<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtual numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/12/26/virtual-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/12/26/virtual-numbers/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:11:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/12/26/virtual-numbers/#comment-250495</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 06:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/12/26/virtual-numbers/#comment-250495</guid>
		<description>The claim of uniformity comes from MSM - I&#039;m just accepting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The claim of uniformity comes from MSM &#8211; I&#8217;m just accepting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barney Lerten</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/12/26/virtual-numbers/#comment-250494</link>
		<dc:creator>Barney Lerten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 06:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/12/26/virtual-numbers/#comment-250494</guid>
		<description>One thing missing from the tale is Wired magazine&#039;s &quot;tour guide,&quot; which I&#039;m sure touted some of the numbers.
Another missing thing is the 25th letter of the alphabet - WHY don&#039;t folks who sign up use it? And I recall a posting to a breathless BizWeek piece on SL online, where a lady expressed her frustration about how every time they upgraded the program, she had to upgrade her video card.
 I have a 14-month-old computer and it doesn&#039;t meet the minimum SL requirements for a video card (integrated graphics). I&#039;ll get a card, as will many to hit the mainstream middle ground for Vista. But I&#039;m sure that&#039;s a big reason why there are more sign-ups than users - they don&#039;t set a minimum requirement (or even a fee!) to sign up, and folks don&#039;t check out the system requirements first.
 I&#039;m no gamer or I&#039;d be going for the latest overclocked liquid-cooled thingamabobs. But Iwould like to dive into this virtual world, and they&#039;ve simply set the bar too high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing missing from the tale is Wired magazine&#8217;s &#8220;tour guide,&#8221; which I&#8217;m sure touted some of the numbers.<br />
Another missing thing is the 25th letter of the alphabet &#8211; WHY don&#8217;t folks who sign up use it? And I recall a posting to a breathless BizWeek piece on SL online, where a lady expressed her frustration about how every time they upgraded the program, she had to upgrade her video card.<br />
 I have a 14-month-old computer and it doesn&#8217;t meet the minimum SL requirements for a video card (integrated graphics). I&#8217;ll get a card, as will many to hit the mainstream middle ground for Vista. But I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s a big reason why there are more sign-ups than users &#8211; they don&#8217;t set a minimum requirement (or even a fee!) to sign up, and folks don&#8217;t check out the system requirements first.<br />
 I&#8217;m no gamer or I&#8217;d be going for the latest overclocked liquid-cooled thingamabobs. But Iwould like to dive into this virtual world, and they&#8217;ve simply set the bar too high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/12/26/virtual-numbers/#comment-250456</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 04:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/12/26/virtual-numbers/#comment-250456</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;Andy Freeman&quot;&gt;Moreover, as Jarvis repeatedly points out, â€œreportersâ€ as a class are still in a â€œbloggers arenâ€™t journalistsâ€ mode.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

An increasingly silly assertion. 

A recurring theme here is the injustice of slagging all bloggers for the inelegance and inaccuracy of a few. 

I notice no similar compunctions in regards to &quot;reporters as a class,&quot; or &quot;the MSM,&quot; or what have you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="Andy Freeman"><p>Moreover, as Jarvis repeatedly points out, â€œreportersâ€ as a class are still in a â€œbloggers arenâ€™t journalistsâ€ mode.</p></blockquote>
<p>An increasingly silly assertion. </p>
<p>A recurring theme here is the injustice of slagging all bloggers for the inelegance and inaccuracy of a few. </p>
<p>I notice no similar compunctions in regards to &#8220;reporters as a class,&#8221; or &#8220;the MSM,&#8221; or what have you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ming666</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/12/26/virtual-numbers/#comment-250162</link>
		<dc:creator>Ming666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 20:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/12/26/virtual-numbers/#comment-250162</guid>
		<description>in the second life citation in wikipedia they reference the notion of &quot;signed up&quot; vs. actually using/living.  based upon the &quot;reporting&quot; or &quot;hype&quot;, i have downloaded the client and tried to experience my &quot;second life&quot;.  i can only say that as a retired catholic, it struck me as what purgatory must be like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in the second life citation in wikipedia they reference the notion of &#8220;signed up&#8221; vs. actually using/living.  based upon the &#8220;reporting&#8221; or &#8220;hype&#8221;, i have downloaded the client and tried to experience my &#8220;second life&#8221;.  i can only say that as a retired catholic, it struck me as what purgatory must be like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I.F. Stoner</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/12/26/virtual-numbers/#comment-250153</link>
		<dc:creator>I.F. Stoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 20:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/12/26/virtual-numbers/#comment-250153</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt; When will reporters catch up with the facts?

