up as nothing more than burning gob of goo in the desert.

all this noise and spin cannot detract from the failure of the Clinton administration to confront this head on.  that should not give a pass to the Carter, Reagan or Bush 1 administrations they dealt with this on a piece meal basis as well.  

if Clinton could have dropped his narcissism for just a moment he could have answered the question in a far more statesmanlike manner.  He could have said "I tried, i made mistakes, i like my predecessors did not grasp the gravity of the situation - that said I now believe that the way the current administration is handling the situation is not correct."

I would have looked at that as an opening for real bi-partisan discussion on terrorism.  the spin machine seems to only want to talk about Clinton giving the democrats a spine.  sort of begs the question and allows for a follow up question of, "if you didn't have a spine until now then why shouldn't i believe the accusations that you are objecting to?"  The War Room doesn't work anymore - things like YouTube, blogs, etc. have instant access to information which can immediately demolish what either side say.  beware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the wider context do you really think that capturing Bin Laden matters?  since this is an asymetrical war, do you really think Bin Laden has any knowledge of what is going on in conflict based on individual cells?  the time to get bin laden has passed and unfortunately Mr. Clinton could have pulled the trigger on that at least twice (what he has admitted to).  Now we have the martyr effect to deal with.  had he been dispatched (relatively) quietly he would have shown up as nothing more than burning gob of goo in the desert.</p>
<p>all this noise and spin cannot detract from the failure of the Clinton administration to confront this head on.  that should not give a pass to the Carter, Reagan or Bush 1 administrations they dealt with this on a piece meal basis as well.  </p>
<p>if Clinton could have dropped his narcissism for just a moment he could have answered the question in a far more statesmanlike manner.  He could have said &#8220;I tried, i made mistakes, i like my predecessors did not grasp the gravity of the situation - that said I now believe that the way the current administration is handling the situation is not correct.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would have looked at that as an opening for real bi-partisan discussion on terrorism.  the spin machine seems to only want to talk about Clinton giving the democrats a spine.  sort of begs the question and allows for a follow up question of, &#8220;if you didn&#8217;t have a spine until now then why shouldn&#8217;t i believe the accusations that you are objecting to?&#8221;  The War Room doesn&#8217;t work anymore - things like YouTube, blogs, etc. have instant access to information which can immediately demolish what either side say.  beware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brileni</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146620</link>
		<dc:creator>Brileni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146620</guid>
		<description>Fox News doesn't want to be part of the conversation - they want to control the information that the public has access to, and make sure the story that Fox News promotes is the only one alive. If they can't control the message, then the message cannot exist. Simple as that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox News doesn&#8217;t want to be part of the conversation - they want to control the information that the public has access to, and make sure the story that Fox News promotes is the only one alive. If they can&#8217;t control the message, then the message cannot exist. Simple as that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Mathews</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146602</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mathews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146602</guid>
		<description>The recently declassified &lt;a href="http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2006/sep/26/the_facts_behind_the_nie" rel="nofollow"&gt;NIE judgements&lt;/a&gt; seem to indirectly bolster Clinton's point about the ill-conceived diversion of resources to Iraq instead of their use to track down Bin-Laden.  As former top CIA official in Saudi Arabia, Ray Close, stated: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;No reasonable person can possibly deny that our intervention in Iraq has been an enormous stimulus to terrorist activity worldwide. Efforts by John McCain and others to discount the significance of that factor by pointing out that the attacks on 9/11 occurred before our overthrow of Saddam Hussein is as trivial and irrelevant as they are disingenuous.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recently declassified <a href="http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/coffeehouse/2006/sep/26/the_facts_behind_the_nie" rel="nofollow">NIE judgements</a> seem to indirectly bolster Clinton&#8217;s point about the ill-conceived diversion of resources to Iraq instead of their use to track down Bin-Laden.  As former top CIA official in Saudi Arabia, Ray Close, stated: </p>
<blockquote><p>No reasonable person can possibly deny that our intervention in Iraq has been an enormous stimulus to terrorist activity worldwide. Efforts by John McCain and others to discount the significance of that factor by pointing out that the attacks on 9/11 occurred before our overthrow of Saddam Hussein is as trivial and irrelevant as they are disingenuous.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RonP</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146594</link>
		<dc:creator>RonP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146594</guid>
		<description>At times i wonder whether Bill Clinton is a creation of Karl Rove.  Everything was looking great for the dems to re-capture at least one house of government.  post labor day that seemed to evaporate - evidenced by the RangelPelosiBegalaSchumer et al diving for the microphone in order to denounce El Presidente Chavez - always nice when your betters deign to throw a bone to the bumpkins in flyover country.  But to seal the deal - Rove sends out Bubba to have a meltdown on TV and then distributes it via YouTube - bet Rove invented that as well.  talk about looking guilty - positively nixonian.  there goes 2006!  its been a bad year for the "true believers - kos kids etc., no fitzmas, and no return to power.  how does Chimpy Bushitlerburton do it?  now thats priceles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At times i wonder whether Bill Clinton is a creation of Karl Rove.  Everything was looking great for the dems to re-capture at least one house of government.  post labor day that seemed to evaporate - evidenced by the RangelPelosiBegalaSchumer et al diving for the microphone in order to denounce El Presidente Chavez - always nice when your betters deign to throw a bone to the bumpkins in flyover country.  But to seal the deal - Rove sends out Bubba to have a meltdown on TV and then distributes it via YouTube - bet Rove invented that as well.  talk about looking guilty - positively nixonian.  there goes 2006!  its been a bad year for the &#8220;true believers - kos kids etc., no fitzmas, and no return to power.  how does Chimpy Bushitlerburton do it?  now thats priceles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooklyn Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146592</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooklyn Kitchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146592</guid>
		<description>It's most interesting to see how the Clinton interview was perceived with regard to one's own political afiliations. It seems that Democrats see it as a takedown of Fox and Bush administration nonsense. Republicans see it as a Clinton hissy fit. 

