<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reporting for HuffPo&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:27:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The American Mind / Huffington Post to Start Original Reporting</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/#comment-219978</link>
		<dc:creator>The American Mind / Huffington Post to Start Original Reporting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/#comment-219978</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis writes, Itâ€™s the next step for HuffPo and the blogosphere, to add more original reporting as it becomes worthwhile to do so. And itâ€™s the next step for more and more institutional journalists to venture into the future&#8230;. Note, too, that it will soon be more difficult to tell the difference between old and new, as blogs and reporting and reporters blog. Itâ€™s all news. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis writes, Itâ€™s the next step for HuffPo and the blogosphere, to add more original reporting as it becomes worthwhile to do so. And itâ€™s the next step for more and more institutional journalists to venture into the future&#8230;. Note, too, that it will soon be more difficult to tell the difference between old and new, as blogs and reporting and reporters blog. Itâ€™s all news. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/#comment-219543</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 14:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/#comment-219543</guid>
		<description>Hey wait...new media is now hiring editors to to tell us what we&#039;re supposed to pay attention to? I thought we were here to crucify big old media for doing the same thing.

Stop confusing us, Jeff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey wait&#8230;new media is now hiring editors to to tell us what we&#8217;re supposed to pay attention to? I thought we were here to crucify big old media for doing the same thing.</p>
<p>Stop confusing us, Jeff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Staten Island guy</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/#comment-218816</link>
		<dc:creator>Staten Island guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 00:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/#comment-218816</guid>
		<description>&quot;Almost everything on HuffPo, even Dershowitzâ€™s defenestration of Carterâ€™s book, reeks of cheap perfume and the fashion runway.&quot;

WE HAVE A WINNER!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Almost everything on HuffPo, even Dershowitzâ€™s defenestration of Carterâ€™s book, reeks of cheap perfume and the fashion runway.&#8221;</p>
<p>WE HAVE A WINNER!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daveinboca</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/#comment-218803</link>
		<dc:creator>daveinboca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 00:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/#comment-218803</guid>
		<description>Arianna&#039;s political migration right across the spectrum from red to deep ultraviolet plus her fascination with socialites and celebs put her on a par with Cindy Adams as a commentator.

She&#039;s been tinkering with avenues into the US mainstream since way back when she wrote a book about Maria Callas.

Almost everything on HuffPo, even Dershowitz&#039;s defenestration of Carter&#039;s book, reeks of cheap perfume and the fashion runway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arianna&#8217;s political migration right across the spectrum from red to deep ultraviolet plus her fascination with socialites and celebs put her on a par with Cindy Adams as a commentator.</p>
<p>She&#8217;s been tinkering with avenues into the US mainstream since way back when she wrote a book about Maria Callas.</p>
<p>Almost everything on HuffPo, even Dershowitz&#8217;s defenestration of Carter&#8217;s book, reeks of cheap perfume and the fashion runway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Staten Island guy</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/#comment-218555</link>
		<dc:creator>Staten Island guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/#comment-218555</guid>
		<description>So, Zsa-Zsa is now PAYING for politically-aimed blurbs with a Hollywood veneer of &quot;reporting&quot; glossed over the obvious motivational tilt....

You teaching this as the &quot;Web 2.0&quot; way to go in your classes at CUNY, Jeffey?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Zsa-Zsa is now PAYING for politically-aimed blurbs with a Hollywood veneer of &#8220;reporting&#8221; glossed over the obvious motivational tilt&#8230;.</p>
<p>You teaching this as the &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; way to go in your classes at CUNY, Jeffey?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hepzeeba</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/#comment-218403</link>
		<dc:creator>Hepzeeba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/#comment-218403</guid>
		<description>Love the &quot;seamless&quot; transition from old media to new.

Hate that this venture is sponsored by Arianna Huffington, a relentlessly vocal political operative for the Democrats--it taints the product.