Given that Reuters is the official news agency there, not bloody likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; When will reporters catch up with the facts?</p>
<p>Given that Reuters is the official news agency there, not bloody likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paw</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/12/26/virtual-numbers/#comment-250136</link>
		<dc:creator>Paw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 19:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/12/26/virtual-numbers/#comment-250136</guid>
		<description>This is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to measuring anything empirically in the online world.  Unique users, advertising impressions, whatever it may be - unless a set of standard definitions is created and overseen/audited by a third party measurment service (and adhered to by ALL legitimate online businesses), this sort of monkey business will continue.  And BTW, isn&#039;t this a Sarbanes Oxley issue - the overstating of the volume of a business in order to make the asset appear more robust than it truly is?

Don&#039;t count on the MSM to help figure any of this out - they don&#039;t even know where to begin asking the right questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to measuring anything empirically in the online world.  Unique users, advertising impressions, whatever it may be &#8211; unless a set of standard definitions is created and overseen/audited by a third party measurment service (and adhered to by ALL legitimate online businesses), this sort of monkey business will continue.  And BTW, isn&#8217;t this a Sarbanes Oxley issue &#8211; the overstating of the volume of a business in order to make the asset appear more robust than it truly is?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t count on the MSM to help figure any of this out &#8211; they don&#8217;t even know where to begin asking the right questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/12/26/virtual-numbers/#comment-250135</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 19:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/12/26/virtual-numbers/#comment-250135</guid>
		<description>What about them?

Surely you&#039;re not going to claim that they&#039;re the norm?  If they were, Shirky wouldn&#039;t have a story....

Moreover, as Jarvis repeatedly points out, &quot;reporters&quot; as a class are still in a &quot;bloggers aren&#039;t journalists&quot; mode.  If Shirky isn&#039;t a reporter, his connection to facts tells us nothing about reporters&#039; relationship to same.

You don&#039;t get to say bloggers are reporters when it makes reporters look good and not when it doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about them?</p>
<p>Surely you&#8217;re not going to claim that they&#8217;re the norm?  If they were, Shirky wouldn&#8217;t have a story&#8230;.</p>
<p>Moreover, as Jarvis repeatedly points out, &#8220;reporters&#8221; as a class are still in a &#8220;bloggers aren&#8217;t journalists&#8221; mode.  If Shirky isn&#8217;t a reporter, his connection to facts tells us nothing about reporters&#8217; relationship to same.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t get to say bloggers are reporters when it makes reporters look good and not when it doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Choire</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/12/26/virtual-numbers/#comment-250093</link>
		<dc:creator>Choire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 17:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/12/26/virtual-numbers/#comment-250093</guid>
		<description>Really, Andy? And what about reporters like Clay Shirky?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, Andy? And what about reporters like Clay Shirky?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2006/12/26/virtual-numbers/#comment-250071</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 17:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/12/26/virtual-numbers/#comment-250071</guid>
		<description>&gt; When will reporters catch up with the facts?

Why would they even try?

A reporter&#039;s job is to string together sentences so someone will look at the story long enough to see the ads around it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; When will reporters catch up with the facts?</p>
<p>Why would they even try?</p>
<p>A reporter&#8217;s job is to string together sentences so someone will look at the story long enough to see the ads around it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
