Comments on: Nastier and nastier http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/12/21/nastier-and-nastier/ by Jeff Jarvis Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:24:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Eric http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/12/21/nastier-and-nastier/#comment-244855 Eric Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:42:12 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/12/21/nastier-and-nastier/#comment-244855 All quite unseemly, yes, but very entertaining. All quite unseemly, yes, but very entertaining.

]]> By: PSGInfinity http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/12/21/nastier-and-nastier/#comment-244680 PSGInfinity Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:26:51 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/12/21/nastier-and-nastier/#comment-244680 ...So i suppose I should root for both to 'lose'. Speaking of losing; one or the other could 'lose', or they could both end up 'losing' (however we choose do define it). Q: Is a win/win scenario out there? …So i suppose I should root for both to ‘lose’.

Speaking of losing; one or the other could ‘lose’, or they could both end up ‘losing’ (however we choose do define it). Q: Is a win/win scenario out there?

]]> By: Gamara http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/12/21/nastier-and-nastier/#comment-244671 Gamara Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:04:00 +0000 http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/12/21/nastier-and-nastier/#comment-244671 Judith Regan and Rupert Murdoch are a couple of Mothrafuckers. Judith Regan and Rupert Murdoch are a couple of Mothrafuckers.

]]>