<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paper losses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/02/paper-losses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/02/paper-losses/</link>
	<description>by Jeff Jarvis</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/02/paper-losses/#comment-266145</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 04:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2007/01/02/paper-losses/#comment-266145</guid>
		<description>Penny, the press barons and their minions will twist and turn, spin this 12 ways to Sunday and blame everyone but their shoddy reporting. It's incredible that they just refuse to get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Penny, the press barons and their minions will twist and turn, spin this 12 ways to Sunday and blame everyone but their shoddy reporting. It&#8217;s incredible that they just refuse to get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penny</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/02/paper-losses/#comment-265247</link>
		<dc:creator>penny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 22:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2007/01/02/paper-losses/#comment-265247</guid>
		<description>What's so shocking about the financial losses of an industry that like trans fats is bad for your health.  The agenda driven slop, poor quality journalism and blatant refusal to check facts with care has finally taken its toll on the MSM. It's a trust issue and a content issue. 

Even when the hacks at the NYT's went online, their news is two days past what bloggers have been discussing. We are still buying good books in spite to the rising cost.  Format isn't the issue if the content is quality.

2007 isn't going to be any better for print journalism. They just don't get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s so shocking about the financial losses of an industry that like trans fats is bad for your health.  The agenda driven slop, poor quality journalism and blatant refusal to check facts with care has finally taken its toll on the MSM. It&#8217;s a trust issue and a content issue. </p>
<p>Even when the hacks at the NYT&#8217;s went online, their news is two days past what bloggers have been discussing. We are still buying good books in spite to the rising cost.  Format isn&#8217;t the issue if the content is quality.</p>
<p>2007 isn&#8217;t going to be any better for print journalism. They just don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robhyndman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Paper Cuts</title>
		<link>http://www.buzzmachine.com/2007/01/02/paper-losses/#comment-264846</link>
		<dc:creator>robhyndman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Paper Cuts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2007/01/02/paper-losses/#comment-264846</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis links to some interesting stats posted by Alan Mutter on capitalization losses by the newspapers. The numbers are breathtaking (in the way that standing on the edge of a cliff feels breathtaking): In a dramatic repudiation of newspapers by investors, the shares of publicly held publishing stocks in the last two years lost nearly $13.5 billion in value, or 20.5% of their market capitalization. To put this in perspective, the vaporized value is greater than the enterprise value of the Tribune Co. or the combined value of the McClatchy, New York Times and Media General publishing companies. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis links to some interesting stats posted by Alan Mutter on capitalization losses by the newspapers. The numbers are breathtaking (in the way that standing on the edge of a cliff feels breathtaking): In a dramatic repudiation of newspapers by investors, the shares of publicly held publishing stocks in the last two years lost nearly $13.5 billion in value, or 20.5% of their market capitalization. To put this in perspective, the vaporized value is greater than the enterprise value of the Tribune Co. or the combined value of the McClatchy, New York Times and Media General publishing companies. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
