Neutrality winning?

The Wall Street Journal reports that AT&T offered concessions to the FCC to get its merger approved, including a promise to follow the principles of net neutrality.

Tags: ,

4 Responses to “Neutrality winning?”

  1. Jim Long Says:

    Come on baby, I promise… no really!

  2. Duffer Says:

    “…The problem with listing the FCC’s network neutrality principles as a “concession” is that those principles are simply guidelines, and are not legally binding.”

    http://www.broadbandreports.com/shownews/78860

  3. Tom Evslin Says:

    Unfortunately the concessions are more apparent than real. The net neutrality concession specifically excludes IPTV, is limited to the “access” network so doesn’t cover the backbone of the Internet, and sunsets in two years instead of the 42 months for most of the other concessions.

    This would be a good starting point for negotiation between the FCC and at&t but informed opinion is that it’s the final result of a negotiation.

    The full text is here

    I posted more detailed analysis here.

  4. lucasgrindley.com blog | Exploring the new way for journalism Says:

    Top 10 blogs I read

    The much anticipated lucasgrindley.com blogroll debuts today. During the last couple months, I’ve used the “most visited” tool from del.icio.us to monitor the blogs I frequent. As a result, the blogs are listed in order of how often I visit…

Leave a Reply





Site Meter