Will these journalists still be considered &quot;objective&quot;&quot;?
Will we expect them to be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the &#8220;seamless&#8221; transition from old media to new.</p>
<p>Hate that this venture is sponsored by Arianna Huffington, a relentlessly vocal political operative for the Democrats&#8211;it taints the product.</p>
<p>Will these journalists still be considered &#8220;objective&#8221;"?<br />
Will we expect them to be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/#comment-218220</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/#comment-218220</guid>
		<description>Please hire the War Room guys from salon.com! Rescue them from Salon&#039;s descent into icky, navel-gazing pap! I&#039;ve often said if the War Room spun off I&#039;d send my premiumn subscription money straight to them. As it is, I&#039;ve long since let my sub run out (and the gift sub I&#039;d been giving for two years).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please hire the War Room guys from salon.com! Rescue them from Salon&#8217;s descent into icky, navel-gazing pap! I&#8217;ve often said if the War Room spun off I&#8217;d send my premiumn subscription money straight to them. As it is, I&#8217;ve long since let my sub run out (and the gift sub I&#8217;d been giving for two years).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grayson</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/#comment-218215</link>
		<dc:creator>Grayson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/#comment-218215</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m waiting for when we see a &quot;real&quot; journalist come out of the comedy industry. Heck, I hear that&#039;s already happening on cable. There goes your alt media revolution, Mr. J. Now run go catch-up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m waiting for when we see a &#8220;real&#8221; journalist come out of the comedy industry. Heck, I hear that&#8217;s already happening on cable. There goes your alt media revolution, Mr. J. Now run go catch-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooklyn Kitchen</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/#comment-218204</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooklyn Kitchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/#comment-218204</guid>
		<description>This is not surprising. The HuffPo is making a natural transition into newswriting after proving itself as a blog/opinion comodity. It&#039;s faux-liberal stance has won it a readership, the readership attracted advertisers, and now they will use the ad money to hire and pay reporters. This was probably the goal all along, an attempt to bootstrap a supposedly alternative media outlet into the mainstream. It is a very savvy use of new media! 

Nonetheless, I dislike the HuffPo as a poor representation of the American left. Its worshipful obsession with entertainment figures and celebrity wealth undermines its supposed politics and reveals its &#039;liberal&#039; stance as something of a weak, limp-wristed pose. If things progress, news reports will run alongside the HuffPo&#039;s opinion columns and the news will lend credibility to the party-line opinion. Consequently more supposedly progressive readers will be attracted to this watered-down swill, considering it an alternative to the big-money media of yore.

But the HuffPo&#039;s no more of a threat to the political situation in this country than the New York Times opinion section. Both are mainstream reassurances of the status quo, platitudes that satisfy one&#039;s inner revolutionary.  All-in-all, very dull stuff.  

That said, it&#039;s hard for me to believe the hype about how new media will revolutionize the way news is produced and distributed, when it very quickly falls into line with the same-old-shit that we&#039;ve always known. The new editor coming as she does from established media sources, is hardly a HuffPo challenge to old media, it&#039;s more of a capitulation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not surprising. The HuffPo is making a natural transition into newswriting after proving itself as a blog/opinion comodity. It&#8217;s faux-liberal stance has won it a readership, the readership attracted advertisers, and now they will use the ad money to hire and pay reporters. This was probably the goal all along, an attempt to bootstrap a supposedly alternative media outlet into the mainstream. It is a very savvy use of new media! </p>
<p>Nonetheless, I dislike the HuffPo as a poor representation of the American left. Its worshipful obsession with entertainment figures and celebrity wealth undermines its supposed politics and reveals its &#8216;liberal&#8217; stance as something of a weak, limp-wristed pose. If things progress, news reports will run alongside the HuffPo&#8217;s opinion columns and the news will lend credibility to the party-line opinion. Consequently more supposedly progressive readers will be attracted to this watered-down swill, considering it an alternative to the big-money media of yore.</p>
<p>But the HuffPo&#8217;s no more of a threat to the political situation in this country than the New York Times opinion section. Both are mainstream reassurances of the status quo, platitudes that satisfy one&#8217;s inner revolutionary.  All-in-all, very dull stuff.  </p>
<p>That said, it&#8217;s hard for me to believe the hype about how new media will revolutionize the way news is produced and distributed, when it very quickly falls into line with the same-old-shit that we&#8217;ve always known. The new editor coming as she does from established media sources, is hardly a HuffPo challenge to old media, it&#8217;s more of a capitulation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffreyW</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/#comment-218145</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffreyW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/11/30/reporting-for-huffpo/#comment-218145</guid>
		<description>&quot;The HuffPo editor, Melinda Henneberger, comes out of Newsweek and The New York Times.&quot;

She&#039;ll fit right in!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The HuffPo editor, Melinda Henneberger, comes out of Newsweek and The New York Times.&#8221;</p>
<p>She&#8217;ll fit right in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

