http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/09/the-stewardship-of-journalisms-future/ by Jeff Jarvis Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:30:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/09/the-stewardship-of-journalisms-future/#comment-195156 Confused Of Calcutta » Blog Archive » On hurricanes and windmills and independent bloggers Mon, 13 Nov 2006 00:39:48 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2187#comment-195156 [...] Doc made some fascinating points while commenting on Jeff Jarvis’s post The Stewardship of Journalism’s Future. Read both the posts, they’re well worth it. Some examples: [...] [...] Doc made some fascinating points while commenting on Jeff Jarvis’s post The Stewardship of Journalism’s Future. Read both the posts, they’re well worth it. Some examples: [...]

]]> http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/09/the-stewardship-of-journalisms-future/#comment-194911 BuzzMachine » Blog Archive » Journalism’s stewards and inventors Sun, 12 Nov 2006 20:08:35 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2187#comment-194911 [...] Doc Searls responds to my fretting about the stewardship of the future of journalism, below, joining the call for more invention in news: We need more tools like RSS, and more people using them, in more creative ways. Most of all, we need more journalists (of both new and aged vintages) to take advantage of these new tools and methods. Once they do, the business will follow. . . . [...] [...] Doc Searls responds to my fretting about the stewardship of the future of journalism, below, joining the call for more invention in news: We need more tools like RSS, and more people using them, in more creative ways. Most of all, we need more journalists (of both new and aged vintages) to take advantage of these new tools and methods. Once they do, the business will follow. . . . [...]

]]> http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/09/the-stewardship-of-journalisms-future/#comment-194859 Kokonet - Internet Point » Blog Archive » Follow the lack of money Sun, 12 Nov 2006 19:07:28 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2187#comment-194859 [...] Follow the lack of money Jeff Jarvis is looking for better stewards of journalism’s future. He explains, I don’t see enough development going on in new news efforts — enough to save journalism from the sinking news business. And that’s what’s troubling me. The old players are proving to be quite ineffective stewards — we knew that — but there aren’t enough new stewards joining the church. [...] [...] Follow the lack of money Jeff Jarvis is looking for better stewards of journalism’s future. He explains, I don’t see enough development going on in new news efforts — enough to save journalism from the sinking news business. And that’s what’s troubling me. The old players are proving to be quite ineffective stewards — we knew that — but there aren’t enough new stewards joining the church. [...]

]]> http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/09/the-stewardship-of-journalisms-future/#comment-194803 Doc Searls Sun, 12 Nov 2006 18:16:10 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2187#comment-194803 My short response is <a href="http://doc.weblogs.com/2006/11/12#becauseTheresNoMoneyInIt" rel="nofollow">here</a>. My longer one is <a href="http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/1000122" rel="nofollow">here</a>. My short response is here. My longer one is here.

]]> http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/09/the-stewardship-of-journalisms-future/#comment-190898 ABC Digital Futures » Blog Archive » Who’s looking after the future of news? Thu, 09 Nov 2006 23:51:09 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2187#comment-190898 [...] Over at buzzmachine, Jeff Jarvis says he’s “obnoxiously optimistic about the future of news: the definitions of it are exploding along with the new means to gather, share, judge it. I am confident that the public wants news; the society demands to be informed.” [...] [...] Over at buzzmachine, Jeff Jarvis says he’s “obnoxiously optimistic about the future of news: the definitions of it are exploding along with the new means to gather, share, judge it. I am confident that the public wants news; the society demands to be informed.” [...]

]]> http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/09/the-stewardship-of-journalisms-future/#comment-190688 jb Thu, 09 Nov 2006 20:34:49 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2187#comment-190688 Boy Toys? You're hopelessly naive if you think Broad and Burkle are on an ego trip in their desire to own the LA Times. Broad and Burkle have a political agenda -- electing Hillary Clinton. The only "toy" they are interested in playing with is U.S. foreign and domestic policy, and they would use the Times to help make sure that happens. Boy Toys? You’re hopelessly naive if you think Broad and Burkle are on an ego trip in their desire to own the LA Times. Broad and Burkle have a political agenda — electing Hillary Clinton. The only “toy” they are interested in playing with is U.S. foreign and domestic policy, and they would use the Times to help make sure that happens.

]]> http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/09/the-stewardship-of-journalisms-future/#comment-190578 A Reader Thu, 09 Nov 2006 18:36:36 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/?p=2187#comment-190578 Jeff, there seem to be a lot of used newspaper editors suddenly (Carroll, Baquet, Bennett). What should they do with themselves? Jeff, there seem to be a lot of used newspaper editors suddenly (Carroll, Baquet, Bennett). What should they do with themselves?

]]>