<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google and newspapers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/07/google-and-newspapers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/07/google-and-newspapers/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin Stabe &#187; links for 2006-11-08</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/07/google-and-newspapers/#comment-189416</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe &#187; links for 2006-11-08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 17:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/07/google-and-newspapers/#comment-189416</guid>
		<description>[...] BuzzMachine: Google and newspapers &#8220;Google is a reality. Arguing about whether it is friend or foe will do no more good than sitting back and watching it do what you should be doing.&#8221; (tags: google newspapers advertising classifieds societyofeditors) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BuzzMachine: Google and newspapers &#8220;Google is a reality. Arguing about whether it is friend or foe will do no more good than sitting back and watching it do what you should be doing.&#8221; (tags: google newspapers advertising classifieds societyofeditors) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 Television &#187; More Web2.0Newspaper Links Than Anyone Could Ever Want</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/07/google-and-newspapers/#comment-188324</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 Television &#187; More Web2.0Newspaper Links Than Anyone Could Ever Want</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 23:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/07/google-and-newspapers/#comment-188324</guid>
		<description>[...] Posts are forthcoming on the following: the Society of Editors Conference in Glasgow (see Roy Greenslade, Fleet Street 2.0), at which attending editors and journos are buzzing about the Google print ad test run project (more today on that via Poynter&#39;s Jim Romenesko, Mathew Ingram and BuzzMachine); Gannett&#39;s newsroom convergence (see E-Media Tidbits, Editors Weblog , Editor and Publisher and Wired); and the BBC&#39;s local stations plans to buy content from local and regional newspapers (BuzzMachine &#38; Wordblog, also see the Wordblog post on print and broadcast journalism training convergence). &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posts are forthcoming on the following: the Society of Editors Conference in Glasgow (see Roy Greenslade, Fleet Street 2.0), at which attending editors and journos are buzzing about the Google print ad test run project (more today on that via Poynter&#39;s Jim Romenesko, Mathew Ingram and BuzzMachine); Gannett&#39;s newsroom convergence (see E-Media Tidbits, Editors Weblog , Editor and Publisher and Wired); and the BBC&#39;s local stations plans to buy content from local and regional newspapers (BuzzMachine &amp; Wordblog, also see the Wordblog post on print and broadcast journalism training convergence). &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todd williams</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/07/google-and-newspapers/#comment-188036</link>
		<dc:creator>todd williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 15:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/07/google-and-newspapers/#comment-188036</guid>
		<description>What to do, what to do?

The Google announcement should come as no surprise to anyone, in the business or not.

Googleâ€™s auction operation will now take bids for newspaper ads for fifty major newspapers around the country â€“ and itâ€™s the big guys:  Gannett, Hearst, and the 
Tribune companies to name a few.

A three-month test?  Now letâ€™s slow the boat down for a minute.  Letâ€™s see what we have here.  We have an industry with losses in every profit center, i.e. retail, advertising, national advertising, circulation, and letâ€™s not forget the biggest loser â€“ classified.  Many of these losses can be directly tied to the machine we call Google. 

Here is the part I really like â€“ "The new system will begin a test with 100 advertisers.  Google will not earn any revenue during this test."

Okay, so we have 100 advertisers, theoretically and potentially new business for Google, and these advertisers are going to be handed to us â€“ no cost, no obligation â€“ for a period of three months.  What happens after that?

I read an article the other day that said newspapers need to quit worrying about making Wall Street happy and start concentrating their efforts on cultivating their customers.  How true. 

That said, the Google newspaper test will provide much needed revenue for these papers, develop a revenue model for all to follow, and Google will make it easy for publishers to reap the revenue.  My prediction?  We wont read much more about this marriage.  It will quietly continue; no big announcements or fanfare.  Other players that were not a part of the pilot program will want their piece and Google will be happy to give it to them.  And you guessed it â€“ Wall Street will be happy again.

The obvious question: is this good for the newspaper industry?  This author thinks it depends on which newspaper industry weâ€™re taking about.  If weâ€™re discussing the business that once was the breakfast staple of America, then no. If weâ€™re talking about Wall Street, then yes.

Now is not the time for blame, what-ifs, or whys.  Now is the time to figure out who and what is important.  If you are a publicly traded company, good luck.  I donâ€™t see an out for you guys.  Your bankers want return, plain and simple.  If you are a privately held company, then you have to move if you arenâ€™t already. 

Just a couple of years ago I was a marketing director for a large group of weeklies.  We had a mantra, so to speak.  It was "Back to Basics" and although we couldnâ€™t ever truly embrace this concept, the newspaper owners and managers of today, must!

Start with your customers â€“ simply put, the reader and the advertiser.  What do they want and how are you going to get it to them?  Work on identifying the needs, remove roadblocks, forget the old business model, and move forward.  Itâ€™s not going to be easy, but as a newspaper industry veteran and even longer newspaper reader, I believe it will be worth it.  I look forward to the day when newspapers can say the report of my death has been greatly exaggerated.

