<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC PC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/10/14/bbc-pc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/10/14/bbc-pc/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:23:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken vs. the City &#187; BBC&#8217;s published Israel-Palestine style guide</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/10/14/bbc-pc/#comment-166131</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken vs. the City &#187; BBC&#8217;s published Israel-Palestine style guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/10/14/bbc-pc/#comment-166131</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more&#8230; (via BuzzMachine) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more&#8230; (via BuzzMachine) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/10/14/bbc-pc/#comment-163456</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/10/14/bbc-pc/#comment-163456</guid>
		<description>Publicly funded organisations like the BBC should assume their job is to be open. 

However I understand the downside of revealing all.  Should a reporter choose to deviate from guidelines to improve the way they communicate with the audience it may invite a maelstrom of criticism which is hard to defend.    

Prescribed language tends to become meaningless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Publicly funded organisations like the BBC should assume their job is to be open. </p>
<p>However I understand the downside of revealing all.  Should a reporter choose to deviate from guidelines to improve the way they communicate with the audience it may invite a maelstrom of criticism which is hard to defend.    </p>
<p>Prescribed language tends to become meaningless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kat</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/10/14/bbc-pc/#comment-162815</link>
		<dc:creator>kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/10/14/bbc-pc/#comment-162815</guid>
		<description>Meanwhile, they try to hide the truth--that they are biased.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/10/15/nbeeb15.xml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, they try to hide the truth&#8211;that they are biased.<br />
<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/10/15/nbeeb15.xml" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/10/15/nbeeb15.xml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Banner</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/10/14/bbc-pc/#comment-161656</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Banner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 02:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/10/14/bbc-pc/#comment-161656</guid>
		<description>@ Michael,

Sarcasm....right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Michael,</p>
<p>Sarcasm&#8230;.right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Rosenblum</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/10/14/bbc-pc/#comment-161613</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rosenblum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 00:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/10/14/bbc-pc/#comment-161613</guid>
		<description>If only American news organizations were so thoughtful and so careful in their work.  Do you think they agonize in the same way over stuff like this at Fox or Good Morning America?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only American news organizations were so thoughtful and so careful in their work.  Do you think they agonize in the same way over stuff like this at Fox or Good Morning America?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Marks</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/10/14/bbc-pc/#comment-161589</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 23:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/10/14/bbc-pc/#comment-161589</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://epeus.blogspot.com/2006/10/bbc-and-insurgents.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The BBC has been doing this for a while&lt;/a&gt;
George Orwell wrote in 1944:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Nearly all human beings feel that a thing becomes different if you call it by a different name. Thus when the Spanish civil war broke out the B.B.C. produced the name &quot;Insurgents&quot; for Franco&#039;s followers. This covered the fact that they were rebels while making the rebellion sound respectable.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://epeus.blogspot.com/2006/10/bbc-and-insurgents.html" rel="nofollow">The BBC has been doing this for a while</a><br />
George Orwell wrote in 1944:</p>
<blockquote><p>Nearly all human beings feel that a thing becomes different if you call it by a different name. Thus when the Spanish civil war broke out the B.B.C. produced the name &#8220;Insurgents&#8221; for Franco&#8217;s followers. This covered the fact that they were rebels while making the rebellion sound respectable.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

