<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The lesser of evils</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/13/the-lesser-of-evils/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/13/the-lesser-of-evils/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:21:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Beta Alfa 2.0 &#187; ReviewMe lÃ¥ter annonsÃ¶rer mÃ¶ta bloggosfÃ¤ren</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/13/the-lesser-of-evils/#comment-197376</link>
		<dc:creator>Beta Alfa 2.0 &#187; ReviewMe lÃ¥ter annonsÃ¶rer mÃ¶ta bloggosfÃ¤ren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/13/the-lesser-of-evils/#comment-197376</guid>
		<description>[...] Andra bloggar om: bloggosfÃ¤ren, marknadsfÃ¶ring, bloggreklam, reviewme. BuzzMachine: The lesser of evils (upp)BuzzMachine: Word of my mouth (upp) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Andra bloggar om: bloggosfÃ¤ren, marknadsfÃ¶ring, bloggreklam, reviewme. BuzzMachine: The lesser of evils (upp)BuzzMachine: Word of my mouth (upp) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Zero Boss</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/13/the-lesser-of-evils/#comment-196568</link>
		<dc:creator>The Zero Boss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/13/the-lesser-of-evils/#comment-196568</guid>
		<description>Tony, I gave three explicit reasons for not wanting to take the $125. If you disagree with those reasons, that&#039;s cool. It&#039;s a personal decision. But I don&#039;t see where I was unclear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony, I gave three explicit reasons for not wanting to take the $125. If you disagree with those reasons, that&#8217;s cool. It&#8217;s a personal decision. But I don&#8217;t see where I was unclear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/13/the-lesser-of-evils/#comment-196156</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/13/the-lesser-of-evils/#comment-196156</guid>
		<description>unfortunately i will have to disagree with you on this one Jeff.

youre one for transparency, and youre one for businesses embracing this new media in new ways. so why be against a form of advertising that&#039;s more than just &quot;drink Coke&quot; which actually pays the bloggers for actually reviewing the Coke?

i dont see how it&#039;s &quot;telling us what to write about&quot; when bloggers of the service have the choice *not* to review the product(s). to me it sounds like merely an opportunity to get paid for writing about a product in an honest way, since negative reviews are paid as well.

and no offense to Zero Boss, but i didn&#039;t find his post all that great, and i still don&#039;t really understand why he didn&#039;t charge the company the $125 he was offered even after he signed up and then reviewed the product.  

in my mind he provided an opinion, was honest, and transparent.  id much rather have that sort of content on a blog page, than say, generic Yahoo or Adsense ads that are on the right of this blog, with all due respect. because at least the blogger is actually acknowledging some awareness with the product hes getting paid to present on his holy blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unfortunately i will have to disagree with you on this one Jeff.</p>
<p>youre one for transparency, and youre one for businesses embracing this new media in new ways. so why be against a form of advertising that&#8217;s more than just &#8220;drink Coke&#8221; which actually pays the bloggers for actually reviewing the Coke?</p>
<p>i dont see how it&#8217;s &#8220;telling us what to write about&#8221; when bloggers of the service have the choice *not* to review the product(s). to me it sounds like merely an opportunity to get paid for writing about a product in an honest way, since negative reviews are paid as well.</p>
<p>and no offense to Zero Boss, but i didn&#8217;t find his post all that great, and i still don&#8217;t really understand why he didn&#8217;t charge the company the $125 he was offered even after he signed up and then reviewed the product.  </p>
<p>in my mind he provided an opinion, was honest, and transparent.  id much rather have that sort of content on a blog page, than say, generic Yahoo or Adsense ads that are on the right of this blog, with all due respect. because at least the blogger is actually acknowledging some awareness with the product hes getting paid to present on his holy blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brem</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/13/the-lesser-of-evils/#comment-196106</link>
		<dc:creator>brem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/13/the-lesser-of-evils/#comment-196106</guid>
		<description>Can someone explain to me what is so different from paper media?
Journalist are paid to talk about a product, ALREADY. Only, they not always mention they do. 

If anything, ReviewMe has the virtue of introducing some ethics into a pratice that has long existed and will exist for a long time to come, no matter what anybody says.

brem of martinbreton.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone explain to me what is so different from paper media?<br />
Journalist are paid to talk about a product, ALREADY. Only, they not always mention they do. </p>
<p>If anything, ReviewMe has the virtue of introducing some ethics into a pratice that has long existed and will exist for a long time to come, no matter what anybody says.</p>
<p>brem of martinbreton.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