********
Todd Williams spent thirty years in the newspaper business. He is now the owner of Noapples.com, an award winning newspaper website development firm and administrator of GreatNewspapers.com.  He can be reached at todd@greatnewspapers.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What to do, what to do?</p>
<p>The Google announcement should come as no surprise to anyone, in the business or not.</p>
<p>Googleâ€™s auction operation will now take bids for newspaper ads for fifty major newspapers around the country â€“ and itâ€™s the big guys:  Gannett, Hearst, and the<br />
Tribune companies to name a few.</p>
<p>A three-month test?  Now letâ€™s slow the boat down for a minute.  Letâ€™s see what we have here.  We have an industry with losses in every profit center, i.e. retail, advertising, national advertising, circulation, and letâ€™s not forget the biggest loser â€“ classified.  Many of these losses can be directly tied to the machine we call Google. </p>
<p>Here is the part I really like â€“ &#8220;The new system will begin a test with 100 advertisers.  Google will not earn any revenue during this test.&#8221;</p>
<p>Okay, so we have 100 advertisers, theoretically and potentially new business for Google, and these advertisers are going to be handed to us â€“ no cost, no obligation â€“ for a period of three months.  What happens after that?</p>
<p>I read an article the other day that said newspapers need to quit worrying about making Wall Street happy and start concentrating their efforts on cultivating their customers.  How true. </p>
<p>That said, the Google newspaper test will provide much needed revenue for these papers, develop a revenue model for all to follow, and Google will make it easy for publishers to reap the revenue.  My prediction?  We wont read much more about this marriage.  It will quietly continue; no big announcements or fanfare.  Other players that were not a part of the pilot program will want their piece and Google will be happy to give it to them.  And you guessed it â€“ Wall Street will be happy again.</p>
<p>The obvious question: is this good for the newspaper industry?  This author thinks it depends on which newspaper industry weâ€™re taking about.  If weâ€™re discussing the business that once was the breakfast staple of America, then no. If weâ€™re talking about Wall Street, then yes.</p>
<p>Now is not the time for blame, what-ifs, or whys.  Now is the time to figure out who and what is important.  If you are a publicly traded company, good luck.  I donâ€™t see an out for you guys.  Your bankers want return, plain and simple.  If you are a privately held company, then you have to move if you arenâ€™t already. </p>
<p>Just a couple of years ago I was a marketing director for a large group of weeklies.  We had a mantra, so to speak.  It was &#8220;Back to Basics&#8221; and although we couldnâ€™t ever truly embrace this concept, the newspaper owners and managers of today, must!</p>
<p>Start with your customers â€“ simply put, the reader and the advertiser.  What do they want and how are you going to get it to them?  Work on identifying the needs, remove roadblocks, forget the old business model, and move forward.  Itâ€™s not going to be easy, but as a newspaper industry veteran and even longer newspaper reader, I believe it will be worth it.  I look forward to the day when newspapers can say the report of my death has been greatly exaggerated.</p>
<p>********<br />
Todd Williams spent thirty years in the newspaper business. He is now the owner of Noapples.com, an award winning newspaper website development firm and administrator of GreatNewspapers.com.  He can be reached at <a href="mailto:todd@greatnewspapers.com">todd@greatnewspapers.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shakeup Media &#187; Google paper</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/07/google-and-newspapers/#comment-187932</link>
		<dc:creator>Shakeup Media &#187; Google paper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 13:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/07/google-and-newspapers/#comment-187932</guid>
		<description>[...] Everyone&#8217;s talking about it but its not that surprising, or at least it shouldn&#8217;t be: Google is stepping into the newspaper arena.Â  They are vying hard to become the long-tail vacuum of old media, sucking up all the ad space that newspapers dont sell on their own, selling it for slightly cheaper and keeping a cut (probably about 20% but no one really knows and they won&#8217;t get a thing in the initial three month trial that was announced yesterday).Â  That Google has extended their &#8216;media buyer&#8217; role into traditional media is less than shocking, first of all because they have tried (and failed) before only with magazines; second of all its a pretty logical extension of the web advertising business that is the core cash cow of the Google business as a whole.Â  They will of course try to extend the web metric system, with all its fancy the built in feedback loops, into the newspaper advertising business. Everyone is already braying about the web showing newspapers yet again how to innovate and its a hard thing to refute, in what world are all those huge newspaper businesses in the States not to pick up on this opportunity?Â  Its embarassing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Everyone&#8217;s talking about it but its not that surprising, or at least it shouldn&#8217;t be: Google is stepping into the newspaper arena.Â  They are vying hard to become the long-tail vacuum of old media, sucking up all the ad space that newspapers dont sell on their own, selling it for slightly cheaper and keeping a cut (probably about 20% but no one really knows and they won&#8217;t get a thing in the initial three month trial that was announced yesterday).Â  That Google has extended their &#8216;media buyer&#8217; role into traditional media is less than shocking, first of all because they have tried (and failed) before only with magazines; second of all its a pretty logical extension of the web advertising business that is the core cash cow of the Google business as a whole.Â  They will of course try to extend the web metric system, with all its fancy the built in feedback loops, into the newspaper advertising business. Everyone is already braying about the web showing newspapers yet again how to innovate and its a hard thing to refute, in what world are all those huge newspaper businesses in the States not to pick up on this opportunity?Â  Its embarassing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
