<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No cigar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/28/2247/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/28/2247/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:31:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: In defense of the Pulitzer Prizes &#171; Korr Values</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/28/2247/#comment-411987</link>
		<dc:creator>In defense of the Pulitzer Prizes &#171; Korr Values</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/28/2247/#comment-411987</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis has written several posts criticizing various aspects of the Pulitzer Prizes and culture (distilled: they turn [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis has written several posts criticizing various aspects of the Pulitzer Prizes and culture (distilled: they turn [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seks izle</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/28/2247/#comment-397851</link>
		<dc:creator>seks izle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/28/2247/#comment-397851</guid>
		<description>Reporting in recent years you think didn’t necessarily serve their communities and skewed the priorities of the newsrooms that produced them? I don’t think the problem is the stories that win (which you imply when you say “I’m not saying all Pulitzer-winning journalism is bad”). The problem is when understaffed, poorly-directed and under-talented newsrooms forget their primary mission and aim for prizes instead of aiming for good journalism</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reporting in recent years you think didn’t necessarily serve their communities and skewed the priorities of the newsrooms that produced them? I don’t think the problem is the stories that win (which you imply when you say “I’m not saying all Pulitzer-winning journalism is bad”). The problem is when understaffed, poorly-directed and under-talented newsrooms forget their primary mission and aim for prizes instead of aiming for good journalism</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What makes Sammy report?</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/28/2247/#comment-223716</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What makes Sammy report?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 11:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/28/2247/#comment-223716</guid>
		<description>[...] 3. Winning prizes. I say that reporters and especially editors are all too motivated by prizes, to the sacrifice of simple service to their communities. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 3. Winning prizes. I say that reporters and especially editors are all too motivated by prizes, to the sacrifice of simple service to their communities. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Andersen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/28/2247/#comment-220022</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Andersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/28/2247/#comment-220022</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m wondering which Pulitzers for reporting in recent years you think didn&#039;t necessarily serve their communities and skewed the priorities of the newsrooms that produced them? I don&#039;t think the problem is the stories that win (which you imply when you say &quot;I&#039;m not saying all Pulitzer-winning journalism is bad&quot;). The problem is when understaffed, poorly-directed and under-talented newsrooms forget their primary mission and aim for prizes instead of aiming for good journalism (which you imply when you say the Pulitzer has been a dangerous influence)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wondering which Pulitzers for reporting in recent years you think didn&#8217;t necessarily serve their communities and skewed the priorities of the newsrooms that produced them? I don&#8217;t think the problem is the stories that win (which you imply when you say &#8220;I&#8217;m not saying all Pulitzer-winning journalism is bad&#8221;). The problem is when understaffed, poorly-directed and under-talented newsrooms forget their primary mission and aim for prizes instead of aiming for good journalism (which you imply when you say the Pulitzer has been a dangerous influence)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Stabe &#187; links for 2006-11-30</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/28/2247/#comment-217788</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe &#187; links for 2006-11-30</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 08:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/28/2247/#comment-217788</guid>
		<description>[...] BuzzMachine: No cigar Jeff Jarvis: &#8220;I thought the Pulitzers existed to award journalism, not printing.&#8221; (tags: journalism printing pulitzer_prize) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BuzzMachine: No cigar Jeff Jarvis: &#8220;I thought the Pulitzers existed to award journalism, not printing.&#8221; (tags: journalism printing pulitzer_prize) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PULITZER PRIZES MYOPIA at WHAT&#8217;S NEXT: INNOVATIONS IN NEWSPAPERS</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/28/2247/#comment-217704</link>
		<dc:creator>PULITZER PRIZES MYOPIA at WHAT&#8217;S NEXT: INNOVATIONS IN NEWSPAPERS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/28/2247/#comment-217704</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis says that &#8220;the Pulitzer Prize has long been a dangerous influence in American journalism, and itâ€™s only getting worse.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis says that &#8220;the Pulitzer Prize has long been a dangerous influence in American journalism, and itâ€™s only getting worse.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beta Alfa 2.0 &#187; Prisade bloggar och en gris</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/28/2247/#comment-216871</link>
		<dc:creator>Beta Alfa 2.0 &#187; Prisade bloggar och en gris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/28/2247/#comment-216871</guid>
		<description>[...] BuzzMachine: No cigar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BuzzMachine: No cigar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Drees</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/28/2247/#comment-216590</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Drees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/28/2247/#comment-216590</guid>
		<description>Does anyone remember the name of the prize for the best buggy whip manufacturer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone remember the name of the prize for the best buggy whip manufacturer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delilah</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/28/2247/#comment-216222</link>
		<dc:creator>Delilah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 07:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/28/2247/#comment-216222</guid>
		<description>To Stephen.... Haven&#039;t you even taken a course in writing? CATCHY HEADLINES AND TITLES!!!! You don&#039;t like it... don&#039;t read it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Stephen&#8230;. Haven&#8217;t you even taken a course in writing? CATCHY HEADLINES AND TITLES!!!! You don&#8217;t like it&#8230; don&#8217;t read it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/28/2247/#comment-216156</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 06:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/28/2247/#comment-216156</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t you drop the cute headlines and title your posts in a way that readers can tell more-or-less what the post is about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t you drop the cute headlines and title your posts in a way that readers can tell more-or-less what the post is about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