Also: Fox took the video off of YouTube because they wanted to draw the new audience you speak of back to their own site. There move is about advertising impressions, isn't it? Fox likely sees the video on YouTube and imagines all that money going down the toilet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s most interesting to see how the Clinton interview was perceived with regard to one&#8217;s own political afiliations. It seems that Democrats see it as a takedown of Fox and Bush administration nonsense. Republicans see it as a Clinton hissy fit. </p>
<p>Also: Fox took the video off of YouTube because they wanted to draw the new audience you speak of back to their own site. There move is about advertising impressions, isn&#8217;t it? Fox likely sees the video on YouTube and imagines all that money going down the toilet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Drees</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146582</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Drees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146582</guid>
		<description>Opps. That should read "better liar".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opps. That should read &#8220;better liar&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Drees</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146580</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Drees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146580</guid>
		<description>At least he's a better lie than Bush, who can't seem to keep his stories straight. ("We're going to get OBL...OBL isn't important...We're still going after OBL...")</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least he&#8217;s a better lie than Bush, who can&#8217;t seem to keep his stories straight. (&#8221;We&#8217;re going to get OBL&#8230;OBL isn&#8217;t important&#8230;We&#8217;re still going after OBL&#8230;&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kat</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146566</link>
		<dc:creator>kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146566</guid>
		<description>(Conviction looks like Clinton,) Yeah, I saw that conviction when he didn't have sex with that woman. He's a convincing liar who lies with conviction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Conviction looks like Clinton,) Yeah, I saw that conviction when he didn&#8217;t have sex with that woman. He&#8217;s a convincing liar who lies with conviction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eirikso.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Idiots</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146504</link>
		<dc:creator>eirikso.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Idiots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146504</guid>
		<description>[...] I stole this headline from Jeff Jarvis. He is talking about Fox News: FoxNews takes the Bill Clinton interview down from YouTube. Fools. They would be getting a whole new audience. Theyâ€™d be even more part of the conversation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I stole this headline from Jeff Jarvis. He is talking about Fox News: FoxNews takes the Bill Clinton interview down from YouTube. Fools. They would be getting a whole new audience. Theyâ€™d be even more part of the conversation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dusty</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146256</link>
		<dc:creator>dusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146256</guid>
		<description>Republicans reminiscing about the blow job - $1

The Media regurgitating the Clinton gets crazed nonsense - $.50

A true believer "watching Clinton come unglued over nothing was like watching a train wreck" - Priceless

Attacks on pre-Bush America are "nothing" except that they weren't responded to as well as GWB's America so let's stay calm. Wait... Not calm but afraid. Attacks on a Republican America are worth burning the Constitution and don't you even think about debating the Republican response you seditionist traitor. Weird, something going on here.

I'm beginning to think republicans have lived an an echo chamber for so long that they don't recognize simple debate. Clinton was far from unglued and merely articulated his responses to OBL (with a bit of conviction) that have already been established in the 9/11 commission report. You repubs really should debate somebody offline to see what it's like. Conviction looks like Clinton, irritation with the Peasants is what Bush does. 

Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans reminiscing about the blow job - $1</p>
<p>The Media regurgitating the Clinton gets crazed nonsense - $.50</p>
<p>A true believer &#8220;watching Clinton come unglued over nothing was like watching a train wreck&#8221; - Priceless</p>
<p>Attacks on pre-Bush America are &#8220;nothing&#8221; except that they weren&#8217;t responded to as well as GWB&#8217;s America so let&#8217;s stay calm. Wait&#8230; Not calm but afraid. Attacks on a Republican America are worth burning the Constitution and don&#8217;t you even think about debating the Republican response you seditionist traitor. Weird, something going on here.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m beginning to think republicans have lived an an echo chamber for so long that they don&#8217;t recognize simple debate. Clinton was far from unglued and merely articulated his responses to OBL (with a bit of conviction) that have already been established in the 9/11 commission report. You repubs really should debate somebody offline to see what it&#8217;s like. Conviction looks like Clinton, irritation with the Peasants is what Bush does. </p>
<p>Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beta Alfa 2.0 &#187; Fox News vill inte ha nya tittare</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146229</link>
		<dc:creator>Beta Alfa 2.0 &#187; Fox News vill inte ha nya tittare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 04:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-146229</guid>
		<description>[...] BuzzMachine: Idiots [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BuzzMachine: Idiots [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thedude</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-145978</link>
		<dc:creator>thedude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-145978</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuVtQUQvIpo

Typical pissy fit, filled with bizarre half sentences.  I guess he is the decider.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjAzaqjBCZs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mp4vLBvU1bA
So what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuVtQUQvIpo" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuVtQUQvIpo</a></p>
<p>Typical pissy fit, filled with bizarre half sentences.  I guess he is the decider.<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjAzaqjBCZs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjAzaqjBCZs</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mp4vLBvU1bA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mp4vLBvU1bA</a><br />
So what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lost Remote TV Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-145921</link>
		<dc:creator>Lost Remote TV Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-145921</guid>
		<description>[...] BuzzMachine reports that Fox News had YouTube pull this clip of Clinton&#8217;s Fox News Sunday interview from the site. &#8220;Fools. They would be getting a whole new audience,&#8221; writes Jeff Jarvis. Interestingly, there&#8217;s a full slate of clips from the interview still on YouTube. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BuzzMachine reports that Fox News had YouTube pull this clip of Clinton&#8217;s Fox News Sunday interview from the site. &#8220;Fools. They would be getting a whole new audience,&#8221; writes Jeff Jarvis. Interestingly, there&#8217;s a full slate of clips from the interview still on YouTube. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kat</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-145897</link>
		<dc:creator>kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-145897</guid>
		<description>The finger wagging reminds me of "I've never had sex with that woman" and we know he lied then just like he lied now. And then there was the moment with Peter Jennings, who sure as hell can't be accused of being rightwing.
http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/26/video-flashback-clinton-points-finger-at-jennings-enraged-at-moral-questioning/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The finger wagging reminds me of &#8220;I&#8217;ve never had sex with that woman&#8221; and we know he lied then just like he lied now. And then there was the moment with Peter Jennings, who sure as hell can&#8217;t be accused of being rightwing.<br />
<a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/26/video-flashback-clinton-points-finger-at-jennings-enraged-at-moral-questioning/" rel="nofollow">http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/26/video-flashback-clinton-points-finger-at-jennings-enraged-at-moral-questioning/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RonP</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-145844</link>
		<dc:creator>RonP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-145844</guid>
		<description>seriously suebob - we can have this debate or foodfight precisely because of things like YouTube (technology) &#38; FoxNews (media).  get it.  the fun is the subjective interpretation of events by both sides.  i will take thedude anyday over scolds like yourself.  at least he (making a sexist assumption )has an opinion.  

and isn't that the point of this blog?  that traditional media is de-constructing into configurations that are not quite comfortable for the mainstream.  your statement reminds me of so much media i have ignored for so many years now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seriously suebob - we can have this debate or foodfight precisely because of things like YouTube (technology) &amp; FoxNews (media).  get it.  the fun is the subjective interpretation of events by both sides.  i will take thedude anyday over scolds like yourself.  at least he (making a sexist assumption )has an opinion.  </p>
<p>and isn&#8217;t that the point of this blog?  that traditional media is de-constructing into configurations that are not quite comfortable for the mainstream.  your statement reminds me of so much media i have ignored for so many years now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yoyo</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-145839</link>
		<dc:creator>yoyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-145839</guid>
		<description>suebob,
    talk away or press the down key, it's that easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>suebob,<br />
    talk away or press the down key, it&#8217;s that easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RonP</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-145823</link>
		<dc:creator>RonP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/09/26/idiots/#comment-145823</guid>
		<description>who made SueBob the hall monitor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who made SueBob the hall monitor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
